Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Top 10s and lists
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - The most archetypal classic Progressive Rock?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

The most archetypal classic Progressive Rock?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123
Author
Message
richardh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 27993
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote richardh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 5 hours 14 minutes ago at 09:10
Originally posted by Starshiper Starshiper wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

As much as I love VDGG they were really a 'one off' and entirely based around the mercurial genius of Peter Hammill. What other bands sounded even remotely like them??!
Ah, the term 'archetypal'—a rather posh way of saying *original,* wouldn't you agree? Now, when it comes to bands that have taken a leaf out of the Van der Graaf Generator playbook and decided to traipse down a similar path, we find ourselves with quite the eclectic bunch. There’s the late 70s Swiss band Island, who released only one record, yet a masterpiece with H.R. Giger sleeve design, seems to think they can channel that vibe. Discipline, who are clearly on a mission; Dear Hunter, who might be hunting for something more than just a catchy tune; Thank You Scientist, because why not throw in a bit of gratitude while we’re at it; and Dog Fashion Disco—yes, you read that right. It’s all rather amusing, really. By the way, as you can see, he also regrettably missed Gentle Giant; he just listed the "Big Six."

I like DFD but not so much Dear Hunter or Thank You Scientist. I'm not convinced any of those are like VDGG though.

On the definition then I suppose you are correct. However does it mean the style has to stay the same? VDGG doesn't change but King Crimson were almost a reinvention for every album which for some may the defintion of progressive rock. Genesis and Yes (and VDGG) just do the same thing (brilliantly) for every album so what does that say. I'm confused about the point of the thread tbh. Is it just about what is 'progressive' or what bands influence can be strongly heard in modern day prog? The latter is what I took it to be but then I may just be confused.
Back to Top
kenethlevine View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog-Folk Team

Joined: December 06 2006
Location: New England
Status: Offline
Points: 8951
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kenethlevine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 5 hours 14 minutes ago at 09:10
I guess KC...they never stopped being prog or progressive either, even though after Islands I have tough time enjoying them
Back to Top
Big Sky View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 24 2022
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 530
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Big Sky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3 hours 43 minutes ago at 10:41
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

Originally posted by Starshiper Starshiper wrote:

Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

As much as I love VDGG they were really a 'one off' and
entirely based around the mercurial genius of Peter Hammill. What other
bands sounded even remotely like them??!
Ah, the term
'archetypal'—a rather posh way of saying *original,* wouldn't you agree?
Now, when it comes to bands that have taken a leaf out of the Van der
Graaf Generator playbook and decided to traipse down a similar path, we
find ourselves with quite the eclectic bunch. There’s the late 70s Swiss
band Island, who released only one record, yet a masterpiece with H.R.
Giger sleeve design, seems to think they can channel that vibe.
Discipline, who are clearly on a mission; Dear Hunter, who might be
hunting for something more than just a catchy tune; Thank You Scientist,
because why not throw in a bit of gratitude while we’re at it; and Dog
Fashion Disco—yes, you read that right. It’s all rather amusing, really.
By the way, as you can see, he also regrettably missed Gentle Giant; he
just listed the "Big Six."


I like DFD but not so much Dear Hunter or Thank You Scientist. I'm not convinced any of those are like VDGG though.

On the definition then I suppose you are correct. However does it mean the style has to stay the same? VDGG doesn't change but King Crimson were almost a reinvention for every album which for some may the defintion of progressive rock. Genesis and Yes (and VDGG) just do the same thing (brilliantly) for every album so what does that say. I'm confused about the point of the thread tbh. Is it just about what is 'progressive' or what bands influence can be strongly heard in modern day prog? The latter is what I took it to be but then I may just be confused.


Richardh,

I would disagree Yes did the same thing for every album. The Yes Album, Fragile, Relayer, Drama and 90125 all sound quite different from each other. You can add the Ancient to the mix from TFTGO as side long piece of music that sounds far different than anything that band ever did. Some of the changes in the musical direction Yes took are due to the keyboardist, drummers and guitarists that were in the band at the time of recording these albums. Kaye, Wakeman, Moraz and Downes would never be mistaken for the other. Steve Howe (Jazz, Country influences) and Trevor Rabin (Metal, Fusion) are stylistically far apart. Obviously, Bruford and White drumming styles are quite different.

As far as KC is concerned, they get far more credit for reinventing themselves from album to album than probably is deserved. The Wetton era of KC chewed much the same ground. The 80s reincarnation of Crimson was quite different than what they had done before, but those three albums, Discipline, Beat and Three of the Perfect Pair, I have always grouped together musically. The Construkction of Light and The Power to Believe does the Industrial Metal experimentation.

Just my take on the matter.

As far as the posters question, Yes and Genesis are probably what people think of when it comes to the arch type Prog. ELP would take the third spot.
Back to Top
David_D View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 26 2010
Location: Copenhagen
Status: Offline
Points: 15107
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote David_D Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3 hours 28 minutes ago at 10:56
Originally posted by richardh richardh wrote:

I'm confused about the point of the thread tbh. Is it just about what is 'progressive' or what bands influence can be strongly heard in modern day prog? The latter is what I took it to be but then I may just be confused.

Well, I can't say it better than my question is which of "The Big Six" do you find to be the most archetypal of the classic Progressive Rock, and by now I've defined "archetypal" as:
"I can tell that by "the most archetypal classic Progressive Rock", I mean that which is the most typical or the most defining for the classic Progressive Rock."

The rest is up to you. Smile

                      quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond
Back to Top
Hrychu View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 03 2013
Location: poland?
Status: Offline
Points: 5357
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Hrychu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 3 hours 18 minutes ago at 11:06
Originally posted by Guru Can Guru Can wrote:

Nah. When it comes to the U.S. bands, it could be only Utopia.
Well, while Todd Rundgren's Utopia is an incredible prog band, in my opinion, they're way too experimental, stylistically eclectic and "shaped like itself" for me to consider them and archetypal example of the prog rock genre in a way that it's an approximation of all the core elements.
“On the day of my creation, I fell in love with education. And overcoming all frustration, a teacher I became.”
— Ernest Vong
Back to Top
Deadwing View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 05 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 449
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Deadwing Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 minutes ago at 14:03
Pink Floyd, Genesis and Yes to me
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65250
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11 minutes ago at 14:13
Depends what one means by 'archetypal'--- if that means finest, it would be the 'big five' or whatever.

But archetypal can also mean most crucial which is a different thing, and for me would indicate Procol Harum, The Nice, Zappa, and the Beach Boys among a few others.
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.133 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.