The most archetypal classic Progressive Rock? - Progressive Rock Music Forum

I reckon that it's most commonly today to consider

Yes

King Crimson

Genesis

Jethro Tull

ELP and

Pink Floyd

as The Big Six of the classic Progressive Rock.

Now, my question is which of these bands do you find to be the most archetypal of the classic Progressive Rock?

You can vote for as many of these 6 bands as you want to, and each time a band gets a vote, I'll give it 1 point, and by updates I'll tell the total score at a given point of time, and as voted by whom.

I find the most archetypal

ELP

Yes

Genesis

So the score to begin with is

ELP - 1

Yes - 1

Genesis - 1

Jethro Tull - 0

King Crimson - 0

Pink Floyd - 0

as voted by David_D

Edited by David_D - 2 hours 3 minutes ago at 18:57

quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond

Can we only vote for three?

Psychedelic Paul wrote:

Can we only vote for three?

David_D wrote:

You can vote for all of these bands you want, .........

quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond

Valdez wrote:

The Moody Blues oft neglected but really deserve more.

Discussion is of course very welcomed, but especially of "The Big Six".

quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond

I think of ELP as the quintessential Prog band (a sound so associated with Prog fro good or bad), followed by Yes and King Crimson in its own way. And of course Prog-Genesis has been incredibly influential and does deserve mention. I had not associated Pink Floyd with Prog so much when growing up.

Edited by Logan - 7 hours 29 minutes ago at 13:31

Duos for fave acts

Then it says:

Yes - 5

King Crimson - 4

Genesis - 3

ELP - 2

Jethro Tull - 1

Pink Floyd - 0

as voted by David_D, Valdez, felonafan, Logan and The Dark Elf

quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond

I think that Yes and Genesis are on the podium.

Pink Floyd came from psychedelia, they were prog only in passing, they are much more than prog.

Jethro tull before Thick As a Brick were mainly folkblues, they too were prog in passing.

Now that leaves EL&P and King Crimson.

Both can aspire to the podium, as importance for prog. EL&P came from Nice, from adapting classical music to rock, and they were very successful.

King Crimson have never adapted classical music to rock, they come partly from psychedelia, partly from the avant-garde, partly from melodic romantic rock and, from their second album onwards, partly from jazz.

In short, King Crimson are much more experimental than EL&P. And they kick-started Prog with their first album. They went through various musical phases, often changing their sound, whereas EL&P always remained the same. KC are definitely more difficult than El&P. But like Pink Floyd they are admired far beyond prog.

However, both choices seem legitimate to me.

I choose King Crimson, because in my opinion without them, prog would be lost far more than it is with EL&P.

-King Crimson

- Yes

- Genesis

Amos Goldberg (professor of Genocide Studies at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem): Yes, it's genocide. It's so difficult and painful to admit it, but we can no longer avoid this conclusion.

So by now:

Yes - 7

King Crimson - 7

Genesis - 5

ELP - 3

Jethro Tull - 1

Pink Floyd - 0

as voted by David_D, Valdez, felonafan, Logan, The Dark Elf, Easy Money, jamesbaldwin and AFlowerKingCrimson

quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond

jamesbaldwin wrote:

...............

In short, King Crimson are much more experimental than EL&P. And they kick-started Prog with their first album. They went through various musical phases, often changing their sound, whereas EL&P always remained the same. KC are definitely more difficult than El&P. But like Pink Floyd they are admired far beyond prog.

However, both choices seem legitimate to me.

.............

Very nice with your thorough reasoning and explanation. One can vote for up to all 6 bands, so you can vote for ELP too, if you want to.

quality over quantity, and all kind of PopcoRn almost beyond