Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Posted: December 12 2009 at 20:34
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
If you see it as simple as that, then have it your way. Did you see my post regarding the celestial teapot?
Mike, the Celestial Teapot is not a system of beliefs, not even something argued as truth by anybody, it's only an argument obviously absurd created to discredit the belief in God,
There's no scientist or system of beliefs that believes in this atrocity, there are no Gospels or even oral tradition that mentions it...So there's no need to believe or have faith in it.
On the contrary, there are issues that can be proved wrong.
"Humans need oxygen, so no human being can survive in the vacuum, this can be proved beyond any doubt, you can test all the humans if you want, and all will die, so you can prove this is false.
With simpler examples, it's easier.
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
Some things can't be proven, but a certain probability can be assumed. You can collect hints and clues that make a proposition more or less likely to be true. So when something can neither be proved nor disproved, it doesn't automatically follow that there's an equal chance for it to be true or false.
It depends in your perception of evidence Mike.
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
And especially for the Christian God there's the problem with the Bible and its inconsistencies. For example, take the Second Coming of Christ. AFAIK Jesus said that it would happen in the lifetime of his contemporaries (apostles) ... we're still waiting for it to happen. It's many little nuggets like this which - for me - shift the probability for God's existence near zero percent.
This point is not at all clear, the Bible must not be taken literally, specially in time issues: :
"No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. Be on guard! Be alert! You do not know when that time will come." (NIV, Mark 13:32-33)
So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him. (NIV, Matthew 24:43-44)
Nobody knows.
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
Another point is that there are many competing religions on this planet, and most of them claim that their solution is the only valid one. But they can't be all true. These consistencies make much more sense when you assume that God is a delusion, a false belief without any basis in reality, than when you assume that all those people are right and the Atheists are wrong.
Aren't you the slightest bit worried about all these discrepancies?
By the contrary, the idea of God is present in the vast majority of humans. Some of them see God in a different way, but all have the perception in God.
For example, Jewish, Moslem and Christians are often placed as contradictory, but all believe in the same God of Abraham, it's a strong coincidence despitethe differences.
Even some Hindu texts talk about Jesus, and there's a group of Messianic Jewish who believe in Christ.
I of course believe the Catholic God is the true one, but also believe every God image in human minds is a reflex of the divinity, but humans understood the message in different ways, so they see God from a different perspective.
I see no contradiction, that's why I show the same respect for a Church, a Synagogue and a Mosque, because I believe all are tributes to God, no matter our differences.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - December 12 2009 at 20:38
Joined: October 08 2008
Location: Norwich UK
Status: Offline
Points: 7053
Posted: December 13 2009 at 03:30
Dean wrote:
CPicard wrote:
Why don't you have a pagan/Wiccan thread?
There just aren't enough Wiccan's who believe in Prog. Go to Alt.Gothic or uk.people.gothic and you can't move for them.
I know a Wiccan couple quite well and musically there's not a trace of goth about them - it's all Blackmore's Knight, Steeleye Span and a bit of Gong thrown in for pot luck. They run a Magick Shop in Norwich where they sell most of their charms amulets and other assorted jewellery to... teenage Goths
It's not that I can't find worth in anything, it's just that I can't find worth in enough.
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Posted: December 13 2009 at 03:55
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
By the contrary, the idea of God is present in the vast majority of humans. Some of them see God in a different way, but all have the perception in God.
For example, Jewish, Moslem and Christians are often placed as contradictory, but all believe in the same God of Abraham, it's a strong coincidence despitethe differences.
Even some Hindu texts talk about Jesus, and there's a group of Messianic Jewish who believe in Christ.
Iván
It is nothing to do with coincidence and all to do with geography - if all four of those religions had developed in issolation on seperate continents that would be conincidence so strong that even the most furvent athiest would have difficulty explaining it. If in 1482 Columbus had discovered the Native Americans wearing crucifixes, Captain Cook had found Australian Abouriginies quoting Genesis, had Cortes discovered Moctezuma reading the Qur'an and if a bust of Vishnu had been discovered at Machu Picchu - then that would be an amazingly strong coincidence (even if only one of those had occured it would be pretty spectacular). But they didn't. All four of those religions developed in a relatively small region of the Middle East - that is not a coincidence - it isn't even a surprise.
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Posted: December 13 2009 at 04:10
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Of course I don't believe it, but if I ask respect for my beliefs, I will fight for the same respect for this people's beliefs, no matter how insane may sound to me.
Now, being that in my case I have a different religious faith, it is contradictory with Scientology, so by the act of having faith in the God of Abraham I'm assuming this is false, being that both couldn't be truth simultaneously.
But if you want, and being I don't have any evidence that the Galactic Confederacy is a myth, yes I have faith that Scientology is false.
What happened to this fantastic tolerance of the Catholic church? You're really being quite intolerant here.
Remember that I am not going much further than you are going here. You say that Scientology belief sounds insane to you, and that you assume that it is a false belief. When you look up "delusion", you'll find that "false belief" is just one of its meanings.
But why are you clinging on to using the word faith in that way? There is no faith required for a Catholic to come to the conclusion that Scientology is a false belief ... it directly follows from all the assumptions that Catholics make for their daily lives. It wouldn't normally occur to a typical Catholic to even consider that Scientology may be true. In order to achieve that, a lot of convincing would have to be done, involving dogmatic teachings (like for example "our auditing equipment works - there's no scientific explanation, you *must* take our word for it").
Edited by Mr ProgFreak - December 13 2009 at 04:12
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Posted: December 13 2009 at 04:24
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
If you see it as simple as that, then have it your way. Did you see my post regarding the celestial teapot?
Mike, the Celestial Teapot is not a system of beliefs, not even something argued as truth by anybody, it's only an argument obviously absurd created to discredit the belief in God,
There's no scientist or system of beliefs that believes in this atrocity, there are no Gospels or even oral tradition that mentions it...So there's no need to believe or have faith in it.
On the contrary, there are issues that can be proved wrong.
"Humans need oxygen, so no human being can survive in the vacuum, this can be proved beyond any doubt, you can test all the humans if you want, and all will die, so you can prove this is false.
With simpler examples, it's easier.
I'm sorry to see that it seems to be impossible for you to apply logic in this case. I've seen you apply logic before, and that makes me sad ... well, maybe some day you'll see the obvious flaws in your logic.
Iván wrote:
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
Some things can't be proven, but a certain probability can be assumed. You can collect hints and clues that make a proposition more or less likely to be true. So when something can neither be proved nor disproved, it doesn't automatically follow that there's an equal chance for it to be true or false.
It depends in your perception of evidence Mike.
Well, I have a realistic perception of it, and I see that you don't.
Iván wrote:
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
And especially for the Christian God there's the problem with the Bible and its inconsistencies. For example, take the Second Coming of Christ. AFAIK Jesus said that it would happen in the lifetime of his contemporaries (apostles) ... we're still waiting for it to happen. It's many little nuggets like this which - for me - shift the probability for God's existence near zero percent.
This point is not at all clear, the Bible must not be taken literally, specially in time issues: :
"No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father. Be on guard! Be alert! You do not know when that time will come." (NIV, Mark 13:32-33)
So you also must be ready, because the Son of Man will come at an hour when you do not expect him. (NIV, Matthew 24:43-44)
Nobody knows.
"Nobody knows" ... that's very true. Yet around the world, at this very moment, there may be hundreds of thousands of people who take prophecies like that literally, and change their lives accordingly, *as if* they knew that it was true.
Iván wrote:
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
Another point is that there are many competing religions on this planet, and most of them claim that their solution is the only valid one. But they can't be all true. These consistencies make much more sense when you assume that God is a delusion, a false belief without any basis in reality, than when you assume that all those people are right and the Atheists are wrong.
Aren't you the slightest bit worried about all these discrepancies?
By the contrary, the idea of God is present in the vast majority of humans. Some of them see God in a different way, but all have the perception in God.
For example, Jewish, Moslem and Christians are often placed as contradictory, but all believe in the same God of Abraham, it's a strong coincidence despitethe differences.
Even some Hindu texts talk about Jesus, and there's a group of Messianic Jewish who believe in Christ.
I of course believe the Catholic God is the true one, but also believe every God image in human minds is a reflex of the divinity, but humans understood the message in different ways, so they see God from a different perspective.
I see no contradiction, that's why I show the same respect for a Church, a Synagogue and a Mosque, because I believe all are tributes to God, no matter our differences.
Iván
In Irak there's even Muslims blowing up other Muslims, and in Northern Ireland there's Protestants killing Catholics and the other way round.
This violence comes from the fact that all these religions you named demand in some way or another that its followers interact with God in a special way. That may involve praying, mutilating their children, not collect wood at a certain day of the week, fasting etc.. Anyone who doesn't follow the specific procedures - which are, in most cases, defined in scripture - is a potential threat to the religion, because in the minds of the believers this behavior doesn't please their God. Of course many believers are peaceful and tolerant, but the fundamentalist fanatics aren't. That's why I agree with Christopher Hitchens when he says that "religion poisons everything". Most of us appreciate religion because of its morality and sense of community ... but we could have that directly, without the poisonous side effects of religion.
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Posted: December 13 2009 at 04:28
Dean wrote:
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
By the contrary, the idea of God is present in the vast majority of humans. Some of them see God in a different way, but all have the perception in God.
For example, Jewish, Moslem and Christians are often placed as contradictory, but all believe in the same God of Abraham, it's a strong coincidence despitethe differences.
Even some Hindu texts talk about Jesus, and there's a group of Messianic Jewish who believe in Christ.
Iván
It is nothing to do with coincidence and all to do with geography - if all four of those religions had developed in issolation on seperate continents that would be conincidence so strong that even the most furvent athiest would have difficulty explaining it. If in 1482 Columbus had discovered the Native Americans wearing crucifixes, Captain Cook had found Australian Abouriginies quoting Genesis, had Cortes discovered Moctezuma reading the Qur'an and if a bust of Vishnu had been discovered at Machu Picchu - then that would be an amazingly strong coincidence (even if only one of those had occured it would be pretty spectacular). But they didn't. All four of those religions developed in a relatively small region of the Middle East - that is not a coincidence - it isn't even a surprise.
A really nice presentation about the (possible) origins or religious belief.
And btw, as always when I'm posting videos and which I thought was too obvious to mention explicitly: watching the video is not mandatory.
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Posted: December 13 2009 at 04:40
el dingo wrote:
Dean wrote:
CPicard wrote:
Why don't you have a pagan/Wiccan thread?
There just aren't enough Wiccan's who believe in Prog. Go to Alt.Gothic or uk.people.gothic and you can't move for them.
I know a Wiccan couple quite well and musically there's not a trace of goth about them - it's all Blackmore's Knight, Steeleye Span and a bit of Gong thrown in for pot luck. They run a Magick Shop in Norwich where they sell most of their charms amulets and other assorted jewellery to... teenage Goths
Unfortunately this sort of superstition is on the rise ... TV series like Charmed, Buffy or Ghost Whisperer are no help either.
Great video from Andy Thomson, enjoyed it immensely. Now I know why my heckles rise when I hear those poseurs describe themselves as 'afro americans' without any trace of irony. We are ALL africans.
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Posted: December 13 2009 at 10:18
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
Dean wrote:
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
By the contrary, the idea of God is present in the vast majority of humans. Some of them see God in a different way, but all have the perception in God.
For example, Jewish, Moslem and Christians are often placed as contradictory, but all believe in the same God of Abraham, it's a strong coincidence despitethe differences.
Even some Hindu texts talk about Jesus, and there's a group of Messianic Jewish who believe in Christ.
Iván
It is nothing to do with coincidence and all to do with geography - if all four of those religions had developed in issolation on seperate continents that would be conincidence so strong that even the most furvent athiest would have difficulty explaining it. If in 1482 Columbus had discovered the Native Americans wearing crucifixes, Captain Cook had found Australian Abouriginies quoting Genesis, had Cortes discovered Moctezuma reading the Qur'an and if a bust of Vishnu had been discovered at Machu Picchu - then that would be an amazingly strong coincidence (even if only one of those had occured it would be pretty spectacular). But they didn't. All four of those religions developed in a relatively small region of the Middle East - that is not a coincidence - it isn't even a surprise.
A really nice presentation about the (possible) origins or religious belief.
And btw, as always when I'm posting videos and which I thought was too obvious to mention explicitly: is watching the video is not mandatory.
Mike, your argument suffers from the wrong approach. You treat religion like science, you want "proof". But religion is not about proof at all. Science is good at answering the question "how?", but it remains silent to the question "why?". "Big Bang" is definitely not the answer to that question.
Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195
Posted: December 13 2009 at 10:24
^ why should religion be more qualified than science to answer the "why"?
BTW: The Big Bang (which actually has been shown not to have been the beginning of the universe, as explained for example in the Lawrence Krauss presentations) is a bit of a far cry from the origins or religions ...
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Posted: December 13 2009 at 10:46
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
^ why should religion be more qualified than science to answer the "why"?
BTW: The Big Bang (which actually has been shown not to have been the beginning of the universe, as explained for example in the Lawrence Krauss presentations) is a bit of a far cry from the origins or religions ...
Still the wrong approach, Mike. I am a science nut myself and studied mathematics, physics and computer sciences. Yet I see no contradiction between the existence of a deity and the way the universe is built. On the contrary, the very way the universe is structured makes me believe in a spirit behind it all.
Religions are all about answering the question "why". Whether you believe in them or not is another question. You behave as if all that matters is proof. However, are you aware how many things you yourself take for granted without having any proof at all? That's not a special feat of yours, it is true for all human beings, and be it just the belief "Mr. Miller, my neighbour, is an assh***". You never ask proof for these many things, you simply do believe them. Life and reality are not all about proof at all; there is more to it than that.
Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19557
Posted: December 13 2009 at 11:46
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
What happened to this fantastic tolerance of the Catholic church? You're really being quite intolerant here.
This is a silly question that proves you don't read the posts, my first sentence reads clearly
Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:
Of course I don't believe it, but if I ask respect for my beliefs, I will fight for the same respect for this people's beliefs, no matter how insane may sound to me.
Tollerance is not to share their believes or to find them logic, tollerance is precisely to find them wrong and still be ready toi fight for their right to believe.
The only thing I can give to Scientologists (and the onlñy thing hey can ask from me) is RESPECT FOR THEIR RIGHT TO BELIEVE, even if I don't share anything them, you can't ask me to believe in their dogmas, because I have a different religion, but respect for them, is the prove for tollerance.
And it's not only words, I have taken cases of religious discrimination, two of them for free, while you say that every religion should vanish.
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
Remember that I am not going much further than you are going here. You say that Scientology belief sounds insane to you, and that you assume that it is a false belief. When you look up "delusion", you'll find that "false belief" is just one of its meanings.
However they sound to me is not transcendental, unlike you, I am willing to fight for their right to believe in their dogmas, no matter how insane they sound to me
Mr ProgFreak wrote:
But why are you clinging on to using the word faith in that way? There is no faith required for a Catholic to come to the conclusion that Scientology is a false belief ... it directly follows from all the assumptions that Catholics make for their daily lives. It wouldn't normally occur to a typical Catholic to even consider that Scientology may be true. In order to achieve that, a lot of convincing would have to be done, involving dogmatic teachings (like for example "our auditing equipment works - there's no scientific explanation, you *must* take our word for it").
You are obsessed with Scientific explanations Mike, this is faith, religion, to believe despite the absence of physical knowledge, so If I strongly believe the Scientologist dogmas are false, I'm having faith (Faith(1): firm belief in something for which there is no proof ) that this dogmas are false.
I don't have prove that this guys are wrong, despíte this fact I believe they are wrong (even when they're entitled to believe in what they want), then it's faith, call it negative faith if you want, but it's simply faith.
Iván
Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - December 13 2009 at 23:56
Joined: October 03 2008
Location: Là, sui monti.
Status: Offline
Points: 10841
Posted: December 13 2009 at 14:54
stonebeard wrote:
Why should a "why?" even matter.
To me, it seems strangely appropriate but unsettling that the universe just exists for no reason.
I think the same things: I don't understand why people ask "why is there something rather than anything?" The word "chance" seems to make people uneasy. I mean: protons, electrons, neutrinos, quarks... are just particles of matter. They don't have a mind, a soul and, therefore, an intelligence.
Joined: November 14 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 1313
Posted: December 13 2009 at 17:38
First was I a protestant-christian, then agnostic for some time and now I am a pantheistic neopagan.
I don't think that only one god is likely, I do not believe in sins, heaven, hell, paradise or last judgement either but I have also come to the conclusion that no god or no spiritual might is a litte bit too few to me. So that would be my present behavior towards atheism and agnosticism, I think.
Peace and love, Badabec.
Mesmo a tristeza da gente era mais bela E além disso se via da janela Um cantinho de céu e o Redentor
- Antônio Carlos Jobim, Toquinho & Vinícius de Moraes - Carta ao Tom 74
assssssociations from my childhood a la What About Bob.
The New Atheist position of simplifying all things complex is laughable to those with a little noggin in their noodle. Don't take the easy way out. It's old, simple, and leads to the dark side.
You are quite a fine person, and I am very fond of you. But you are only quite a little fellow, in a wide world, after all.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.834 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.