Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Progressive rock and progressive music are two different same things. One is the original fusion of older classical ideas with a newer music. Occasionally there are changes and new bands that turn up, but after a while I get the idea that "prog" most certainly means symphonic rock mainly. Remove that and where are we all?
As for SW, when I heard P Tree's Sky Moves Sideways a long time ago I thought here's a guy who wants to be Pink Floyd so much he's recorded one of their best albums. After that album P Tree became one of the greats right up to but not including The Incident. The Raven is okay, fusion oriented but I am reminded of U2's Rattle and Um (sic) where they "discovered" Americana, blues etc and thought they were so cool at this "new" thing. I think alot of this perception of new / old is that many people (but probably not on this site) do not consider music from before they were adolescents. Thus anything recorded / released before they were"alive" is "irrelevant". Unless they are heritage oriented then music may be respected.
But there it is - time. Either dismissed as past history (tautology noted). Or a proud history. Still the same thing. Plus ca change n'est pas?
However I can't help but also note that people, as the sum of their conflicts and not resolutions are a mass of contradictions (just look at the indecision, discussion and debate on the meaning of prog.) - and SW is no different. Since making his / their identity he got in touch with the 60s 70s masters and re-did some of their records.
Progressive rock means moving rock on but also remaining the same. Contradictions in music that indicate the indelible humanity involved in writing, recording, performing, hearing, absorbing, loving, hating, arguing, occasionally agreeing and well, being passionately indifferent.
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20604
Posted: July 01 2014 at 16:17
To Answer your question, yes Steven Wilson has reached his time. I find his trips down progressive memory lane tedious and his album TRTRTS completely overrated and lack luster. Perhaps it's in his execution of the material as to why it comes off so feeling so sterile. The Flaming Lips put out an album titled The Terror that is strangely similar to early Popol Vuh in it's soundscapes and it's also creepy as hell so it works for me demonstrating that going backwards is not always counter productive to making enjoyable Prog music. And let's face it, what new sounds are going to come about now? Better grab something you like while you can and enjoy it.
Joined: February 14 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 187
Posted: July 02 2014 at 04:44
Horizons wrote:
There's a difference from having influences from the past and sounding pastoral. Stevens recognizes this line.
Old comment, but do you really think The Raven is more original than say, TFK? That's actually blatantly wrong. TFK has a much more unique sound, with the Swedish melodies and a much more integrated fusion of their influences. The Raven is very much "first a Yes bit, now here's the Crimson part, and over here in this song is some Genesis". It's overall more original than a lot of things and I like the album, but the idea that this album is a real exemption from "retro prog" while TFK aren't is inane. I guess it's his voice and the fact that his music is on the dreary side that makes it seem more 'modern'.
Joined: January 03 2012
Location: Russia
Status: Offline
Points: 1534
Posted: July 02 2014 at 06:34
^Have you heard anything before 'The Raven'? Yeah, 'The Raven' was clearly a nod for 70's music (although there is a lot of post-rock and indie pop here and there), but can you find any Yes or Genesis-like music on Insurgentes or Deadwing or Storm Corrosion?
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28029
Posted: July 03 2014 at 01:16
I don't think 'Genesis,Yes or Crimson' when I listen to The Raven, I just hear a bloody good album. TFK are largely a pastiche of prog although a pleasant enough band . That said Desolation Rose marks a point where the penny has finally dropped for Roine and not before time. Long complex passages that go nowhere does not prog make. Wilson knows what works and doesn't pummel you over the head again and again with a notion of prog.
Joined: February 14 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 187
Posted: July 03 2014 at 04:25
I'm talking about The Raven, not Wilson in general.
I hear Yes,
Crimson and Genesis and I hear a good album. But like I said, it's
bizarre to call TFK a pastiche and give Wilson a pass when Wilson in
this album is far more closely imitating. There are original parts, but
they're separate from the 'homage' parts. TFK has the originality and
unoriginality blended into one entity. They created an unmistakeable
sound though, whereas The Raven is unmistakeably Wilson with a few
mistakable sections. I like Porcupine Tree about as much as TFK but
Wilson never created his own trademark symphonic sound, so it's only
natural that he fall back on the originals too much when he gets too
close to the pure thing.
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28029
Posted: July 03 2014 at 16:25
Altairius wrote:
I'm talking about The Raven, not Wilson in general.
I hear Yes,
Crimson and Genesis and I hear a good album. But like I said, it's
bizarre to call TFK a pastiche and give Wilson a pass when Wilson in
this album is far more closely imitating. There are original parts, but
they're separate from the 'homage' parts. TFK has the originality and
unoriginality blended into one entity. They created an unmistakeable
sound though, whereas The Raven is unmistakeably Wilson with a few
mistakable sections. I like Porcupine Tree about as much as TFK but
Wilson never created his own trademark symphonic sound, so it's only
natural that he fall back on the originals too much when he gets too
close to the pure thing.
I don't hear imitation. On the downside the album is a bit cold but then I think that is purely intentional. Yes and Genesis are not coming through to me at all. King Crimson is going to be the closest it gets not least because he is using the exact same Mellotron that Fripp used but even then the style is not close enough to be an imitation imo.
Joined: February 14 2014
Status: Offline
Points: 187
Posted: July 04 2014 at 04:12
Yes is in the first section of Luminol, Genesis in The Watchmaker. Like I said, the heavily influenced sections are kind of separate and then it goes into some pretty original sections too. It's pretty odd, come to think of it.
Joined: May 25 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 10970
Posted: July 05 2014 at 01:43
^ It doesn't have to be a particular Yes track. It sure does sound like it has a Squire-esque bass riff in it (think Fragile) ... with some music that reminds me of Remedy Lane. In fact, much of that track reminds me of PoS.
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 28029
Posted: July 06 2014 at 01:52
Dayvenkirq wrote:
^ It doesn't have to be a particular Yes track. It sure does sound like it has a Squire-esque bass riff in it (think Fragile) ... with some music that reminds me of Remedy Lane. In fact, much of that track reminds me of PoS.
Rickenbacker = Yes
Just listening to it now.Parts of the album remind me a little of Crimson especially when you get the jazz freak out bits but not getting any string hints of Yes or Genesis. It is something of a rich dish of gourmet delights for a prog fan that perhaps its just too much for some.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.574 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.