Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Other music related lounges
Forum Name: General Music Discussions
Forum Description: Discuss and create polls about all types of music
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=132205 Printed Date: February 22 2025 at 07:36 Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Never Mind the Bollocks.....Posted By: David_D
Subject: Never Mind the Bollocks.....
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 02:38
The British Punk Rock has in general not been very admired for its musical achievements, but I'm surely impressed by
The Pistols album.
What's your opinion about it?
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Replies: Posted By: Octopus II
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 02:58
A great album, I remember buying it at the time of it's release, and the word 'Bollocks' on the cover was covered with tape so as not to cause offence to the public.
My favourite tracks are 'No Feelings' and 'Bodies'.
I think I will give this album a spin now.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 03:14
It's ... bollocks...
Posted By: Logan
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 03:20
I never have minded the bollocks. I have liked it, especially "Anarchy in the UK" and "Pretty Vacant" as I recall. I used to have it on vinyl. It has been years since I last heard it in full. I had a political science professor who was a huge fan of it and adopted it for one of his lectures. That said, John Lydon's Public Image Ltd is much more significant to me.
Posted By: Psychedelic Paul
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 04:37
Cristi wrote:
It's ... b*******...
I couldn't agree more. I've always hated Punk Rock and everything it stood for with vile angry youths banging bits of furniture together to make a horrendous racket. After all, it was punk that tried to destroy prog, but Punk Rock ending up in the dustbin of music history after barely three years, whereas Prog Rock is still going strong nearly half a century later. Vive La Prog, as we say in England.
Posted By: Hrychu
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 05:11
------------- On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became. Ernest Vong
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 05:14
^
Posted By: Octopus II
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 05:36
The Wurzels were fans of The Sex Pistols.
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 05:39
It's brilliant. Holidays in the Sun is one of my favorite album openers in rock and the whole album is full of memorable riffs and melodies. Plus its got John Lydon's one of a kind sneering vocals.
Posted By: omphaloskepsis
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 05:43
I like the riffs and energy. In a way, anger is an energy.
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 06:12
omphaloskepsis wrote:
I like the riffs and energy. In a way, anger is an energy.
It surely is.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Grumpyprogfan
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 07:02
I liked it, but it didn't impress me. I enjoyed The Ramones more. They came before the Pistols and had more humor in their music.
Posted By: Easy Money
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 08:05
I like the Pistols, but I like early 80s hardcore more; Black Flag, Dead Kennedys, Bad Brains etc.
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 08:12
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
After all, it was punk that tried to destroy prog, ....
The British Punk Rock was not specifically anti-Prog but rejected all contemporary mainstream Rock, and especially the well-established part of it.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Gentle and Giant
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 08:14
I love it. At the time it came out there was a bit of a crossover between Heavy Metal and Punk fans in my home town. You were in one group or other obviously but albums like this appealed to both sides; and with other albums too - e.g. Motorhead.
------------- Oh, for the wings of any bird, other than a battery hen
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 08:19
Grumpyprogfan wrote:
I liked it, but it didn't impress me. I enjoyed The
Ramones more. They came before the Pistols and had more humor in their
music.
I'm a bit surprised a prog fan thinks like that. The Ramones were a one-dimensional one trick pony-band to me. On Never Mind the Bollocks at least each song has it's own thing going, so I don't get bored halfway into the second track.
Posted By: Nogbad_The_Bad
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 08:31
Its a marketing exercise but is done well and has some good tunes.
------------- Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 08:45
Nogbad_The_Bad wrote:
Its a marketing exercise but is done well and has some good tunes.
I don't even think, it was meant just like that by Malcolm McLaren.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Grumpyprogfan
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 09:36
Saperlipopette! wrote:
Grumpyprogfan wrote:
I liked it, but it didn't impress me. I enjoyed The Ramones more. They came before the Pistols and had more humor in their music.
I'm a bit surprised a prog fan thinks like that. The Ramones were a one-dimensional one trick pony-band to me. On Never Mind the Bollocks at least each song has it's own thing going, so I don't get bored halfway into the second track.
Guess I'm not a typical prog fan. And to me, every Pistols song sounds the same.
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 09:48
^ I'm not really a prog fan myself, but you normally come across like one.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 09:50
What's a "typical prog fan"? I'm sure I am not one either.
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:04
Grumpyprogfan wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
.....On Never Mind the Bollocks at least each song has it's own thing going, ....
.... to me, every Pistols song sounds the same.
I agree mostly with Saperlipopette! here.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Grumpyprogfan
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:09
^No prob. Most of my choices are in the minority.
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:15
I'd also say that the all-round sound on Never Mind... is really great and unique.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Grumpyprogfan
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:15
Cristi wrote:
What's a "typical prog fan"? I'm sure I am not one either.
One that is stuck in the 70's and thinks modern prog is crap, and only listens to "real prog". Or one who follows the popular modern prog bands only and don't veer out of their comfort zone.
You're anything but typical, Cristi.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:20
Grumpyprogfan wrote:
Cristi wrote:
What's a "typical prog fan"? I'm sure I am not one either.
One that is stuck in the 70's and thinks modern prog is crap, and only listens to "real prog". Or one who follows the popular modern prog bands only and don't veer out of their comfort zone.
You're anything but typical, Cristi.
I thought so.
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:30
Cristi wrote:
What's a "typical prog fan"? I'm sure I am not one either.
I guess what people mean by that differs, but I just though of someone
who listens primarely to prog - og at least has prog as their preferred
genre.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:43
Saperlipopette! wrote:
Cristi wrote:
What's a "typical prog fan"? I'm sure I am not one either.
I guess what people mean by that differs, but I just though of someone
who listens primarely to prog - og at least has prog as their preferred
genre.
I don't listen primarily to prog, never did, I do listen to prog bands from all decades, but I listen to other genres as well.
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:44
If we're talking about the American Punk, then I find Marquee Moon to have very unique sound too, but still not quite as much
as Never Mind.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:47
Cristi wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
Cristi wrote:
What's a "typical prog fan"? I'm sure I am not one either.
I guess what people mean by that differs, but I just though of someone
who listens primarely to prog - og at least has prog as their preferred
genre.
I don't listen primarily to prog, never did, I do listen to prog bands from all decades, but I listen to other genres as well.
That's nice, but I wasn't addressing you.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:49
Saperlipopette! wrote:
Cristi wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
Cristi wrote:
What's a "typical prog fan"? I'm sure I am not one either.
I guess what people mean by that differs, but I just though of someone
who listens primarely to prog - og at least has prog as their preferred
genre.
I don't listen primarily to prog, never did, I do listen to prog bands from all decades, but I listen to other genres as well.
But I wasn't addressing you now was I?
What do you mean?! You quoted me, I thought you were talking to me.
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:52
Cristi wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
Cristi wrote:
Saperlipopette! wrote:
Cristi wrote:
What's a "typical prog fan"? I'm sure I am not one either.
I guess what people mean by that differs, but I just though of someone
who listens primarely to prog - og at least has prog as their preferred
genre.
I don't listen primarily to prog, never did, I do listen to prog bands from all decades, but I listen to other genres as well.
But I wasn't addressing you now was I?
What do you mean?! You quoted me, I thought you were talking to me.
Not to begin with, no. I just explained my way of thinking to you. Here's who I was addressing
Saperlipopette! wrote:
Grumpyprogfan wrote:
I liked it, but it didn't impress me. I enjoyed The
Ramones more. They came before the Pistols and had more humor in their
music.
I'm a bit surprised a prog fan thinks like that. The Ramones were a one-dimensional one trick pony-band to me. On Never Mind the Bollocks at least each song has it's own thing going, so I don't get bored halfway into the second track.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 10:56
^OK
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 12:11
Saperlipopette! wrote:
.....On Never Mind the Bollocks at least each song has it's own thing going, ....
Now, I listened to it again and in fact, I'm amazed by how much variety they can get in all the songs when using
more or less the same formula.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 12:44
Honestly one of the best punk albums ever made and one of my personal favorites
While not as far out as some of the post punk and art punk acts to come
The Sex Pistols scored the perfect musical slap in the face in 1977
The hatred of punk by many proggers only showcases how stuck in the mud many of them really were \ are!
Posted By: mellotronwave
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 12:51
Marketing just marketing
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 12:57
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Honestly one of the best punk albums ever made and one of my personal favorites
While not as far out as some of the post punk and art punk acts to come
The Sex Pistols scored the perfect musical slap in the face in 1977
The hatred of punk by many proggers only showcases how stuck in the mud many of them really were \ are!
That last sentence is unfair. Maybe some dislike punk because the music just does not speak to them in any way.
The only good thing punk did was inspire other musicians to create new music, gave metal a boost, post punk is much more interesting.
An album (anda genre obviously) that appeared at the right place and the right time, filled a void. Grunge & alternative did the same in the 90s.
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 13:16
When talking about Ramones, frankly speaking, to me they're like Pop-Rock when comparing to the Punk Rock of Sex Pistols.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 13:31
Cristi wrote:
The only good thing punk did was inspire other musicians to create new music, gave metal a boost, post punk is much more interesting.
An album (anda genre obviously) that appeared at the right place and the right time, filled a void. Grunge & alternative did the same in the 90s.
The British Punk Rock was as much a social rebellion as a musical one - just very nihilistic.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 14:28
Cristi wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Honestly one of the best punk albums ever made and one of my personal favorites
While not as far out as some of the post punk and art punk acts to come
The Sex Pistols scored the perfect musical slap in the face in 1977
The hatred of punk by many proggers only showcases how stuck in the mud many of them really were \ are!
That last sentence is unfair. Maybe some dislike punk because the music just does not speak to them in any way.
The only good thing punk did was inspire other musicians to create new music, gave metal a boost, post punk is much more interesting.
An album (anda genre obviously) that appeared at the right place and the right time, filled a void. Grunge & alternative did the same in the 90s.
Punk pissed off many proggers because they were too wrapped up in escapism and failed to address social issues. The whole point of punk was to NOT connect with escapists drawn to prog.
That means those who hated were definitely stuck in the mud and could not adapt to the changing musical world around them. The same went for punkers stuck in the mud who hated more artistic statements.
This pattern repeats every decade or so however in the modern world it seems more music lovers are more mature in accepting all forms of musical expressions as valid and thankfully so!
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 14:29
Cristi wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Honestly one of the best punk albums ever made and one of my personal favorites
While not as far out as some of the post punk and art punk acts to come
The Sex Pistols scored the perfect musical slap in the face in 1977
The hatred of punk by many proggers only showcases how stuck in the mud many of them really were \ are!
That last sentence is unfair. Maybe some dislike punk because the music just does not speak to them in any way.
The only good thing punk did was inspire other musicians to create new music, gave metal a boost, post punk is much more interesting.
An album (anda genre obviously) that appeared at the right place and the right time, filled a void. Grunge & alternative did the same in the 90s.
Punk pissed off many proggers because they were too wrapped up in escapism and failed to address social issues. The whole point of punk was to NOT connect with escapists drawn to prog.
That means those who hated were definitely stuck in the mud and could not adapt to the changing musical world around them. The same went for punkers stuck in the mud who hated more artistic statements.
This pattern repeats every decade or so however in the modern world it seems more music lovers are more mature in accepting all forms of musical expressions as valid and thankfully so!
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 14:30
@ Crist
Punk pissed off many proggers because they were too wrapped up in escapism and failed to address social issues. The whole point of punk was to NOT connect with escapists drawn to prog.
That means those who hated were definitely stuck in the mud and could not adapt to the changing musical world around them. The same went for punkers stuck in the mud who hated more artistic statements.
This pattern repeats every decade or so however in the modern world it seems more music lovers are more mature in accepting all forms of musical expressions as valid and thankfully so!
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 14:38
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Punk pissed off many proggers because they were too wrapped up in escapism and failed to address social issues. The whole point of punk was to NOT connect with escapists drawn to prog.
That means those who hated were definitely stuck in the mud and could not adapt to the changing musical world around them. The same went for punkers stuck in the mud who hated more artistic statements.
This pattern repeats every decade or so however in the modern world it seems more music lovers are more mature in accepting all forms of musical expressions as valid and thankfully so!
I don't know what the expression "stuck in the mud" means.
There's nothing wrong with escapism and there's nothing wrong with rebellion.
I can respect, in retrospect, the rebellious nature of punk, but musically doesn't do much for me. I don't cringe if I hear it or am annoyed, but it's no fun for me to put it gently.
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 16:25
Cristi wrote:
I can respect, in retrospect, the rebellious nature of punk, ....
That's good because I certainly won't say that the rebellious nature of Metal as a whole is of a better kind than the one of Punk.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Hugh Manatee
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 17:21
Prog became a victim of its own success. As prog moved into stadiums it lost an intimacy and connection with the audience that Punk was able to cater for.
This next generation of youth found the same thing in Punk that the audiences in The Cavern and the Star Club found with The Beatles and other early acts that were basically peddling the same brand of rebellion that punk repackaged. Music that was accessible to all who cared to seek it out.
It's all just rock 'n' Roll until it becomes to big for its own good.
------------- I should have been a pair of ragged claws Scuttling across the floors of uncertain seas
Posted By: Atavachron
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 17:29
^ Nicely said. We forget how loud, dirty and punky the Fabs were when they were clubbing. Unrecognizable from the sophisticated, tragically hip modern rockers they became.
------------- "Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
Posted By: Lewian
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 17:33
I like Pretty Vacant and two or three other songs. I respect that album but wouldn't enjoy going through it as a whole. Rotten/Lydon is a good and original singer though, and I adore much of PIL.
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: December 10 2023 at 17:52
Cristi wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Honestly one of the best punk albums ever made and one of my personal favorites
While not as far out as some of the post punk and art punk acts to come
The Sex Pistols scored the perfect musical slap in the face in 1977
The hatred of punk by many proggers only showcases how stuck in the mud many of them really were \ are!
That last sentence is unfair. Maybe some dislike punk because the music just does not speak to them in any way.
The only good thing punk did was inspire other musicians to create new music, gave metal a boost, post punk is much more interesting.
An album (anda genre obviously) that appeared at the right place and the right time, filled a void. Grunge & alternative did the same in the 90s.
Nothing unfair about it. Absolute truth. It's just the psychological nature of certain genres. The old timers are thrown off guard by something completely new and unexpected and they react with terror.
Nothing against first wave proggers at all. In fact first wave punkers got all indignant with the more art punk and post-punk types. Glam metal with grunge etc.
The cool thing about the modern era is that many have matured to the point where they can enjoy all types of music and don't feel judgmental if they don't like a certain style.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 11 2023 at 00:14
David_D wrote:
Cristi wrote:
I can respect, in retrospect, the rebellious nature of punk, ....
That's good because I certainly won't say that the rebellious nature of Metal as a whole is of a better kind than the one of Punk.
Depends on the band, on the subgenre. Plenty of metal is rebellious in a good way, many bands have great lyrics, from life's struggle to societal and political issues. So you are generalizing here.
Also not all punk is great lyrically, so there you go...
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 11 2023 at 07:37
Hugh Manatee wrote:
This next generation of youth found the same thing in Punk that the audiences in The Cavern and the Star Club found with The Beatles and other early acts that were basically peddling the same brand of rebellion that punk repackaged. Music that was accessible to all who cared to seek it out.
If to look at it more exactly, the British Punk was a specific social rebellion as a reaction to specific social conditions in the mid-'70s Britain.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 11 2023 at 07:40
Cristi wrote:
David_D wrote:
Cristi wrote:
I can respect, in retrospect, the rebellious nature of punk, ....
That's good because I certainly won't say that the rebellious nature of Metal as a whole is of a better kind than the one of Punk.
Depends on the band, on the subgenre. Plenty of metal is rebellious in a good way, many bands have great lyrics, from life's struggle to societal and political issues. So you are generalizing here.
Yes, I was generalizing because so were you.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 11 2023 at 07:42
David_D wrote:
Cristi wrote:
David_D wrote:
Cristi wrote:
I can respect, in retrospect, the rebellious nature of punk, ....
That's good because I certainly won't say that the rebellious nature of Metal as a whole is of a better kind than the one of Punk.
Depends on the band, on the subgenre. Plenty of metal is rebellious in a good way, many bands have great lyrics, from life's struggle to societal and political issues. So you are generalizing here.
Yes, I were generalizing because so were you.
Can you tell me how was I generalizing? What was it that i said that was a generalization?
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: December 11 2023 at 08:01
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
Cristi wrote:
It's ... b*******...
I couldn't agree more. I've always hated Punk Rock and everything it stood for with vile angry youths banging bits of furniture together to make a horrendous racket. After all, it was punk that tried to destroy prog, but Punk Rock ending up in the dustbin of music history after barely three years, whereas Prog Rock is still going strong nearly half a century later. Vive La Prog, as we say in England.
I wouldn't go that far....
In a way, punk made perfect sense around 77/78 with the No Future slogan and my being 15/15 at the time. As most punk purists would tell you, that real punk started in August 76 in Mont De Marsan (French festival) and started dying in fall 77.
I was in Toronto, living 30 m away from the lake (Ontario), and when The Clash was singing London's Drowning, and I live by the River (society is sinking, and me the first), it resonated heavily with me.
London Calling, Outlandos d'Amour and a few more Pub/Punk albums (thinking of Stranglers & Dr Feelgood's first few) were all albums I kept for a while, and much later (82/83) The Jam's The Gift (which was more Ska by that time) and Violent Femmes's debut also rang true to me. I was also a bit into Jamaοcan reggae and some UK Ska bands, and there were links (thinking of Steel Pulse) around those years. The Ramones were also quite fun at the time.
Now of course, I disliked The Pistols' raucus. I witnessed a few Toronto local punk bands in the late 70's, and the vscene was vivid, as we even saw some of those black duffelcoat and army boots skinheads that were quite violent. When London sneezed, Toronto caught the flu.
The Diodes were probably the better one and the worst was The Viletones (their singer Nazi Dog stabbed himself on stage with broken beer bottles). In between those extremes, Teenage Heads was definitely the one that broke big.
------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: December 11 2023 at 10:46
I loved it at the time although like everything that is so called 'anti-establishment' eventually becomes the establishment (famously Lydon 'did lunch' with Keith Emerson when they were living fairly close to each other in the USA). I don't think the irony was ever lost on Lydon/Rotten or whatever he goes by now. As an aside, the famous English footballer Stuart Pearce is a big fan and never loses the opportunity to talk about them on the radio. He also admits that he can't listen to any bands that have songs over 3 minutes long with reference to prog rock especially aas he lacks the attention span and would get bored very quickly. He's not nasty about this and I quite like hearing his comments.
Posted By: Progishness
Date Posted: December 11 2023 at 10:55
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
Cristi wrote:
It's ... b*******...
I couldn't agree more. I've always hated Punk Rock and everything it stood for with vile angry youths banging bits of furniture together to make a horrendous racket. After all, it was punk that tried to destroy prog, but Punk Rock ending up in the dustbin of music history after barely three years, whereas Prog Rock is still going strong nearly half a century later. Vive La Prog, as we say in England.
Agree 100%.
------------- "We're going to need a bigger swear jar."
Chloλ Grace Moretz as Mindy McCready aka 'Hit Girl' in Kick-Ass 2
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: December 11 2023 at 11:13
Progishness wrote:
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
Cristi wrote:
It's ... b*******...
I couldn't agree more. I've always hated Punk Rock and everything it stood for with vile angry youths banging bits of furniture together to make a horrendous racket. After all, it was punk that tried to destroy prog, but Punk Rock ending up in the dustbin of music history after barely three years, whereas Prog Rock is still going strong nearly half a century later. Vive La Prog, as we say in England.
Agree 100%.
Why are you agreeing when it's completely wrong? First of all punk didn't kill prog. Punk started well before the Sex Pistols, it just wasn't called punk yet. MC5, New York Dolls and The Stooges were the quintessential early punk bands that captured the imagination of those who wanted a more rebellious style in their rock. Punk did not die after three years, au contraire it simply splintered off into myriad sub-genres ranging from post-punk and new wave to art punk, Gothic rock and yes even progressive punk! Both punk and prog are still going strong so why is it considered a competition nearly 50 years on? Sure the initial reaction was to emphasize on simpler songs that highlighted social issues but prog's decline was a result of burnout and the increased interest in disco, electronica and good old fashioned pop music. Prog really didn't die out at all. Some of the best prog came out around 1977 and after and likewise some of the best best punk came out in the 1980s. People who make these general claims don't seem to have a grasp on the deeper history that played out. Keep in mind that popularity in music has a lot to do with record companies manipulating the public's perceptions and not the true zeitgeist of any given era.
Posted By: Nogbad_The_Bad
Date Posted: December 11 2023 at 11:57
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Why are you agreeing when it's completely wrong? First of all punk didn't kill prog. Punk started well before the Sex Pistols, it just wasn't called punk yet. MC5, New York Dolls and The Stooges were the quintessential early punk bands that captured the imagination of those who wanted a more rebellious style in their rock. Punk did not die after three years, au contraire it simply splintered off into myriad sub-genres ranging from post-punk and new wave to art punk, Gothic rock and yes even progressive punk! Both punk and prog are still going strong so why is it considered a competition nearly 50 years on? Sure the initial reaction was to emphasize on simpler songs that highlighted social issues but prog's decline was a result of burnout and the increased interest in disco, electronica and good old fashioned pop music. Prog really didn't die out at all. Some of the best prog came out around 1977 and after and likewise some of the best best punk came out in the 1980s. People who make these general claims don't seem to have a grasp on the deeper history that played out. Keep in mind that popularity in music has a lot to do with record companies manipulating the public's perceptions and not the true zeitgeist of any given era.
Thank You.
------------- Ian
Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 11 2023 at 17:10
Cristi wrote:
David_D wrote:
Cristi wrote:
I can respect, in retrospect, the rebellious nature of punk, ....
That's good because I certainly won't say that the rebellious nature of Metal as a whole is of a better kind than the one of Punk.
Depends on the band, on the subgenre. Plenty of metal is rebellious in a good way, many bands have great lyrics, from life's struggle to societal and political issues. So you are generalizing here.
More correctly, I wasn't really generalizing, just compared the two genres as a whole, and it would be good if you had distinguished between the British and the American Punk, as there was a big difference in their character.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: December 11 2023 at 22:36
I think the Punk v Prog partly came from the Pistols appearing on TV and one of them (Rotten?) was wearing a 'I Hate Pink Floyd' T-shirt. That was about as clear as it gets. Prog did garner a lot of support from the so called 'Intelligentsia' which was mainly music critics/music papers most of whom turned on prog bands after punk came along. Roger Waters addressed this attitude to some extent on The Wall and may even have mimicked punk with the infamous spitting incident on the Animals tour that eventually lead to The Wall. Greg Lake said that up until punk he was being called a 'progressive revolutionary genius' but afterwords mainly just 'crap'. The battle for hearts of minds of teenagers back in the late seventies was won by punks very quickly but the big prog hitters such as Yes and ELP had little new to say while the movement in general had gone for a more fusion based direction that had little crossover to radio and therefore was not very visible. Prog resurfaced in the 80's under the moniker Neo prog and clearly the likes of Marillion and IQ were able to take some of that punk attitude and put it into their music, one of the big reasons I like The Wake so much.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 01:24
David_D wrote:
Cristi wrote:
David_D wrote:
Cristi wrote:
I can respect, in retrospect, the rebellious nature of punk, ....
That's good because I certainly won't say that the rebellious nature of Metal as a whole is of a better kind than the one of Punk.
Depends on the band, on the subgenre. Plenty of metal is rebellious in a good way, many bands have great lyrics, from life's struggle to societal and political issues. So you are generalizing here.
More correctly, I wasn't really generalizing, just compared the two genres as a whole, and it would be good if you had distinguished between the British and the American Punk, as there was a big difference in their character.
Why bring metal into this conversation? Is it just to pick a fight because you have not found your guy...
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 02:35
Anyway, when talking about the rebellious nature in Sex Pistols' milestone of a Rock album:
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 03:17
richardh wrote:
I think the Punk v Prog partly came from the Pistols appearing on TV and one of them (Rotten?) was wearing a 'I Hate Pink Floyd' T-shirt.
It was very probably Rotten, as he was fond of a self-made T-shirt like that. On the other hand, one of his influences was Peter Hammill.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Saperlipopette!
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 03:34
David_D wrote:
richardh wrote:
I think the Punk v Prog partly came from the Pistols appearing on TV and one of them (Rotten?) was wearing a 'I Hate Pink Floyd' T-shirt.
It was very probably Rotten, as he was fond of a self-made T-shirt like that. On the other hand, one of his influences was Peter Hammill.
and Can, Captain Beefheart, Kraftwerk, Henry Cow...
Posted By: Lewian
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 03:44
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_Pistols" rel="nofollow - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_Pistols
McLaren, Rhodes and the band began looking locally for a new member to assume the lead vocal duties. As described by Matlock, "Everyone had long hair then, even the milkman, so what we used to do was if someone had short hair we would stop them in the street and ask them if they fancied themselves as a singer. (...) In August 1975, Rhodes spotted Lydon, then nineteen-year-old, wearing a Pink Floyd T-shirt with the words I Hate handwritten above the band's name and holes scratched through the Floyd members' eyes. Soon after, either Rhodes or McLaren asked Lydon to audition. During the session, Lydon improvised to Alice Cooper's "I'm Eighteen" on the Sex's jukebox. According to Jones, "he came in with green hair. I thought he had a really interesting face. I liked his look. He had the 'I Hate Pink Floyd' T-shirt on...held together with safety pins... he was a real arseholebut smart."
So the "I hate Pink Floyd" T-shirt was a key qualification.
Posted By: Cactus Choir
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 04:25
My favourite Pistols track was Silly Thing, released after Lydon and Vicious had gone, which was more of a catchy hard rock song than punk. The Stranglers were the only "punk" band I really got into and bought albums by. Prog music was new to me at the time even though the bands had been around for a long time, and I found it exciting and interesting.
Being 15 in the summer of 1977 punk should have been "my music" but it didn't speak to me at all really. There was certainly plenty of energy and aggression but I thought it was musically not very interesting, nihilistic and aesthetically ugly. I wanted to be Keith Emerson or Jimmy Page, not the spotty green-haired herbert Johnny Rotten! Most of the prog musicians were pushing or past 30 by 1977 and a new generation had come along so it was time for one of the periodic resets. The punks couldn't say they were better musicians than the old guard so their USP was that they were more relevant and "street".
I always found it ironic that punk came along when there was an old school Labour left-wing government in power in the UK. If they'd left it a few more years they might have struggled to form bands as Maggie Thatcher would have had them on job creation schemes! In some ways I think punk was a precursor of Thatcherism with both attempting to blow away what was perceived as a dusty decaying old Britain, one from a youth/musical standpoint and the other in terms of politics and economics.
Punk died a fairly rapid death and morphed into new wave which was more arty and musically adventurous. I remember seeing Magazine on the Old Grey Whistle Test and thinking they sounded like a prog band under heavy sedation.
------------- "And now...on the drums...Mick Underwooooooooood!!!"
"He's up the pub"
Posted By: Psychedelic Paul
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 04:36
Cactus Choir wrote:
.....not the spotty green-haired herbert Johnny Rotten!
Never mind the bullocks, it's anarchy in the dairy farm... Who would've guessed the spotty green-haired herbert would end up selling Country Life butter to spread the cost of living, presumably because he kneaded the bread. It can't be good for his Public Image though.
Posted By: Cactus Choir
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 04:44
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
Cactus Choir wrote:
.....not the spotty green-haired herbert Johnny Rotten!
Anarchy in the dairy farm... Who would've guessed the spotty green-haired herbert would end up selling Country Life butter to spread the cost of living, presumably because he kneaded the bread. It can't be good for his Public Image though.
It's also interesting that in later life John Lydon and Keith Emerson ended up as near-neighbours in California and apparently got on pretty well!
------------- "And now...on the drums...Mick Underwooooooooood!!!"
"He's up the pub"
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 04:48
Lewian wrote:
So the "I hate Pink Floyd" T-shirt was a key qualification.
I wouldn't necessarily interpret the quoted in that way, but rejection of the well-established Rock bands was definitely one of the main characteristics of the British Punk Rock movement.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 04:52
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Punk did not die after three years, au contraire it simply splintered off into myriad sub-genres ranging from post-punk and new wave to art punk, Gothic rock and yes even progressive punk! Both punk and prog are still going strong so why is it considered a competition nearly 50 years on?
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 05:08
siLLy puPPy wrote:
so why is it considered a competition nearly 50 years on?
there's still a competition?! I didn't know that (I doubt it though )
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 05:19
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
Cactus Choir wrote:
.....not the spotty green-haired herbert Johnny Rotten!
Never mind the bullocks, it's anarchy in the dairy farm... Who would've guessed the spotty green-haired herbert would end up selling Country Life butter to spread the cost of living, presumably because he kneaded the bread. It can't be good for his Public Image though.
Just a new true dinosaur.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 05:29
Cristi wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
so why is it considered a competition nearly 50 years on?
there's still a competition?! I didn't know that (I doubt it though )
According to RYM statistics, just about 6000 Punk releases in 2023, which is much more than Progressive Rock releases.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 05:42
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
Never mind the bullocks, it's anarchy in the dairy farm...
I'm afraid, so it is
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 06:15
David_D wrote:
Cristi wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
so why is it considered a competition nearly 50 years on?
there's still a competition?! I didn't know that (I doubt it though )
According to RYM statistics, just about 6000 Punk releases in 2023, which is much more than Progressive Rock releases.
Who says it's a competition?
Who cares about RYM statistics?! How is this relevant, in a positive way?
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 07:04
^ I misunderstood you.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 07:06
David_D wrote:
^ I misunderstood you.
ok
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 09:09
Cristi wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
so why is it considered a competition nearly 50 years on?
there's still a competition?! I didn't know that (I doubt it though )
Maybe rivalry is a better word. Were there punks who hated prog? Definitely. Were there proggers who hated punk? Of course but i would say that was a minority when many music lovers actually loved or at least tolerated both. I think these divisions were gimmicks of the music industry for the most part. Really punk and prog satisfy two completely different musical needs much like broccoli and chocolate do for our appetites.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 09:29
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Cristi wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
so why is it considered a competition nearly 50 years on?
there's still a competition?! I didn't know that (I doubt it though )
Maybe rivalry is a better word. Were there punks who hated prog? Definitely. Were there proggers who hated punk? Of course but i would say that was a minority when many music lovers actually loved or at least tolerated both. I think these divisions were gimmicks of the music industry for the most part. Really punk and prog satisfy two completely different musical needs much like broccoli and chocolate do for our appetites.
Mass media is guilty to encourage such rivalries, maybe they would sell more magazines (in the past), get more views (remember MTV?), or get clicks these days.
I remember an interview with Nirvana in which the reviewer was baiting Kurt and the guys to mock glam metal bands, which in the end they did. There was also the Kurt-Axl rivalry which MTV and the musical press encouraged for profit.
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 09:56
^ yes, having immersed myself in contract law for the last several years, it has come to light that when you sign up for selling your art to one of the major industries (film, music etc) you are basically owned and serve as an actor on the stage for the global elite's agendas. Even though i love all these styles of music, it has also become apparent that such shifts in popular music trends are very much orchestrated for the effect of creating divisions in society and the world at large therefore anybody who falls into this trap is really just serving their masters behind the scenes. Sounds crazy but too many have left the various industries and explained these things in great detail. In the case of glam metal, some of those bands really were bad. There is a time and place where something needs to change and the 1991 timeline was one of those times. On the bright side with grunge came the all things alternative era as well as prog revival. As i see it grunge was the last hurrah for the traditional music industry before the decentralized platform changed it all forever. It will take a while but eventually a new more just and freer music industry will evolve into something that serves the artist and fans and not just the profits of the industry. In the meantime, indie music is king!
Posted By: Psychedelic Paul
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 10:08
^ Nirvana and Grunge Rock generally were one of the reasons why the 1990's were such a terrible decade for music.
The original Nirvana...
...and something that Smells Like Nirvana...
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 10:09
siLLy puPPy wrote:
In the case of glam metal, some of those bands really were bad. There is a time and place where something needs to change and the 1991 timeline was one of those times. On the bright side with grunge came the all things alternative era as well as prog revival. As i see it grunge was the last hurrah for the traditional music industry before the decentralized platform changed it all forever.
You are right. But the mocking of the '80s glam metal was often not deserved. Some bands were dropped by labels, some bands releasing music did not get any help with promotion, add the mockery from the music media, it must have been hard for quite a few musicians. It was not just glam that fell on hard times, but metal in general (and that's just ignorance if you ask me). Many bands did not know what to do next after 1991-92, they either became less heavy (and at times more commercial) or followed the trends of the times, often with not good results.
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 10:27
Cristi wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
In the case of glam metal, some of those bands really were bad. There is a time and place where something needs to change and the 1991 timeline was one of those times. On the bright side with grunge came the all things alternative era as well as prog revival. As i see it grunge was the last hurrah for the traditional music industry before the decentralized platform changed it all forever.
You are right. But the mocking of the '80s glam metal was often not deserved. Some bands were dropped by labels, some bands releasing music did not get any help with promotion, add the mockery from the music media, it must have been hard for quite a few musicians. It was not just glam that fell on hard times, but metal in general (and that's just ignorance if you ask me). Many bands did not know what to do next after 1991-92, they either became less heavy (and at times more commercial) or followed the trends of the times, often with not good results.
I disagree with that. One of the major reasons glam metal fell by the wayside was that the more extreme thrash, death and black metal bands were gaining popularity in the underground. While Poison and Bon Jovi were ruling the pop charts, Metallica, Megadeth and Anthrax were selling lots of albums and bringing metal into a more credible realm. Glam metal attracted the sell outs who simply played the game instead of focusing on inventive music. It became a cliche of itself. By 1991 extreme metal had already splintered into many styles of subgenres. The pace of musical evolution has quickened in the last few decades and artists that fail to keep up things will get swept by the wayside. Just the way it works. Glam metal was just too shallow with more philosophical bands growing in number. In some ways grunge was simply the easy listening section of the extreme metal universe that grew unnoticed by the masses into the juggernaut that it is today.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 10:36
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Cristi wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
In the case of glam metal, some of those bands really were bad. There is a time and place where something needs to change and the 1991 timeline was one of those times. On the bright side with grunge came the all things alternative era as well as prog revival. As i see it grunge was the last hurrah for the traditional music industry before the decentralized platform changed it all forever.
You are right. But the mocking of the '80s glam metal was often not deserved. Some bands were dropped by labels, some bands releasing music did not get any help with promotion, add the mockery from the music media, it must have been hard for quite a few musicians. It was not just glam that fell on hard times, but metal in general (and that's just ignorance if you ask me). Many bands did not know what to do next after 1991-92, they either became less heavy (and at times more commercial) or followed the trends of the times, often with not good results.
I disagree with that. One of the major reasons glam metal fell by the wayside was that the more extreme thrash, death and black metal bands were gaining popularity in the underground. While Poison and Bon Jovi were ruling the pop charts, Metallica, Megadeth and Anthrax were selling lots of albums and bringing metal into a more credible realm. Glam metal attracted the sell outs who simply played the game instead of focusing on inventive music. It became a cliche of itself. By 1991 extreme metal had already splintered into many styles of subgenres. The pace of musical evolution has quickened in the last few decades and artists that fail to keep up things will get swept by the wayside. Just the way it works. Glam metal was just too shallow with more philosophical bands growing in number. In some ways grunge was simply the easy listening section of the extreme metal universe that grew unnoticed by the masses into the juggernaut that it is today.
I was talking about undeserved backlash and mockery.
Yes, there were glam bands that were awful (but so were awful alternative bands in the 90s as well), that scene would have imploded sooner or later anyway, big labels milked that scene too death (which they will do the same with grunge and alternative a few years later).
A lot of bands changed sound in their attempt to stay relevant, attract a new audience, follow trends try to stay "fresh". The results were mixed (to put it gently).
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 10:40
Cristi wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Cristi wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
In the case of glam metal, some of those bands really were bad. There is a time and place where something needs to change and the 1991 timeline was one of those times. On the bright side with grunge came the all things alternative era as well as prog revival. As i see it grunge was the last hurrah for the traditional music industry before the decentralized platform changed it all forever.
You are right. But the mocking of the '80s glam metal was often not deserved. Some bands were dropped by labels, some bands releasing music did not get any help with promotion, add the mockery from the music media, it must have been hard for quite a few musicians. It was not just glam that fell on hard times, but metal in general (and that's just ignorance if you ask me). Many bands did not know what to do next after 1991-92, they either became less heavy (and at times more commercial) or followed the trends of the times, often with not good results.
I disagree with that. One of the major reasons glam metal fell by the wayside was that the more extreme thrash, death and black metal bands were gaining popularity in the underground. While Poison and Bon Jovi were ruling the pop charts, Metallica, Megadeth and Anthrax were selling lots of albums and bringing metal into a more credible realm. Glam metal attracted the sell outs who simply played the game instead of focusing on inventive music. It became a cliche of itself. By 1991 extreme metal had already splintered into many styles of subgenres. The pace of musical evolution has quickened in the last few decades and artists that fail to keep up things will get swept by the wayside. Just the way it works. Glam metal was just too shallow with more philosophical bands growing in number. In some ways grunge was simply the easy listening section of the extreme metal universe that grew unnoticed by the masses into the juggernaut that it is today.
I was talking about undeserved backlash and mockery.
Yes, there were glam bands that were awful (but so were awful alternative bands in the 90s as well), that scene would have imploded sooner or later anyway, big labels milked that scene too death (which they will do the same with grunge and alternative a few years later).
A lot of bands changed sound in their attempt to stay relevant, attract a new audience, follow trends try to stay "fresh". The results were mixed (to put it gently).
That was my point exactly! The backlash WAS deserved because those bands looked ridiculous in comparison to the extreme metal upgrade that they didn't even notice. Glam metal bands were puppets of the music industry and were blindsided because they were clueless to the developments around them. They didn't attract new audiences because the rest of the world moved on and they were stuck in 1985!
Posted By: Psychedelic Paul
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 10:40
^ Maybe you had in mind one of the five Glam Metal bands below who all appear to be having a bad hair metal day.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 10:44
I like two of the bands in the video above. It's just someone's opinion.
If I made such a list, it would look different and someone would say some bands in there are not so bad.
Posted By: Psychedelic Paul
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 10:51
Cristi wrote:
I like two of the bands in the video above. It's just someone's opinion.
If I made such a list, it would look different and someone would say some bands in there are not so bad.
Twisted Sister would make my list of the five worst Hair Metal bands of all time. They're so bad that they're almost good.
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 10:51
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Cristi wrote:
I was talking about undeserved backlash and mockery.
Yes, there were glam bands that were awful (but so were awful alternative bands in the 90s as well), that scene would have imploded sooner or later anyway, big labels milked that scene too death (which they will do the same with grunge and alternative a few years later).
A lot of bands changed sound in their attempt to stay relevant, attract a new audience, follow trends try to stay "fresh". The results were mixed (to put it gently).
That was my point exactly! The backlash WAS deserved because those bands looked ridiculous in comparison to the extreme metal upgrade that they didn't even notice. Glam metal bands were puppets of the music industry and were blindsided because they were clueless to the developments around them. They didn't attract new audiences because the rest of the world moved on and they were stuck in 1985!
They didn't attract an audience because they used to play something different and went with the grungy alternative sound, which a lot of people found rather ridiculous.
Even Kiss did a grunge album, which was initially shelved but in the end released, maybe, maybe it would make some money.
For example Winger and Cinderella released really good albums in the 90s ('93-'94), both went unnoticed, they are getting some respect these days. And they were not the only ones.
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 14:10
siLLy puPPy wrote:
^ yes, having immersed myself in contract law for the last several years, it has come to light that when you sign up for selling your art to one of the major industries (film, music etc) you are basically owned and serve as an actor on the stage for the global elite's agendas. Even though i love all these styles of music, it has also become apparent that such shifts in popular music trends are very much orchestrated for the effect of creating divisions in society and the world at large therefore anybody who falls into this trap is really just serving their masters behind the scenes. Sounds crazy but too many have left the various industries and explained these things in great detail. In the case of glam metal, some of those bands really were bad. There is a time and place where something needs to change and the 1991 timeline was one of those times. On the bright side with grunge came the all things alternative era as well as prog revival. As i see it grunge was the last hurrah for the traditional music industry before the decentralized platform changed it all forever. It will take a while but eventually a new more just and freer music industry will evolve into something that serves the artist and fans and not just the profits of the industry. In the meantime, indie music is king!
very interesting
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 15:11
Nogbad_The_Bad wrote:
siLLy puPPy wrote:
Why are you agreeing when it's completely wrong? First of all punk didn't kill prog. Punk started well before the Sex Pistols, it just wasn't called punk yet. MC5, New York Dolls and The Stooges were the quintessential early punk bands that captured the imagination of those who wanted a more rebellious style in their rock. Punk did not die after three years, au contraire it simply splintered off into myriad sub-genres ranging from post-punk and new wave to art punk, Gothic rock and yes even progressive punk! Both punk and prog are still going strong so why is it considered a competition nearly 50 years on? Sure the initial reaction was to emphasize on simpler songs that highlighted social issues but prog's decline was a result of burnout and the increased interest in disco, electronica and good old fashioned pop music. Prog really didn't die out at all. Some of the best prog came out around 1977 and after and likewise some of the best best punk came out in the 1980s. People who make these general claims don't seem to have a grasp on the deeper history that played out. Keep in mind that popularity in music has a lot to do with record companies manipulating the public's perceptions and not the true zeitgeist of any given era.
Thank You.
+/- my take on things as well.
------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword
Posted By: siLLy puPPy
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 16:30
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
^ Maybe you had in mind one of the five Glam Metal bands below who all appear to be having a bad hair metal day.
First of all glam metal wasn't really metal at all but rather a heavier version of 70s glam rock therefore it's pretty much now accepted as a form of hard rock.
I agree with Poison and Nelson as some of the worst the era had to offer but Winger had musical creds and Great White had a few catchy tunes albeit too much in the Led Zep worship camp. Slaughter was simply generic but listenable. Stryper had a gimmick and a cool fashion statement but was kind of cheesy too.
Bands that really DID suck for the most part IMHO from the glam metal years are:
Cats In Boots
Enuff Z-Nuff
Faster Pussycat
Warrant
Dirty Looks
Bands that i love that are included in the glam metal camp are:
W.A.S.P.
Dokken
Twisted Sister
Ratt
Cinderella
Def Leppard
Motley Crue
McAuley Shenker Group
EZO
Extreme
Skid Row
Guns N Roses
There were also many bands that had a great song or two but rather dull generic albums:
Britny Fox
Kix
Helix
KISS
Lita Ford
Autograph
Quiet Riot
Vandenberg
Winger
White Lion
Hurricane
Dangerous Toys
As far as appearances, they all looked ridiculous. I hate the glam metal look. I only judge by musical output.
Posted By: richardh
Date Posted: December 12 2023 at 18:32
Cactus Choir wrote:
My favourite Pistols track was Silly Thing, released after Lydon and Vicious had gone, which was more of a catchy hard rock song than punk. The Stranglers were the only "punk" band I really got into and bought albums by. Prog music was new to me at the time even though the bands had been around for a long time, and I found it exciting and interesting.
Being 15 in the summer of 1977 punk should have been "my music" but it didn't speak to me at all really. There was certainly plenty of energy and aggression but I thought it was musically not very interesting, nihilistic and aesthetically ugly. I wanted to be Keith Emerson or Jimmy Page, not the spotty green-haired herbert Johnny Rotten! Most of the prog musicians were pushing or past 30 by 1977 and a new generation had come along so it was time for one of the periodic resets. The punks couldn't say they were better musicians than the old guard so their USP was that they were more relevant and "street".
I always found it ironic that punk came along when there was an old school Labour left-wing government in power in the UK. If they'd left it a few more years they might have struggled to form bands as Maggie Thatcher would have had them on job creation schemes! In some ways I think punk was a precursor of Thatcherism with both attempting to blow away what was perceived as a dusty decaying old Britain, one from a youth/musical standpoint and the other in terms of politics and economics.
Punk died a fairly rapid death and morphed into new wave which was more arty and musically adventurous. I remember seeing Magazine on the Old Grey Whistle Test and thinking they sounded like a prog band under heavy sedation.
Some very interesting stuff in there and I can relate.
However I never felt the same about the so called 'New Wave' scene. The original punk bands were the best. The Damned, The Stranglers (although barely a punk band) The Clash, Siouxsie and The Banshees, Pistols and maybe The Jam. They had the energy and I liked it. Never loved it though and as you say it had nowhere to go. I didn't listen to much prog other than ELP at the time. Genesis sounded bland while Floyd were boring and Yes were just strange. I didn't find a whole lot to sink my teeth into at the time. I think by the 80's I was independent enough just to listen to whatever I fancied and gravitated to Kate Bush, Mike Oldfield Tangerine Dream, Vangelis, Al Stewart and actually liked a lot of 'New Age'. The rock scene mostly passed me by. I liked Iron Maiden and could see a point to them but not a lot else around tickled my fancy. U2 were just horrid to my ears and I couldn't stand the plastic production of so much music that was being pumped out. Roll on the 90's!
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 13 2023 at 03:35
Cactus Choir wrote:
I always found it ironic that punk came along when there was an old school Labour left-wing government in power in the UK. If they'd left it a few more years they might have struggled to form bands as Maggie Thatcher would have had them on job creation schemes!
I don't think, it was accidental that the punk rebellion came close after the '60s counterculture, even the early '80s had their squatter movement where, I think, Punk was quite popular too.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 13 2023 at 04:47
Some more of Never Mind the Bollocks... and the time:
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Octopus II
Date Posted: December 13 2023 at 05:10
Posted By: Cristi
Date Posted: December 13 2023 at 05:27
Octopus II wrote:
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 13 2023 at 07:37
Yeah, it's a pretty creative one, even I might find it more vulgar than funny.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: David_D
Date Posted: December 13 2023 at 07:45
David_D wrote:
Yeah, it's a pretty creative one, even I might find it more vulgar than funny.
And definitely not as funny as Glam Metal.
------------- quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Posted By: Sean Trane
Date Posted: December 13 2023 at 07:47
Octopus II wrote:
------------- let's just stay above the moral melee prefer the sink to the gutter keep our sand-castle virtues content to be a doer as well as a thinker, prefer lifting our pen rather than un-sheath our sword