Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43778
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 13:12 |
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
Anyone who hasn't heard of Paul McCartney & The Beatles must be living on Venus and Mars. |
|
|
Psychedelic Paul
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 16 2019
Location: Nottingham, U.K
Status: Online
Points: 40313
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 13:19 |
^ Are you trying to Ram that message home?
|
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43778
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 13:22 |
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
^ Are you trying to Ram that message home? |
|
|
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13065
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 13:24 |
Psychedelic Paul wrote:
Anyone who hasn't heard of Paul McCartney & The Beatles must be living on Venus and Mars. |
Not true, Paul. The Beatles are known Across the Universe. Literally Here, There and Everywhere. Both Within You and Without You. Because, In The End, Even Your Mother Should Know.
|
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
|
|
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18313
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 13:27 |
Come on guys, let it be.
|
|
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35951
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 13:49 |
Let's all Come Together. Or on second-thought, let's not go there.
Someone might do a "Did Genesis inspire Neo-Prog?" poll.
Option one: "Yes, the Book of Genesis influenced Neo-Prog." Option two: "No, Neo-Prog is just a Neo (New) Testament phenomenon." Option three: "It's all about the Quran, man" Option four: "Two words, Dianetics and Scientology" etc.
|
|
|
Awesoreno
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 07 2019
Location: Culver City, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3041
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 13:49 |
It's the name of his 1975 album with Wings. Yes, 22 year old here, I know about McCartney.
|
|
Awesoreno
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 07 2019
Location: Culver City, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3041
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 14:00 |
The Dark Elf wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
The Dark Elf wrote:
Catcher10 wrote:
The Dark Elf wrote:
SteveG wrote:
^ I admire and respect your zeal for Rush Jose, but people forgetting Zeppelin and Sabbath? Come on, now. Rush was never that much in the consciousness of the main stream. I know you want people to forget about the Beatles, but that's impossible too.
|
Particularly since The Beatles can release another remastered album tomorrow and sell a million copies -- 50 years after they broke up. Rush in 50 years? I don't think they can duplicate the generation-to-generation success and universal appeal of The Beatles. On a lesser scale, you could say the same thing about Zeppelin, Sabbath, or even Pink Floyd, for that matter. |
The difference is its the same people buying the million copies, 70yr old coggers who have 20 versions of each album......they claim they have 2,000 albums, but in fact 1,000 of those albums are Beatles records. |
Sure thing, Jose. But since my daughter is in college, visiting the campus I can tell you that Floyd and the Beatles are being listened to far more than Rush. Hell, even their paraphernalia like t-shirts and such are still being worn and purchased. Rush? Not so much. Fine band, but not on par.
|
Rush is an underground band and following......as Steve stated "not main stream". I have yet to see a young person wearing Beatles shirt, but I see gobs of them wearing Pink Floyd, Zepp and AC/DC shirts. |
Some reading material for you...
|
Yeah, as someone who recently graduated college, I can confirm TDE's point. In fact, just yesterday, I recorded some of their music with a group of young people. I was in a Pops Orchestra in college, and many of the members/alumni came together to form this virtual orchestra called the Philanthropic Philharmonic. We accept donations for our music videos (everyone records at home to a MIDI/click and they footage/audio is put together) and put them towards charitable causes. Our third recording is of Come Together (I recorded melodica, and will be doing vocals next), so I put on my THE BEATLES T-SHIRT and laid down the track. Everyone involved is somewhere between 20 and 25, and the tune got the most votes in a poll among the members that included mostly contemporary pop. So yeah, they're still in the zeitgeist.
As for Rush, I certainly didn't see many of their t-shirts on campus compared to Beatles and PF. However, any time I brought up that I listen/play/write prog to anyone, of any age, Rush is always an example band I am asked about. So I wouldn't quite call them "underground." Certainly less well known than the aforementioned bands. But Underground is a stretch.
|
|
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 35951
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 14:03 |
Awesoreno wrote:
It's the name of his 1975 album with Wings. Yes, 22 year old here, I know about McCartney. | And Wait, What Goes On are two songs off Rubber Soul. "Glee Sings the Beatles" was a Glee release. The Beatles are everywhere, and nowhere, man.
|
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 14:16 |
To get back (ugh) to your premise, Greg, that inspiration can lead to influence is clever but I can only go by how it relates legally to music. There is a definitive line between inspiration and plagerism but not such a definitive line between influence and plagerism. So, they have to have different definitions from each other and be unrelated.
Edited by SteveG - October 06 2020 at 14:19
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 14:18 |
dougmcauliffe wrote:
Honestly reading through this it just sounds like the 2-3 people who are convinced Rush had little to no influence on Prog metal just don't like Rush very much so they're trying to subtly diminish and undercut their achievements and influence. I think Logan has hit the nail on the head, you can see countless interviews with members of Dream Theater where they say that they hold Rush as their number on influence, even the video Mike Portnoy posted less than 24 hours ago where he is going through his record collection he says this very thing. Most popular prog metal bands are influenced by Dream Theater, who are, according to them, influenced by.... (fill in the blank) | Completely wrong. Rush was my favorite band for years, I bought Hemispheres when it came out--- I was eleven. The fact that they were Dream Theater's #1 influence has nothing to do with Rush's minimal influence on progressive ~ or for that matter, heavy ~ metal. Rush were never metal, had nothing to do with it, and it assumes progmetal emerged form prog rock, which presumes a lot and misses much.
Further, it diminishes the hardrock and metal bands that were gradually becoming more complex and musical, and who in turn invented and passed down the art of metal, not the art of rock. Two very different forms. To discredit the Scorpions, Priest, Sabbath, Maiden, heck even Yngwie Malmsteen, those who existentially created the proto-progmetal form, is a crime and a true misreading of musical history.
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
AFlowerKingCrimson
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18313
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 14:41 |
Rush had nothing to do with metal? To me that's like saying Led Zeppelin had nothing to do with heavy metal. I wouldn't call them metal or even prog metal but to say they had nothing to do with it doesn't sound quite right either. They were actually an influence on the so called new wave of british heavy metal(NWOBM)in the late seventies and early 80's and much of their 70's albums were very metallish and even proto metal imo. Maybe these days they don't sound like modern metal but neither does Thin Lizzy or UFO or whoever. At the time Rush and several other bands including Aerosmith were lumped in with heavy metal. Of course maybe the defintion of metal has changed but to say they had nothing to do with metal(ever)is a bit of a stretch and quite inaccurate imo. I consider Rush to be proto prog metal at the very least. Heck I even saw them recently listed in a heavy metal book at the book store. While I thought that might be a bit much I can see why they were in there(the same reason DP and LZ should be in there).
Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - October 06 2020 at 14:46
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 14:57 |
^ I was around when Rush were at there height. I was around when metal was at its height. And I was around when progmetal was at its height. Yes Rush had a minor influence on one NWOBHM band I'm aware of: Kevin Heybourne's Angel Witch. Rush don't sound like metal "these days" because they never were, then or now.
Dream Theater? Dream Theater was a latecomer to the progmetal movement, their debut was released in 1989. Don't tell me about Dream Theater. You know who Voivod's main influences were?: Béla Bartók, Stravinsky, Shostakovitch, Judas Priest, all well before they cite Rush.
That a few scruffy headbangers who would go on to invent progressive metal may have dug Rush, and that therefore Rush were a direct creative influence on prog metal, is an assumption based on notions, recollections, quotes and projections. Credit where it's due, please.
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43778
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 15:01 |
^ The question was did Rush influence progressive metal. I say yes. The question is not if Rush created progressive metal or invent it. The answer would be "no".
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 15:16 |
^ Fair enough but the question ignores the far greater impact of other bands, does it not?
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 15:24 |
I hate to say it but even PA's definition of prog metal holds that KC and Rush are the two major influences on prog metal. This fantasy runs deep.
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43778
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 15:27 |
Atavachron wrote:
^ Fair enough but the question ignores the far greater impact of other bands, does it not?
|
I don't think so. I can make a long list of bands that I think influenced bands, I'm sure I would get some frowned faces
|
|
SteveG
Forum Senior Member
Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 15:28 |
Cristi wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
^ Fair enough but the question ignores the far greater impact of other bands, does it not?
|
I don't think so. I can make a long list of bands that I think influenced bands, I'm sure I would get some frowned faces |
I have a feeling you'd do better than Psychedelic Paul.
Edited by SteveG - October 06 2020 at 15:29
|
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|
Atavachron
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 15:30 |
SteveG wrote:
I hate to say it but even PA's definition of prog metal holds that KC and Rush are the two major influences on prog metal. This fantasy runs deep. | And yet Rush are in many ways the cornerstone Heavyprog band, a form with roots in blues, as clear on their first three records and Zeppelin influence.
|
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|
Cristi
Special Collaborator
Crossover / Prog Metal Teams
Joined: July 27 2006
Location: wonderland
Status: Offline
Points: 43778
|
Posted: October 06 2020 at 15:30 |
SteveG wrote:
Cristi wrote:
Atavachron wrote:
^ Fair enough but the question ignores the far greater impact of other bands, does it not?
|
I don't think so. I can make a long list of bands that I think influenced bands, I'm sure I would get some frowned faces | I have a feeling you'd do better than Psychedelic Paul. |
don't know if that's a compliment or an insult.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.