![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 5> |
Author | |||
Dr. Occulator ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 04 2006 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 634 |
![]() Posted: May 06 2014 at 15:53 |
||
Just a thought after reading some album reviews I don't necessarily agree with.
It may be useful and also popular to have P.A. followers give a thumbs up or a thumbs down to a particular album review. This may help to give a more reliably consensus whether or not a review is agreed by the majority or minority. I realize everyone has their own opinion but if a particular album has been getting mostly 4 to 5 starts and a reviewer gives 1 star this may help him see if his reasons stated in the review are compelling or not and also vice versa where a generally poor consensus suddenly gets a 5 star review which I believe is more common. Anyway just throwing this idea out there and welcome any comments. Cheers to all.
|
|||
My Doc Told Me I Have Doggie Head.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
The Dark Elf ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: February 01 2011 Location: Michigan Status: Offline Points: 13229 |
![]() |
||
Boy, don't we all wish we had a "Review-the-Reviewer" option for newspaper and magazine rock critics who regularly attack prog albums? I would want a "pound sand" option. ![]() Anyway, I don't particularly care for the option you are suggesting for PA. If someone offers a reasoned and well-written critique of an album, why punish him/her for harboring an opposing view? Someone is bound to get hundreds of thumbs up for praising a certain Gabriel-led Genesis album just as someone would get as many thumbs down for desecrating a King Crimson album with sacrilegious opinions. We don't want a popularity contest for reviews.
|
|||
...a vigorous circular motion hitherto unknown to the people of this area, but destined
to take the place of the mud shark in your mythology... |
|||
![]() |
|||
Guldbamsen ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
![]() |
||
^completely agree with you Dark Elf.
Also, why not use the already existing reviews discussion? Or if you really dig a review, then highlight it in Sagi's "I really like your review!!!" thread. Let's not go down the Facebook path of 'likes'-galore. I fear it would blow up in our faces.....and what's all this about having to 'rate' everything? It's practically everywhere I look in modern media. "Nice somersault! I'll give it a 3.5" |
|||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
|||
![]() |
|||
HolyMoly ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin Joined: April 01 2009 Location: Atlanta Status: Offline Points: 26138 |
![]() |
||
Sounds a lot like Amazon's feature of "Was this Review Helpful? Yes/No" Which isn't a bad idea in itself, if there are 500 reviews of an album and a newbie wants to know which one to read first. But more than likely, it'll be used to rate the album rather than the review - e.g. a well written review gives 2 stars to Joe's favorite album, so he votes "NAY!" on that review. Then all the discussion and flak that will ensue from there.
It's not a bad idea, but good intentions often turn to nightmares around here.
|
|||
My other avatar is a Porsche
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased. -Kehlog Albran |
|||
![]() |
|||
NotAProghead ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7957 |
![]() |
||
I think reviews discussion and "I really like your review!!!" thread are not for everybody. You have to have the time and will to discuss some review or to explain why you like it. Too much effort in many cases. And the review should be extraordinary to force the reader to send PM to reviewer. In my opinion something similar to Facebook "likes" is a good form of feedback. With the help of "likes" you may at least know that somebody read your review. Why not to have this harmless feature? Edited by NotAProghead - May 06 2014 at 18:57 |
|||
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Man With Hat ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Jazz-Rock/Fusion/Canterbury Team Joined: March 12 2005 Location: Neurotica Status: Offline Points: 166183 |
![]() |
||
Pass from me as well. There are already sufficient options to express your opinion on other peoples opinions IMO.
|
|||
Dig me...But don't...Bury me
I'm running still, I shall until, one day, I hope that I'll arrive Warning: Listening to jazz excessively can cause a laxative effect. |
|||
![]() |
|||
Dayvenkirq ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 25 2011 Location: Los Angeles, CA Status: Offline Points: 10970 |
![]() |
||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Guldbamsen ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
![]() |
||
Like I said, I'm really not a fan of the whole 'likes' thing on Facebook. More than anything, I find it irritating. You can't post anything - or just be online without people asking/pleading you to 'like' something. When you don't people start getting insulted.... and what does a simple thumbs up say about anything really? As for the already existing threads: one doesn't need to post a full synopsis of X review. A lot of the times I see people just making a quick shout-out to highlight a given album. "Hey Bernhard!! I really loved your Torman Maxt review here the other day!" Doesn't need to be anything more than that. As for the reviews discussion - at least you get some kind of bearing on what people think of X review. Seeing a thumbs down on your review doesn't tell you anything other than the person who rated you didn't like it. On here you at least get an explanation.
|
|||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
|||
![]() |
|||
aapatsos ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 11 2005 Location: Manchester, UK Status: Offline Points: 9226 |
![]() |
||
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Guldbamsen ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin Joined: January 22 2009 Location: Magic Theatre Status: Offline Points: 23104 |
![]() |
||
Reading my posts back I think I may have come on a bit strong, but that's essentially how I feel. Wasn't meant to denigrate the OPs intentions
![]() One thing though: how often do you see changes in the forum software? I mean, we've had some really good ideas on how to better the site, like the add on of half stars, using individual album tagging etc, -some of which are ideas which have been discussed the past 6-8 years, yet even if we all seem to agree on these things, nothing really happens, because in the end it is up to one guy. Oh well we can dream
![]() |
|||
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”
- Douglas Adams |
|||
![]() |
|||
NotAProghead ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7957 |
![]() |
||
Existing forms of feedback on PA, except PMs, don't have direct connection to reviews. I don't think many people visit discussion reviews threads. If the review is written long time ago I can't imagine someone will search through the forum whether it has been discussed. A simple "Thanks" (or "Like") button near a review could indicate at least some interest (ot the lack of it) to each review. I think it would be useful, though I can live without it.
|
|||
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Tom Ozric ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: September 03 2005 Location: Olympus Mons Status: Offline Points: 15926 |
![]() |
||
I wouldn't want this option in place for fear of gaining too many 'thumb downs' - it would hurt my already cracked ego.......(but then I review once a blue moon and no-one probably notices anyway......)
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Matti ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: April 15 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 2148 |
![]() |
||
Definitely NO! The biggest reason why I haven't signed into Facebook is that I see the thumbing culture so banal and stupid. Of course the nature of Facebook - and social media by and large - just happens to be such, and I deeply wish that our dear ProgArchives keeps away from those banalities.
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Atavachron ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: September 30 2006 Location: Pearland Status: Online Points: 65624 |
![]() |
||
^ Good point-- it is a bit common
|
|||
"Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -- John F. Kennedy
|
|||
![]() |
|||
NotAProghead ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7957 |
![]() |
||
So you, guys, write reviews and don't give a sh*t whether they are read or not? Right?
|
|||
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Dayvenkirq ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 25 2011 Location: Los Angeles, CA Status: Offline Points: 10970 |
![]() |
||
^ Ok, how about this: a number of views that only you can see ... ? Other people don't want to know how many times your review has been read.
Edited by Dayvenkirq - May 08 2014 at 14:54 |
|||
![]() |
|||
NotAProghead ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Errors & Omissions Team Joined: October 22 2005 Location: Russia Status: Offline Points: 7957 |
![]() |
||
^ Will not work. How to count views without a button if the review is read on the main page or on the album page?
And why so secretly? I prefer to see the number of likes (or views, no matter) for other people reviews. In order to compare my impression with others. Pure curiosity, nothing more.
![]() |
|||
Who are you and who am I to say we know the reason why... (D. Gilmour)
|
|||
![]() |
|||
Dayvenkirq ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: May 25 2011 Location: Los Angeles, CA Status: Offline Points: 10970 |
![]() |
||
Touché, evidently.
![]() Edited by Dayvenkirq - May 08 2014 at 19:52 |
|||
![]() |
|||
Angelo ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: May 07 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 13244 |
![]() |
||
Let's revive this. I posted this in a thread that was so derailed it was moved to Just For Fun. This is not for fun, so here goes....
|
|||
ISKC Rock Radio
I stopped blogging and reviewing - so won't be handling requests. Promo's for ariplay can be sent to [email protected] |
|||
![]() |
|||
ExittheLemming ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 19 2007 Location: Penal Colony Status: Offline Points: 11420 |
![]() |
||
^ I agree that from a visitor perspective there is nothing currently available that provides any indication of which reviewers are considered more credible than others (apart from the Prog Reviewer/Forum Senior Member demarcation) Is there a danger however, that if we had some sort of 'league table' which measured the perceived worth of the reviewers work, those occupying the lower positions would become disheartened and stop submitting reviews? Although this might reduce fanboy/disingenuous reviews it might also tempt more members to reach for the 'rating only' button rather than risk some visible negative feedback?
|
|||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page 123 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |