Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: April 02 2012
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Topic: Metallica in "prog related" ? Posted: April 07 2012 at 13:53
Ive noticed that the two Metallica albums "Master of Puppets" and "And Justice for all" is mentioned in "Prog Related". And i started thinking to myself "why have those 2 albums been placed into that camp?". I mean i was a big fan of old Metallica and througout my early 20's, i knew their first 6 albums almost like the back of my hand lol.
The reason why is obviously because, on those 2 albums of theirs, theres a trait that exists on those 2 albums but not on the other albums. And that trait is..............long songs that last over 8 mins. There are 2-3 songs on each of those albums that last for over 8 mins. This is the only "progressive rock" trait tho that exists on those Metallica albums.....lenghty songs. You rarely get a progressive rock song lasting less than 5 mins, but "lenght" is not the be all end all of a prog rock song.
Prog Rock songs are longer than non prog rock songs, but.......they are structured differently aswell. On those long metallica songs, they still have the same structure as typical metal songs. But instead of being verse chorus verse chorus verse chorus....end of song, its just verse chorus verse chorus verse chorus verse chorus verse chorus verse chorus....end of song instead lol. You could easily concise those songs down and nothing would be ruined from them (strictly speaking). But you definently could not shorten and concise for example.....the Pink Floyd song Time. If you did that you'd butcher it, you'd destroy the very thing the songs meant to be about.
Theres only 2 exceptions though in regards to the 8 min plus songs of Metallica's. Orion from the puppets album, as its a lenghty instrumental that takes you on a journey, and the song To Live is To Die from the justice for all album. That song is not your typical verse chorus verse chorus verse chorus song, it takes you on a fair bit of a journey aswell and is not typical metal song song structured. Also when To Live is to Die ends.....it immediatly kicks into the next song, Dyers Eve. Those 2 songs tie in together with each other. I have seen this done on a fair amount of progressive rock songs aswell. For example Arena do this a few times on their album The Visitor. Darkwater also do this with "The Play part 1" and "The Play part 2" on their album "Calling the Earth to Witness". To Live is to Die and Dyers Eve could actually be merged together to form 1 huge song.
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Online
Points: 65298
Posted: April 07 2012 at 18:51
let's not let this turn into another debate about artist vs. album subgenres-- Metallica is in PR because several of their LPs, including the two mentioned by the OP, were progressive, particularly in the way they progressed Metal beyond the normally blues or 'swing' -oriented patterns long practiced by Zep, Sabbath, Priest, Ozzy, and even Maiden. And they were American which itself was a development away from the Kinks-Yardbirds-Zep evolutionary path of heavy rock.
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Posted: April 14 2012 at 09:06
Mutez wrote:
On those long metallica songs, they still have the same structure as typical metal songs. But instead of being verse chorus verse chorus verse chorus....end of song, its just verse chorus verse chorus verse chorus verse chorus verse chorus verse chorus....end of song instead lol. You could easily concise those songs down and nothing would be ruined from them (strictly speaking).
That is not true for the two albums you mentioned, Master of Puppets and And Justice for All. It is also not true for the title track of Ride The Lightning. You could probably argue that Rainbow and Iron Maiden have used that kind of structure, but then they are in prog related as well.
Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2134
Posted: April 14 2012 at 11:52
Dean wrote:
Prog Related isn't Prog.
Careful now.
Overall / in average, Metallica is obviously not prog, but periodically / section-wise they are. Consequently, they are Prog-Related (deliberatately leaving out other criteria).
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Posted: April 14 2012 at 11:56
earlyprog wrote:
Dean wrote:
Prog Related isn't Prog.
Careful now.
Overall / in average, Metallica is obviously not prog, but periodically / section-wise they are. Consequently, they are Prog-Related (deliberatately leaving out other criteria).
But still a band classified as Prog Related here.....are not considered prog. Which is Dean's point.
Joined: March 05 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 2134
Posted: April 14 2012 at 12:07
Snow Dog wrote:
earlyprog wrote:
Dean wrote:
Prog Related isn't Prog.
Careful now.
Overall / in average, Metallica is obviously not prog, but periodically / section-wise they are. Consequently, they are Prog-Related (deliberatately leaving out other criteria).
But still a band classified as Prog Related here.....are not considered prog. Which is Dean's point.
Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Posted: April 14 2012 at 12:50
earlyprog wrote:
Snow Dog wrote:
earlyprog wrote:
Dean wrote:
Prog Related isn't Prog.
Careful now.
Overall / in average, Metallica is obviously not prog, but periodically / section-wise they are. Consequently, they are Prog-Related (deliberatately leaving out other criteria).
But still a band classified as Prog Related here.....are not considered prog. Which is Dean's point.
Grrrrrrrrr! ()
So Deans's point = PA's point? .......
(I'm a hugger. Lighten up.)
I'm light. i wasn't trying to be ratty with you. And maybe I shouldn't speak for Dean. I may be wrong.
Joined: April 02 2012
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 26
Posted: April 20 2012 at 06:44
Guldbamsen wrote:
Hhmm compared to a lot of things, I personally feel this is a pretty good stab at "prog":
I did actually say in my OP that the two Metallica songs that i thought did decently emulate the progressive rock song structure, were Orion and To Live is to Die, but glad you agree with me on something tho lol
Joined: January 03 2008
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 1818
Posted: June 22 2012 at 11:52
Metallica were a band that helped develop progressive metal a lot. Their first 4 albums are pivotal in the genre. They weren't prog in style but were real progressive artists in the genre.
I don't wanna start the old prog vs progressive debate but let me show you an example:
And Justice for all (progressive metal) vs SDOIT (prog metal)
Joined: June 23 2005
Location: The Tardis
Status: Offline
Points: 8543
Posted: June 22 2012 at 12:38
I found quite a few proggy moments on Metallica's 2nd, 3rd and 4th albums. And on those albums, I challenge the OP to name one song that has 6 verses and 6 choruses. I certainly don't remember any and I'm fairly well-versed in those three albums. Oh, and just to let the OP know, PA and my collection are full of prog that has only 4-5 minute long songs. So I doubt only song length was taken into account when deciding on Metallica for related. Some of their rhythmic and harmonic structures are quite complex in parts. And, I'm sure they influenced a lot of the prog-metal that is out there today (one of the criteria for related I believe).
I can understand your anger at me, but what did the horse I rode in on ever do to you?
Joined: April 15 2014
Location: St.Petersburg
Status: Offline
Points: 173
Posted: May 25 2014 at 10:38
And Justice For All is a progressive metal album. More progressive than many of Dream Theater albums for example. And the three first albums are prog related. IMO.
Joined: August 22 2010
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 20631
Posted: May 25 2014 at 15:17
Snow Dog wrote:
earlyprog wrote:
Dean wrote:
Prog Related isn't Prog.
Careful now.
Overall / in average, Metallica is obviously not prog, but periodically / section-wise they are. Consequently, they are Prog-Related (deliberatately leaving out other criteria).
But still a band classified as Prog Related here.....are not considered prog. Which is Dean's point.
So....why are they , and other prog related bands, on Prog Rock Archives then if they aren't 'prog'...?
I have always found that to be a bit odd.
One does nothing yet nothing is left undone. Haquin
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.