If The Beatles kept going..Prog? |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | |||
mrcozdude
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 25 2007 Location: Devon,UK. Status: Offline Points: 2078 |
Posted: April 07 2009 at 13:51 | ||
I think the Beatles got the perfect combination of styles and song writing.I actually think if they were to become more progressive they would of had less of an impact I can only imagine them sounding more along the lines of the moody blues/early Floyd and replace screaming teenage girls with middle aged bearded men possibly screaming equally as loud.
|
|||
mr.cub
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 06 2009 Location: Lexington, VA Status: Offline Points: 971 |
Posted: April 07 2009 at 18:14 | ||
I believe Lennon told the press if they wanted to hear what a new Beatles album would sound like he said look no further than a Wings recording. Not sure if that was a jest on Lennon's part considering his aversion to Paul at the time but I think it is interesting considering the topic
|
|||
|
|||
Atavachron
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Offline Points: 65305 |
Posted: April 07 2009 at 18:40 | ||
^ well we know Lennon very much liked Band on the Run
|
|||
Odisseos
Forum Newbie Joined: March 08 2009 Location: Miami Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Posted: September 02 2009 at 18:30 | ||
If The Beatles kept going Prog they could sound like King Crimson's Thrak (Dinosaur, Walking on Air, People, Sex Sleep Eat Drink Dream) or may be like Nektar's Remember the Future
|
|||
Odisseos
Forum Newbie Joined: March 08 2009 Location: Miami Status: Offline Points: 10 |
Posted: September 02 2009 at 18:35 | ||
Or, who knows, like Tears for Fears' Elemental
|
|||
SgtPepper67
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 17 2007 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 530 |
Posted: September 02 2009 at 19:22 | ||
I always thought it was Harrison who said that, and I always had the feeling he didn't mean it in a good way. |
|||
In the end the love you take is equal to the love you made... |
|||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: September 02 2009 at 19:38 | ||
Well, they did start to make prog albums back in the late '60's. Not a uniform point of agreement on PA . I think Hendrix would have gone more in a jazz/rock-fusion direction. |
|||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|||
ExittheLemming
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 19 2007 Location: Penal Colony Status: Offline Points: 11420 |
Posted: September 03 2009 at 06:50 | ||
Best two example of what I envisage a Beatles song might have sounded like had they survived into the prog years would have to be:
(McCartney) re Counting Out Time from the Lamb Lies Down on Broadway. (Lennon) re Sex, Sleep, Eat. Drink. Dream by King Crimson Both still unashamedly poppy but cut from more sophisticated cloth than that of the fab four's heyday. |
|||
CPicard
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 03 2008 Location: Lā, sui monti. Status: Offline Points: 10841 |
Posted: September 03 2009 at 16:01 | ||
Mmmmm... Dubious. I think he would have tried a return to the blues, a bit of free-jazz, sometimes jazz-rock or even a fusion of hard-rock and funk. He wouldn't have sticked to one genre. |
|||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: September 03 2009 at 18:18 | ||
Guys, they could have gone anywhere. They went from a rock and roll band, to a psych band, and then a prog band in a matter of 7 years. If they went on for another 20 they might be making electronic for all we know!
|
|||
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
|||
Slartibartfast
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam Joined: April 29 2006 Location: Atlantais Status: Offline Points: 29630 |
Posted: September 03 2009 at 18:19 | ||
Dubious? Dubious? Yet, you're kind of agreeing with me. I do think you're right that he probably would gone diverse.
OK that's a scary thought. Edited by Slartibartfast - September 03 2009 at 18:21 |
|||
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
|
|||
J-Man
Prog Reviewer Joined: August 07 2008 Location: Philadelphia,PA Status: Offline Points: 7826 |
Posted: September 03 2009 at 18:27 | ||
I agree |
|||
Check out my YouTube channel! http://www.youtube.com/user/demiseoftime |
|||
Jozef
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 17 2008 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 2204 |
Posted: September 09 2009 at 12:08 | ||
I was discussing the same thing with some friends of mine who are big fans of the Beatles. One of them agreed and thought they had the potential. I believe they started to develop a "proggish" sound near the end of the 60s during the recording of Abbey Road and Let It Be. One can argue it started as early as the White album. I think it would have been very interesting had they continued on much longer.
|
|||
|
|||
Alberto Muņoz
Forum Senior Member Joined: July 26 2006 Location: Mexico Status: Offline Points: 3577 |
Posted: September 11 2009 at 16:39 | ||
I think that if The beatles kept going, probably they have ended playing some high quality 70's rock stadium music, and at the same time playing some AOR music, too.
|
|||
|
|||
ModernRocker79
Forum Groupie Joined: November 02 2008 Status: Offline Points: 62 |
Posted: September 12 2009 at 10:12 | ||
Anything that is pop that is rock related or experimental with the Beatles migh have started and that includes crossover prog which about half of Abbey Road is. Now that should be put to a poll.
|
|||
Kashmir75
Forum Senior Member Joined: June 25 2009 Status: Offline Points: 1029 |
Posted: September 14 2009 at 23:10 | ||
I think they may well have gone even more progressive, yes.
Look at sixties Pink Floyd. Or Yes, for that matter. Both, in the late 60s, were playing psychedelic music. By the dawn of the seventies, both had morphed into prog. The Beatles kind of already were prog. If Sgt Pepper, or The White Album isn't progressive, then what the heck is? If you look at another of their contemporaries, The Who, we have a band which went from Mod rockers, to psychedelia, to rock operas, to disco-ish (the Who are You? era), in the space of a decade. So its hard to predict where the Beatles may have gone. One of the most rewarding aspects of following a band's career, is to see how they have changed over the years (unless its someone like AC/DC, who release the same record every time!). Be careful what you wish for, though. It's better the Beatles ending when they did, rather than possibly turning into AOR tryhards had they survived into the 80s!
|
|||
Hello, mirror. So glad to see you, my friend. It's been a while...
|
|||
JLocke
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
Posted: September 15 2009 at 17:10 | ||
Well, in my opinion, they DID go Prog. Crossover Prog fits them perfectly, because there are plenty of Space-Rock, Symphonic Prog and RIO/Avant-Prog present in their later works to warrant that. However, there is still more Pop than Prog in their entire catalogue. So Crossover is where I consider them fitting.
It will never happen, though. Why? Because too many people here woul get their panties in a wad if their precious Prog genere were 'tainted' by the fab four. Unfortunate, because listening to tracks like A Day In the Life, Elanor Rigby, Revolution 9, Tomorrow Never Knows, Piggies, Goodnight, Come Together, etc. I can clearly hear the Prog Rock as plain as day. |
|||
JLocke
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 18 2007 Status: Offline Points: 4900 |
Posted: September 15 2009 at 17:16 | ||
I don't even think that's arguable-- they WERE a Prog band by that point in their career. Have you not heard ''Revolution 9''? Hell, they were even Progressive in many ways by the time Revolver came out. And let us not forget they beat The Moody Blues by a few months in releasing the first concept album. To say they only became merely 'proggish' by their last album, then say that it's only arguable that maybe The White Album was when it began, is being very unfair to them.
I rest my case. Edited by p0mt3 - September 15 2009 at 17:23 |
|||
theteaclub_dan
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 05 2008 Location: Barrington NJ Status: Offline Points: 166 |
Posted: December 04 2009 at 18:37 | ||
I thought this was kind of a fun idea...
http://www.helium.com/items/1104862-speculating-what-songs-would-have-been-on-the-beatles-next-album Obviously this can't be really accurate, but some of these songs from the Beatles' first or second solo records, I can see fitting onto what could have been the "next Beatles album"... 1. Instant Karma 2. Uncle Albert 3. All Things Must Pass 4. Imagine 5. Every Night 6. I'd Have You Anytime 7. Love 8. Junk 9. What Is Life I dunno! |
|||
Devonsidhe
Forum Groupie Joined: April 21 2010 Location: PDX, OR Status: Offline Points: 74 |
Posted: August 18 2010 at 01:36 | ||
I seem to remember John saying it as well. It's been a while but did both John and Paul record a song on their solo stuff against the other? Wish I could remember which songs they were.
Either way, for the Beatles to have stayed together, they would have had to get along which would have made them more cooperative at least. Considering the different style each member went after the break up, they would have had to be prog just to stay in key with each other.
|
|||
Even a man who stumbles around in the dark will influence those he does not see.
|
|||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |