Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 21:30 |
Just saw a union guy on the news trying to defend the state liquor stores. Made me want to f**king throw up.
|
|
Trademark
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 21 2006
Location: oHIo
Status: Offline
Points: 1009
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 21:33 |
Train A is heading toward Philadelphia at 60 mph. Train B is in Nevada at 85 mph. Both are on tracks. So knowing that, who do you save from drowning; yourself or your mother?
Edited by Trademark - November 04 2010 at 21:37
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32530
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 21:40 |
Padraic wrote:
Just saw a union guy on the news trying to defend the state liquor stores. Made me want to f**king throw up. | What could he possibly have to say?
Edited by Epignosis - November 04 2010 at 21:40
|
|
|
stonebeard
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 21:40 |
Trademark wrote:
Train A is heading toward Philadelphia at 60 mph. Train B is in Nevada at 85 mph. Both are on tracks. So knowing that, who do you save from drowning; yourself or your mother?
|
The train.
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 21:47 |
Epignosis wrote:
Padraic wrote:
Just saw a union guy on the news trying to defend the state liquor stores. Made me want to f**king throw up. |
What could he possibly have to say?
|
Nothing of value, he sort of just yelled a lot and kept interrupting the host and "other viewpoint" guy (it was one of those tri-panel thingys).
The privatization issue is getting legs again because we're flush with Republicans now in state government, and because we have a large budget shortfall. Selling the stores would net the state about $2 billion by current estimates.
It needs to go further than that, though, a lot of laws need to be changed and/or scrapped as well.
|
|
Trademark
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 21 2006
Location: oHIo
Status: Offline
Points: 1009
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 21:57 |
The state would make more money by keeping the stores and simply raising the profit margin by a nickel a bottle. If the state's gone Libertopian the rational people will probably try to drink themselves to death anyway thereby balancing the budget.
|
|
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 21:59 |
Oh yes. The government not having a monopoly on the sale of liquor. What a libertarian paradise.
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 22:10 |
Trademark wrote:
The state would make more money by keeping the stores and simply raising the profit margin by a nickel a bottle. If the state's gone Libertopian the rational people will probably try to drink themselves to death anyway thereby balancing the budget. |
God forbid we have private liquor sales, like that bastion of nutjob Libertarianism, Hawaii.
C'mon, this is what most of the people of the state want, and what they have in a lot of states now. Why should the state be the only one to be able to sell me a bottle of wine? This isn't abstract Randian stuff, it's just common sense.
Or maybe you were just trolling.
Edited by Padraic - November 04 2010 at 22:15
|
|
Slartibartfast
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam
Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 22:15 |
Padraic wrote:
God forbid we have private liquor sales, like that bastion of nutjob Libertarianism, Hawaii. |
Oh, I do hope you are joking about that state. We went on honeymoon there. Probably the best state in the union. And don't say "because it is so far away".
Edited by Slartibartfast - November 04 2010 at 22:15
|
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 22:17 |
Slartibartfast wrote:
Padraic wrote:
God forbid we have private liquor sales, like that bastion of nutjob Libertarianism, Hawaii. |
Oh, I do hope you are joking about that state. We went on honeymoon there. Probably the best state in the union. And don't say "because it is so far away".
|
I was joking, it's as liberal as it gets, but you can buy beer in any ABC store, of which they have one every 10 feet in Honolulu. You can buy any sort of alcohol in the grocery stores.
I spent about 6 weeks total out there working.
Edited by Padraic - November 04 2010 at 22:17
|
|
Henry Plainview
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 22:33 |
Slartibartfast wrote:
Padraic wrote:
God forbid we have private liquor sales, like that bastion of nutjob Libertarianism, Hawaii. |
Oh, I do hope you are joking about that state. We went on honeymoon there. Probably the best state in the union. And don't say "because it is so far away".
|
I've heard Hawaii is a horrible place to actually live.
|
if you own a sodastream i hate you
|
|
Padraic
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 16 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 31169
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 22:45 |
Henry Plainview wrote:
Slartibartfast wrote:
Padraic wrote:
God forbid we have private liquor sales, like that bastion of nutjob Libertarianism, Hawaii. |
Oh, I do hope you are joking about that state. We went on honeymoon there. Probably the best state in the union. And don't say "because it is so far away".
|
I've heard Hawaii is a horrible place to actually live. |
I wouldn't want to live there. The Hawaiian "music" being constantly piped everywhere made me want to kill myself.
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32530
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 23:56 |
Egh...I am moving back to NC...state income tax and ABC stores....I am gonna miss keeping more of my income and buying Evan Williams Green Label by the liter for 9 bones at this place up the street.
*sigh*
However, family.
Also, a $470 a month house with a big ass yard and a deck we get to rent to own.
The scales have been tipped.
|
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: November 04 2010 at 23:56 |
Only knew one person from Hawaii His opinion on living there? Well, since I've known him he's chosen to live in PA with his father so that should say something
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: November 05 2010 at 01:30 |
One question Libertarians... Rob has mentioned Hitler and how if we start allowing little rights to be taken in specific circumstances, the chances of having something like nazism are higher... So, in Libertarian Land, do people like him cease to exist? Arguably, a narcissist dangerous personality would be very likely to emerge in Libertarian Land. What would stop him? It wouldn't be the fact that we regard certain rights as inalienable, untouchable, but the fact that the structure and system of society would grant very little control to a single person. In Nazi Germany, is not like suddenly all germans decided to strip jews off their rights; a few horrible people acting selfishly elevated their ridiculous ideas to principles and even dogmas, and then they sold them to the people, also gaining total power due to the structure (or lack thereof in a way) of society... Yes, we can put all this hypothetical scenarios and make some of us look like little-Adolfs but in thr end there will always be real Adolfs who, given power, wouldn't give a damn even if everybody else holds deep principles. Libertarian Land would be less likely to yield another Third Reich mostly because it would be quite difficult to attain the necessary power...
|
|
|
The T
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
|
Posted: November 05 2010 at 01:33 |
|
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: November 05 2010 at 01:45 |
I would HOPE the Libertarians would say the consumers right to class action suits can not be inhibited. After all, its all about rights...and not business right?
Though in real life land libertarianism does not seem so ideal but just another platform to be outright pro-business, and not about rights. IMHO *emphasis on opinion*
|
|
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: November 05 2010 at 07:43 |
JJLehto wrote:
I would HOPE the Libertarians would say the consumers right to class action suits can not be inhibited. After all, its all about rights...and not business right?
Though in real life land libertarianism does not seem so ideal but just another platform to be outright pro-business, and not about rights. IMHO *emphasis on opinion*
|
It's a bad opinion. Go thread through a libertarian site and look at how they blast big business, banks, and the super rich. Libertarianism is essentially populist in nature.
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: November 05 2010 at 07:45 |
The T wrote:
One question Libertarians... Rob has mentioned Hitler and how if we start allowing little rights to be taken in specific circumstances, the chances of having something like nazism are higher... So, in Libertarian Land, do people like him cease to exist? Arguably, a narcissist dangerous personality would be very likely to emerge in Libertarian Land. What would stop him? It wouldn't be the fact that we regard certain rights as inalienable, untouchable, but the fact that the structure and system of society would grant very little control to a single person. In Nazi Germany, is not like suddenly all germans decided to strip jews off their rights; a few horrible people acting selfishly elevated their ridiculous ideas to principles and even dogmas, and then they sold them to the people, also gaining total power due to the structure (or lack thereof in a way) of society... Yes, we can put all this hypothetical scenarios and make some of us look like little-Adolfs but in thr end there will always be real Adolfs who, given power, wouldn't give a damn even if everybody else holds deep principles. Libertarian Land would be less likely to yield another Third Reich mostly because it would be quite difficult to attain the necessary power... |
There'd be no power structure for him to seize. No laws he could pass to justify his actions. No position he could be elected to or gain. Any attempt of a new Hitler would be no different than a criminal, which is how he should have been regarded.
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: November 05 2010 at 08:40 |
Please also remember that Hitler was Democratically elected. It's not like it was just one insane guy who seized control of the entire country by force. The people wanted him there, at least for a while, and he had the loyalty of the military. In a Libertarian government (I almost said "Libertopia" there. Damn you, Trademark) the leader of the country (if there even were such a person) would have very little ability to do anything. Where would he get the money? But of course, this, like all other forms of Democracy, only works f it's what the majority of the people want, otherwise they'll just keep voting to give him more and more power.
|
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.