What ever happened to E.L.P.?

richardh wrote: ELP never get any credit for being eclectic. Other bands can do 'silly songs' (ie Caravan with Golf Girl, Genesis with More Fool Me, Gentle Giant with Dog's Life) and seemingly get away with it. Oh well.

richardh wrote: ELP never get any credit for being eclectic. Other bands can do 'silly songs' (ie Caravan with Golf Girl, Genesis with More Fool Me, Gentle Giant with Dog's Life) and seemingly get away with it. Oh well.

I listened to Works Volume 1 yesterday again [the cover of Fanfare for Common Man is on it only, right?] and while the album does has it's moments; honestly,  I only liked two/three songs overall from it's dozen or so selections including the cover mentioned before. The highs of their debut and Tarkus [even some of the shorter songs on that LP appealed to me] seemed to have gone. I think I now have "Love Beach" and their off shoot Emerson, Lake and Powell to listen to apart from archival live recordings which I will get to in due time.

Yes, Maybe I do need to re-listen to the album in a quiet place again. I would probably appreciate it slightly more maybe. I do like atleast couple of ELP's albums very much [debut and Tarkus],so I am atleast a partial fan :p. The album does have some bloat and can do with some toning down, as you said.Edit: Works is a better album than Love Beach and whatever they were trying with Black Moon. The latter was ghastly

kirk782 wrote: Yes, Maybe I do need to re-listen to the album in a quiet place again. I would probably appreciate it slightly more maybe. I do like atleast couple of ELP's albums very much [debut and Tarkus],so I am atleast a partial fan :p. The album does have some bloat and can do with some toning down, as you said. Edit: Works is a better album than Love Beach and whatever they were trying with Black Moon. The latter was ghastly

agreed on all points. Black Moon seemed okay when it came out but has not aged well, the band had lost all its dynamics and it was not helped either by Mancina's over production (versions of the tracks off the album played live were better at least). Lake insisted on producing potentially another album around the time they came off their South America tour (97?) but Emerson said 'no' and that was that.

richardh wrote: agreed on all points. Black Moon seemed okay when it came out but has not aged well, the band had lost all its dynamics and it was not helped either by Mancina's over production (versions of the tracks off the album played live were better at least).

The issue with Black Moon is that there's not enough material on par with the two instrumentals (both of which enjoy better versions on Keith's solo album/compilation issued three years later) and the title track. And, as we know, Greg's voice had already degraded a bit.

"Burning Bridges" isn't bad, but it sounds unfinished to me. "Paper Blood" is an enjoyable tune, tailored to airplay. The ballads are where the album loses me. I keep it for the upbeat tracks.

The less said about Black Moon's successor, the better.

verslibre wrote: richardh wrote: ELP never get any credit for being eclectic. Other bands can do 'silly songs' (ie Caravan with Golf Girl, Genesis with More Fool Me, Gentle Giant with Dog's Life) and seemingly get away with it. Oh well. You don't see me complaining about "Benny the Bouncer," do you? "Hoedown" is one of my favorite ELP compositions, too. Anyone who doesn't like it is off their axis.

Hi,

I think that it looks like some musicians take their music too seriously. It's understandable, since it is "your child", however, there is a time and place when one needs to stand up and fight back. The hard time in England, would be to have to fight something like MM, or the other one NME, and an issue or two would show up putting the musicians down ... with one issue here ... in the end, the magazine would look stupid, and they were not the artist pouring their heart out in their work ... and that, eventually, would hurt the journalistic side of the magazine ... and many other bands would pay attention.

The hard part is to think that they needed the magazine for various things, and their daily lives, which is crazy ... but at the time, MM and NME could make or break a band easily enough, though I really think that it was just a matter of time before someone told them where to stick their opinions.

Nowadays, things are very different, but it scares me that a band feels they have to post on PA, on AP or other sites, in order to be heard, and get a leg up on the competition ... stories are everywhere, that some folks just had to show up and their talent and musicianship would shine, though I think that today, a lot of this is ignored, and instead falling for the mentions ... the fallacy of the advertising world ... that not being heard or ignored is the worst thing in life ... to me, not believing your work enough is the problem, not being heard or ignored! But it is the difference between selling one, or a hundred. However, folks forget that the sale is "temporary" and tomorrow it will be gone ... and picking it up again, is not quite likely!

You can not, as an artist, think that you have to listen to everyone ... PERIOD. And that's the part that I think needs to come to fruition a bit more, because on that day, some new music will wake up right from under our feet!

Edited by moshkito - April 15 2025 at 06:53

Rick1 wrote: ELP illustrate the life cycle of bands who all go through a creative peak for a few years but can never recapture it, no matter how hard they try. They certainly find it hard over the course of an album. I am a huge ELP fan and I am used to defending them but what ELP had was the ability to put on great live performances right up until their final concert in 2010, which I was lucky enough to be at. Forget this album and that album...

without the albums to fall back onto, then the live performances would have counted for nothing I think. Brain Salad Surgery was the peak because they played 99% of it live during the 73/74 world tour. After that the live performances relied too much on a mixture of the same classic material. It was actually Ian Anderson that said much later (maybe the 90's) that ''the trouble with ELP is that they only ever play the same 12 tracks''. Carl Palmer responded by saying ''true, but we change the order sometimes''.

They are one of the least interesting of the most famous progressive rock artists out there...that´s the reason why. They predomiantly play cold and calculated technically accomplished progressive rock, but there´s little emotion or emotional impact in what they are doing. I´m sure that´s one of the reasons why people aren´t voting them into the top 100. There are simply many other great artists out there who have produced better output.

Just my opinion: ELP were great up to Works included. I love Piano Concerto, Pirates, and some of the short songs by Lake. The rest is good enough. Trilogy is one of my favorite albums ever and what conquered me to prog when I was 10 years old. What I have read here about the fillers is true, but when you record a track like Tarkus you can have some fun with Are You Ready Eddy. Still better than silence or than a short album below 30 minutes. Nowadays Tarkus could have been a single digital track, but I remember only one LP recorded on 1 side only: "Io se Fossi Dio" by Giorgio Gaber that contains a > 20 minutes song on side A and nothing on side B.