Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - King Crimson's little success?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

King Crimson's little success?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>
Author
Message
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18300
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 30 2020 at 20:38
Originally posted by TexasKing TexasKing wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:


Fripp would perhaps envy what Rush achieved to some extent (I doubt it, because his only concern was satisfying himself rather than the audience).  They didn't dumb down for mass appeal but walked the fine line between accessibility and complexity and kept selling out stadiums.  

Rush were selling out stadiums? Really? 

People say that about Yes also but in both cases it's not true. Rush played arenas but not stadiums. As for selling them out I'm sure they did but I don't have the details on that. 
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 30 2020 at 20:41
Originally posted by TexasKing TexasKing wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:


Fripp would perhaps envy what Rush achieved to some extent (I doubt it, because his only concern was satisfying himself rather than the audience).  They didn't dumb down for mass appeal but walked the fine line between accessibility and complexity and kept selling out stadiums.  

Rush were selling out stadiums? Really? 

Here's the Moving Pictures set list.  


Now read the numbers on top for the MP tour.  95 dates and approximately a million tickets sold.  Each venue would on average have seated 9-10k people, so....

I don't HAVE to put up these numbers for you, by the way. Know that in the music biz, no promoter will put a band on stadiums for 40 years if they never sell out. 
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 30 2020 at 20:45
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

Originally posted by TexasKing TexasKing wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:


Fripp would perhaps envy what Rush achieved to some extent (I doubt it, because his only concern was satisfying himself rather than the audience).  They didn't dumb down for mass appeal but walked the fine line between accessibility and complexity and kept selling out stadiums.  

Rush were selling out stadiums? Really? 

People say that about Yes also but in both cases it's not true. Rush played arenas but not stadiums. As for selling them out I'm sure they did but I don't have the details on that. 

Ah, I see the confusion now.  I'd call a 10k seater as a stadium.  But I guess it's something like American definition of small car, which is radically different from what that term means in Europe or Asia.
Back to Top
AFlowerKingCrimson View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2016
Location: Philly burbs
Status: Offline
Points: 18300
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AFlowerKingCrimson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 30 2020 at 20:52
^Yeah, over here 5-10,000 is barely an arena much less a stadium. A stadium over here is usually at least 40,000. Also, you don't have your location listed on your profile so unless you mention where you are from no one on here has any way of knowing where you live. Wink

Edited by AFlowerKingCrimson - March 30 2020 at 20:53
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 30 2020 at 20:57
Originally posted by AFlowerKingCrimson AFlowerKingCrimson wrote:

^Yeah, over here 5-10,000 is barely an arena much less a stadium. A stadium over here is usually at least 40,000. Also, you don't have your location listed on your profile so unless you mention where you are from no one on here has any way of knowing where you live. Wink

Sure, no problem, I just didn't know stadium means something like that in the USA.  Only a few of our cricket stadiums can accommodate over 40000 people, forget music venues.  20-30k is considered a decent sized stadium. I should have guessed though...I have been over there and seen the massive parking lots set aside for retail stores.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Catcher10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 02:18
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by TexasKing TexasKing wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:


Fripp would perhaps envy what Rush achieved to some extent (I doubt it, because his only concern was satisfying himself rather than the audience).  They didn't dumb down for mass appeal but walked the fine line between accessibility and complexity and kept selling out stadiums.  

Rush were selling out stadiums? Really? 

Here's the Moving Pictures set list.  


Now read the numbers on top for the MP tour.  95 dates and approximately a million tickets sold.  Each venue would on average have seated 9-10k people, so....

I don't HAVE to put up these numbers for you, by the way. Know that in the music biz, no promoter will put a band on stadiums for 40 years if they never sell out. 
According to their official tour book Wandering the Face Of The Earth, Chapter 12 describes the MP Tour opening date was Kalamazoo MI on 20/Feb 1981.....They played 79 shows to more than 900,000 fans, or approx 11,400 per show avg. They played several multi night shows, for example Seattle 2 nights of 12,320 per show at Seattle Center Coliseum (now Key Arena). 2 nights at Forum in LA of 14,600 per show, 2 nights in Maryland at Capitol Centre 18,600 each show and Madison Sq Garden 1 night of 17,300.

Along with many smaller venues of 7-9k capacity. Most of the shows were FM and Max Webster as support acts and many as Evening With Rush, especially when Kim Mitchell left Max Webster during the tour.
Back to Top
moshkito View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17524
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moshkito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 06:05
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Luck has nothing to do with it.   Crimson were radical, difficult, cerebral, unpredictable, poetic, internal, and "alternative" before it existed.   It's no wonder they didn't sell as many units as ELP or Yes or Tull.

Hi,

I am not sure that there weren't bigger numbers in the sales ... I think that Robert Fripp did not have control of a lot of the music for a long time, and that means that he would not know (necessarily) any numbers about the sales, and it would be easy for a record company to throw out a number for 10 stores instead of 50 to make it look like things didn't sell, or the album was crap.

In the end, when Robert finally got control of everything, he has been doing just fine, and it shows ... he has the control needed to be more successful, but in those early days, you signed your life away and many bands ended up in their death bed without any financial rewards that they deserved.

The difference now, is that it looks like finances are not an issue, and for the longest time they were ... 

(... haven't found/read any good books on RF/KC. Only Bruford's book, but he does not talk much about it all except ... when things went wrong. He doesn't even talk about the music itself.)

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

...
According to their official tour book Wandering the Face Of The Earth, Chapter 12 describes the MP Tour opening date was Kalamazoo MI on 20/Feb 1981.....They played 79 shows to more than 900,000 fans, or approx 11,400 per show avg. They played several multi night shows, for example Seattle 2 nights of 12,320 per show at Seattle Center Coliseum (now Key Arena). 2 nights at Forum in LA of 14,600 per show, 2 nights in Maryland at Capitol Centre 18,600 each show and Madison Sq Garden 1 night of 17,300.
...
 

These are the kind of tours that kill bands ... Nektar and Golden Earring also had a huge tour together with so many dates that you could get a headache, and both bands were not the same after it.

I can appreciate the fact that more people get to see it and appreciate the music, at the expense of the artist ... but honestly, did the bands go home happy and with a couple of dollars in their pocket?

I doubt it!


Edited by moshkito - March 31 2020 at 06:09
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SteveG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 06:23
Originally posted by Prog-jester Prog-jester wrote:

Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:


Because they never made a pop song. Wink
yeah, apart from "I Talk to the Wind", "Book of Saturday", "Epitaph", "Matte Kudasai", "Exiles", "One Time", "Walking on Air"...
You think that's pop? Then you don't know much about pop music and it's inherent intent at mass appeal due to an express intent to obtain a financial gain. To put it simply, the art and business of music are mixed and co dependent on each other.
 
Having been informed of that, do you still think that the KC songs that you posted above are pop songs?


Edited by SteveG - March 31 2020 at 07:39
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Nogbad_The_Bad View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl & Eclectic Team

Joined: March 16 2007
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Points: 20866
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nogbad_The_Bad Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 06:24
Originally posted by moshkito moshkito wrote:

(... haven't found/read any good books on RF/KC. Only Bruford's book, but he does not talk much about it all except ... when things went wrong. He doesn't even talk about the music itself.)



Sid Smith's book - In The Court Of The Crimson King has just been updated and reissued and is definitive.
Ian

Host of the Post-Avant Jazzcore Happy Hour on Progrock.com

https://podcasts.progrock.com/post-avant-jazzcore-happy-hour/
Back to Top
Blacksword View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 22 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 16130
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Blacksword Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 06:47
There's no need to over analyze. Their music is simply less accessible than those other bands; dark, eclectic, ever changing and riddled with odd time signatures and other musical approaches not consistent with chart topping success.

Even at their most radical, Yes were like the Bee Gees compared to Crimson. Rush always had something for the hard rockers as well as the progheads, and enjoyed commercial success in the early 80's with their new wave leanings. ELP were bombastic and overblown, but could also pen a love song. Yes and Genesis despite their complexities were masters of melody.

King Crimson is the sound of the devil breaking wind...and I love them for it.
Ultimately bored by endless ecstasy!
Back to Top
chopper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 13 2005
Location: Essex, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 20030
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote chopper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 07:26
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:

There's no need to over analyze. Their music is simply less accessible than those other bands; dark, eclectic, ever changing and riddled with odd time signatures and other musical approaches not consistent with chart topping success.

Even at their most radical, Yes were like the Bee Gees compared to Crimson. Rush always had something for the hard rockers as well as the progheads, and enjoyed commercial success in the early 80's with their new wave leanings. ELP were bombastic and overblown, but could also pen a love song. Yes and Genesis despite their complexities were masters of melody.

King Crimson is the sound of the devil breaking wind...and I love them for it.
 
Nicely summed up sir, I have nothing to add.
Back to Top
SteveG View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 11 2014
Location: Kyiv In Spirit
Status: Offline
Points: 20609
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote SteveG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 07:28
Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:



King Crimson is the sound of the devil breaking wind...and I love them for it.
Clap
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Catcher10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 10:07
First time I saw Golden Earring was when they opened for Rush in '81/'82, don't remember...... LOL
Back to Top
lazland View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13634
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote lazland Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 10:54
Originally posted by SteveG SteveG wrote:

Originally posted by Blacksword Blacksword wrote:



King Crimson is the sound of the devil breaking wind...and I love them for it.
Clap

Yeah, absolutely great postClap
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org

Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
Back to Top
The Dark Elf View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: February 01 2011
Location: Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 13064
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote The Dark Elf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 16:08
Perhaps King Crimson's lack of success has to do with them not selling a lot of albums.
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology...
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65268
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Atavachron Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 17:10
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Fripp would perhaps envy what Rush achieved to some extent (I doubt it, because his only concern was satisfying himself rather than the audience).  They didn't dumb down for mass appeal but walked the fine line between accessibility and complexity and kept selling out stadiums.

They never dumbed-down but they did change with the times like Genesis & Yes did, and in 1984 GUP was some seriously cold water in the face of longtime fans.   Crimson on the other hand didn't change with the times, they changed the times they were with.


"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought."   -- John F. Kennedy
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 20:24
Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Fripp would perhaps envy what Rush achieved to some extent (I doubt it, because his only concern was satisfying himself rather than the audience).  They didn't dumb down for mass appeal but walked the fine line between accessibility and complexity and kept selling out stadiums.

They never dumbed-down but they did change with the times like Genesis & Yes did, and in 1984 GUP was some seriously cold water in the face of longtime fans.   Crimson on the other hand didn't change with the times, they changed the times they were with.



I think unless you are AC DC, Motorhead or Iron Maiden, you have to change.  I will agree that Rush never had the vision to refashion the sounds of their times to create something original and distinct out of it the way KC could.  But I won't hold that against them as no band other than KC did anyway.  Nobody other than Fripp would have operated akin to a jazz band leader, rearranging his troops once every few albums.  He recognised that that is the only way to do something totally different for a rock band too.  In the case of Rush, Lifeson (the weakest link of the trio if you ask me) became disgruntled with the keyboard oriented direction of the mid 80s and the other two eventually decided to come around and accommodate him.  These are the typical pressures of a rock band where everybody is not always on board with the changes.  Fripp upended this problem entirely by just changing the lineup altogether.  This may be why KC is seen as elusive even for some prog rock fans because fans of rock bands look for a sound whereas KC is just about an approach to music.  That is the only common denominator between its various formations.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17847
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Catcher10 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 21:56
Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Originally posted by Atavachron Atavachron wrote:

Originally posted by rogerthat rogerthat wrote:

Fripp would perhaps envy what Rush achieved to some extent (I doubt it, because his only concern was satisfying himself rather than the audience).  They didn't dumb down for mass appeal but walked the fine line between accessibility and complexity and kept selling out stadiums.

They never dumbed-down but they did change with the times like Genesis & Yes did, and in 1984 GUP was some seriously cold water in the face of longtime fans.   Crimson on the other hand didn't change with the times, they changed the times they were with.



I think unless you are AC DC, Motorhead or Iron Maiden, you have to change.  I will agree that Rush never had the vision to refashion the sounds of their times to create something original and distinct out of it the way KC could.  But I won't hold that against them as no band other than KC did anyway.  Nobody other than Fripp would have operated akin to a jazz band leader, rearranging his troops once every few albums.  He recognised that that is the only way to do something totally different for a rock band too.  In the case of Rush, Lifeson (the weakest link of the trio if you ask me) became disgruntled with the keyboard oriented direction of the mid 80s and the other two eventually decided to come around and accommodate him.  These are the typical pressures of a rock band where everybody is not always on board with the changes.  Fripp upended this problem entirely by just changing the lineup altogether.  This may be why KC is seen as elusive even for some prog rock fans because fans of rock bands look for a sound whereas KC is just about an approach to music.  That is the only common denominator between its various formations.
Maybe I don't understand what you are trying to state. I don't hear much changes in KC music during most of their 80s output. Red is nothing like Poseidon or Lizard, most everything else is fairly samey. 

Rush in 80s thru 90s starting with PW gave a different sound and texture to what they had done on previous 6 albums. The rock world identifies (as do critics) pre-PW, post PW eras with Rush and then with Counterparts and Vapor Trails a return to harder guitar driven formula, only the furrow browed deep state prog fan had issues with this change, by then those fans meant nothing to the music world as prog has been dead for years. The Rush faithful rolled with the changes, similar to how Yes changed and fans followed.

I don't think it matters if ur a rock fan or prog rock fan, you either connect with the music or you don't. Rock fans are what made KC have any success as in late 60s early 70s as prog fans were non existent, prog was less than infantile at that time. Acid rock, psychedelic rock and jazz rock is what make up KC, later it was tagged prog rock.
As has been stated already, KC music is hardly accessible but for me that is the only negative to what Fripp did, and like I said ........ It's ok. Big smile
Back to Top
cstack3 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: July 20 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Status: Offline
Points: 7272
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cstack3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 21:56
Originally posted by Lewian Lewian wrote:

Apart from the music, Yes and ELP were far more show-guys than KC. OK, I wasn't around in the early seventies, but I don't think KC ever had a reputation for their shows as "events" that were about more than the music. ELP, Yes, also Genesis and Jethro Tull had much more of a reputation to put up something special on stage, not just the music. Also Pink Floyd with their light shows. 

Yeah, Fripp never learned that he had to stand up and play guitar onstage!!  LOL

That is what Lake told him, anyway.  

I've seen some real flashes of stagecraft brilliance with the Crimson King over the years....John Wetton was a brilliant, forceful frontman who had the rare talent of being as adept at playing his bass as singing lead.  

Discipline era KC certainly attracted more than a few women (after all, you have to appeal to more than the "male prog ghetto") and the THRAK show I saw, with the entire band lined up & singing "People," was stirring. 


I am not a Robot, I'm a FREE MAN!!
Back to Top
rogerthat View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rogerthat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 31 2020 at 22:11
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Maybe I don't understand what you are trying to state. I don't hear much changes in KC music during most of their 80s output. Red is nothing like Poseidon or Lizard, most everything else is fairly samey. 


Not only Red, Larks Tongue In Aspic and Starless And Bible Black too were nothing like Lizard.  Lizard was nothing like Poseidon/ITCOTCK either.  And even Lizard and Islands aren't particularly  alike.  Reason?  The line up changed even between Lizard and Islands.  And the lineup for LTIA-SABB-Red was a total revamp of the band.  Wetton and Bruford had never played for KC before.  It is difficult to take seriously the claim then that LTIA somehow sounds similar to say Poseidon, Lizard or Court of the Crimson King.  Unless Fripp forced Bruford and Wetton to play the same music as on those albums, that wouldn't happen.  

Then, Discipline-Beat-Three of a Perfect Pair is again a new chapter in KC that simply has nothing in common with everything previously done by the band and has much more in common with what Talking Heads were up to at that time.  It is one thing for Rush to go from a loosely LZ based sound to adding new wave tinges by the time of Permanent Waves/Moving Pictures but Fripp was there in 1969 during the take off of prog and went from Epitaph to Frame by Frame.  Same sounding?  Exactly how?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.141 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.