SR VII: It's extreme male brooding!

James wrote: Which concert is that, Rico?

Theusz Hamtaak Trilogie.

It must be the seventh time I'm mentioning what I'm currently listening/watching.

More people enter the stage as the show goes on.

Ouch, this concert is flawed in so many ways.

I will be working at one of the Olympic venues during the Olympics. 

Evening, Jody.

Most of us are behaving, don't worry.  Some just like to tread on thin ice.  They'll fall-in eventually.

So no action is required.  Nature will take its course.

How's you then?

I'm fairly good.  I saw Upsilon Acrux on Sunday and Magma on Tuesday.  If I'd known earlier, I could have been seeing Ulver tomorrow as well.  Ah well.  Maybe next time.

I did get to meet Kristoffer of Ulver though, so that was a bonus.

So this week has been excellent in terms of concert experiences.

I'm my usual self though really.

Warehouse 13 is a pretty neat new show.  It is kind of similar to the Friday the 13th television series.  I always thought that it was weird that the Friday the 13th television series had absolutely nothing to do with the Jason movies.

I like Warehouse 13 too. The last episode had some parts that feel a little cliche though.

stonebeard wrote: Hey guys. Bad day. Gin and Sprite time.

Make that one for me as well


There is nothing worse than getting an assignment back and being told you write like a romantic novelist, when it is infact, a history essay.


Edited by Any Colour You Like - October 08 2009 at 20:01

Epignosis wrote: Henry Plainview wrote: I don't know, I'm not in your secret club. BUT MOVING ON Alex, I finally read the Wiki article for Atlas Shrugged (because I'm not going to read a book that long), and I would like to ask you a question: How does John Galt plunging the world into a massive depression, killing countless numbers of people, just to prove the point that he doesn't want to share his free energy not make Ayn Rand a bad person? Counter question. Let's say there is one person in the world with the skill to cure a wasting disease (spot the Rush song).  Let's say, AIDS.  It takes four hours per procedure for this individual to cure one person of AIDS, and costs him $1500 in resources and staff for each treatment. Is that person obligated to cure people? Is that person obligated to teach others how to cure it? Is that person reasonable in expecting people to pay for either? Look at me being all philosophical and sh*t.

Better make it a different example; for something as big as AIDs, if there's a cure, it gets cured. I don't care if people can't afford it. It's like saying if the Black Death was killing homeless people you'd expect them to pay. F**k no, but the government should, or someone should steal the guy's ideas and give the cure away. No one's obliged to be nice, but I won't feel bad for someone who makes no money trying to sell a cure for a horrible disease. It's unconscionable.