Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Bands going on forever
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedBands going on forever

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Stool Man View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 30 2007
Location: Anti-Cool (anag
Status: Offline
Points: 2689
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Bands going on forever
    Posted: January 14 2013 at 04:39
Late last year I turned 50 (yeah, thanks) and so I noticed when there was a fiftieth anniversary of something more than I usually would.  Seemed like a lot of things (University Challenge, Bond films, Jamaican music etc) and bands (Status Quo, The Rolling Stones, The Beach Boys, The Beatles, etc) were also fifty years old.  Apart from the Beatles, all those examples are still active, still writing new material, still releasing new albums, still touring. 
Other, younger, bands have extended their existence partially through changing their lineup.  Yes is an obvious example - I think Steve Howe commented that maybe their children could continue the band into a next generation.  Similarly, The Albion Band have had over 100 people play with them, and recently Ashley Hutchings passed the baton on to his son to start a completely new lineup of the band - this one could run and run.
Napalm Death are another band with no original members, also The Sugababes, Thin Lizzy, and more.
(edit: I just remembered Brian Downey is back in Thin Lizzy again - I sit corrected)
 
My own band has been going for over twenty years, and currently has a mostly new lineup, with nobody from the first year of the band playing in it, and only a few from before 2010.  But that will change, and change again.  Several members of the band weren't even born when we first started.  I can easily imagine my band continuing for a century or two, with constantly shifting lineups.
 
It makes me wonder if some bands could go on potentially forever.  What do you think?


Edited by Stool Man - January 14 2013 at 04:43
rotten hound of the burnie crew
Back to Top
zeqexes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 19 2012
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1238
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 14 2013 at 05:00
Well theoretically, yes, as long as you keep shifting the line-up to a younger generation and make sure that there's people interested in playing in the band.
Back to Top
Stool Man View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 30 2007
Location: Anti-Cool (anag
Status: Offline
Points: 2689
Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 14 2013 at 05:16
I suppose also there must be an audience for the new version of the band - otherwise why bother?
 
In 1988 I saw Napalm Death play live, with the lineup that made their first two albums, I think.  None of that lineup were in the original band, and only the last to join - Shane Embury - has been in the band for the last twenty years.  The lineup I saw were very popular, and I'm sure the lineup of the last twenty years must be very popular too.  If it changes again, as it surely will, the new lineup will also be popular. 
 
rotten hound of the burnie crew
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.371 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.