Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: January 07 2009
Location: Ireland
Status: Offline
Points: 679
Topic: Terry Riley? Posted: March 12 2010 at 12:35
I said in a tread about Phillip Glass that I felt Terry Riley should be here so I feel it deserves a tread of its own. I always felt albums like ‘A Rainbow in Curved Air’ and ‘Shri Camel’ were much more than minimalism. Riley’s inventive and original Electronic melodies were pushing musical boundaries in a highly experimental way that could definitely, in my opinion, be classified as Prog Rock.
Will Terry Riley ever find his way into Prog Archives?
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 37214
Posted: March 12 2010 at 15:43
I very definitely support Riley's inclusion, and have mentioned it in threads before.
A Rainbow in Curved Air is prog (as far as site parameters go) and could easily, I think, be included in Progressive Electronic. It's a great album.
And again, first track I check at youtube because it has been a while since I've heard Shri Camel, it would great for Progressive Electronic, I think.
So yeah, he should be in. I think, the question might be whether he follows Cale whom is in Prog Related and he collaborated with on a great album, who is in Prog Related, because Prrog Related better fits Cale's discography or a proper Prog category . He is a great figure who really does deserve inclusion, I think
Incidentally, for those that don't know it, here's a track from that Riley/Cale album:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHPQYGLa61c
He has also collaborated with Eno and many others, and is at least Related (though I would rather see him in a prog category). I like his jazzy music too.
This is a very cool Riley/Cherry improv collaboration:
Electronic, academic music, jazz, rock, drone, ambient... the guy is good.
Sorry not writing this very well, but I'm very distracted with other things.
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Posted: March 13 2010 at 07:02
I wonder if Terry Riley isn't a bit too much "avant-garde" for PA. But, after all, I just know "In C", so I'm not sure if his music has rock elements in it or not.
Rainbow in Curved Air is certainly worthy of being considered as distinctly separate from the systems music/minimalism canon (and it did inspire Baba O'Riley by the Who) BTW I think the album sucks but it certainly wouldn't be out of place in the archive.
However, please consider the precedent being set here i.e. if PA is open to Adams, Reich, Lamont Young Glass, Reilly et al where does it stop ? e.g. Bartok, Stravinsky and Ginastera have been influential to many prog musicians and I'm sure you would hesitate at endorsing the latter's claim as 'prog related' ?
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 11 2007
Location: Memphis
Status: Offline
Points: 10678
Posted: March 13 2010 at 07:21
I believe the electronic team voted on Terry Riley not long ago and he was rejected. If someone wants to send a PM to Phillipe and see if he wants to discuss Riley that might prove illuminating.
By the way, Riley's record with John Cale is here under the Cale discography.
Joined: March 14 2004
Location: noosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 3597
Posted: March 13 2010 at 08:22
I've already discussed about this possibility time ago. Terry Riley
clearly influenced many bands and artists mentioned in the progressive
electronic section...and his looped hypnotic organ works (Rainbow in
curved air / Persian Surgey dervishes) are very challenging, intuitive
and unusually experimental for a classical minimalism artist. However
most part of his discography belongs to classical contemporary music,
admitting strong relationships with Glass, Adams, Reich, Lou Harrisson
(...) Consequently I don't hesitate to tell you that I'm opposed to an
addition (despite that I've mentioned his name in the progressive
electronic subgenre definition, because of historical facts. I've done the same with Morton Subotnick)...despite
that John Cale is in prog related I'm not sure that Terry Riley
deserves an addition...because 95% of his work is based on
classical-acoustic orchestration, using codified notation and belongs
to the contemporary repertoire.
Terry Riley's list of (proggy) transcendent minimal electronic works:
Rainbow in Curved Air (1969) Persian Surgery Dervishes (1972) Shri Camel (1980) Descending Moonshine Dervishes (1982)
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Posted: March 13 2010 at 09:40
I betcha we might take it in Crossover. I don't know, it seems like Electronic and all the other Sub teams are a bit too picky. I'm honestly not really familiar with Riley, but I like what I'm hearing.
I betcha we might take it in Crossover. I don't know, it seems like Electronic and all the other Sub teams are a bit too picky. I'm honestly not really familiar with Riley, but I like what I'm hearing.
This couldn't be more true.
I'd be glad if Terry Riley gets into the Archives; he deserves to be here.
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
Posted: March 13 2010 at 09:57
MovingPictures07 wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
I betcha we might take it in Crossover. I don't know, it seems like Electronic and all the other Sub teams are a bit too picky. I'm honestly not really familiar with Riley, but I like what I'm hearing.
This couldn't be more true.
I'd be glad if Terry Riley gets into the Archives; he deserves to be here.
You know as much as I am familiar with Reich and Glass, I am ashamed to admit I don't really know Riley.
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 37214
Posted: March 13 2010 at 11:47
philippe wrote:
I've already discussed about this possibility time ago. Terry Riley
clearly influenced many bands and artists mentioned in the progressive
electronic section...and his looped hypnotic organ works (Rainbow in
curved air / Persian Surgey dervishes) are very challenging, intuitive
and unusually experimental for a classical minimalism artist. However
most part of his discography belongs to classical contemporary music,
admitting strong relationships with Glass, Adams, Reich, Lou Harrisson
(...) Consequently I don't hesitate to tell you that I'm opposed to an
addition (despite that I've mentioned his name in the progressive
electronic subgenre definition, because of historical facts. I've done the same with Morton Subotnick)...despite
that John Cale is in prog related I'm not sure that Terry Riley
deserves an addition...because 95% of his work is based on
classical-acoustic orchestration, using codified notation and belongs
to the contemporary repertoire.
Terry Riley's list of (proggy) transcendent minimal electronic works:
Rainbow in Curved Air (1969) Persian Surgery Dervishes (1972) Shri Camel (1980) Descending Moonshine Dervishes (1982)
Thanks, was sure it had been discussed before. While I think he has
enough suitable material to be a contender for Progressive Electronic,
I understand your reservations and respect them. At the least, I believe that he should
be included in Prog-Related for his significant contributions to and
influence on progressive electronic music.
I betcha we might take it in Crossover. I don't know, it seems like Electronic and all the other Sub teams are a bit too picky. I'm honestly not really familiar with Riley, but I like what I'm hearing.
This couldn't be more true.
I'd be glad if Terry Riley gets into the Archives; he deserves to be here.
You know as much as I am familiar with Reich and Glass, I am ashamed to admit I don't really know Riley.
You'll have to check some more out, it's pretty good stuff.
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Posted: March 13 2010 at 12:03
Well, I definitely think Rainbow in Curved Air is on the more progressive side of electronica, especially as it came near the beginning of progressive electronic (and toward to end of proto-electronic). I don't really know much else of his work so there.
I will say that progressive electronic seems to be the most paradoxical genre we have on PA. Let's admit that tons of electronic bands have long pieces of challenging, progressive music, or short intense, pieces of chanllenging music. But the spectrum and variety of artists and styles in the electronica genre is many times more diverse than in rock music. And it seems that lest the floodgates be opened 'til eventually Daft Punk gets in somehow, the levee is kept shut to many, many modern bands that seem quite progressive (Aphex Twin, Flashbulb, BT). I'm probably wrong, but in many cases how else could these bands not be included if not because "they're not like Tangerine Dream or Redshift."
That's not a complaint against the PE team, though. I understand that with the huge variety in electronica, all it takes is a few controversial additions 'til people start asking why Moby isn't here.
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Online
Points: 37214
Posted: March 13 2010 at 12:42
ExittheLemming wrote:
Rainbow in Curved Air is certainly worthy of being considered as distinctly separate from the systems music/minimalism canon (and it did inspire Baba O'Riley by the Who) BTW I think the album sucks but it certainly wouldn't be out of place in the archive.
However, please consider the precedent being set here i.e. if PA is open to Adams, Reich, Lamont Young Glass, Reilly et al where does it stop ? e.g. Bartok, Stravinsky and Ginastera have been influential to many prog musicians and I'm sure you would hesitate at endorsing the latter's claim as 'prog related' ?
It'll stop at Stockhausen (whom Riley was influenced by), Xenakis, Varese and the like (I'd actually like a new category for such non-Prog artists). ;)
I think some worry too much about precedents. The academic music composers you mentioned (Bartok, Stravinsky, and Ginastera) were influential to Prog, but one cannot say they had the direct involvement with progressive music, as encompassed by the site's categories, as Riley did. Aside from Riley's progressive electronic albums, his collaborations with artists such as Cale, Eno and others makes him far more considerable. Riley has worked with rock artists. Furthermore, Igor Wakhevitch, who is in Progressive Electronic, was a student of his. Aside from influence and collaborations, I do believe that Riley has sufficient music, and that's what really matters, that fits PA's parameters.
I expect there would be calls for Reich, whom Riley has collaborated with, but that should be evaluated on its own merits. Maybe there'd be calls for the jazzer, who has done Fusion work, Don Cherry whom he has collaborated with, and maybe there would have been calls for Cale if he weren't already in due to their collaboration. Don Cherry would of course lead to Ornette Coleman (of course we already have Ornette Coleman's Prime Time in here). And of course Riley would lead to Kronos Quartet's addition (think there are are already precedents for that). Of course La Monte Young would have to be added. Of course Eno is already here. My God, if Rilley is added, then every minimalist, every academic music composer, ever electronic artist, and every jazz man will have to be added. It'll be the end of progressive "rock" archives as we know it.
Joined: March 14 2004
Location: noosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 3597
Posted: March 13 2010 at 16:03
stonebeard wrote:
I'm probably wrong, but in many cases how else could these bands not be included if not because "they're not like Tangerine Dream or Redshift."
I accept everything adventurous from early Moog pop-ish experiments, to kosmische, droning minimalism, industrial and ethereal, organic ambient...I reject things related to IDM, clubbing, breakbeats (...) all these sh*tty stuffs for mechanical-body dancers, also functional new age relaxation music...Progressive electronic music is music for the "Brain".
Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Posted: March 13 2010 at 23:14
philippe wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
I'm probably wrong, but in many cases how else could these bands not be included if not because "they're not like Tangerine Dream or Redshift."
I accept everything adventurous from early Moog pop-ish experiments, to kosmische, droning minimalism, industrial and ethereal, organic ambient...I reject things related to IDM, clubbing, breakbeats (...) all these sh*tty stuffs for mechanical-body dancers, also functional new age relaxation music...Progressive electronic music is music for the "Brain".
You do realize that you're not supposed to actually dance to IDM and breakbeat, right? Something can be "music for the brain" without being an ambient voyage into the recesses of your psyche.
Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Posted: March 13 2010 at 23:26
Henry Plainview wrote:
philippe wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
I'm probably wrong, but in many cases how else could these bands not be included if not because "they're not like Tangerine Dream or Redshift."
I accept everything adventurous from early Moog pop-ish experiments, to kosmische, droning minimalism, industrial and ethereal, organic ambient...I reject things related to IDM, clubbing, breakbeats (...) all these sh*tty stuffs for mechanical-body dancers, also functional new age relaxation music...Progressive electronic music is music for the "Brain".
You do realize that you're not supposed to actually dance to IDM and breakbeat, right? Something can be "music for the brain" without being an ambient voyage into the recesses of your psyche.
^Just because it has a beat doesn't mean you dance to it. Besides, I'd like to see someone dance to anything off Venetian Snares Making Orange Things.
Joined: March 14 2004
Location: noosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 3597
Posted: March 14 2010 at 04:07
ok, I think with people like you, the discussion is pointless. I'm not opposed to "electro beats", it depends of many things and especially to the approach. Kraftwerk, Wolfgang Riechmann, Cybotron and many others included in the archives provide electro beats to their soundscapes...about musical ways to reach astral voyage and ravishing state of trance you are wrong...just listen to the noisy-bruitish facet of the subgenre or the almost symphonic-orchestrated splendor of compositions delivered by Roberto Cacciapaglia and a few others.
About Venetian Snares, this one is a real atrocity for the ears and largely commercially orientated. Breakcore is just the opposite to the fundamentals of progressive rock . This is closer to punk music. In a sense it is electro-punk.
I'm sure both of you will have an other discourse in a few years.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.371 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.