the peak year of a musician
Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Progressive Music Lounges
Forum Name: Prog Music Lounge
Forum Description: General progressive music discussions
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=37963
Printed Date: February 05 2025 at 19:43 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: the peak year of a musician
Posted By: greenback
Subject: the peak year of a musician
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 01:37
everybody reaches a performance peak in his life.
some are hard to find when, but others are easy.
which musician comes to your mind, what instrument and what year?
phil collins - drums - 1976
------------- [HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
|
Replies:
Posted By: andu
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 01:45
This somehow reminds me of a brilliant verse that I can't get out of my head: "The memories of a man in his old age/Are the deeds of a man in his prime"...
I won't name some artists, but I'll throw this observation: doesn't it seem interesting to you how in rock music the creativity peak is at a much younger age than in other genres that are more academic? I mean, in classical music the older/more mature you get, the better your works are (of course taking account of the several notable exceptions); on the other side, in rock many musicians peak at 18-25 years and very rarely equal at the age of 40-50 years their deeds from their prime. I've been thinking about this for some time without finding a decent answer.
------------- "PA's own GI Joe!"
|
Posted By: SirPsycho388
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 01:46
bill bruford - drums - 1974
------------- Strangers passing in the street by chance two separate glances meet and I am you and what I see is me. And do I take you by the hand and lead you through the land and help me understand the best I can
|
Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 02:19
Frank Zappa (guitar and compostionally IMO) - 1972-1975
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm
|
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 02:48
andu wrote:
This somehow reminds me of a brilliant verse that I can't get out of my head: "The memories of a man in his old age/Are the deeds of a man in his prime"...
I won't name some artists, but I'll throw this observation: doesn't it seem interesting to you how in rock music the creativity peak is at a much younger age than in other genres that are more academic? I mean, in classical music the older/more mature you get, the better your works are (of course taking account of the several notable exceptions); on the other side, in rock many musicians peak at 18-25 years and very rarely equal at the age of 40-50 years their deeds from their prime. I've been thinking about this for some time without finding a decent answer. |
That's because classical musicians spend a huge amount of time studying and training before they realise that the best way to play is not to think about it.
Rock musicians don't think about it from the start - but they soon come to realise that they haven't learnt much, try to expand on a non-solid base, and find that their non-musicianly background is their undoing.
*from generalisms "R" Us... ![Wink](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif)
------------- The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
Posted By: fuxi
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 03:07
SirPsycho388 wrote:
bill bruford - drums - 1974 |
'74? Maybe! But he definitely peaked again in 2001, with THE SOUND OF SURPRISE, followed by the amazing live album FOOTLOOSE AND FANCY FREE!
|
Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 03:28
for me, jazz muscians get better with time all the way until they die (or quit/switch styles)
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm
|
Posted By: Rocktopus
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 03:48
I'm no musician, so its just based on tastes and instinct:
- Simon House / violin - 70 (High Tide) - Teddy Lasry / flute (sax) - 70 (Magma) - Jaki Liebezeit / drums - 72 (Can) - Didier Malherbe / saxes, flute - 74 (Gong)
- Pierre Moerlen / drums, percussion - 74 (Gong) - Michi Dei Rossi / drums, percussion - 74 (Le Orme) - Giulio Capiozzo / drums, percussion - 74 (Area) - Patrick Gauthier / keyboards - 78 (Weidorje/Heldon)
------------- Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
|
Posted By: Easy Livin
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 03:53
Perhaps some commentary on the nominations? It would make the threrad more interesting.
|
Posted By: darkshade
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 04:04
^ ^ ^ i mentioned Zappa, so i guess ill explain
in the 60's, Zappa was doing extremely experimental things with the original Mothers' lineups. in '69 Zappa began fully realizing his interest in melding jazz and rock (waaayyy before most jazz-rock classic bands and artists even thought about it, except maybe Miles Davis) and recorded Hot Rats, one of his most popular and celebrated works. pretty much from there he did a lot of jazz-rock/fusion mixed with rock, classical, and funk. in 72 he recorded Waka/Jawaka and The Grand Wazoo, which are fusion classics and praised on this site. As a guitarist he was developing into a monster and his improvs were so unique. He then formed the next installment of the Mothers which had great guys like George Duke, Napoleon Murphy Brock and Ruth Underwood (who went back as far as some of the early Mothers' albums like Uncle Meat) the albums that came out between 72 and 75/76 are among his freshest and exquisite albums he ever released, some being some of the greatest jazz-rock albums (and he came from the rock/avant-guarde side of music)
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/MysticBoogy" rel="nofollow - My Last.fm
|
Posted By: Rocktopus
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 04:11
Easy Livin wrote:
Perhaps some commentary on the nominations? It would make the threrad more interesting. |
You're right, but I don't know what to write. Except that the albums they contributed on those specific years contains my favorite playing by all of them. I feel that its their peaks, but don' t really have the language to tell you why.
------------- Over land and under ashes
In the sunlight, see - it flashes
Find a fly and eat his eye
But don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
Don't believe in me
|
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 04:15
Certif1ed wrote:
andu wrote:
on the other side, in rock many musicians peak at 18-25 years and very rarely equal at the age of 40-50 years their deeds from their prime. I've been thinking about this for some time without finding a decent answer. |
That's because classical musicians spend a huge amount of time studying and training before they realise that the best way to play is not to think about it.
Rock musicians don't think about it from the start - but they soon come to realise that they haven't learnt much, try to expand on a non-solid base, and find that their non-musicianly background is their undoing.
*from generalisms "R" Us... ![Wink](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif) |
I've heard it say that because the hands and hand/brain coordination is better in one's 20s, that's why so many great players peak young.. but this wouldn't explain people like Stephane Grappelli or Allan Holdsworth, so I'm not sure.
|
Posted By: fuxi
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 05:20
Easy Livin wrote:
Perhaps some commentary on the nominations? It would make the threrad more interesting. |
Well, as far as Bruford is concerned: the things he does on those 2001 albums are just as exciting as anything he did with Yes, Crimso or his own electric band. Perhaps even more so! I guess people are absolutely right when they point out that musicians get better with age. (But with too many rockers, the problem is there's too little to develop. Once they've given all they've got, in maybe four or five essential albums, there's nothing left to say...)
|
Posted By: Anthony
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 05:33
David Gilmour - Guitar - 1975
(Roger Waters - bassguitar - always a lowpoint)
------------- Future prosperity lies in the way you heal the world with love
(Introitus - The hand that feeds you)
|
Posted By: toolis
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 05:47
as a player, Mark Zonder blew my mind with A Pleasant Shade Of Gray (1997).. just watch the DVD and you'll understand...
also, Roger Waters reached the top twice, with The Wall (1979) and Amused To Death (1994)..
The Wall cause: http://www.progarchives.com/Review.asp?id=76799 and Amused.. cause it is the best anti-war concept ever...
------------- -music is like pornography...
sometimes amateurs turn us on, even more...
-sometimes you are the pigeon and sometimes you are the statue...
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 06:04
Steve Hackett......now
Bill Bruford.........now
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: fuxi
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 06:12
Snow Dog wrote:
Steve Hackett......now
Bill Bruford.........now
|
NOW you're talking!
|
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 07:00
Atavachron wrote:
Certif1ed wrote:
andu wrote:
on the other side, in rock many musicians peak at 18-25 years and very rarely equal at the age of 40-50 years their deeds from their prime. I've been thinking about this for some time without finding a decent answer.
|
That's because classical musicians spend a huge amount of time studying and training before they realise that the best way to play is not to think about it.
Rock musicians don't think about it from the start - but they soon come to realise that they haven't learnt much, try to expand on a non-solid base, and find that their non-musicianly background is their undoing.
*from generalisms "R" Us... ![Wink](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley2.gif) |
I've heard it say that because the hands and hand/brain coordination is better in one's 20s, that's why so many great players peak young.. but this wouldn't explain people like Stephane Grappelli or Allan Holdsworth, so I'm not sure.
|
Without doing any particular research, it would make sense that maybe left-brain (or whichever side is the creative one) to physical activity connectors respond more quickly when young - but without right-brain (or the logical centre), it's going to dry up pretty quickly once the limits have been reached.
If you train the logical centre to think rationally and learn the rules, then, once you've nailed the hand/brain co-ordination bit, it only gets better as the rules begin to sink in.
At least, that's my take on it - I'm older than 20, and did a lot of studying from age 4 upwards - although mainly not on the guitar - and my guitar playing has definitely not reached its peak, as I find I'm still learning new things all the time because my creative drive is probably stronger than it was back then, and I'm driven to try new things all the time.
It certainly holds true when you consider Grappelli, with his rigourous training - and Holdsworth also received training from his father - so there's evidence to suggest that my theory holds some water - and when you consider that Mozart was trained by his father at the age of 4, and was both writing and performing well before he hit double figures, this side of the equation seems proven.
It's the other side that's more interesting - untrained rock musicians who remain at their prime.
I can't think of many...
------------- The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
Posted By: paolo.beenees
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 07:18
Niccolò - Guitar 2027 (he's my nephew, you'll see!) ![Big%20smile](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley4.gif)
-------------
|
Posted By: zbida
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 07:39
My proposition:
Bryan Ferry (hmm, rare mentioned here ![Unhappy](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley6.gif) ) - first half of '80's - creativity: Avalon, Boys And Girls.
|
Posted By: Badabec
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 08:33
andu wrote:
This somehow reminds me of a brilliant verse that I
can't get out of my head: "The memories of a man in his old age/Are the
deeds of a man in his prime"...
I won't name some artists, but I'll throw this observation:
doesn't it seem interesting to you how in rock music the creativity
peak is at a much younger age than in other genres that are more
academic? I mean, in classical music the older/more mature you
get, the better your works are (of course taking account of the several
notable exceptions); on the other side, in rock many musicians peak at
18-25 years and very rarely equal at the age of 40-50 years their deeds
from their prime. I've been thinking about this for some time without
finding a decent answer. |
Maybe this is the case because after the age of 25 they start to found
a family and don't have as much time as they had when they were younger.
------------- Mesmo a tristeza da gente era mais bela E além disso se via da janela Um cantinho de céu e o Redentor
- Antônio Carlos Jobim, Toquinho & Vinícius de Moraes - Carta ao Tom 74
|
Posted By: bhikkhu
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 08:43
In most cases, it seem to be early on, but after a few learning experiences. However, that's not always true. Steve Hackett is currently doing some of his best work. Jeff Beck is also doing music now that is only paralleled by his early to mid '70s period. PFM just did their best album since the '70s. Paul McCartney's "Chaos and Creation" is one of his all time best albums, and he released an excellent classical work in "Ecce Cor Meum."
------------- a.k.a. H.T.
http://riekels.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow - http://riekels.wordpress.com
|
Posted By: Roskisdyykkari
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 09:08
Ian Anderson (in fact, the whole Jethro Tull): 1972 - 1977 Back then, his voice was in top-condition, he did the most excellent albums such as Thick as a Brick and Songs from the Wood. His flute-playing has always been great, but especially since the 70s it has been fantastic. The best year of Jethro Tull / Ian Anderson must be 1972, but 1977 was pretty damn good year for them as well, and so were all the years between 72 and 77.
--- And this one is not-so-prog, but I'll mention it anyway: Nicko McBrain: 1988 Of course I like his drumming before that year, but on the album "Seventh Son of a Seventh Son" - wow! One of the best drum-albums that I have ever heard. Just listen to "Infinite Dreams", damn I like that drumming! In the 90s Nicko didn't play THAT good drum-patterns, and especially on the album Virtual XI his drumming sounds very boring. Luckily he has always played well live even though he did some boring drum-patterns on few albums. And luckily his drumming on the latest IM-album, A Matter Of Life And Death, his drumming is almost as good as it was in the 80s!
------------- And the sand-castle virtues are all swept away
in the tidal destruction the moral melee.
|
Posted By: lady_iona
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 09:27
Steve Walsh , Kansas 1978 saw them that year he looked good in his little yellow shorts and he sang superb also played some wicked keyboards and ran around everywhere on stage like he was unstoppable knee pads looked good too ![Wink](smileys/smiley2.gif)
|
Posted By: King Zappa
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 10:36
Rodger Waters, 1971. After this he seems to have stoped trying to improve his playing and prefered to spend his time re-writing the same songs about how he doesn't want the money that he had.
------------- Good, Better, Best. Never let it rest, Till your Good be Better and your Better, Best
|
Posted By: tuxon
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 11:02
Freddie Mercury 1975-1976
In the years between 1967 and 1974 he was building up to that creative perfection by learning the skills and the experience he needed to manipulate his music to do what was in his head and transfer it to recorded music. After that he stayed capable but his creativity and novelty waned a bit untill he learned he died, which unleashed another creative peak between 1988 and 1990.
top moment: Bohemian Rhapsody
------------- I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
Posted By: NutterAlert
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 11:06
need to ask Ricochet how old he is, as he's just peaking (he won a piano contest at the weekend playing with Debussey).
Hey, Rico, how old are you now?
------------- Proud to be an un-banned member since 2005
|
Posted By: blazno
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 11:37
John Zorn - every time he plays he's always pushin the boundries of his playing as well as the boundries of musical compositiones
-------------
|
Posted By: febus
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 12:26
JOHN WETTON---1974 when he was the meanest bassist on earth
|
Posted By: fuxi
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 12:32
bhikkhu wrote:
Steve Hackett is currently doing some of his best work. Jeff Beck is also doing music now that is only paralleled by his early to mid '70s period. PFM just did their best album since the '70s. Paul McCartney's "Chaos and Creation" is one of his all time best albums, and he released an excellent classical work in "Ecce Cor Meum." |
I don't know how many people would agree that these artists are now doing some of their best work, but even if that's true, they seem to be exceptions, rather than the rule. Generally speaking, rock musicians peak before they are thirty, although they may return later in life, for a few more molehills...
Perhaps the fact that they get children, or feel they have partied enough, is part of the reason. Another explanation could be that most rock music is a typically ADOLESCENT means of expression.
In prog, I guess players who keep trying to reinvent themselves (e.g. Fripp, Hackett, Bruford) are the truest musicians of all. But the question remains: why do so many jazz musicians keep making the most imaginative music, well into their thirties and forties, and beyond? Surely the lives they lead are just as irregular as rock musicians' lives?
|
Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 12:34
Hackett hasn't reinvented himself, just expanded his horizons.
------------- http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: The Acolyte
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 12:37
Ì've been thinking and I agree with someone who says that this topic is very related with the albums you like, so my favorites are: Mike Howlett (bass) - 1974 - Gong; Steve Hillage (guitar) - 1975 - solo work (Fish Rising); Andy Latimer (guitar) - Andy Ward (drums) - 1973-1976 - Camel; Dave Jackson (sax) - 1975 - VdGG
------------- "…but would I leave you in this moment of your trial?"
|
Posted By: fuxi
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 13:10
Snow Dog wrote:
Hackett hasn't reinvented himself, just expanded his horizons. |
O.K., that's a better description of Bruford's development as well.
|
Posted By: Certif1ed
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 16:12
fuxi wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
Hackett hasn't reinvented himself, just expanded his horizons. |
O.K., that's a better description of Bruford's development as well. |
...and a clever play on words... ![LOL](https://www.progarchives.com/forum/smileys/smiley36.gif)
------------- The important thing is not to stop questioning.
|
Posted By: Sasquamo
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 17:49
The older you get, the better you should get. Of course, in the case of many rock musicians, they sometimes seem to reach a plateau and never get better, for all sorts of reasons, maybe from not practicing, or maybe from having a poor technique that can only get them so far. But as you get older, you might run out of things to say, especially if you were pretty groundbreaking early on.
|
Posted By: greenback
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 20:31
Sasquamo wrote:
The older you get, the better you should get. Of course, in the case of many rock musicians, they sometimes seem to reach a plateau and never get better, for all sorts of reasons, maybe from not practicing, or maybe from having a poor technique that can only get them so far. But as you get older, you might run out of things to say, especially if you were pretty groundbreaking early on. |
it is hard to ask phil collins to be better on drums than on trick of the tail & unorthodox behabviour
wind and wuthering has excellent drum parts, but not at the same level as on ATOTT. after that, the demise started for collins. TLLDOB is original in terms of drums but it is not spectacular.
------------- [HEADPINS - LINE OF FIRE: THE RECORD HAVING THE MOST POWERFUL GUITAR SOUND IN THE WHOLE HISTORY OF MUSIC!>
|
Posted By: patomtz
Date Posted: May 15 2007 at 21:28
Daniel Gildenlow (songwriting), Petrucci (guitar) 90s and 00
------------- I still can't get how Dream Theater music is created by humans
Dream Theater in Monterrey, Mexico 03.03.06 Unforgettable
|
Posted By: el böthy
Date Posted: May 16 2007 at 00:02
On a creative level or on a technical level?... I will talk about both
Creative
Jon Anderson 1972/1974 - I dont only mean the singing, Jon was pretty much the mind behind Close, Relayer and of course Tales. Tales might not be for everyone, but I find some parts that are just... magical. He would still make great music, but in those 2-3 years... he was touched my God or something ...he also sung his best in that period!
Peter Hammill 1971/1974 - The same as with Anderson, this man alwasy, alwasy sings great, I love his vocals in Present, but when it comes to... composing, those years where perfection, as simple as that
Technically
Martin Lopez 2003/2005 - He always was a great drummer, but in his later albums he just does some incredible stuff, and its so recognizable, you can tell that its Lopez who is playing!
...I want to say Fripp 1969/2007... but I dont want to sound like a freakin n00b fanboy ajjajaja
------------- "You want me to play what, Robert?"
|
|