Print Page | Close Window

Lack of objectivity in biographies

Printed From: Progarchives.com
Category: Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements
Forum Name: Help us improve the site
Forum Description: Help us improve the forums, and the site as a whole
URL: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=12165
Printed Date: February 23 2025 at 10:58
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Lack of objectivity in biographies
Posted By: Baza
Subject: Lack of objectivity in biographies
Date Posted: September 27 2005 at 09:51

I think that some of the biographies here lack objectivity and represent only one point of view, for example:

"Nursery Cryme" (1971) shows the band struggling with their new mix of talent, and has a couple of weak songs. "Foxtrot" (1972) shows a more confident and accomplished band. "Selling England By The Pound" (1973) finds the band in a slightly mellower mood, with more acoustic work here on piano and guitar than before. "The Lamb Lies Down On Broadway" (1974) is arguably the band's finest album.

The 70’s gave them the occasion to issue some masterpieces, like for example "Remember the Future" (1973) and "Recycled" (1975). Each is a conceptual album that is a nice blend of melodic guitar and keyboards with a vocal story. "Journey To The Centre Of The Eye" is a mindblowing epic with lots of echoplex guitar and dual Mellotrons which is quite in tune with the Krautrock stuff going on around them, yet is definitely British. "Tab in the Ocean" and "Magic is a Child" had shorter songs and were less less satisfying.

It's not the best way to introduce new guys to these bands, is it? I think some of the biographies should be rewrited, what do you think?




Replies:
Posted By: con safo
Date Posted: September 27 2005 at 11:09
Originally posted by Baza Baza wrote:

It's not the best way to introduce new guys to these bands, is it? I think some of the biographies should be rewrited, what do you think?

As long as someone else is doing the writing!



-------------


Posted By: chopper
Date Posted: September 27 2005 at 11:12

The Genesis one sounds pretty good to me. It's a bit short admittedly, but I would say it's fairly objective. Most Genesis fans here would say these albums represent their best period, so you're bound to get favourable comments. Wait till you get on to the later stuff!

As for the second one, I don't even know who it is.



Posted By: Snow Dog
Date Posted: September 27 2005 at 12:01
i agree!

-------------
http://www.last.fm/user/Snow_Dog" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: BebieM
Date Posted: September 27 2005 at 12:01
I#m not a big fan of the Genesis one either, I think it's a bit unfair to Nursery Cryme which I find even better than foxtrott (just my opinion).

@chopper: the second one's nektar i think, but I don't own any of those albums either


Posted By: R_DeNIRO
Date Posted: September 27 2005 at 14:00
Originally posted by Baza Baza wrote:

I think that some of the biographies here lack objectivity and represent only one point of view, for example:

"Nursery Cryme" (1971) shows the band struggling with their new mix of talent, and has a couple of weak songs. "Foxtrot" (1972) shows a more confident and accomplished band. "Selling England By The Pound" (1973) finds the band in a slightly mellower mood, with more acoustic work here on piano and guitar than before. "The Lamb Lies Down On Broadway" (1974) is arguably the band's finest album.

The 70’s gave them the occasion to issue some masterpieces, like for example "Remember the Future" (1973) and "Recycled" (1975). Each is a conceptual album that is a nice blend of melodic guitar and keyboards with a vocal story. "Journey To The Centre Of The Eye" is a mindblowing epic with lots of echoplex guitar and dual Mellotrons which is quite in tune with the Krautrock stuff going on around them, yet is definitely British. "Tab in the Ocean" and "Magic is a Child" had shorter songs and were less less satisfying.

It's not the best way to introduce new guys to these bands, is it? I think some of the biographies should be rewrited, what do you think?

I'm totally agree with you. There´s no objectivity in some reviews. Nursery Crime have a couple of weak songs?  My god... Objectivity would be saying that after Gabriel left ,Genesis became poppier or that 71-75 is considered their best period, but writting all these in the biography it's not apropiate.



-------------
We were always be much human than we whish to be.


Posted By: FragileDT
Date Posted: September 27 2005 at 15:02
Yeah definitely. I don't find one weak song on Nursery Cryme not to mention
that the writer implied that theres a couple. I think a slightly more extensive
review should be done.

-------------
One likes to believe
In the freedom of music
But glittering prizes
And endless Compromises
Shatter the illusion
Of integrity


Posted By: The Minstrel
Date Posted: September 27 2005 at 15:44

Originally posted by FragileDT FragileDT wrote:

Yeah definitely. I don't find one weak song on Nursery Cryme not to mention
that the writer implied that theres a couple. I think a slightly more extensive
review should be done.

One should read the individual reviews and not the biography for reviews.



Posted By: Tony R
Date Posted: September 27 2005 at 17:48

Over the coming months we will look at the Band Bios and try to freshen them up.

I guess at the early stage of the archives development just having a bio in place was more important than considerations of quality.

Why not submit a Band Bio to myself,Maani,EL,UI, or Garion?

If it is better than the one in place we will add it.



Posted By: goose
Date Posted: September 27 2005 at 18:22
Are single paragraphs allowed to be submitted? That way people don't have to do a complete rewrite - I can see that putting people off, certainly.



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.01 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2014 Web Wiz Ltd. - http://www.webwiz.co.uk