The Auto-censor
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Help us improve the site
Forum Description: Help us improve the forums, and the site as a whole
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=53396
Printed Date: February 24 2025 at 13:04 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: The Auto-censor
Posted By: Dean
Subject: The Auto-censor
Date Posted: November 17 2008 at 19:10
I have noticed that more and more people are relying too much on the Auto-censor to bleep-out swear words.
The problem with that is the addition of asterisks into the word doesn't actually hide or conceal the original word - type 'f**k' and even a dim-witted myopic penquin can still see what the word was supposed to be - so what's the point?
The way the Auto-censor works is a simple look-up table - all the banned words are on one column and all the replacement words are on the other. Someone types a banned word and the auto-censor substitutes the replacement. At the moment all the substitution words are the originals with '*' added.
I propose we swap all the substitution words in the Auto-censor with something completely innocuous and un-euphemistic - something so totally silly and ridiculous that whatever message using the swear word was supposed to send is made completely harmless... words like 'cuddle', 'fluffy' and 'tickle'
Solves two problems in one go and offends no one. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de28a/de28a55daee0af3858bdb61dd0c69e58ba27162a" alt="Big smile Big smile"
------------- What?
|
Replies:
Posted By: micky
Date Posted: November 17 2008 at 19:28
sounds good to me Dean Sounds like a no-brainer of an idea.
------------- The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
Posted By: Bern
Date Posted: November 17 2008 at 19:53
Fluffin' good idea.
And it's incredibly simple.
-------------
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4ed2/e4ed2420c315c18ed7e80f93e6948edeffc08276" alt=""
RIP in bossa nova heaven.
|
Posted By: Man With Hat
Date Posted: November 17 2008 at 20:26
I like it.
------------- Dig me...But don't...Bury me I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: November 17 2008 at 20:40
A cuddling idea. How the cuddle did this incredibly fluffliocious idea get in your god-fluffied mind? What is this? I've never read anything more ticklish my whole cuddling life. Tickle!! Tickle you!!
(now being serious... please, don't take all the rage-potential out of PA... we need the ight to have our poorly-disguised f**ks from time to time... Micky, I don't understand how you can agree with this, since you will be the most affected... data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/959ca/959ca2d6d88148d24699142aaed89a741d71a1b9" alt="LOL LOL" .. and I'll be second or third in line, too. Please... no ProgKindergartenArchives please!! )
-------------
|
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: November 17 2008 at 20:40
fine but you realize someone bent on using a word will simply write it in another way and avoid the whole fluffing thing altogether
|
Posted By: febus
Date Posted: November 17 2008 at 20:52
Agreed.....i never liked people around me using swear words...it doesn't add anything to a discussion or in writing except showing most of the time the lack of class of the person using them.
I never thought it was ''cool'' talking or writing like that anyway ! Great point , Dean
|
Posted By: Raff
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 01:29
Well, on other forums I've seen the funniest things, like the use of 'fcuk', 'beotch', or even having the irst part of the word 'cocktail' asterisked . Personally, I never use swear words when I post, and very rarely in real life, so I wouldn't be affected at all. I like the suggestion of using 'fluffy', 'cuddle' and 'tickle' anyway - they make me think of kitties !
|
Posted By: Plankowner
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 01:46
tickle kitties.
|
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 03:37
Makes a lot of sense Dean. You will be our naughty words expert too!
|
Posted By: Visitor13
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 05:38
Here's my post from another forum, showing how they implemented a similar idea: http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?p=3794398#post3794398 - http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?p=3794398#post3794398
|
Posted By: npjnpj
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 07:12
Can someone send me a copy of that table? I'd love to see if I know more.
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 07:15
Hmm, listing it here or in PM won't be much use I'm afraid. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de800/de8000c24f6526755c7a3cf350454d63e906faa1" alt="Wink Wink"
------------- What?
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 07:49
You know, I've seen another method (I don't know if it'd be easy to implement here):
One website I frequent gives each user the option of blocking profanity (in which case, the word is completely asterisked out), or showing the profanity in all it's low-brow glory.
This way those who may be offended can have it their way, and those who don't appreciate censorship can have it theirs.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: npjnpj
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 07:51
I just rememberd a beautiful show opener from Billy Connoly, which went something like this:
"I have to warn you that there will be a lot of swearing. I swear a lot. If there are any members in the audience that are easily offended by profanity: F... off!"
|
Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 08:57
Well, does this device work for profanities in other linguages than English? Because I know a lot of nasty words in spanish, italian, german (not mentioning my own mother tongue, French linguage). F****EDIEU !
/admin edit: it does now data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15600/156005a9937d3dd352b4b967046cb732c08adfae" alt="Stern Smile Stern Smile"
|
Posted By: NotAProghead
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 10:18
IMHO a bad idea. No need to use "bad" words too often, but sometimes they could look quite natural.
If we replace them with something senseless, words will not disappear from the language. Show me at least one person who learned these words reading PA pages. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54a14/54a1490285d6567a8feaf467c227e06f4c7424a9" alt="LOL LOL"
------------- Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 10:25
NotAProghead wrote:
Show me at least one person who learned these words reading PA pages. |
Good morning, the worm, your honour, The crown will plainly show, The prisoner who now stands before you, Was caught red-handed showing feelings...
I enter for the prosecution, exhibit A: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=52645&PID=3041874#3041874 - http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=52645&PID=3041874#3041874 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de800/de8000c24f6526755c7a3cf350454d63e906faa1" alt="Wink Wink" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/959ca/959ca2d6d88148d24699142aaed89a741d71a1b9" alt="LOL LOL"
------------- What?
|
Posted By: NotAProghead
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 11:17
Well, imagine, we're discussing, in some thread, Roger Waters lyrics:
"Lloyd Webber's awful stuff...
Then the piano lid comes down
And breaks his f * * k i n g fingers.
It's a miracle." data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54a14/54a1490285d6567a8feaf467c227e06f4c7424a9" alt="LOL LOL"
And here comes Auto-censor. What f**ng for? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fb39/4fb39033a899855c0adfda3b0438a9ad0ab809ef" alt="Wink Wink"
/admin edit. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15600/156005a9937d3dd352b4b967046cb732c08adfae" alt="Stern Smile Stern Smile"
------------- Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 11:34
Because, and I quote:
site rules wrote:
1. No Vulgarity, profanity or bigotry. We ask all members to refrain from using "foul language." Profanity - the deliberate denigration of another person's belief, will not be tolerated. Our membership is global, and thus represents a host of spiritual and religious beliefs. Given this, profanity is tantamount to personal attack (see next entry). Likewise, there is no place in this forum for bigotry (this includes religious bigotry, racism, and sexual discrimination) which are also considered to be personal attacks. We are committed to not censoring messages or opinions, but this is a moderated forum. We simply want to maintain the spirit of an open, interactive discussion without offending any of the participants. Any deliberate and conscious attempt to "circumvent" or ignore this guideline will be seen as grounds for a warning to be issued, and may result in ejection from the site. |
------------- What?
|
Posted By: NotAProghead
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 12:22
^ Please don't try to be holier than Pope.
Admin edit in quoted text from the song is ridiculous.
I think the idea is clear: most of forum members don't use mentioned words and, even if they sometimes do it, no need to invent senseless substitutes.
------------- Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 14:53
NotAProghead wrote:
^ Please don't try to be holier than Pope.
Admin edit in quoted text from the song is ridiculous.
I think the idea is clear: most of forum members don't use mentioned words and, even if they sometimes do it, no need to invent senseless substitutes. | I have no need to be holier than anyone, nor do I need your assistance in realising that.
I know it appears ridiculous to edit the quoted text - but it would not be correct for me to quote the rules and then ignore them - that would be worse than ridiculous - it would be hypocritical. Your quoting of that lyric was to make a humorous point, the means in which you did it infringed the site rules, I have no choice but to edit the post.
This is a moderated site - that is something you agree to when registering as a member. We are never heavy-handed and always "sign" the edit and you are free to question that decision.
Most forum members do not use profanity, some do and the Auto-censor is designed to trap that. My proposal to use senseless words is a suggestion to stop people relying on the auto-censor and to inject some humour into the result when they do.
Personally I find swearing to be extremely funny, in the real world I use it all the time, I would imagine that many of us use it without thinking, reducing it to nothing more than verbal punctuation. Here there is no need, if you cannot articulate a thought without swearing then use the data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f7/542f7ca4b78b1328d5a8fc9782a44ffce74d99b0" alt="Censored Censored" emoticon - it's not difficult.
So, I find the notion of this light-hearted proposal and the possible humorous outcomes amusing.
------------- What?
|
Posted By: rushfan4
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 14:58
Have you ever seen the movie "The Breakfast Club"? It is about a group of teenagers in Saturday morning detention. The movie was pretty funny, but every other word was a swear word of some sort. They showed the movie on regular TV filtering out all of the swear words with the "fluffy" words as mentioned above, and it made the movie even 10 times funnier.
-------------
|
Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 15:05
What if someone is offended by words like 'cuddle', 'fluffy' and
'tickle'?
Personally I'm fine with 'cuddle' and 'tickle', but 'fluffy' makes me
think of fluffers and thus slightly offends me. But then again, I find
asterisks even more offensive. If you look closely, they look just like little cuddles.
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 15:12
Asterisks imply fine print.*
*Dean is the master of the stern face.
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 15:33
rushfan4 wrote:
Have you ever seen the movie "The Breakfast Club"? It is about a group of teenagers in Saturday morning detention. The movie was pretty funny, but every other word was a swear word of some sort. They showed the movie on regular TV filtering out all of the swear words with the "fluffy" words as mentioned above, and it made the movie even 10 times funnier. |
In the sanitised TV version of Risky Business when Curtis Armstrong says to Cruise: 'Say "what the flip."... If you can't say it, you can't do it.' - just cracks me up. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54a14/54a1490285d6567a8feaf467c227e06f4c7424a9" alt="LOL LOL"
------------- What?
|
Posted By: Vompatti
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 15:41
I wonder if there's such a "fluffy" version of Martin Scorsese's Casino.
|
Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 16:32
I rarely swear (except when I'm with those no-good friends of mine who contaminated me with the way of swearing in the first place) - which probably makes me Jim Garten's main antagonist. But wait, I am actually often amused by both godawful and "excellent" swearing (well, that's me...). Take Scorsese's The Departed for example (since Vompatti mentioned his films): half of the script should be licensed if posted here on PA, but it makes me chuckle (especially Mark Walhberg's character swears endlessly).
As far as the suggestion goes, it gets my vote, if there's actually a serious problem we're talking about (IMO, some members tend to be agressive and disrespectful, but that doesn't necessarily imply swearing, ego steroids could do just fine...). For me, humorous swearing can be ok (of course, depends on the humorous moment), on the other hand replies to serious conversations such as "you don't know what the **** you're talking about" are unacceptable.
-------------
|
Posted By: NotAProghead
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 17:08
Anyway, I prefer asterisks.
------------- Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 17:17
^ That's cool too.
The first time I posted on a Gothic-rock message-board way back in the dim dark distant past before forums existed, I inserted my own asterisks in a post and was summarily flamed by someone who entered into a long diatribe on why Asterix was not welcome because he was a Gaul not a Goth. I've tended to avoid asterisks since then data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b5f7/7b5f7509da8c945afbea45412cf846bc15abd048" alt="Embarrassed Embarrassed"
------------- What?
|
Posted By: CPicard
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 17:27
Oooooh, good one. Talking about comics, I began to think of using angry smileys instead of typing "censored" dirty words. That would be nicer.
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: November 18 2008 at 19:02
I have a feeling this has the potential to be more fun than randomly moving people's threads around because then we'll just have to make up our own substitute cuss words and then you guys just try and keep up with auto bleeping those out. Aww, klerm! And before I forget ***************************************.
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: WinterLight
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 00:19
Stupidity offends me. Please replace this forum with one large asterisk. Thank you.
|
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 03:46
Thanks for the helpful contribution... or is there an emoticon missing?
|
Posted By: npjnpj
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 04:09
This cuddly thread has gotten to be one kittened-up pile of flowers. Why the moonbeam should I give a spaceman, if some scented bunnybunny wants to rosely express his pink opinion about some heavenly leaves that none of you puppydogs give a yellow babykins about.
See how it works? I bet I've just filled your innocent minds with one big pile of dirty words. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de28a/de28a55daee0af3858bdb61dd0c69e58ba27162a" alt="Big smile Big smile"
|
Posted By: The Whistler
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 04:26
Dean wrote:
rushfan4 wrote:
Have you ever seen the movie "The Breakfast Club"? It is about a group of teenagers in Saturday morning detention. The movie was pretty funny, but every other word was a swear word of some sort. They showed the movie on regular TV filtering out all of the swear words with the "fluffy" words as mentioned above, and it made the movie even 10 times funnier. |
In the sanitised TV version of Risky Business when Curtis Armstrong says to Cruise: 'Say "what the flip."... If you can't say it, you can't do it.' - just cracks me up. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54a14/54a1490285d6567a8feaf467c227e06f4c7424a9" alt="LOL LOL" |
Nah, best example of that was Die Hard 2 played on a local station...where the phrase "melon farmer" replaced, uh, something else that started with an M and an F.
------------- "There seem to be quite a large percentage of young American boys out there tonight. A long way from home, eh? Well so are we... Gotta stick together." -I. Anderson
|
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 04:38
The Whistler wrote:
Nah, best example of that was Die Hard 2 played on a local station...where the phrase "melon farmer" replaced, uh, something else that started with an M and an F. |
as if that movie wasn't already dumb enough
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 06:03
rushfan4 wrote:
Have you ever seen the movie "The Breakfast Club"? It is about a group of teenagers in Saturday morning detention. The movie was pretty funny, but every other word was a swear word of some sort. They showed the movie on regular TV filtering out all of the swear words with the "fluffy" words as mentioned above, and it made the movie even 10 times funnier. |
Speaking as a fan of that movie, the edited version is totally neutered. Even cut the pot smoking scene. Boo! If you haven't seen it go for the original. (Bunch of melon farmers )
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 08:18
npjnpj wrote:
This cuddly thread has gotten to be one kittened-up pile of flowers. Why the moonbeam should I give a spaceman, if some scented bunnybunny wants to rosely express his pink opinion about some heavenly leaves that none of you puppydogs give a yellow babykins about. |
Perfect - that entire sentence manages to sound like a rant, yet raises a grin at the same time data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fb6b/8fb6bae5e58ae2ab8061e87abf90716923538cd5" alt=""
-------------
Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
|
Posted By: WinterLight
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 11:15
Easy Livin wrote:
Thanks for the helpful contribution... or is there an emoticon missing? |
Not sure why a good Anglo-Saxon word or two should offend while its Latin counterpart acquires a reluctant respectability. Still, only the most penurious imagination takes offense over words, especially in view of the genuinely offensive deeds which plague our world.
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 11:49
My opinion on the matter was articulated by the late George Carlin many, many years ago:
"Shoot is just sh*t with two Os."
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 12:08
Dean wrote:
Because, and I quote:
site rules wrote:
1. No Vulgarity, profanity or bigotry. We ask all members to refrain from using "foul language." Profanity - the deliberate denigration of another person's belief, will not be tolerated. Our membership is global, and thus represents a host of spiritual and religious beliefs. Given this, profanity is tantamount to personal attack (see next entry). Likewise, there is no place in this forum for bigotry (this includes religious bigotry, racism, and sexual discrimination) which are also considered to be personal attacks. We are committed to not censoring messages or opinions, but this is a moderated forum. We simply want to maintain the spirit of an open, interactive discussion without offending any of the participants. Any deliberate and conscious attempt to "circumvent" or ignore this guideline will be seen as grounds for a warning to be issued, and may result in ejection from the site. |
|
Come on, I don't often swear or use these words, but I should be able to use the censor with asterisks when I feel I must get my point across, or else I might actually be tempted to circumvent it, since I can't use the asterisk version (BTW, I have developped a few methods, which I jokingly used once or twice data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de28a/de28a55daee0af3858bdb61dd0c69e58ba27162a" alt="Big smile Big smile" ).
And the fact that uncensored prog forum are certainly not anymore violent or shocking than PA, but I understand the average age here causes a problem.
So instead of modifying the censor, I'd try to fix it when it goes overboard and we cant write bandnames Stilt**ter and other perfectly innocent names.
I haven't really noticed much more asterisks around, either.
------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword
|
Posted By: The T
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 13:07
I don't like censorship, I abhorr censorshipp.. if there are 13 year-old prog fans coming here they better learn that prog-land is not disney-land but just another segment of the real world we live in where people, yes, say things like F.
As you know, I swear only a little... it's not that IO think my posts will be affected... but it's the general idea behind this what I'm against.
At least keep the asterisks. The somehow manage to at least look less "offensive" (come one... if you get offended by someone saying something -most of the times not even at you but just throwing it at the air-) then the interenet is not your place. I guess. Or maybe forums for... kids... (where there';s probabl much more foul language anyway, haha).
The moment I see a F*** replaced by a "fluffy" will be the moment I'll decide to be just a team member and a reviewer. Again, not because I really say F** that much (actually, almost never) but because I'd feel I'm in ProgKindergarten....
-------------
|
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 16:54
WinterLight wrote:
Easy Livin wrote:
Thanks for the helpful contribution... or is there an emoticon missing? |
Not sure why a good Anglo-Saxon word or two should offend while its Latin counterpart acquires a reluctant respectability. Still, only the most penurious imagination takes offense over words, especially in view of the genuinely offensive deeds which plague our world.
|
That doesn't really address the logic behind your previous post does it?
On the wider question of the profanity filter, we're not trying to change the world or eradicate all eveil here, all we're trying to do is make this place somewhere where epople can enjoy a friendly environment.
If members genuinely have difficulty in expressing themselves without using profanities, perhaps they need to ask themselves how they got into that postion.
|
Posted By: WinterLight
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 18:29
A bit of a dishonest question since I never claimed to have addressed the rationale (a more accurate term than "logic") for that post. I merely elaborated on my view in a slightly less sardonic tone--this should be transparent to anyone without underlying motives.
|
Posted By: Peter
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 19:28
The proposed idea is not without some merit and whimsical charm, but I have some serious misgivings that it might be more trouble than it's worth. I think you should remove troublesome members and topics, not troublesome individual words.
Like my friend The T, I am also leery of this forum becoming too "safe" and bland, too "wrapped in cotton wool" in an overwrought effort to "protect" the delicate and easily-offended. (Such folks, arguably, should not use Internet forums at all, and perhaps should not even leave their houses, for that matter.) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15600/156005a9937d3dd352b4b967046cb732c08adfae" alt="Stern Smile Stern Smile"
I like to think I am (generally) among grownups here. The forum was more free-wheeling in the early days, and we got along okay, as I recollect. I am a grown man, and I work with English for a living. Sometimes, l choose to use (or hint at) profanity here to indicate emotion, conviction, humour, or strong feeling. I don't think I ever direct it at other members. I would not want my posts and words, which I have thought about, to be modified by unthinking software, just because a small minority here are too free with their insults and personal attacks. As I say, remove the post and/or member (censure and censor) in such a case -- don't catch us all in the same indiscriminate "humourless big brother is watching" net. That smacks of being over protective, and over-reacting to a small problem (which is best controlled via existing methods, IMO).
If I want to say "this is an effin' good album," then I think I should be able to, without anyone's diapers, knickers or Attends getting in a twist.
Again, as I did there ^, there will always be ways around the "no cussing" software, which will make the implied profanity obvious to a human, but not to a machine. It won't work very well, and it just might p*ss off more people than it pleases. Is it really worth the bother? Is the problem really that bad? Are there not bigger fish to fry? (racism, hatred, personal attacks, sexism, pornography, etc.) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15600/156005a9937d3dd352b4b967046cb732c08adfae" alt="Stern Smile Stern Smile"
Shall we ask Dick Heath to change his name? Can I discuss Joe Cocker, or blue-footed boobies? How about God and Jesus Christ? Firetr ucks? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de800/de8000c24f6526755c7a3cf350454d63e906faa1" alt="Wink Wink"
Rock itself (which encompasses prog) is also rife with profanity, sexuality and thinly-veiled profanity and sexual references and it has always been so. (Much like Shakespeare is.) Then there is the rather grownup (if not sometimes disgusting) album art we reproduce here-- you are aware, of course, of that Death album cover, a certain Blind Faith cover photo, a famous Nirvana cover, a certain Supertramp cover, a certain Roxy Music cover, etc, etc.
Rock is not music for little kiddies, your great-granny, Sarah Palin, or nuns. Better stop listing certain Zappa song titles too, while you're at it!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c07dd/c07dd4c2b93ff2a262afc3e7fa647b4c4ced07cc" alt="Ermm Ermm" Don't we also list the music of at least one convicted murderer (Burzum), as well? Hmmmm... moral ambiguity, or people being largely free to decide for themselves on matters of morality?
Yep, much more trouble than it's worth, in my considered opinion -- a real can of worms! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de1b3/de1b3803d6f1501574b80342c4cde4d83fdba9fa" alt="Thumbs Down Thumbs Down"
------------- "And, has thou slain the Jabberwock? Come to my arms, my beamish boy! O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!' He chortled in his joy.
|
Posted By: Epignosis
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 19:37
http://www.cracked.com/article_16761_15-worst-album-covers-all-time.html - http://www.cracked.com/article_16761_15-worst-album-covers-all-time.html
------------- https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays" rel="nofollow - https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: November 19 2008 at 20:23
Not too long ago I tried to post Carlin's seven dirty words just to see what the autobleeper would do to them and even though they all got autobleeped an admin came along and put the post on ice. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54a14/54a1490285d6567a8feaf467c227e06f4c7424a9" alt="LOL LOL"
Hey let's try Carlin's euphemisms for intercourse: ball baloney ride bananas and cream bang beef injection belly ride belt blanket drill blow off the loose corns board boff bone bore bump fur bump uglies bury your wick bury the bone bush patrol buzz the brillo cane change your luck chuck a tread cock up dance the mattress jig daub of the brush dick dunk diddle dig your stinger in the honey dip your stick dip your wick dirty work at the crossroads do do a dive in the dark do a slide up the board dog do it do the dirty deed do the horizontal bop do the nasty feather-bed jig feed the dummy fiddle firk fit end to end fix her plumbing flesh session flop flop in the hay four-legged frolic f**k get a crumpet get a little get a piece get a snipper get a wet one get into her pants get it on get jack in the orchard get laid get lucky get your ashes hauled get your leather stretched get your noodle wet get your oil changed get some get some action get some ass get some stuff get some tail get some tweeze get your bean waxed get your pole varnished give her a stab go all the way go like a belt-fed motor go to bed with go to it go to town go vaulting grease the wheel grind grind your tool hanky-panky have a bit of giblet pie have a bit of summer cabbage (huh?) have a blow through have sex with hide the ferret hide the salami hit on the tail hock hop on horizontal bop horizontal hula horizontal refreshment hose hot roll with cream hump impale introduce charlie invade irish whist jazz jink job join paunches jounce joy ride jug juke jump jump your bones knock knock off a piece know lay lay some pipe lay the hip make feet for children's shoes make it make love make babies make the beast with two backs make whoopie mate mattress dance mess around mingle limbs mix your peanut butter mount mugg nail nib nub nut park your yacht in the hair harbor peel your best end peg pestle pile-drive pin plant your oats play at all fours play hide the bone plow pluck plug pocket the red poke pole work pop pork post a letter pound pump put a finger in the dyke put the boots to put the tool in the shed quimstick ram ride rites of venus roast the broomstick roll roll in the hay rock rod roger romp root roust rub bacon rub up rumble rumple rut saw off a chunk score screw scutz around service shack up shaft shag shake the sheets shoot between wind and water shoot your wad short arm practice shove shtup sink the sausage sink the soldier slam slip her a length slip into split spoil squat on the hog squat jumps in the cucumber patch squeeze and a squirt stab stable your naggie strop your beak strum stuff swing tail-work take a turn in the stubble take a turn on shooter's hill tear off a piece the disappearing cane trick the matrimonial polka thread the needle throw a hump throw a leg over thump tie the true lover's knot tip the long one tool in the woods trim the buff trip up the Rhine tumble tumple turn up twiddle varnish one's cane vitamin F wap wham what mother did (I'd rather not think about that) wind the clock work out work the hairy oracle yard yentz
I see the usual suspect didn't make it through. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54a14/54a1490285d6567a8feaf467c227e06f4c7424a9" alt="LOL LOL"
|
Posted By: Slartibartfast
Date Posted: November 20 2008 at 13:19
http://store.funnytimes.com/merchant2/ - http://store.funnytimes.com/merchant2/
Newest and Bestest: Swear Bears!
http://store.funnytimes.com/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=TFTGS&Product_Code=FT404"> | http://store.funnytimes.com/merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Store_Code=TFTGS&Product_Code=FT404 - Swear Bears , a great stress reliever for any daily disaster. Don't let the 'cute' fool you; one little squeeze gets you an earful! ADULTS ONLY! Individually hand-crafted in Vermont by disgruntled US workers. |
------------- Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
Posted By: Ivan_Melgar_M
Date Posted: November 20 2008 at 13:30
Dean wrote:
I propose we swap all the substitution words in the Auto-censor with something completely innocuous and un-euphemistic - something so totally silly and ridiculous that whatever message using the swear word was supposed to send is made completely harmless... words like 'cuddle', 'fluffy' and 'tickle'
Solves two problems in one go and offends no one. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de28a/de28a55daee0af3858bdb61dd0c69e58ba27162a" alt="Big smile Big smile"
|
LOL, everything has two sides.
There's another site in which the words are replaced by silly messages, the word Dick appears as thingy, so when i wrote Bruce Dickinson, I found Bruce Thingyson. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/959ca/959ca2d6d88148d24699142aaed89a741d71a1b9" alt="LOL LOL"
Iván
-------------
|
Posted By: Failcore
Date Posted: December 12 2008 at 01:01
I personally think censorship (especially when you can still derive waht the word was supposed to be) is pretty dumb. However, I don't blame the site; you can get sued these days for looking at someone the wrong way. The last thing we need is some repressed parent finding their kid on a site full of "filthy language" and going ape sh*t. So it beign said that censorship is a must, we might as well make it hilarious. I propose writning a rand fucntion that goes to a look-up table of hilarious words. That way you don't get the same fluffin thing twice. Cuz that would just be George Foreman.
|
Posted By: MovingPictures07
Date Posted: December 12 2008 at 06:40
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Dean wrote:
I propose we swap all the substitution words in the Auto-censor with something completely innocuous and un-euphemistic - something so totally silly and ridiculous that whatever message using the swear word was supposed to send is made completely harmless... words like 'cuddle', 'fluffy' and 'tickle'
Solves two problems in one go and offends no one. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de28a/de28a55daee0af3858bdb61dd0c69e58ba27162a" alt="Big smile Big smile"
|
LOL, everything has two sides.
There's another site in which the words are replaced by silly messages, the word Dick appears as thingy, so when i wrote Bruce Dickinson, I found Bruce Thingyson. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/959ca/959ca2d6d88148d24699142aaed89a741d71a1b9" alt="LOL LOL"
Iván |
That's hilarious. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54a14/54a1490285d6567a8feaf467c227e06f4c7424a9" alt="LOL LOL"
-------------
|
Posted By: The Doctor
Date Posted: December 12 2008 at 06:55
That is hilarious.
Why not just have the auto-censor replace bad words with data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f7/542f7ca4b78b1328d5a8fc9782a44ffce74d99b0" alt="Censored Censored" ? That tends to be what I use anyway. Of course, we'd have to be careful what words we include in the auto-censor, so that we don't have rediculous things happen like with Ivan's Bruce Thingyson. We probably shouldn't include Dick in the auto-censor, since it also has non-vulgar uses. However, we could obviously still include data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f7/542f7ca4b78b1328d5a8fc9782a44ffce74d99b0" alt="Censored Censored" and of course data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f7/542f7ca4b78b1328d5a8fc9782a44ffce74d99b0" alt="Censored Censored" .
------------- I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
|
Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: December 12 2008 at 07:17
The Doctor wrote:
That is hilarious.
Why not just have the auto-censor replace bad words with data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f7/542f7ca4b78b1328d5a8fc9782a44ffce74d99b0" alt="Censored Censored" ? That tends to be what I use anyway. Of course, we'd have to be careful what words we include in the auto-censor, so that we don't have rediculous things happen like with Ivan's Bruce Thingyson. We probably shouldn't include Dick in the auto-censor, since it also has non-vulgar uses. However, we could obviously still include data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f7/542f7ca4b78b1328d5a8fc9782a44ffce74d99b0" alt="Censored Censored" and of course data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f7/542f7ca4b78b1328d5a8fc9782a44ffce74d99b0" alt="Censored Censored" . |
Exactly - use the data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/542f7/542f7ca4b78b1328d5a8fc9782a44ffce74d99b0" alt="Censored Censored" emoticon.
My point is - people shold stop using the auto-censor to censor their posts, do it yourself.
Bruce Thingyson is silly - it's supposed to be - seeing pocket**tch censored is equally as silly - in fact it highlights a "banned" word where no one saw one before...
Dean, from a parallel thread in the CZ wrote:
I cannot be 'king serious data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2247e/2247e2b2346b6250d3b926bc512cfabbf2e51815" alt="Shocked Shocked"
Seriously, I can't.
I'll level with you...
My initial idea was to propose turning the auto-censor off – after an initial feeding frenzy the actual levels of swearing would dissipate, probably to less than what we see at the moment (which I admit is not very much – but it is more that we were seeing six months ago, which is more than a year ago). On unregulated boards & forums the level of swearing is lower than here, but when it is used you can be damn sure the person means it. The big difference there is those forums are often a lot less antagonistic that we appear to be.
I have (had? data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de800/de8000c24f6526755c7a3cf350454d63e906faa1" alt="Wink Wink" ) no real intention of changing any of the auto-censors translations - the purpose of the thread was to bring attention to lazy (or even deliberate) use of the auto-bleeper and to promote discussion on the general subject of swearing on the forum. My logic was simple - the worse kind of swearing occurs here when someone loses the plot and has a minor paddy in the middle of a thread - the discussion seldom recovers from that - it turns into a slanging match, people who were enjoying a good debate get disenchanted, spectators get bored and wander off, Admins are forced to step in and we're the bad guys again data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb0ec/fb0ec2bdffa11d23d48ff7c5d9cb13b28fa8cbc8" alt="Ouch Ouch" . To me, that’s not unlike an angry child chucking his teddy from the pram, so I thought how disarming it would be for the protagonists if the profanities they were hurling magically turned into cuddly toys. (I guess that's the hippy side of me wanting to turn bullets to flowers).
And it is a really silly idea – I’ll not deny that – but it is one that would encourage the determined swearer to be creative and to actually think about what they are saying - I cannot help wondering whether some of the people who are getting all hot under the collar about this are really concerned about free speech and censorship, or just fearing being made to look foolish by an impartial and unthinking piece of software, not because it modified their carefully chosen word but because in a moments heated passion they forgot to think and forgot they actually had a vocabulary to choose from.
The bottom line is - the auto-censor is there now, monitoring your every word, whether it replaces the colloquial term for fornication with f**k or cuddle is actually irrelevant – ('f**k' lost its power years ago, now it is just noise, like verbal punctuation – most 11 year-old kids in the UK use it with impunity) – we could reprogram it with any phrase from the marvelous list of euphemisms that Brian so kindly provided, but the f-word is never used here in that context (well, rarely anyway) so it wouldn’t be of much benefit. If we were so inclined we could program it to replace any word – we could make it replace “overrated” with “a band I don’t like very much” - but we won’t because that is true censorship – the deliberate altering of the meaning of a phrase – not simply bleeping a choice selection of offensive words. Censorship prevents you from saying what you want to say, not how you say it. (yeah, yeah, I know technically ‘go cuddle yourself’ has altered the original meaning, but since that is a physically impossible request it never really had a meaning in the first place) – It is not about censoring language, it is about moderating language – two different concepts.
Like it or lump it, this site has two main “rules”: no illegal activities and be respectful (the other three are variants on the latter). The use of profanity is restricted because their original use was for abuse, offence, bigotry, blasphemy and personal attacks – regardless of how they are used colloquially now; they still have that meaning and that usein some contexts.
That is the crux of the matter – it is not about casual swearing – we all do that (in the pub with my b*****d mates getting sh*tfaced on cheap beer I’ll swear like a f**king docker) and casual swearing here is (again) irrelevant; it is about targeted profanity – words purposely chosen to offend - there are some words that are still have that power, that are highly emotive… we cannot allow these words to be used at any time (even casually) … there is no valid justification for using them on a Prog Rock website - I’m sure you’ll correct me if you think I’m wrong - but I would go as far as to say that even when these words are bleeped they are still offensive.
The auto-censor is a dumb machine – it has no idea of context or intent – it does not know the difference between casual swearing and actual abuse. It’s our job as collaborators to determine those properties of a particular post and decide whether to report it or not. This is easier if the profane words are not there and we could more easily identify the offensive individuals from those who think they are still in the pub getting drunk with their mates.
Of course people will find ways around it, but at least they will be thinking about what they type rather than typing "like wot they speak" and once they start actually thinking instead of posting through a haze of anger, then perhaps the level of discussion on the forum will be raised a tad for the better.
Then perhaps I'm hoping for too much but if there is a windmill nearby, bring me a horse and a long stick. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de800/de8000c24f6526755c7a3cf350454d63e906faa1" alt="Wink Wink"
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74088/740886c123757fc2579cc55f6ebd683ae5d9df5d" alt=""
------------- What?
|
|