Travis & Fripp album added under Fripp?
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Report errors & omissions here
Forum Description: Seen a mistake in a band bio etc then please tell us
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=73209
Printed Date: February 17 2025 at 09:32
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Travis & Fripp album added under Fripp?
Posted By: snobb
Subject: Travis & Fripp album added under Fripp?
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 09:02
|
Travis & Fripp album is added under Fripp. Such addition doesn't look right, such album should be add under Travis ( but he is not the artist ,included on PA).
Should this album stay there, and then next (new) album of Travis & Fripp (live,2010) should be added, or they shouldn't be presented between Fripp's solo discography? Not long ago we had similar situation with addition of Plant/Page album, BTW. |
Replies:
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 09:05
|
What about all the other Fripp albums with someone else. If this one goes they all go. Anyway i also answered you where you posted this before. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow"> 
|
Posted By: snobb
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 09:13
|
As rule, collaborations between two (and more) artists are added under the first artist , mentioned on the album cover, name. Another version is some collaborations are added as separate entries.
All collaborations under the name of "Fripp+..." are placed in Fripp's discography ,there is no problem at all My question is easy - should I add Travis & Fripp live album from 2010 to Fripp's albums list, or shouldn't (and than above mentioned album, added already, should be removed from there as well)? |
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 09:21
Toyah and fripp has Toyah first. Do you think we should also delete that? As I said in the other thread. Admin can decide on this one. They are the deleters anyway.
I would vote to keep it though. ------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: snobb
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 09:32
No problem for me with any decision. Just want to know how to behave with such addition now and in future 
|
Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 10:06
| I think I nominated Theo Travis for inclusion once. I'll have to have a look. |
Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 10:09
|
I did indeed.
http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=47112&KW=travis - http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=47112&KW=travis
It got ignored so I'm going to bump it up again.
|
Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 10:11
It got closed without an update.  Doesn't look like the new bands team ever saw it. It was never like that in my day. 
|
Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 11:02
|
The new "new bands" "team" does not do scavanging, thanks I am looking into Travis' MySpace. Also, I thought that the order of the names on a collaborations is important only when more of the artists have pages on PA, and when only one of the collaborators is on PA, the albums goes on his page regardless of the order of the names on the album cover. |
Posted By: snobb
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 11:08
Possibly yes, but I am not sure. It will be nice to hear comments. If it works as you said ,Alex, I afraid PA could be filled by huge amount of free jazz,avant jazz, avant-garde, avant-punk,etc collaborations of once added artists, whenever they collaborate with tens and hundred of other artists of very different musical direction |
harmonium.ro wrote:Posted By: harmonium.ro
Date Posted: November 15 2010 at 12:32
I did a quick check of the JRF team thread and Travis was discussed for addition around 2007-2008, but to no end since only one team member seemed to know his output. |