![]() |
What ever happened to E.L.P.? |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 567 |
Author | ||
AFlowerKingCrimson ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 02 2016 Location: Philly burbs Status: Offline Points: 19205 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
No doubt but it's being billed as an evening with Emerson, Lake & Palmer or something like that. |
||
![]() |
||
dr prog ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: September 25 2010 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 2530 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I have the movie and soundtrack lol |
||
All I like is prog related bands beginning late 60's/early 70's. Their music from 1968 - 83 has the composition and sound which will never be beaten. Perfect blend of jazz, classical, folk and rock.
|
||
![]() |
||
Fercandio46 ![]() Forum Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: September 06 2023 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 43 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It remains to be seen what criteria they use, not only the talent of the musicians and their albums, but also their longevity in the music scene, their ability to reinvent themselves, or whether their music is timeless or anchored in its time. I agree that ELP seems to be below Jethro Tull, Yes, Genesis, Van der Graaf Generator, or King Crimson, although it's a matter of taste. However, when they emerged, they were a success from their first album, attracting the attention of Jimi Hendrix himself and Miles Davis after their performance on the Isle of Wight. And their first five albums, from the self-titled album to Brain Salad Surgery, boast a superlative level of innovation. The classical adaptations to rock, which he had already patented with The Nice, were the hallmark of Keith Emerson, a pianist with a sensitivity for playing everything from jazz to classical to rock 'n' roll. Carl Palmer had already proven his worth with Atomic Rooster, but later, he grew even more capable of playing melodies on his drums. And Greg Lake, personally, for me, had one of the best and most versatile voices, along with Ian Anderson's, in the early years. While they seemed to lose their way after 1973, at a younger age than some of their fellow bandmates, with the aforementioned merits, I believe they deserve a place that honors their achievements.
|
||
![]() |
||
richardh ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: February 18 2004 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 30017 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
It comes down to what can genuinely be called 'prog'. We've been down that road on PA many times. I'm talking about what was genuinely regarded as 'progressive rock' back in the day (ie the 'first wave') not talking about purely innovative music which of course carried on and is stil happeining all over the world. IMHO |
||
![]() |
||
moshkito ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 18419 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi, Not sure that this sounds right, or might mean something else ... the "original" progressive music was innovative, and different, at least as far as the methodology and format designs of most pop music ... I still believe the idea was to get past the pop music formats, and in essence, that meant that anything new had to be innovative, since I'm not sure you can have 674 variations upon a theme on the same 12 notes in a couple of scales, and not add something else to it all. In the end, let's face it ... most "progressive" and "progrock" and innovative materials that we list here, still are not exactly beyond what classical music has shown specially in the 20th century when a lot of music busted out the designs and the ideas of what music was ... thus, thinking that innovative and special new materials from all over the world, was what made it innovative, when it really wasn't, even if there was some inspiration taken from it. Almost ALL new music, over the centuries, was completely different than what the norm was and while it might not have taken to the ears all around, eventually it did so. But I think that we are missing the point of all this ... the one thing that rock and jazz music brought to the plate in the 20th century was what I consider "attitude", which was ignored by classical music for hundreds of years, since it was not exactly easy to score something that had been improvised, and the player had no idea what he did here or there, and there didn't exist a recording device available which would help, and THERE WASN'T until nearly 100 years ago! That, on its own, dismantles the idea of "innovative" because we can not evaluate what it was what was played! And could not be scored!!! Miles Davis, for example, was not exactly appreciated by the classical music folks, however, in due time, his forays into somewhere else, got some results, and at that point I think it went beyond jazz, in terms of a definition, something that we don't like to do ... we think that everything has to fit in a little box with the same 4 corners and so forth! But the main issue, with something like Miles Davis, is ... where is it going to lead us all? And how are we going to take it ... and all of a sudden we think that John McLaughlin was crazy when he just flew away, but we love it when Steve Howe did it, or Chris Squire did it for 60 seconds incredibly well, and then, we have an issue ... our ideas of all this, are not comprehensive and strong, or our ideas would make a little bit better sense, specially with the history of the music in mind, which rock fans intentionally ignore because it trashes their likes left and right and every which way! In the end, I think that we're trying hard to CLOSE DOWN the idea that new music can come along and create something new ... why? Easy! ... We have no terminology or ideas how to interpret it, but one thing is always true ... when yo look at it all within a historical context in music, most of it makes sense, except the "fan-dom" ... which will likely still fight for pieces of the pig! Music? So what? ... Edited by moshkito - 8 hours 28 minutes ago at 09:02 |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
![]() |
||
Floydoid ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 02 2007 Location: Planet Prog Status: Offline Points: 2079 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
As ELP? Shouldn't that be as P? |
||
"Christ, where would rock & roll be without feedback?" - D. Gimour
|
||
![]() |
||
moshkito ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 18419 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Hi, If I knew that he was using film to show what he did with the drums, and (basically) give us a drum clinic that most hitters do not have or will ever learn, other than timing ... then it will be worth seeing ... you can't see the others, this might be a bit weird, but hopefully interesting ... he was one of the few drummers that worked on helping the music come alive ... instead of the cheap and low level abilities in most bands these days! Hopefully it will be nice and worth it, is all I can hope for ... I never got a chance to see ELP, and I might enjoy saying hello and at least say a fond thank yo ufor the inspiration that he and his mates gave me and others! |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 567 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |