Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
richardh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: February 18 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 29495
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 15:14 |
Well I've paid for both the Blu Ray version and the CD version. It is a brilliant album and I have no regret on that score. What I hope is that all the people who have downloaded it and not bought it can honestly say they can't afford to purchase it. If that's the case then its perfectly forgiveable in my eyes and no different to someone being given a copy by a friend in all truth.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
infandous
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 23 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2447
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 14:24 |
Dean wrote:
infandous wrote:
Dean wrote:
Any musicians out there reading this can chip in and correct me if I am wrong, but it is fair to say that every artist in Progressive Rock Music today has a day-job that finances his Prog - If I am not mistaken every Prog Musician is part-time. |
Well, there are quite a few that are full time in music.....by having multiple projects (Roine Stolt, for example), having their own studio (Karl Groom, Neal Morse, others), or working in various musical endeavors as writers, session men, etc. Or, like Andy Tillison, simply dirt poor trying to make prog music their sole income stream.
|
Sure, but they are still a day-jobs that are necessary to pay the bills. Rest assured these guys are not rich by any stretch of the imagination. And they are in the top eschelon, below them are hundreds of Prog musicians who do not make a living from music. |
Oh I certainly agree that the vast majority of prog musicians are strictly part time, just not all of them as I've pointed out. And no, none of these guys is anywhere close to being rich......not even Wilson (who is probably pretty comfortable though, being single with no children to worry about).
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 13:55 |
infandous wrote:
Dean wrote:
Any musicians out there reading this can chip in and correct me if I am wrong, but it is fair to say that every artist in Progressive Rock Music today has a day-job that finances his Prog - If I am not mistaken every Prog Musician is part-time. |
Well, there are quite a few that are full time in music.....by having multiple projects (Roine Stolt, for example), having their own studio (Karl Groom, Neal Morse, others), or working in various musical endeavors as writers, session men, etc. Or, like Andy Tillison, simply dirt poor trying to make prog music their sole income stream.
|
Sure, but they are still a day-jobs that are necessary to pay the bills. Rest assured these guys are not rich by any stretch of the imagination. And they are in the top eschelon, below them are hundreds of Prog musicians who do not make a living from music.
|
What?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17310
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 13:52 |
Thanks Mike, though I'll admit I was heavy-handed, so apologies to anyone my words below offend. The whole "debate" to justify illegal downloading just seems ridiculous to me......idk, is it "dinosaur" thinking to believe a musician has the right to set his own price to his work? And that all of us as fans need to respect that? Esp in an era where we have so many free choices?
|
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
infandous
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 23 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2447
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 13:28 |
Dean wrote:
Any musicians out there reading this can chip in and correct me if I am wrong, but it is fair to say that every artist in Progressive Rock Music today has a day-job that finances his Prog - If I am not mistaken every Prog Musician is part-time. |
Well, there are quite a few that are full time in music.....by having multiple projects (Roine Stolt, for example), having their own studio (Karl Groom, Neal Morse, others), or working in various musical endeavors as writers, session men, etc. Or, like Andy Tillison, simply dirt poor trying to make prog music their sole income stream.
Edited by infandous - February 25 2013 at 13:29
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
infandous
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 23 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2447
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 13:25 |
Finnforest wrote:
My two cents....
When you can't afford to buy something/anything, I guess there are two general choices.
a. I'll just steal it. b. I'll save up my dough for a while and when I can afford it, I'll buy it.
Choice
"b" is what was pretty common when I was a kid, silly us, we didn't sit
around crafting sob stories about why we should get free music,
man....We didn't whine about "those rich guys", who incidentally probably worked very hard for what they have. We just had a little patience and eventually we managed to save
up and buy some music, books, whatever....
There's no debate
here, no grey area. You can either steal
someone's work, then try 20 different angles to justify your thievery,
or, you save your money and purchase your stuff at the offered price.
One choice is right, one borders on a****le territory. And if you think otherwise, then you'll be perfectly accepting
and happy when someone steals something of value from you, from your
home, your car, your computer. If you agree you wouldn't mind being
ripped off, then I can at least give you points for consistency. Because, hey, that guy who took your Ipod couldn't afford to buy one! Should he be denied the ability to have one?
Last
there are TONS of free music choices out there people can stream with
permission. The idea that people who can't afford to buy music "will have no music to enjoy" is as daft as any comment I've read in this forum in years.
|
This completely sums up my feelings on the issue. I'd like to point out that even though I had friends record LP's onto cassette for me when I was younger, and never bought the physical album myself in many cases (until later, when I was more financially secure and wanted to replace those old tapes with better sounding CD's) , they were not copied a billion times and given out to everyone on the planet. The same principal applies to library books. You simply can't compare tape trading (which in many cases was condoned and even encouraged by bands, as such trading was almost always of live shows that were not officially released in any capacity) to downloading torrents. I was excited when I first saw all the music on Napster back in the late 90's (before I gave much thought to the legality of it). My excitement wasn't, however, about getting free music, it was about being able to hear and sample music I was potentially interested in buying. Nowadays that is quite easy to do LEGALLY, so I don't really see how anyone can justify downloading pirated music. Many prog bands offer ENTIRE albums for streaming at their web sites so for the most part the excuses being offered here are complete BS.
Edited by infandous - February 25 2013 at 13:30
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:50 |
It's very intriguing; the same technology that makes music theft easy should potentially be able to make it difficult. Identity fraud happens but still hasn't been so rampant as to make ecommerce untenable. On the other hand, more and more people are hopping onto that bandwagon and prefer shopping online. It's now what 15 years or so since internet piracy began to hurt the industry. Why, after so many years, have they still been unable to find a way to protect their work from it? And why not Hollywood, which is more powerful, more moneyed? Or could it be that Hollywood makes money anyway and doesn't really care which leaves the labels to fend for themselves? I think Itunes presented a good opportunity to permanently move to a secure file format while still giving portability to the users but the industry missed the bus there. They really should have forced other device makers to likewise offer secure formats for transfer of music files to the device, rather than conversion to mp3.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17310
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:44 |
Metalmarsh89 wrote:
Finnforest wrote:
There's no debate
here, no grey area. You can either steal
someone's work, then try 20 different angles to justify your thievery,
or, you save your money and purchase your stuff at the offered price.
One choice is right, one borders on a****le territory. And if you think otherwise, then you'll be perfectly accepting
and happy when someone steals something of value from you, from your
home, your car, your computer. If you agree you wouldn't mind being
ripped off, then I can at least give you points for consistency. Because, hey, that guy who took your Ipod couldn't afford to buy one! Should he be denied the ability to have one? |
I think you're missing a point here. Any time an artist records and releases a CD, he does so knowing that there are going to be thousands of illegal downloads. Any artist who doesn't think it can/will happen would be have to be pretty naive. It would be much more comparable to going into the grocery store and leaving your car windows down with a computer or ipod sitting in plain sight. You'd be a fool to think it would be safe. I'm not saying that it's the musicians' fault, more that these are very unfortunate circumstances we live in, because unlike the grocer, musicians don't have the option of rolling the windows up.
|
No, I'm not missing the point. I understand the technology makes this kind of theft very simple. As do the musicians. That doesn't change in any way the issue of right and wrong. I'm sure you're not making the case that because something is easy to steal, that makes it OK to steal.
Edited by Finnforest - February 25 2013 at 10:59
|
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Metalmarsh89
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 15 2013
Location: Oregon, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 2673
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:38 |
Finnforest wrote:
There's no debate
here, no grey area. You can either steal
someone's work, then try 20 different angles to justify your thievery,
or, you save your money and purchase your stuff at the offered price.
One choice is right, one borders on a****le territory. And if you think otherwise, then you'll be perfectly accepting
and happy when someone steals something of value from you, from your
home, your car, your computer. If you agree you wouldn't mind being
ripped off, then I can at least give you points for consistency. Because, hey, that guy who took your Ipod couldn't afford to buy one! Should he be denied the ability to have one? |
I think you're missing a point here. Any time an artist records and releases a CD, he does so knowing that there are going to be thousands of illegal downloads. Any artist who doesn't think it can/will happen would be have to be pretty naive. It would be much more comparable to going into the grocery store and leaving your car windows down with a computer or ipod sitting in plain sight. You'd be a fool to think it would be safe. I'm not saying that it's the musicians' fault, more that these are very unfortunate circumstances we live in, because unlike the grocer, musicians don't have the option of rolling the windows up.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
rogerthat
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 03 2006
Location: .
Status: Offline
Points: 9869
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:36 |
My question, is why don't they just make multimedia CDs? I know Iron Maiden do that. Maybe it's possible to crack them too but it would be much harder (on the other hand, it's ridiculously easy to make a copy of a CD on the hard drive and the moment somebody uploads that on a file sharing website, the 'magic' starts). My guess is, the labels fear it would make it unattractive in terms of transferring to portable players but it's still worth a try. Have one or two songs off an album that you can only rip onto Itunes or something like that (not as a freely accessible mp3 file) and the CD in multimedia format. Why should music be so easily share-able in any case? It wasn't the case in the days of tape or even when CDs first hit the market (and before they became vulnerable to theft).
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:29 |
Any musicians out there reading this can chip in and correct me if I am wrong, but it is fair to say that every artist in Progressive Rock Music today has a day-job that finances his Prog - If I am not mistaken every Prog Musician is part-time.
|
What?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Bonnek
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 01 2009
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Points: 4521
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:25 |
zumacraig wrote:
i think what's going to happen is that folks will make music as a part time thing.
|
It's happening already, and we are getting part-time quality in return. Combining 2 professional careers is impossible, i'm having hard enough a time doing one!
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Aussie-Byrd-Brother
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: October 12 2011
Location: Melb, Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 7951
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:20 |
I remember this really hit home to me, seeing how pirating effects prog musicians:
From an interview The Tangent's Andy Tillison:
Andy: "Going off on Two' was (to us at least) one of the highlights of the band's career. Toughest of all was the fact that this "Fan Release" – pre-financed by our most fantastic supporters, was leaked onto the internet within a day of first delivery and sales just stopped – that day. The pirate site hosting it reported over 500 downloads in two days and we "charted" at number 14 for illegal downloads that week, Lady Gaga taking the number one slot. For us, that was a catastrophe that led to cancelled gigs, and ultimately members of the band finally giving up hope of ever seeing reward for their efforts. Jonathan left the band recently, disillusioned by the way everyone seems to be OK with the whole download culture."
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Barbu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 09 2005
Location: infinity
Status: Offline
Points: 30855
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:17 |
lazland wrote:
Barbu wrote:
Downloaders beware :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7b86/f7b86723d58388145d8ad931ae690a1046887eb4" alt="" |
I am not in favour of downloading, but I am sorry, I regard this as being in the most ridiculous bad taste. Whatever else they are, rock artists are not victims in the same manner as the poor wretches who inhabited these shocking places. Also, although wrong, downloaders do not, I feel, warrant a gas chamber for their crimes. I am generally against censorship, but think it might be an idea if a friendly admin removed this |
Calm down, Dude! This is called cynical exaggeration. Now that's a crime.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
zumacraig
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:11 |
i think part of the decrease in music sales is precisely because people download. to some extent this has cause lost revenue, but also burst the music bubble. CD prices never went down, we bought CDs for one song etc. now people can download or listen to music before buying it...as a result, some stuff just isn't going to get bought. my sense is that most of the downloading is for pop artists by teens who don't have the cash to buy a CD or download. they just get the songs they want from a torrent site or whatever. at the same time, these pop stars are RICH! what gives?
i think what's going to happen is that folks will make music as a part time thing. if they get heard and build a buzz, then they can maintain a paying audience like radiohead or these kickstarter bands.
|
Stardust we are.
-Roine Stolt
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17310
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:06 |
Floydian42 wrote:
I know what you're probably thinking, that giddy feeling is the feeling all thieves have when they get away with stealing, and you're right. Every downloader knows in their hearts that they are stealing.
It's just the way the culture is now. |
Omg, this is such a sad statement and the general mentality overflows into other areas of society....that we are helpless to resist something we know in our hearts is wrong. Floydian, though i find your "perspective" to be seriously wrong, I sincerely appreciate your honesty to put it as bluntly as you did. I understood your case even if we don't agree.
Edited by Finnforest - February 25 2013 at 10:39
|
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:02 |
Floydian42 wrote:
In all honesty, I downloaded the leak. I didn't download it a couple weeks ago, I got it the week after Christmas. And it sounds pretty good! I loved the record and have been sitting on it now for almost two months, gotten my fair share of it and moved on, but I'm a die hard Wilson fan and I bought a hard copy (hasn't arrived yet, but I'm pretty excited).
Someone's gotta speak from a downloaders perspective. I'm 21 years old, and I have been born and raised indoctrinated into a download culture. When I was 10 I remember going on napster and getting backstreet boys, going on Limewire when I was 14 or 15, and now I use torrent sites to get my music. Just as there is a certain nostalgia to going into a record store in the 70s and smelling the incense and buying a record and investing your time and money into it, there's a feeling that I think is similar for all of those who download something before it's release. There's that giddy excitement when you see that the files are there, and when you download it and think "I'm one of the first who's going to hear this." I know what you're probably thinking, that giddy feeling is the feeling all thieves have when they get away with stealing, and you're right. Every downloader knows in their hearts that they are stealing.
It's just the way the culture is now. Even if I don't buy or download it, a friend of mine will, and he'll upload the CD and send me the tracks. There's so much music out there that for all of it to be appreciated, not all of it can be bought. |
Thank you for being so frank and not trying to justify your actions with stupid excuses.
Floydian42 wrote:
Wilson himself is a great example, as most of his music was probably found through filesharing means. This file sharing turned into fans, who went out to his concerts (which makes more money than the records anyway) and a lot of those people became bigger fans who are now willing to buy the CD's. |
But at what cost - what was the actual cost of that - How many albums get downloaded every day that the downloader eventually buys on CD - and what of all those less successful artists who see their entire stock sitting unsold while the download count ticks away like a kitchen timer?
Floydian42 wrote:
The amount of music that's readily available at the click of a button is a blessing that comes at the price of a sin. For true music lovers, this isn't too much of an issue, because their willing to dish out the bucks on the artists that they love and are willing to support, because the product is usually better quality, and they like supporting an artist. Wilson can bitch and moan about how people steal his music and how he can't eat, and he has a right to, but he should be even more grateful that he's one of the view honest musicians who's able to make a living doing what he loves because he has the overwhelming support from the fans who are willing to buy his $80 double vinyl blue ray photography book edition. He's a lucky a man. |
Unfortunately this is not your right to make this choice on behalf of the artist, it is for him to decide how his music is distrubuted, it is his property after all. Regardless of the aledged benefits that people claim can result from illegal downloading, there is little actual evidence to support this.
Floydian42 wrote:
There, I've said my piece. |
You did.
Edited by Dean - February 25 2013 at 10:07
|
What?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Finnforest
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17310
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 10:00 |
My two cents....
When you can't afford to buy something/anything, I guess there are two general choices.
a. I'll just steal it. b. I'll save up my dough for a while and when I can afford it, I'll buy it.
Choice
"b" is what was pretty common when I was a kid, silly us, we didn't sit
around crafting sob stories about why we should get free music,
man....We didn't whine about "those rich guys", who incidentally probably worked very hard for what they have. We just had a little patience and eventually we managed to save
up and buy some music, books, whatever....
There's no debate
here, no grey area. You can either steal
someone's work, then try 20 different angles to justify your thievery,
or, you save your money and purchase your stuff at the offered price.
One choice is right, one borders on a****le territory. And if you think otherwise, then you'll be perfectly accepting
and happy when someone steals something of value from you, from your
home, your car, your computer. If you agree you wouldn't mind being
ripped off, then I can at least give you points for consistency. Because, hey, that guy who took your Ipod couldn't afford to buy one! Should he be denied the ability to have one?
Last
there are TONS of free music choices out there people can stream with
permission. The idea that people who can't afford to buy music "will have no music to enjoy" is as daft as any comment I've read in this forum in years.
|
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Floydian42
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 13 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 846
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 09:41 |
In all honesty, I downloaded the leak. I didn't download it a couple weeks ago, I got it the week after Christmas. And it sounds pretty good! I loved the record and have been sitting on it now for almost two months, gotten my fair share of it and moved on, but I'm a die hard Wilson fan and I bought a hard copy (hasn't arrived yet, but I'm pretty excited). Someone's gotta speak from a downloaders perspective. I'm 21 years old, and I have been born and raised indoctrinated into a download culture. When I was 10 I remember going on napster and getting backstreet boys, going on Limewire when I was 14 or 15, and now I use torrent sites to get my music. Just as there is a certain nostalgia to going into a record store in the 70s and smelling the incense and buying a record and investing your time and money into it, there's a feeling that I think is similar for all of those who download something before it's release. There's that giddy excitement when you see that the files are there, and when you download it and think "I'm one of the first who's going to hear this." I know what you're probably thinking, that giddy feeling is the feeling all thieves have when they get away with stealing, and you're right. Every downloader knows in their hearts that they are stealing. It's just the way the culture is now. Even if I don't buy or download it, a friend of mine will, and he'll upload the CD and send me the tracks. There's so much music out there that for all of it to be appreciated, not all of it can be bought. Wilson himself is a great example, as most of his music was probably found through filesharing means. This file sharing turned into fans, who went out to his concerts (which makes more money than the records anyway) and a lot of those people became bigger fans who are now willing to buy the CD's.
The amount of music that's readily available at the click of a button is a blessing that comes at the price of a sin. For true music lovers, this isn't too much of an issue, because their willing to dish out the bucks on the artists that they love and are willing to support, because the product is usually better quality, and they like supporting an artist. Wilson can bitch and moan about how people steal his music and how he can't eat, and he has a right to, but he should be even more grateful that he's one of the view honest musicians who's able to make a living doing what he loves because he has the overwhelming support from the fans who are willing to buy his $80 double vinyl blue ray photography book edition. He's a lucky a man.
There, I've said my piece.
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: February 25 2013 at 09:21 |
Junges wrote:
How much money do you think he makes just touring? God.. if it was an underground band it would be all right, but Steven Wilson... |
Not as much as you think he does. What gives you the "right" to demand that he performs for you like some trained monkey? Just so he can earn enough money to finance the albums you download for free? "Well Mr Record Company I'm not going to pay for this album of music but I insist that your monkey boy dances for me at my earliest convenience!" And were do you draw the line? At what point does an underground band start earning enough money to justfy your stealing their music? Are you some latter day Robin Hood that buys from bands that are not successful and only steals from the rich? Or do you just steal their albums anyway on the assumption that they'll be big enough one day to earn some money touring?
|
What?
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59dbb/59dbb982572f4976b4160902326d36e25e8d4ae6" alt="Back to Top Back to Top" |