Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Syd Barrett: Real Genius or Real Hype?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSyd Barrett: Real Genius or Real Hype?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 7>
Author
Message
Komandant Shamal View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 02 2015
Location: Yugoslavia
Status: Offline
Points: 954
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2015 at 11:27
Originally posted by Finnforest Finnforest wrote:

Anyone think there are parallels between Syd and Brian Jones in terms of the band relationships?
i dont think there are any parallels cause nobody killed Syd.
Back to Top
WeepingElf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 18 2013
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 373
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2015 at 14:39
Originally posted by Komandant Shamal Komandant Shamal wrote:

Let me ask you please why he never formed a new band in 70s and to be a leader of that band? due to mental problems, right? well, after reading the articles with the facts about him i dont buy that story that he was so big psycho that he wasnt able to make ONE ingenious lp in 70s - with a band - if he was a genius.


When I say that he had his "streaks of genius", I didn't intend to say that he was a genius.  Having "streaks of" something is not the same as being that something.  He simply was incapable of forming his own band, and his solo work is not particularly interesting (as far as I have heard it).  Yet, he had an occasional interesting or even brilliant idea.  At any rate, a sense of humour which is missing from the later work of Pink Floyd.

Some people say that he was so deranged that he still thought he was a band member when he showed up at Abbey Road in '75, saying that he was "ready to take his part", but I think he was just joking about that - that would very much have been in his character.

There is absolutely NO WAY Pink Floyd could have come up with something as sophisticated as The Dark Side of the Moon or Shine On You Crazy Diamond with Barrett at the helm.

Quote However Barrett solo stuff was re-discovered in 90s by indie-rock artists due to that lets say "proto indie" sound at his two acid-folk lps so as an already forgotten solo artist with a catalogue of two albums he get a recognition by a new crowd and isnt that something very nice? his fanbase should be all happy with that because he wasnt a genius.


Yes.

... brought to you by the Weeping Elf

"What does Elvish rock music sound like?" - "Yes."

Back to Top
HackettFan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: June 20 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2015 at 23:22
I'm glad this thread was opened because I was wondering myself not long ago what other PA members thought of him. I don't like his pop songs. They never fit in cohesively with extended pieces like Interstellar Overdive and such. I'm not sure Syd liked them either given how he would de-emphasize them live. Syd brought forward a different manner of playing slide and an enthusiastic use of delay (echo-like sound). This was cutting edge for the time in the truest Prog sense. That sound seemed to influence Amon Düül II (who influenced in turn all of Krautrock) and early Nektar. I read once, however, in a David Gilmour interview decades ago in which he claimed to have shown Syd that slide technique. He was chafing a bit at accusations that he was plundering the technique from Syd. I have no idea where to find that article now unfortunately.
Back to Top
Komandant Shamal View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 02 2015
Location: Yugoslavia
Status: Offline
Points: 954
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 09 2015 at 23:32
Originally posted by WeepingElf WeepingElf wrote:

Originally posted by Komandant Shamal Komandant Shamal wrote:

Let me ask you please why he never formed a new band in 70s and to be a leader of that band? due to mental problems, right? well, after reading the articles with the facts about him i dont buy that story that he was so big psycho that he wasnt able to make ONE ingenious lp in 70s - with a band - if he was a genius.


When I say that he had his "streaks of genius", I didn't intend to say that he was a genius.  Having "streaks of" something is not the same as being that something.  He simply was incapable of forming his own band, and his solo work is not particularly interesting (as far as I have heard it).  Yet, he had an occasional interesting or even brilliant idea.  At any rate, a sense of humour which is missing from the later work of Pink Floyd.

Some people say that he was so deranged that he still thought he was a band member when he showed up at Abbey Road in '75, saying that he was "ready to take his part", but I think he was just joking about that - that would very much have been in his character.

There is absolutely NO WAY Pink Floyd could have come up with something as sophisticated as The Dark Side of the Moon or Shine On You Crazy Diamond with Barrett at the helm.

Quote However Barrett solo stuff was re-discovered in 90s by indie-rock artists due to that lets say "proto indie" sound at his two acid-folk lps so as an already forgotten solo artist with a catalogue of two albums he get a recognition by a new crowd and isnt that something very nice? his fanbase should be all happy with that because he wasnt a genius.


Yes.

My question was just rhetorical. IMO, Syd Barrett wasnt an artist able to survive that revolution made by Hendrix. And he wasnt only one who wasnt able for that adaptation. In fact Gilmour was that bridge that made possible for Pink Floyd to survive that dramatical change. Without David Gilmour, i think the band could have been disbanded only  - no Gilmour, no Floyd 70s stuff at all.

Edited by Komandant Shamal - August 10 2015 at 00:28
Back to Top
WeepingElf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 18 2013
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 373
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2015 at 09:06
Originally posted by Komandant Shamal Komandant Shamal wrote:

My question was just rhetorical. IMO, Syd Barrett wasnt an artist able to survive that revolution made by Hendrix. And he wasnt only one who wasnt able for that adaptation. In fact Gilmour was that bridge that made possible for Pink Floyd to survive that dramatical change. Without David Gilmour, i think the band could have been disbanded only  - no Gilmour, no Floyd 70s stuff at all.


Of course.  I missed the irony, sorry.  But there are too many people around who seriously think that firing Syd was the worst decision Pink Floyd ever made.  Of course, those people usually dislike the Pink Floyd of the 70s and prog in general ...

... brought to you by the Weeping Elf

"What does Elvish rock music sound like?" - "Yes."

Back to Top
bucka001 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 16 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 864
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2015 at 11:47
I don't know if he was a genius, but he was largely responsible for the only Pink Floyd album I like (well... Saucerful was good too). It's true that PF wouldn't have gone on to do Dark Side if Syd stayed in the band... another feather in his cap!! ;-)
jc
Back to Top
Pastmaster View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 23 2015
Location: Spiderwood Farm
Status: Offline
Points: 1774
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2015 at 11:53
Real Hype easily, I don't know how anyone could call 'Bike' genius.
Back to Top
aglasshouse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 27 2014
Location: riding the MOAB
Status: Offline
Points: 1505
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2015 at 12:36
Syd Barrett was just another loon from the 60's to me. Piper is bad and nonsensical and was really just another psych album of the decade. The main reason it's still known is because it's Pink Floyd and regarded so well for the same reason. I'd say it's definitely hype keeping it afloat. 
http://fryingpanmedia.com
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2015 at 13:37
Originally posted by micky micky wrote:

genius?  It really does seem to be a label tossed about too easily

he was creative and was definitely a tragic figure.. but Christ man... he wasn't the only one of that era. Let's call them all genius's as well.

Skip Spence.. now that was the tragic loss ..cutting the heart of what could have been one of the greats of the era.... Floyd continued on and prospered. Moby Grape couldn't and didn't.
Hmm... I'm staying out of this debate, but I don't feel that genius is overused in the music world because it usually denotes an innovator with a specific vision for a specific form of music, as opposed to a musical virtuoso. Now, that's a term that's  been really abused.
If we look closer at artists like Spence with the Oar album, editing had a lot to do with how much of a 'genius' that Skip sounded like. If you listen to the Sundazed remaster with the previously unreleased bonus tracks included, most of the bonus cuts were Skip meandering on bass (he was a good bassist, though) with stream of consciousness lyrics. What worked was included on the original 1969 Oar vinyl. What didn't was left on the cutting room floor, as the expression goes. So, there's a lot more involved in what makes up a genius, then who we consider one to be. 
 


Edited by SteveG - August 10 2015 at 13:57
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2015 at 19:37
Syd Barrett was definitely unique with his writing..however he was very rebellious against the corporate music industry. He had money, popularity, and Pink Floyd were being set up for the proper breaks a band needs to succeed in life. Unfortunately for many around him, he wasn't interested in that stuff..because he thought it was wrong for him and generally wrong in the righteous sense. He was a very intelligent man who saw no light at the end of the tunnel for this hyped up "Pop Star" image...which!...he found contrived. Although in the early days he dressed in the wildest British Psychedelic fashion, looked very bubbly/excited/happy in pictures and rubbed off that way to his friends. He was on a positive path! He obtained a high level for that and then changed his mind after "See Emily Play" and Piper began to circulate globally. The "Tower Records" red label and the striped were pretty well known when I was a child. During these times where he felt like a spirit flying upward socially and artistically, he make certain snooty comments to the press regarding being sort of "anti-commercial" and because "See Emily Play" was a hit, he was offended and annoyed by the overwhelming process of the industry who often attempted to mold ANY artist into their commercial image to gain profit. Syd Barrett seemed like he was a noble/sincere fanatic of any creation of art...(poetry or music), he seemed as if he didn't want anyone to eventually touch his art and contrive it and may have already quietly been offended over his surroundings socially in the studio, touring, and overall presentation. 



Then he got deeper into LSD and decided with an "attitude" to play with these people's minds. As Roger Waters often said..."Many of the things he did were actually very funny". I totally agree and in "67 ..society had Lenny Bruce, but they probably wouldn't have understood Syd Barrett. He pulled off insane capers in the television studios, constantly setting the cameraman up. When Dick Clark asked Syd..."Syd, you wrote most of the music"..Syd replies, with his hand on his hip.."Yeah, that's right"..and the way he pronounces the word "right" is like..."Yeah, that's right wtf are you gonna do about it?" Or it can be taken that way if the word "right" is phrased like a note traveling upward or changing a low pitch to a higher pitch influences people to think you might have an attitude or they feel like they are bothering you. Lol! Around this period he began to set people up and it made them look like jackasses. He did it this with Roger Waters when he tried to teach him "Have You Got It Yet?" and then he set Norman Smith up having him call a Salvation Army band into the studio, with Syd not arriving until very late, and when asked by Norman Smith "Syd, what do you want them to play?", Syd replied: "I don't know really, well, play anything" "Play anything they'd like" 


Regarding this hyped up glamour on Syd for the last 3 or 4 decades, Syd would be in fact right wouldn't he? He was right to feel destructive to that industry...because look at what they did to him now? Some people get the impression that he was just a clown. Not really. He may have not been a classically trained guitarist or a Ritchie Blackmore, but he wrote songs on the guitar and that's all that mattered. It was the style he created later defined..as "Space Rock" or some folks call it Psychedelic Space Rock. Tags are tags. I'm making reference to the point of Syd Barrett possibly being the first person to create the overall "Space Rock" style and sound, which influentially took hold of many "Space Rock" bands throughout the 70's. Another observation on his writing would tell that he may have been the first person to combine a kind of childlike literature in Rock music. Sometimes with a subtle approach and it is bewildering! One album only with the Floyd and I still think it's just as good as Sgt. Pepper regarding it's sophistication as an art form...however just different regarding the various aspects he creates to a song. "Matilda Mother" had well structured, pre-planned sections. He was definitely a true innovator! He influenced many artists in the world to capture something different in songwriting and that's a pretty difficult thing to do. Think about it? He influenced bands for decades after ...however he was just an innocent guy that rebelled against the industry in his own bizarre fashion. Some people in the past have attributed this to the LSD. I for one, do not. He knew exactly what he was doing by playing games on "The Pat Boone Show" and everyone else who complained. Nick Mason: "Should I feel compassion...or shall I kill him?" 


Syd Barrett sort of spoiled Pink Floyd's high ideals then , but not now..not in the present because Syd Barrett taught Roger Waters methods, concepts..on writing and Waters remembering all of that, and proceeded to master writing and incorporate Syd's influence. Sections of "Julia Dream", "It Would Be So Nice", "Crying Song", Part 2 and part 3 of "The Narrow Way", "Free Four", "Breathe (In the air)" and "Mother" from The Wall..are all very influenced by Syd Barrett's structure and melody. The song "Opel" ..if re-done,,with choir, bass, electric guitar, and keyboards would sound like a Pink Floyd song belonging to the "Animals", "Pigs On The Wing" period. Some material Syd Barrett wrote later for solo albums ..seemed to influence Pink Floyd's later writing. He was a very unique individual in the history of Rock music. He was a natural.


Edited by TODDLER - August 10 2015 at 19:40
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2015 at 21:15
Roger Waters, Rick Wright, and David Gilmour , (Gilmour to a less degree), were all influenced By Syd Barrett's original style of writing. In the early days of the Floyd, Waters and Wright didn't actually know how to write or form structure before harmony or have insight on what to leave out that sounded unprofessional, unfitting, or even logically incorrect. Over a period of time...they observed Syd Barrett's ideas on writing a little more closely and after he was gone, they began to write and everything came natural to them over a course of time. I've done this with musician friends that died, where I'm writing a piece, strumming or finger picking a chord and thinking "what would Bobby have done?" and that's because he influenced me to bring his spirit or way of doing things into my music. It's as simple as that. It is the overall psychological impression and influence of someone else in your life that can cause you to either slightly emulate them, or write exactly like them. For Waters, it was evident in the song "If" and several short songs on "The Wall". Originally Rick Wright was adding very special keyboard parts to Syd Barrett's songs and really not writing anything himself...just adding ideas to a structure already written by Syd. "Take Up Thy Stethoscope And Walk" is not exactly good songwriting to me. It could never compare to "Astronomy Domine". You can personally do so many things with that song. If you wanted to...you could add creepy violins playing the 1-2-3-, 1-2-3- pattern during the verse. You could easily change that song into Symphonic or you could allow organ to dominate it as an ELP version. Anyone who can write a song that gives most musicians visions on how to do it differently or actually observing dimensions which are evident and inspiring ideas to re-record the piece....is usually a genius. 


Syd Barrett's influence on "Punk Rock" had mostly to do with the sound of his "Telecaster" and his idea to emulate "Sci-fi themes of the 60's...which...almost every guitar player from that generation did. The Ventures, The T-Bones, The Surfaris were in the "Surf Rock" scene of the early 60's, yet recorded and also covered various Sci-Fi themes of the 60's. "Surf Rock" style and "Sci'Fi Theme style guitar playing was a sound cemented into "Punk Rock". Syd Barrett incorporated that style in songs like "Lucifer Sam" "Astronomy Domine" and "Interstellar Overdrive". However....he was singing some of the songs and that edge to combine both, influenced driving "Punk Rock" songs. It's so strange to think of this, as he influenced many generations in the writing department and although much of his music was simplistic, it was the emphasis put on what he did in the end.. when the song was finished. People stole or borrowed that from him. In the end, Syd Barrett himself thought and expressed in interviews that Piper was just a collection of songs he wrote and couldn't see why people made a fuss. In the same way that Ian Anderson can often be quoted saying that Aqualung was just a collection of songs and may have felt in his youth ...confused as to why the album was so successful. Syd Barrett was a unique artist with perfect timing. He influenced many musicians right before the dawn of the 70's. Amon Dull II , Hawkwind, Gong, and several others. 
Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2015 at 21:36
My track running for...A Saucerful Of Secrets" if Syd Barrett would have stayed on board.


1. Let There Be More Light
2. Scream Thy Last Scream
3. Remember A Day
4. Set The Controls For The Heart Of The Sun
5. Corporal Clegg
6. Vegetable Man
7. A Saucerful Of Secrets
8. See-Saw
9. Jugband Blues
Back to Top
brainstormer View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 20 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Points: 887
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2015 at 22:25
Did he sing all the songs on the Floyd albums he was on? 
--
Robert Pearson
Regenerative Music http://www.regenerativemusic.net
Telical Books http://www.telicalbooks.com
ParaMind Brainstorming Software http://www.paramind.net


Back to Top
TODDLER View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: August 28 2009
Location: Vineland, N.J.
Status: Offline
Points: 3126
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2015 at 23:31
Originally posted by brainstormer brainstormer wrote:

Did he sing all the songs on the Floyd albums he was on? 



 Not totally. Astronomy Domine has a harmony vocal and it might be Waters backing Syd Barrett. Additionally on "Matilda Mother" ..it may be Waters or an overdubbed vocal of Syd Barrett. Difficult for me to tell...as sometimes, Wright and Waters sang in the style of Syd. "Corporal Clegg" is supposedly Roger Waters singing lead, yet it sounds very much like Syd Barrett. Rick Wright's vocal work can be matched with similarities to Syd Barrett's on very early Wright songs...such as B sides to their singles. Syd Barrett sang lead on most of Piper and lead only on one track from Saucerful which was Jugband Blues. "Scream Thy Last Scream" , written during his last days with the Floyd featured Nick Mason on lead vocal and Syd Barrett singing along with Mason, yet octaves higher in pitch, sped up more or less, emulating the same sound used for Alvin and the Chipmunks. On the BBC Sessions '67, it is easier to tell the difference between Waters voice and Barrett's. This cd contains rare versions of "Astronomy Domine", "The Gnome", "Scarecrow" "Set The Controls" , (which has Syd Barrett on guitar), "Matilda Mother", "Flaming", "Scream Thy Last Scream" and "Vegetable Man". I highly recommend this cd to anyone who appreciates the early Floyd. I have the "so called" original studio recordings of "Vegetable Man" and "Scream Thy Last Scream" and I enjoy them quite more than the BBC recordings because they are not as stripped down.  


Back to Top
AreYouHuman View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 12 2013
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 470
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 10 2015 at 23:55

Toddler: great take on Syd.  I especially liked your point about how his songs lend themselves to different arrangements.  I’m not a musician myself, but I’ve often found myself imagining what else could be done with existing pieces of music.  Could be a subject for a whole new thread.

 

I’m not ready to pin a genius (or any other) tag on him, but one has to wonder how Syd’s career would have gone if he hadn’t let himself become an acid casualty.

Caption: We tend to take ourselves a little too seriously.

Silly human race! Yes is for everybody!
Back to Top
KingCrInuYasha View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2015 at 01:46
@Toddler: I dunno, the BBC version of VM has a bit of a silly pop feel which I like. IIRC, there was also a instrumental version of the song that has the band going absolutely nuts. That version is my favorite.
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
Back to Top
hellogoodbye View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP member

Joined: August 29 2011
Location: Troy
Status: Offline
Points: 7251
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2015 at 03:01
Very Interesting Toddler. Clap Bravo. That would be impossible today that a song as "Emily Play" becomes a hit !Cry
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2015 at 09:23
Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

Syd Barrett was definitely unique with his writing..however he was very rebellious against the corporate music industry. He had money, popularity, and Pink Floyd were being set up for the proper breaks a band needs to succeed in life. Unfortunately for many around him, he wasn't interested in that stuff..because he thought it was wrong for him and generally wrong in the righteous sense. He was a very intelligent man who saw no light at the end of the tunnel for this hyped up "Pop Star" image...which!...he found contrived. Although in the early days he dressed in the wildest British Psychedelic fashion, looked very bubbly/excited/happy in pictures and rubbed off that way to his friends. He was on a positive path! He obtained a high level for that and then changed his mind after "See Emily Play" and Piper began to circulate globally. The "Tower Records" red label and the striped were pretty well known when I was a child. During these times where he felt like a spirit flying upward socially and artistically, he make certain snooty comments to the press regarding being sort of "anti-commercial" and because "See Emily Play" was a hit, he was offended and annoyed by the overwhelming process of the industry who often attempted to mold ANY artist into their commercial image to gain profit. Syd Barrett seemed like he was a noble/sincere fanatic of any creation of art...(poetry or music), he seemed as if he didn't want anyone to eventually touch his art and contrive it and may have already quietly been offended over his surroundings socially in the studio, touring, and overall presentation. 



Then he got deeper into LSD and decided with an "attitude" to play with these people's minds. As Roger Waters often said..."Many of the things he did were actually very funny". I totally agree and in "67 ..society had Lenny Bruce, but they probably wouldn't have understood Syd Barrett. He pulled off insane capers in the television studios, constantly setting the cameraman up. When Dick Clark asked Syd..."Syd, you wrote most of the music"..Syd replies, with his hand on his hip.."Yeah, that's right"..and the way he pronounces the word "right" is like..."Yeah, that's right wtf are you gonna do about it?" Or it can be taken that way if the word "right" is phrased like a note traveling upward or changing a low pitch to a higher pitch influences people to think you might have an attitude or they feel like they are bothering you. Lol! Around this period he began to set people up and it made them look like jackasses. He did it this with Roger Waters when he tried to teach him "Have You Got It Yet?" and then he set Norman Smith up having him call a Salvation Army band into the studio, with Syd not arriving until very late, and when asked by Norman Smith "Syd, what do you want them to play?", Syd replied: "I don't know really, well, play anything" "Play anything they'd like" 


Regarding this hyped up glamour on Syd for the last 3 or 4 decades, Syd would be in fact right wouldn't he? He was right to feel destructive to that industry...because look at what they did to him now? Some people get the impression that he was just a clown. Not really. He may have not been a classically trained guitarist or a Ritchie Blackmore, but he wrote songs on the guitar and that's all that mattered. It was the style he created later defined..as "Space Rock" or some folks call it Psychedelic Space Rock. Tags are tags. I'm making reference to the point of Syd Barrett possibly being the first person to create the overall "Space Rock" style and sound, which influentially took hold of many "Space Rock" bands throughout the 70's. Another observation on his writing would tell that he may have been the first person to combine a kind of childlike literature in Rock music. Sometimes with a subtle approach and it is bewildering! One album only with the Floyd and I still think it's just as good as Sgt. Pepper regarding it's sophistication as an art form...however just different regarding the various aspects he creates to a song. "Matilda Mother" had well structured, pre-planned sections. He was definitely a true innovator! He influenced many artists in the world to capture something different in songwriting and that's a pretty difficult thing to do. Think about it? He influenced bands for decades after ...however he was just an innocent guy that rebelled against the industry in his own bizarre fashion. Some people in the past have attributed this to the LSD. I for one, do not. He knew exactly what he was doing by playing games on "The Pat Boone Show" and everyone else who complained. Nick Mason: "Should I feel compassion...or shall I kill him?" 


Syd Barrett sort of spoiled Pink Floyd's high ideals then , but not now..not in the present because Syd Barrett taught Roger Waters methods, concepts..on writing and Waters remembering all of that, and proceeded to master writing and incorporate Syd's influence. Sections of "Julia Dream", "It Would Be So Nice", "Crying Song", Part 2 and part 3 of "The Narrow Way", "Free Four", "Breathe (In the air)" and "Mother" from The Wall..are all very influenced by Syd Barrett's structure and melody. The song "Opel" ..if re-done,,with choir, bass, electric guitar, and keyboards would sound like a Pink Floyd song belonging to the "Animals", "Pigs On The Wing" period. Some material Syd Barrett wrote later for solo albums ..seemed to influence Pink Floyd's later writing. He was a very unique individual in the history of Rock music. He was a natural.
Great exposition Todd, but what is your basis for it? This is the sort of write up that requires footnotes and bibliography so that it doesn't come off sounding like hearsay and speculation, baring your purely musical observances.

Edited by SteveG - August 11 2015 at 09:57
Back to Top
Dellinger View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: June 18 2009
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 12732
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2015 at 21:41
Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

Originally posted by brainstormer brainstormer wrote:

Did he sing all the songs on the Floyd albums he was on? 




 Not totally. Astronomy Domine has a harmony vocal and it might be Waters backing Syd Barrett. Additionally on "Matilda Mother" ..it may be Waters or an overdubbed vocal of Syd Barrett. Difficult for me to tell...as sometimes, Wright and Waters sang in the style of Syd. "Corporal Clegg" is supposedly Roger Waters singing lead, yet it sounds very much like Syd Barrett. Rick Wright's vocal work can be matched with similarities to Syd Barrett's on very early Wright songs...such as B sides to their singles. Syd Barrett sang lead on most of Piper and lead only on one track from Saucerful which was Jugband Blues. "Scream Thy Last Scream" , written during his last days with the Floyd featured Nick Mason on lead vocal and Syd Barrett singing along with Mason, yet octaves higher in pitch, sped up more or less, emulating the same sound used for Alvin and the Chipmunks. On the BBC Sessions '67, it is easier to tell the difference between Waters voice and Barrett's. This cd contains rare versions of "Astronomy Domine", "The Gnome", "Scarecrow" "Set The Controls" , (which has Syd Barrett on guitar), "Matilda Mother", "Flaming", "Scream Thy Last Scream" and "Vegetable Man". I highly recommend this cd to anyone who appreciates the early Floyd. I have the "so called" original studio recordings of "Vegetable Man" and "Scream Thy Last Scream" and I enjoy them quite more than the BBC recordings because they are not as stripped down.  




I would really love to get this BBC CD you talk of, but as far as I know it's not officially released, and I wouldn't know how to get it. I have been wishing the BBC concerts (or some other early early concert with Gilmour already on it) were to be officially released, but a concert with Syd on it would be just about as interesting for me.
Back to Top
KingCrInuYasha View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 26 2010
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: August 11 2015 at 22:16
Originally posted by TODDLER TODDLER wrote:

Originally posted by brainstormer brainstormer wrote:

Did he sing all the songs on the Floyd albums he was on? 

...

Not totally. Astronomy Domine has a harmony vocal and it might be Waters backing Syd Barrett. Additionally on "Matilda Mother" ..it may be Waters or an overdubbed vocal of Syd Barrett. Difficult for me to tell...as sometimes, Wright and Waters sang in the style of Syd. "Corporal Clegg" is supposedly Roger Waters singing lead, yet it sounds very much like Syd Barrett. 

...

Actually, Wright and Barrett sang lead on "Astronomy Domine" and "Matilda Mother", while Mason sang co-lead on "Corporal Clegg".
He looks at this world and wants it all... so he strikes, like Thunderball!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 7>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.211 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.