Print Page | Close Window

World Clock

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Topics not related to music
Forum Name: General discussions
Forum Description: Discuss any topic at all that is not music-related
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=40410
Printed Date: November 27 2024 at 23:48
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: World Clock
Posted By: TheProgtologist
Subject: World Clock
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 20:28
I don't start many topics but my wife found this and I thought it was interesting,pretty cool and a little scary.
 
http://www.poodwaddle.com/worldclock.swf - http://www.poodwaddle.com/worldclock.swf


-------------





Replies:
Posted By: johnobvious
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 20:33
So this is saying that there are over 2 people born for each death.  Wow.

Food for thought but the whole idea of the clock just depresses me.  I know the world is in the crapper, but having to look at it like this is not a pleasing idea.

-------------
Biggles was in rehab last Saturday


Posted By: JJLehto
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 20:36
I like the illegal immigration counter.
LOL


Posted By: Atkingani
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 20:39
Cardiovascular diseases are the real villain...

-------------
Guigo

~~~~~~


Posted By: clarke2001
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 20:41
It is very scary indeed.

But personally I think that this clock should be in front of every person on this planet right now. Sadly, we need more education and more warnings.

I was shocked not by births or death, but by hectares of forest forever gone. That's horrible.
While I wrote this post, the number of woods surface in hectares  gone is: 91.

Cry


-------------
https://japanskipremijeri.bandcamp.com/album/perkusije-gospodine" rel="nofollow - Percussion, sir!


Posted By: The Miracle
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 20:42
YeahOuch

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/ocellatedgod" rel="nofollow - last.fm


Posted By: johnobvious
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 20:44
I'm not sure who this quote comes from "Everyone wants to go to heaven, but no one wants to die."  The earth's natural resources are stretched to the limit, we are living longer and third world countries compound their lack of resources by continually churning out more children.  It boggles my mind when you see people living in squalor, and they go about pumping out kids to what, revel in the enjoyment?  Human existence and our drive to "Go forth and multiply" sometimes clash in my mind.

-------------
Biggles was in rehab last Saturday


Posted By: Proletariat
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 20:48
Originally posted by johnobvious johnobvious wrote:

I'm not sure who this quote comes from "Everyone wants to go to heaven, but no one wants to die."  The earth's natural resources are stretched to the limit, we are living longer and third world countries compound their lack of resources by continually churning out more children.  It boggles my mind when you see people living in squalor, and they go about pumping out kids to what, revel in the enjoyment?  Human existence and our drive to "Go forth and multiply" sometimes clash in my mind.
They need the kids to work, you forget that they have to do physical labor and need children to support them when they get old because they dont have any Social Security.


-------------
who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob


Posted By: 1800iareyay
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 20:55
^ You're also forgetting the increase of kids amongst the poor in developed nations. The fact is that in developed countries, children are tax write-offs. It's not so much about having a kid ot take care of you so much as a stipend check. This is certainly not always the case, or even usually the case, but it does happen. Plus, poor people are less likely to have had sex education or even the money for protection or birth-control pills. Others still view such as objects as religiously objectionable. There needs to be some world-wide movement to raise awareness for such things (hopefully NOT in the form of a massive concert) before we all end up like China with rampant abortions limitations for teh number of children one can have.


Posted By: TheProgtologist
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 21:04
Originally posted by clarke2001 clarke2001 wrote:



I was shocked not by births or death, but by hectares of forest forever gone. That's horrible.
While I wrote this post, the number of woods surface in hectares  gone is: 91.

Cry
 
That one shocked me too.
 
Also,since I initially looked at the clock,3 species have went extinct.Shocked


-------------




Posted By: johnobvious
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 21:08
I understand the need for children to work in agricultural situations.  And I understand the whole thing is not black and white and there are no easy answers.  And I don't want to come off as, "these people need to stop being a burden on the resource hogging US of A."  A lot of my frustration comes from the leaders of these countries.  Why is so hard to get someone in charge that is decent and will do better by their people instead of living lavishly on the sweat of their people?  That is the biggest problem.

Why doesn't Kim Jung Il drop dead and someone get in charge who can put the work ethic of the N. Korean people to good use so they can live like people instead of animals.  But you know the next a**hole in line will be the same.  Would you have a kid if you were a N. Korean?  What kind of life is that?  Would you have a kid in the middle of the many Civil Wars being waged in Africa?  If your answer is yes, I respect that, but I think that is the "food for thought" type of thing I am going for.


-------------
Biggles was in rehab last Saturday


Posted By: 1800iareyay
Date Posted: July 30 2007 at 21:12
Originally posted by johnobvious johnobvious wrote:

Why doesn't Kim Jung Il drop dead and someone get in charge who can put the work ethic of the N. Korean people to good use so they can live like people instead of animals.  But you know the next a**hole in line will be the same.  Would you have a kid if you were a N. Korean?  What kind of life is that?  Would you have a kid in the middle of the many Civil Wars being waged in Africa?  If your answer is yes, I respect that, but I think that is the "food for thought" type of thing I am going for.
I imagine those children come from the few moments of pleasure in those people's lives. Contraception isn't an immediate worry in those countires, plus humans tend to feel a need to keep their line alive. Sure, a kid born in N. Korea will most likely have the same horrible life of his parents, but he or she ensures that the line doesn't end.


Posted By: memowakeman
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 01:10
The number of abortions is terrible, so is the illegal immigration, that makes me sad jaja

-------------

Follow me on twitter @memowakeman


Posted By: Ricochet
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 01:12
I think it's an interesting application, but some some counters are scary, others are a bit more useless than you can think of.

-------------


Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 05:39
Originally posted by memowakeman memowakeman wrote:

The number of abortions is terrible, so is the illegal immigration, that makes me sad jaja
 
I' d think this is terribly over-estimated, too! I suspect the line below it makes it a strong anti-choice supporter (I'm not using the pro-life they call themselves, since we know those people don't like life, since they don't care about the mother's intellectual well-being)
 
 
But just imagine how much quicker world population would grow if there weren't any.
 
 
 
Can't help but feeling there is some kind of hidden agenda behind this! Beit religious, or installing fears (end of the world etc...) or other motives ........
 
 
 
 
A lot of these numbers are terrifying (the most are : cars and oil >> I dearly hope bo is for bottles than Barrels of OilLOL)


-------------
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword


Posted By: toolis
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 06:11

a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is statistics...

   Joseph Stalin

-------------
-music is like pornography...

sometimes amateurs turn us on, even more...



-sometimes you are the pigeon and sometimes you are the statue...


Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 07:42
Hey - at least we're making more bicycles than cars, eh?

Originally posted by toolis toolis wrote:

a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is statistics...

Joseph Stalin


There are lies, damned lies, statistics & the internet...


...still an eye opener, though

-------------

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012


Posted By: thellama73
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 07:47
Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by memowakeman memowakeman wrote:

The number of abortions is terrible, so is the illegal immigration, that makes me sad jaja
 
I' d think this is terribly over-estimated, too! I suspect the line below it makes it a strong anti-choice supporter (I'm not using the pro-life they call themselves, since we know those a-holes don't like life, since they don't care about the mother's well-being)
 


I suppose defending myself is a sure fire way to get this thread closed, but I would appreciate it if you didn't call me an a-hole simply because I think killing babies is immoral.


-------------


Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 08:04
Originally posted by thellama73 thellama73 wrote:

Originally posted by Sean Trane Sean Trane wrote:

Originally posted by memowakeman memowakeman wrote:

The number of abortions is terrible, so is the illegal immigration, that makes me sad jaja
 
I' d think this is terribly over-estimated, too! I suspect the line below it makes it a strong anti-choice supporter (I'm not using the pro-life they call themselves, since we know those a-holes don't like life, since they don't care about the mother's well-being)
 


I suppose defending myself is a sure fire way to get this thread closed, but I would appreciate it if you didn't call me an a-hole simply because I think killing babies is immoral.
 
I'll take my word back, because last thing I want to do is start a whole debate on this issue. And I don't want to hurt anyone either.SmileWink I believe that each must decide for themselves and let the others do so for themselves. But those calling themselves pro-life are indeed intruding on personal issues that is no business of theirs.


-------------
let's just stay above the moral melee
prefer the sink to the gutter
keep our sand-castle virtues
content to be a doer
as well as a thinker,
prefer lifting our pen
rather than un-sheath our sword


Posted By: Blacksword
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 08:09
That is fascinating, as long as it's not 'agenda driven' and is just a source of information.


Posted By: Arsillus
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 10:55
Originally posted by Proletariat Proletariat wrote:

Originally posted by johnobvious johnobvious wrote:

I'm not sure who this quote comes from "Everyone wants to go to heaven, but no one wants to die."  The earth's natural resources are stretched to the limit, we are living longer and third world countries compound their lack of resources by continually churning out more children.  It boggles my mind when you see people living in squalor, and they go about pumping out kids to what, revel in the enjoyment?  Human existence and our drive to "Go forth and multiply" sometimes clash in my mind.

They need the kids to work, you forget that they have to do physical labor and need children to support them when they get old because they dont have any Social Security.


And a lot of them don't have the kind of access developed countries to birth control products as well as education about that kind of stuff.

And 1800 already took care of that...




Posted By: Arsillus
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 11:00
Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Hey - at least we're making more bicycles than cars, eh?

Originally posted by toolis toolis wrote:

a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is statistics...

Joseph Stalin


There are lies, damned lies, statistics & the internet...


...still an eye opener, though


I'm interested to know where they got those numbers and averages and stuff- the data to back up the clock.




Posted By: Angelo
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 11:04
Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Hey - at least we're making more bicycles than cars, eh?

Originally posted by toolis toolis wrote:

a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is statistics...

Joseph Stalin


There are lies, damned lies, statistics & the internet...


...still an eye opener, though


I'm interested to know where they got those numbers and averages and stuff- the data to back up the clock.




Not to mention the changes in these back up date - in 10 years these will have change significantly for many reasons, including the way they influence each other.
Still - scary...


-------------
http://www.iskcrocks.com" rel="nofollow - ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected]


Posted By: Arsillus
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 11:06
Originally posted by Angelo Angelo wrote:


Originally posted by Arsillus Arsillus wrote:

Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Hey - at least we're making more bicycles than cars, eh?

Originally posted by toolis toolis wrote:

a single death is a tragedy, a million deaths is statistics...

Joseph Stalin


There are lies, damned lies, statistics & the internet...


...still an eye opener, though


I'm interested to know where they got those numbers and averages and stuff- the data to back up the clock.


Not to mention the changes in these back up date - in 10 years these will have change significantly for many reasons, including the way they influence each other.Still - scary...


Oh yeah. Even if there is some sort of agenda behind it, it's still pretty creepy to at least see some sort of representation of all the crap, if you know what I mean.


Posted By: Neil
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 14:32
It's all just evolution.  In the history of the Earth very few dominant species stay dominant for long.  We've achieved a lot but you can be sure that we'll achieve our own demise one day.  Also don't be too upset about the number of species becoming extinct; it's nothing compared to the number that came and went before the time of homo sapiens and it's certain that more new species will evolve after we're gone.  It's very easy to sit in our comfy arm chairs, in our centrally heated houses, watching our flat screen televisions and blame big business and profiteering for the state of the planet; forgetting that it's our consumerism that makes it that way.  But of course it's not us personally, it's everybody else.
 
I have a slight problem with the subject of conservation.  It's equally as arrogant and interfering to try to save species and preserve habitats as it is to deliberately destroy them.  Who says that we should have the right to decide which creatures to favour and which to disregard.  Man is currently on this planet and whatever the consequences of our actions are they are simply part of this planet's evolutionary path. 
 
Right, now I need a beer.Wink
 


-------------
When people get lost in thought it's often because it's unfamiliar territory.


Posted By: Abstrakt
Date Posted: July 31 2007 at 14:33
That's cool, interesting and sad at the same time!


Posted By: jimmy_row
Date Posted: August 01 2007 at 02:37
Originally posted by Heavyfreight Heavyfreight wrote:

It's all just evolution.  In the history of the Earth very few dominant species stay dominant for long.  We've achieved a lot but you can be sure that we'll achieve our own demise one day.  Also don't be too upset about the number of species becoming extinct; it's nothing compared to the number that came and went before the time of homo sapiens and it's certain that more new species will evolve after we're gone.  It's very easy to sit in our comfy arm chairs, in our centrally heated houses, watching our flat screen televisions and blame big business and profiteering for the state of the planet; forgetting that it's our consumerism that makes it that way.  But of course it's not us personally, it's everybody else.
 
I have a slight problem with the subject of conservation.  It's equally as arrogant and interfering to try to save species and preserve habitats as it is to deliberately destroy them.  Who says that we should have the right to decide which creatures to favour and which to disregard.  Man is currently on this planet and whatever the consequences of our actions are they are simply part of this planet's evolutionary path. 
 
Right, now I need a beer.Wink
 
Maybe being the dominant species entails some responsibility?Wink...not to mention that survival of the human race rests upon our ability to preserve the only home we have.  I refuse to accept that the well-intentioned souls who battle to save our beautiful planet (or once beautiful?) are as arrogant as the self-serving profiteers who rape the land in the name of fortune....and yet there are many who just don't care.  Ask for a small sacrifice:  now that's just absolutely crossing the line.
Sure, apathy is a fine attitude...look where it's taken us so farOuch


Posted By: Jim Garten
Date Posted: August 01 2007 at 03:22
Originally posted by Heavyfreight Heavyfreight wrote:

It's very easy to sit in our comfy arm chairs, in our centrally heated houses, watching our flat screen televisions and blame big business and profiteering for the state of the planet; forgetting that it's our consumerism that makes it that way.  But of course it's not us personally, it's everybody else.




Originally posted by Heavyfreight Heavyfreight wrote:

I have a slight problem with the subject of conservation.  It's equally as arrogant and interfering to try to save species and preserve habitats as it is to deliberately destroy them.  Who says that we should have the right to decide which creatures to favour and which to disregard.  Man is currently on this planet and whatever the consequences of our actions are they are simply part of this planet's evolutionary path.


Indeed - to carry the 'clock' analogy forward, if this planet's history to date were to span a single year, humanity (that is to say homo sapiens) only appears in the last second of 31st December; we're just another species that's come along and which will eventually disappear leaving only fossils, a billion tons of plastic bags and The Rolling Stones, who will probably still be touring come Judgement Day.

-------------

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012


Posted By: Neil
Date Posted: August 01 2007 at 13:17
Originally posted by jimmy_row jimmy_row wrote:

 
Maybe being the dominant species entails some responsibility?Wink...not to mention that survival of the human race rests upon our ability to preserve the only home we have.  I refuse to accept that the well-intentioned souls who battle to save our beautiful planet (or once beautiful?) are as arrogant as the self-serving profiteers who rape the land in the name of fortune....and yet there are many who just don't care.  Ask for a small sacrifice:  now that's just absolutely crossing the line.
Sure, apathy is a fine attitude...look where it's taken us so farOuch
 
I agree that wanton destruction and waste is irresponsible and no good for us let alone any other species.  However I return to my previous argument; who decides what is responsible?  Humans basically follow their nature and do what they do.  We can try to alter behaviour patterns but that only causes other problems.  A fox that gets into a hen run will kill every hen but only eat one.  That's not very responsible (or good for their continuing food supply) either but it's what foxes tend to do.  We, as a species have a habit of blaming all the planet's problems on ourselves and then setting out trying to solve them, causing more problems in the process.
 
I tend to think that if everyone concentrated on getting their own life in order and stopped worrying about everyone else's then the world might be a better place.Wink 


-------------
When people get lost in thought it's often because it's unfamiliar territory.


Posted By: limeyrob
Date Posted: August 01 2007 at 16:00
Originally posted by johnobvious johnobvious wrote:

So this is saying that there are over 2 people born for each death.  Wow.

Food for thought but the whole idea of the clock just depresses me.  I know the world is in the crapper, but having to look at it like this is not a pleasing idea.
 
This sort of confirms a fact I heard a while ago that there are more people alive today than have died - EVER!!


Posted By: thellama73
Date Posted: August 01 2007 at 16:08
Originally posted by Heavyfreight Heavyfreight wrote:

I tend to think that if everyone concentrated on getting their own life in order and stopped worrying about everyone else's then the world might be a better place.Wink 


I couldn't agree more! That's why I'm a libertarian.


-------------


Posted By: Dean
Date Posted: August 01 2007 at 16:35
Originally posted by limeyrob limeyrob wrote:

Originally posted by johnobvious johnobvious wrote:

So this is saying that there are over 2 people born for each death.  Wow.

Food for thought but the whole idea of the clock just depresses me.  I know the world is in the crapper, but having to look at it like this is not a pleasing idea.
 
This sort of confirms a fact I heard a while ago that there are more people alive today than have died - EVER!!
That's a bit of an Urban Myth, the best estimate is that slightly over 106 billion people had ever been born - or the dead outnumber the living by a factor of 16.
 
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa004&articleID=09E07C6F-E7F2-99DF-3AD087F0DA77D94F&ref=rss - http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa004&articleID=09E07C6F-E7F2-99DF-3AD087F0DA77D94F&ref=rss


-------------
What?


Posted By: clarke2001
Date Posted: August 01 2007 at 16:51
Originally posted by limeyrob limeyrob wrote:

 
This sort of confirms a fact I heard a while ago that there are more people alive today than have died - EVER!!


I heard a fact (?) that from the beginning of the human kind (sapiens) to day approximately 30 000 000 000 lived and died.


-------------
https://japanskipremijeri.bandcamp.com/album/perkusije-gospodine" rel="nofollow - Percussion, sir!


Posted By: jimmy_row
Date Posted: August 03 2007 at 02:10
Originally posted by Heavyfreight Heavyfreight wrote:

Originally posted by jimmy_row jimmy_row wrote:

 
Maybe being the dominant species entails some responsibility?Wink...not to mention that survival of the human race rests upon our ability to preserve the only home we have.  I refuse to accept that the well-intentioned souls who battle to save our beautiful planet (or once beautiful?) are as arrogant as the self-serving profiteers who rape the land in the name of fortune....and yet there are many who just don't care.  Ask for a small sacrifice:  now that's just absolutely crossing the line.
Sure, apathy is a fine attitude...look where it's taken us so farOuch
 
I agree that wanton destruction and waste is irresponsible and no good for us let alone any other species.  However I return to my previous argument; who decides what is responsible?  Humans basically follow their nature and do what they do.  We can try to alter behaviour patterns but that only causes other problems.  A fox that gets into a hen run will kill every hen but only eat one.  That's not very responsible (or good for their continuing food supply) either but it's what foxes tend to do.  We, as a species have a habit of blaming all the planet's problems on ourselves and then setting out trying to solve them, causing more problems in the process.
 
you know...I actually tend to agree with this (okay I came off a bit harsh before...sorry, it's just that I had been forced to watch so much anti-environmentalist crap that particular day that I snapped; you know Limbaugh, Stossel, and their ilk)
 
Anyway, I'm not sure if a human is comparable to a fox in that human's have far superior reasoning capabilities; we tend to know what is beneficial to our survival whereas a fox relies mostly on inborn responses: instinct.  The one thing I strongly disagree with is the sentiment that we cause more problems in trying to fix what has already gone awry...things like recycling, carbon restrictions, research on alternative fuel, etc....I don't see how it has caused larger problems aside from greedy opportunists (ahem...Al Gore...) which is a sideaffect of almost any sort of movement.
 
The bottom line is, I think human's are a bit more intelligent than you give us credit for.  If we have the potential to destroy (and we ARE likely responsible in large part...our factories and pillaging of forests and habitats, etc.) then we have potential to restore, or at least do the very best we can.  Anyone can do little things without sacrificing freedom and still help get on the right track, even if it's as little as picking up stray trash or using a bike instead of a car every once in a while.
 
I tend to think that if everyone concentrated on getting their own life in order and stopped worrying about everyone else's then the world might be a better place.Wink 
 
ClapClapClapClap  we wouldn't have these problems in the first place.


Posted By: SoundsofSeasons
Date Posted: August 03 2007 at 02:38
GRRRR!!!... Abortionists! They kill their kids, and then even some of them die themselves... man, what are they THINKING??? Cry.

-------------
1 Chronicles 13:7-9

Then David and all Israel played music before God with all their might, with singing, on harps, on stringed instruments, on tambourines, on cymbals, and with trumpets.



Posted By: Ghandi 2
Date Posted: August 03 2007 at 02:58
Originally posted by limeyrob limeyrob wrote:

Originally posted by johnobvious johnobvious wrote:

So this is saying that there are over 2 people born for each death.  Wow.

Food for thought but the whole idea of the clock just depresses me.  I know the world is in the crapper, but having to look at it like this is not a pleasing idea.
 
This sort of confirms a fact I heard a while ago that there are more people alive today than have died - EVER!!
Hehehe, the internet is a source for all kinds of useful information--it's a shame so much of it is false. ;-)
 
Be responsible: don't spread rumors!


Posted By: limeyrob
Date Posted: August 03 2007 at 13:02
Originally posted by clarke2001 clarke2001 wrote:

Originally posted by limeyrob limeyrob wrote:

 
This sort of confirms a fact I heard a while ago that there are more people alive today than have died - EVER!!


I heard a fact (?) that from the beginning of the human kind (sapiens) to day approximately 30 000 000 000 lived and died.
 
Embarrassed Confused


Posted By: limeyrob
Date Posted: August 03 2007 at 13:03
Originally posted by darqdean darqdean wrote:

Originally posted by limeyrob limeyrob wrote:

Originally posted by johnobvious johnobvious wrote:

So this is saying that there are over 2 people born for each death.  Wow.

Food for thought but the whole idea of the clock just depresses me.  I know the world is in the crapper, but having to look at it like this is not a pleasing idea.
 
This sort of confirms a fact I heard a while ago that there are more people alive today than have died - EVER!!
That's a bit of an Urban Myth, the best estimate is that slightly over 106 billion people had ever been born - or the dead outnumber the living by a factor of 16.
 
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa004&articleID=09E07C6F-E7F2-99DF-3AD087F0DA77D94F&ref=rss - http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa004&articleID=09E07C6F-E7F2-99DF-3AD087F0DA77D94F&ref=rss
 
And again  EmbarrassedConfused



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk