Should PA have a Psych Rock Lounge? |
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Author | |||
Rivertree
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Band Submissions Joined: March 22 2006 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 17630 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 17:31 | ||
now that makes it clear what your intention is. You are not the first to claim such a change, this comes up on and off. But my answer, alongside with Dean, always will be - this is a progressive rock archive, as for that we only are willing to add progressive rock acts to our subgenres - simple as that would be interesting to know btw how this new subgenre should be named - non-progressive psychedelic/space rock, or something like that? Edited by Rivertree - December 14 2014 at 17:39 |
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:36 | ||
Good, surprises are seldom welcome and back and forth internet discussions rarely ever resolve. You failed to ask us why we say "No" We are not here to catalogue all that is Psychedelic Rock, that is not our function, mandate, raison d'etre, role, goal, aim, ambition, desire, need or requirement. It is not why the site exists or why we are here. If this is what you want then I suggest looking elsewhere - try a Psych Rock archive or something - or Rate Your Music. We are here to catalogue all that is Progressive Rock. Any category listed on the PA Front Page in Orange is regarded here as a subset (or subgenre) of Progressive Rock and those in Yellow are not. So once again: the "Progressive" in Psychedelic/Space Rock (which is shown in Orange on the Front Page) is implicit. This means that non-Prog bands like Country Joe and The Fish are inadmissible because the Psychedelic Rock they played was not Progressive Psychedelic Rock. We include *some* non-Prog Psychedelic Rock bands under Proto Prog (which is shown in Yellow on the Front Page) if they were germane to the formation of Progressive Rock as a genre, but this does not mean that we should, could or would include every Psych band, regardless of how "key" you believe them to be. [Clue: none of the bands you've listed thus far need to be included under Proto Prog or Psych/Space]. Edited by Dean - December 14 2014 at 16:38 |
|||
What?
|
|||
Angelo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:30 | ||
On that bomb shell I say 'Goodnight to you, sir!'
|
|||
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
|||
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:22 | ||
It's a Christmas thing.
|
|||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
|||
Angelo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:21 | ||
Oh, I wasn't critising you, just looking for confirmation that we were thinking in the same direction. ;-)
And yes, you should blush, you're bra hasn't seen a laundry basket in weeks now.
|
|||
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
|||
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:19 | ||
Sorry Angelo, that post wasn't directed at you even if I used it as a starting point
|
|||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
|||
Angelo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:13 | ||
Isn't that in line with what I wrote? As long as it's 'rock', we can take it in or consider it. Otherwise, we don't - unless we change to 'progressive music' and end up in the mess you describe.
RYM could be different - it is possible to put different front-ends (sites) next to each other that share content. At some point I thought Max had a vision like that, when he started Metal Music Archives and Jazz Music Archive next to this site. It would've been great to be able to put everything in the right genre, publish it at the right site and have a single database behind it all to redirect people to the right place. Maybe one day...
|
|||
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
|||
Guldbamsen
Special Collaborator Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 16:06 | ||
The problem therein is when do you stop? Wu-Tang Clan were hugely progressive. Just like Sarah Vaughan, Sun Ra, Funkadelic, Bob Dylan, The Stooges, The Fall, NWA, Edith Piaf, Neil Young, The Velvet Underground, Beethoven, Django Reinhardt, Cocteau Twins, RZA/Gravediggaz/Bobby Digital, Stockhausen, Varese, Hallucinogen, Sphongle, Napalm Death, Muddy Waters, etc etc etc. and it never stops. We end up like RYM in the end, because going full 'progressive music archives' also means that we can't pick and chose. It would entail all kinds of styles ranging from RnB to Grindcore to trance to classical. RYM here we come!
Just because a band isn't listed on here though doesn't mean that we can't appreciate it and converse about it's aural bliss. That's what general music discussions are for |
|||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
|||
Angelo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 15:46 | ||
Ok... I missed the second question for some reason. If the line below is accurate, then why not just propose these bands to the Psych/Space team?
As long as they have 'rock' applied to their music, they should be headed for acceptance. Only if non-rock bands show up it becomes different - which would lead to the question that also came up in the Miles Davis discussion this weekend: why is PA about progressive rock, and not about progressive music?
Edited by Angelo - December 14 2014 at 15:47 |
|||
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
|||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20616 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 15:20 | ||
|
|||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20616 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 15:19 | ||
|
|||
Svetonio
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 20 2010 Location: Serbia Status: Offline Points: 10213 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 14:52 | ||
|
|||
Angelo
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 14:40 | ||
Call this thread the Psych Lounge, and have your way with it. As often, better to apologise later if your wrong than to spend months of debate to get approval. :)
|
|||
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
|||
LearsFool
Prog Reviewer Joined: November 09 2014 Location: New York Status: Offline Points: 8642 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 14:26 | ||
Good news, then, is that Silver Apples are under Proto. I would say it would be a bit contentious to promote them to Psych, though, since they are also the first prog electronic group.
|
|||
SteveG
Forum Senior Member Joined: April 11 2014 Location: Kyiv In Spirit Status: Offline Points: 20616 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 14:15 | ||
Very good, Gents. You've all given me the answer I expected (except for Atavachron, Finnforrest and Sventonio) without asking the pertinent question: Why?
PA's Psych/Space rock site excludes key psychedelic groups that range from the 13 Floor Elevators, Country Joe and The Fish, The Red Crayola, Lost And Found, The Golden Dawn, The Bubble Puppy, Silver Apples and about two dozen more nascent and influential psychedelic groups that I could list. PA's So called 'Pysch/Space' site is for groups that are just that: Floyd, Hawkwind and their clones. The old rule adage goes "When something isn't broken, don't fix it" That old adage does not apply to PA's current Psych/Space Rock sub genre. Obvious key Psychedelic Rock groups should have been or need to be included. If the criteria to admit them is flawed, out dated and just plain silly (which it seems), then fix it or start a new sub genre. That would be the point for doing this. It's too bad we could not have a had a back and forth discussion about this, but I'm not surprised by this anymore. Edited by SteveG - December 14 2014 at 14:28 |
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 12:11 | ||
There is absolutely no point in doing this. The sub-genre name is Psychedelic/Space Rock - the fact that is Psychedelic Progressive Rock is implicit. If further clarification is required this is also stated in the sub-genre description: "Psychedelic progressive rock music may contain the elements previously described in varying combinations, but the artistic perspective of progressive rock is another factor. Some psychedelic rock bands stuck to the mid 1960's beat rock style in purist form, not partaking in the experimental development of the impressionistic possibilities of psychedelic rock music others spearheaded." |
|||
What?
|
|||
Dean
Special Collaborator Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 12:05 | ||
|
|||
What?
|
|||
Svetonio
Forum Senior Member Joined: September 20 2010 Location: Serbia Status: Offline Points: 10213 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 10:42 | ||
I respect your opinion, but then the current section should be renamed as "progressive psychedelia / space rock". |
|||
Rivertree
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator / Band Submissions Joined: March 22 2006 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 17630 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 10:38 | ||
a lounge would not necessarily mean a new sub genre if the thread is intended to open a door for another subgenre (as this was openend in the Proto-Prog and Prog-Related Lounge section) or to change/extend the genre definition - I would not agree though. such a lounge would be placed in the General Music Discussions section at best |
|||
earlyprog
Collaborator Neo / PSIKE / Heavy Teams Joined: March 05 2006 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 2134 |
Posted: December 14 2014 at 10:33 | ||
This is often postulated. But it's just that - a postulate. So, 'NO' and 'NO WAY'. |
|||
Post Reply | Page <123> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |