The American Politics Thread |
Post Reply | Page <1 1213141516 434> |
Author | |||||
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
Posted: March 02 2017 at 01:30 | ||||
These absolutely astonishing revelations about Jeff Sessions’
contacts to Russia seem to confirm what I’ve been suspecting for a while:
As the (then) future security advisor didn’t have a clue that the Russian Embassy might be under surveillance, it seems safe to assume that those other bozos didn’t suspect this either, meaning that the US secret services most likely sitting on a handy little pile of transcripts and just biding their time. The Trump administration has probably realized this by now. That’s probably why none of them can openly deny any Russian contacts, because if they did, the security services could just pop up, waving a stack of transcripts, and say: “What a coincidence! Look at what we’ve just found.” Hey, wouldn’t it be fun if an entire US administration were to be impeached on the grounds of treason?! |
|||||
A Person
Forum Senior Member Joined: November 10 2008 Location: __ Status: Offline Points: 65760 |
Posted: March 02 2017 at 01:39 | ||||
It also I think has to do with the fact that at the end of the day media outlets sell the stories that gets them the most money. |
|||||
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Tallahassee, FL Status: Offline Points: 34550 |
Posted: March 02 2017 at 01:45 | ||||
I wondered that as well NPJNPJ. It was starting to seem like they are indeed sitting on a pile, slowly trickling them out. It seems very likely they do have more, perhaps more substantive too, and that could be the game of the intel community just what you said.
All of which I'm fine with, these are borderline treasonous actions, and at the least I don't like the idea of foreign influence on us. I criticized the Clinton Foundation but I'm fair (which can't be said of many how have since gone quiet and actively defend Trump...hey wasn't Putin rising in popularity amongst Republicans?) it's clear Trump is in bed with Russia, really not sure how any fair person can deny it. Alas nothing will happen. The GOP has made their deal with the devil. They are gunna get their financial deregulation, wealthy tax cuts, as large budget cuts as they can get through Congress, the Tea Party will (try to) get their cut off to sanctuary cities and immigration clamp down, the fundamentalist are being rewarded, and xenophobes and daddy state conservatives are having a field day. Everyone has a piece of the Trump pie and thus nothing will happen. When Jason "I will pester Clinton for 4 years with investigations" Chaffetz said there's no need to look into any of this, and Rand "hey look I have morals" Paul said itd be silly to investigate Republicans, ya knew any hope was long dead
Edited by JJLehto - March 02 2017 at 01:46 |
|||||
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer Joined: April 05 2006 Location: Tallahassee, FL Status: Offline Points: 34550 |
Posted: March 02 2017 at 01:51 | ||||
That's for sure. Trump has played em like a fiddle, pains me to say: He truly had a plan figured out. I always thought the coverage of Trump was odd. Like, it was often opposed but never in a hard way, his entire campaign I kinda felt like he was getting off easy. You hit it on the head: They loved the story. He's the greatest thing for them. Well, he was. As many media outlets get increasingly shut out as he tries to build a state propaganda machine, clearly it was a not a fruitful endeavor for much of the corporate media |
|||||
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
Posted: March 02 2017 at 02:02 | ||||
@JJLetho: I’m not all too sure about that. The intel
community is outside the scope of the GOP, at least if they want to be.
The intel services are most definitely not on the Trump administration’s side, he himself has seen to that, and I think they’re just doing their own thing, which is waiting for the right moment. Let’s face it: if they make their move now, the USA is most likely to face something akin to a civil war, but if they wait until the Trump support (consisting mostly of the Wallmart-/pitchfork-/haystack-/trailer brigades) wanes due to the promises of mass deportations and mass job creations not being kept, then would be the time for these transcripts to magically materialize. I’m inclined to think that that will be the most likely cause for an untimely demise of the Trump administration. Well, barring committal, of course. |
|||||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20604 |
Posted: March 02 2017 at 15:15 | ||||
|
|||||
This message was brought to you by a proud supporter of the Deep State.
|
|||||
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 29 2005 Location: Lilliwaup, Wa. Status: Offline Points: 5319 |
Posted: March 02 2017 at 15:40 | ||||
timothy leary
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 29 2005 Location: Lilliwaup, Wa. Status: Offline Points: 5319 |
Posted: March 02 2017 at 15:42 | ||||
Jeff should be put in one of the prisons he so much wants to fill up.
|
|||||
Tillerman88
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 31 2015 Location: Tomorrowland Status: Offline Points: 495 |
Posted: March 02 2017 at 17:55 | ||||
Pretty much true. And that's what happens when they are in for the money... I mean, America’s corporate-owned mass communications media are in the business to make money. Hence, it is the profit motive which dictates all successful forms of media in the U.S. to opt for stability, which distorts their editorial bias. As a consequence, the public interest is often subordinated to the interest of the profit motive. Likewise, reporters and the companies they work for will often actively avoid contending with governmental and corporate sources so as to maintain access to news developments and a steady stream of advertisers. Ultimately, self-censorship just will play a large role in silencing the mainstream U.S. media outlets.... . ..
|
|||||
The overwhelming amount of information on a daily basis restrains people from rewinding the news record archives to refresh their memories...
|
|||||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13054 |
Posted: March 02 2017 at 20:09 | ||||
THE RUSSIAN SCORECARD (for those of you keeping count): Donald J. Trump has, since the 1980s, made numerous trips to Russia and relied on Russian investors to buy his properties around the world. In his last visit to Moscow in 2013, Trump was paid $14 million by Russian billionaire Aras Agalarov and other investors to bring the Miss Universe pageant to Russia Donald Trump Jr. made the following announcement at a real estate conference in 2008: “Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.” In the same speech, Donald Jr. claimed to have traveled to Russia 6 times in the previous 18 months. Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, participated in a meeting at Trump Tower with Michael Flynn and Sergey I. Kislyak, the Russian ambassador, the White House announced today. Michael Flynn, disgraced National Security Adviser, lied about meeting Sergey I. Kislyak, the Russian ambassador, several times during the campaign and transition regarding, among other things, the lifting of sanctions against Russia for tampering in the U.S. Presidential election. Flynn resigned his post due to the revelation. Jeff Sessions, Attorney General, acknowledged that he had met twice with the Russian Ambassador during the campaign, despite previous denials. He lied under oath before Senate confirmation hearings regarding the conversations, then he backpedaled, saying he spoke to the Russians from his post as a senior member of the influential Armed Services Committee, but at least one of the discussions occurred at the Republican National Convention, where Sessions was a noted senior foreign adviser on the Trump election Team. As of today, Sessions has recused himself of participating in any investigation of Russian espionage in the White House. Paul Manafort, former Trump campaign manager, is being investigated by the FBI, the CIA and the Treasury Department's financial crimes unit as to whether intercepted communications and financial transactions demonstrate links between Russian intelligence officers and Trump's former campaign manager. He shrugged and said, "It's not like these people wear badges that say, 'I'm a Russian intelligence officer.’ " Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump's personal counsel -- in collusion with Felix Sater, a Russian-American real-estate developer who has helped the Trump Organization scout deals in Russia, and pro-Russian Ukrainian lawmaker Andrii V. Artemenko -- hand-delivered a "peace" plan for Russia and Ukraine to former national security adviser Michael Flynn just prior to Flynn’s resignation. Cohen was also named in the explosive dossier assembled by British Intelligence as being in an “ongoing secret liaison relationship between the New York tycoon’s campaign and the Russian leadership.” Carter Page, former Trump foreign policy adviser, is being investigated by U.S. intelligence agencies regarding his interactions with senior Russian officials, including former Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin and Deputy Chief for Internal Policy Igor Diveykin – the man U.S. officials believed was in charge of "intelligence collected by Russian agencies about the U.S. election." Roger Stone, informal Trump adviser, had prior inside knowledge about the content of the emails hacked from the Clinton campaign and the timing of their release. When WikiLeaks released emails hacked from the DNC over the summer, Stone touted knowledge that more would come. In August, months before Clinton campaign manager John Podesta's emails were leaked, he tweeted: “It will soon the Podesta's time in the barrel." |
|||||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|||||
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
Posted: March 03 2017 at 00:21 | ||||
@ Dark Elf: that is a very helpful list, thank you.
Well, it looks as if Mike Pence has done a naughty with his own private e-mail servers during his time as governor. Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear! It's hard to keep up, isn't it? Edited by npjnpj - March 03 2017 at 00:37 |
|||||
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
Posted: March 03 2017 at 06:09 | ||||
People, this is really, really, really bad! This is one of the things I've been half waiting for, because it follows a dreadful pattern:
I've just read reports that Donald Trump has investment plans to spend 1 trillion dollars on infrastructure, mainly bridges and roads, and we've heard about his plans to increase the US arms arsenal. Adolf Hitler based his continued public support in the 1930s on mainly two factors: the building of infrastructure, mainly motorways (autobahns), thereby providing mass employment, and the construction of a massive arms industry. This is history that went massively wrong all over again; the Nazi methods are being copied without any attempt at concealment. This has Steve Bannon written all over it, and it's absolutely textbook. History has also shown that this works. If Trump and Bannon provide mass employment in these two sectors, they will have all the public support they will ever need, and damn the consequences. They are laying the foundations that will inevitably lead to a new world war. Look at history. I'm beginning to get very scared now, massively more than I've been before. The methods of inciting civil unrest are already well under way, with the legal and illegal immigrants taking on the role of the Jews in Nazi Germany. If what I'm fearing should be true, one of the next steps will be the creation of a secret police organisation only accountable to the closest Trump administration circle. Let me be clear here: Trump is not the instigator; he hasn't got the brains or the mental stability. What he does have, however, is the charismatic personality, just right to take on the famous role of Lenin's 'Useful Idiot' for Steve Bannon. Trump is just smoke and mirrors. Edited by npjnpj - March 03 2017 at 07:27 |
|||||
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Posted: March 03 2017 at 07:26 | ||||
Absolutely a coalition system is better. Yes, it often is inefficient, indecisive and messy (as also being very prone to corruption as rent seeking ensues between the allies). But you know what, those things are much less important than representing everyone's interests. What I have learnt from the experience of the first time in my life that a single party formed a govt of its own at the centre in India is it takes whipping up a frightening wave of mass sentiment of some sort for enough people to vote a single party into power. The last time it happened was a destructive 'sympathy' vote which cost the lives of many Sikhs (in the capital city, no less). This time...no need to elaborate, I think. So...yes, USA would probably also be better served with a coalition govt.
|
|||||
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
Posted: March 03 2017 at 07:35 | ||||
The only thing wrong with such a coalition system is that it results in a serious lack of opposition.
The present German Bundestag, for instance, is a prime example of this. The two main parties, who should be opposing each other and suggesting alternatives, are now in government together and practically indistinguishable from each other, leaving only the extreme right- and left wing crackpots in opposition. It's a pretty dire situation. Edited by npjnpj - March 03 2017 at 07:39 |
|||||
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer Joined: September 03 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 9869 |
Posted: March 03 2017 at 07:42 | ||||
It would happen the other way too anyway. When one party commands a huge majority (I am thinking of a parliamentary system a la UK), they enjoy a lot of popular support and people don't want to listen to the opposition and think of them as a nuisance. By contrast, a scattered opposition in a coalition govt is probably better.
|
|||||
omphaloskepsis
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 19 2011 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 6341 |
Posted: March 03 2017 at 19:24 | ||||
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/01/gop-wants-to-eliminate-shadowy-doj-slush-fund-bankrolling-leftist-groups.html The Obama administration funneled billions of dollars to activist organizations through a Department of Justice slush fund scheme, according to congressional investigators. “It’s clear partisan politics played a role in the illicit actions that were made,” Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, told Fox News. “The DOJ is the last place this should have occurred.” Findings spearheaded by the House Judiciary Committee point to a process shrouded in secrecy whereby monies were distributed to a labyrinth of nonprofit organizations involved with grass-roots activism. Edited by omphaloskepsis - March 03 2017 at 19:27 |
|||||
The Dark Elf
Forum Senior Member VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13054 |
Posted: March 03 2017 at 23:25 | ||||
You mean settlements from corrupt corporations. The money is from judgments against unethical corporations who have cheated consumers. Like the Bank of America. And Volkswagen. If you actually read the Fox News hogwash, you'd actually understand what the Republicans are trying to do, once you eliminate the Faux News rhetoric. But nice try making the Republicans seem ethical. Oh, but sorry, they aren't ethical at all; in fact, they just recently gutted the Office of Congressional Ethics, because they want to hide their dishonest, unethical nature... https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/the-gops-ethics-disaster/512021/ And why is this important now, considering Republican reluctance to investigate actual treason occurring in the Trump White House. Treason. For a group that professes an alleged attachment to constitutionality (when it suits their agenda), one would think a hostile act perpetrated by a foreign power on the U.S. (you know, the hacking of the election process every national security agency says was done by the Russians), and mounting evidence that every staffer in the White House had conversations with the Russians during the presidential campaign or had questionable business dealings with the Russians would supersede anything else. |
|||||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|||||
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
Posted: March 03 2017 at 23:43 | ||||
I went to the trouble of reading that article (twice actually), and I've still got only the vaguest idea what they're going on about. My impression is that whatever muddle-head wrote it has a lot of trouble expressing himself clearly. What a load of convoluted tripe! How is the average Trump supporter supposed to understand all that?
It seems that there is a DOJ slush fund that someone (in the Obama administration) did something with that wasn't illegal, possibly immoral, and highly questionable for, .... well...., reasons. Perhaps. At the very least I think it might be outragous. I'm not sure though. Whatever the contents of this highly inflamatory articel might be, I'm certain it's scandalous, but for the life of me I can't figure out what it might be. One thing is certain though: Obama must go! Edited by npjnpj - March 03 2017 at 23:44 |
|||||
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member Joined: December 05 2007 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 2720 |
Posted: March 04 2017 at 00:13 | ||||
I find it difficult to believe that there was amy Russian involvement at all.
I think most of the Trump votes actually resulted from hundreds of thousands of poor sods being told in the voting booths to sign their names with a cross in that little circle there to win a free two-week trip to Hawaii. |
|||||
omphaloskepsis
Forum Senior Member Joined: October 19 2011 Location: Texas Status: Offline Points: 6341 |
Posted: March 04 2017 at 00:56 | ||||
Dark Elf said- But nice try making the Republicans seem ethical. Oh, but sorry, they aren't ethical at all; in fact, they just recently gutted the Office of Congressional Ethics, because they want to hide their dishonest, unethical. I am not a Republican. I don't believe Republicans are ethical. I am not a Democrat. I don't believe Democrats are ethical. https://www.worldnewspolitics.com/2017/02/04/mccain-violates-logan-act/ "McCain called the Australian ambassador to pass on a message to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull. Besides being stupid – in the middle of negotiating you need to be strong – this call violates the Logan Act. On other words, it’s treason. The Logan Act stipulates we have one voice when talking to our international friends and enemies. The law prevents citizens, like Senators, from interfering in disputes the United States is having with foreign countries. It is a critical piece of our foreign policy." Edited by omphaloskepsis - March 04 2017 at 01:20 |
|||||
Post Reply | Page <1 1213141516 434> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |