Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - New entries - inconsistency
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedNew entries - inconsistency

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Dragon Phoenix View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 31 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1475
Direct Link To This Post Topic: New entries - inconsistency
    Posted: August 03 2005 at 07:46
I noticed that Queen* is already in the alphabetical overview, whereas for instance Eno* and Jarre* are not.
Back to Top
Man With Hat View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team

Joined: March 12 2005
Location: Neurotica
Status: Offline
Points: 166183
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 07 2005 at 22:34

I've noticed that too.

Although, i can't explain why. This has been no help, sry.  



Edited by Man With Hat
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive
Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect.
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 08 2005 at 15:16

It's all down to the asterisk, which marks a band entry as being "under construction".

If it appears at the start of the name, as it does with Jarrre and Eno, the alphabetic listing won't see them as the first letter of their name is *. If it's at the end, as it is with Queen, then Q is still the first letter.

Perhaps those upstairs could make it a policy to put the asterisk at the end of the name?

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.414 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.