![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 225226227228229 303> |
Author | ||||
dtguitarfan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
![]() |
|||
^ You do have a point (that the spending still grew), but I'd love to know how the numbers match up to how much in taxes they took in. I mean, population keeps growing and growing, so I'd assume that the amount of taxes taken in grew as well...but I am not in the know on that, so it is just an assumption.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Epignosis ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32559 |
![]() |
|||
Actually, the way the tax code is set up, a greater population (in keeping with our gamut of income levels) would result in more money spent. I don't mean spent on social programs or defense. I meant actually sent to the people in the form of a check. A person who is married, working, and has three children can get a check from the US treasury for over $5,000. Cash money. It's called the Earned Income Tax Credit. Then there's the additional child tax credit and the making work pay credit that can add even more money paid to the middle class. Also, population growth does not result in more tax revenue, because the larger segment of that population may be unemployed (and thus have no income to tax). Edited by Epignosis - October 27 2012 at 17:45 |
||||
![]() |
||||
thellama73 ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 29 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8368 |
![]() |
|||
When I read this, I at first thought you were talking about the Prog Archives vote. It is true that neither campaign has put much money into flipping Prog fans over to their side. ![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
thellama73 ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 29 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8368 |
![]() |
|||
That's not quite true, because even if they are unemployed they do consume goods, which means more income for the people providing those goods, which means more tax revenue. Tax revenue certainly need not scale proportionately with population, though. |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
The T ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
![]() |
|||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
AlexDOM ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: February 02 2011 Location: Indianapolis Status: Offline Points: 775 |
![]() |
|||
Not true... I believe the Democrat is wrong because of their social policies and Obama is the most pro-abortion president we've ever had. In the Illinois legislature, Obama opposed the “Born-Alive Infants Protection Act” three times. To me social issues matter the most. Now everybody can criticize me:)
|
||||
![]() |
||||
AlexDOM ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: February 02 2011 Location: Indianapolis Status: Offline Points: 775 |
![]() |
|||
Oh and I actually like Mitt too!!!
|
||||
![]() |
||||
thellama73 ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 29 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8368 |
![]() |
|||
I like him too (and I know I will catch hell from the other libertarians for saying this.) Of course I disagree with him on a lot, but he seems like a good person to me, which is more than I can say for Obama. |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
smartpatrol ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 15 2012 Location: My Bedroom Status: Offline Points: 14169 |
![]() |
|||
I feel the exact opposite:
Edited by smartpatrol - October 27 2012 at 23:38 |
||||
![]() |
||||
The T ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 16 2006 Location: FL, USA Status: Offline Points: 17493 |
![]() |
|||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
HarbouringTheSoul ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: May 21 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1199 |
![]() |
|||
Why on earth would you care more about whether or not a woman you don't even know has an abortion than, say, the economy (which affects you personally)? |
||||
![]() |
||||
Equality 7-2521 ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 11 2005 Location: Philly Status: Offline Points: 15784 |
![]() |
|||
If you view abortion as murder, then that might kinda be a bigger deal than getting a $500 tax credit.
|
||||
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
||||
![]() |
||||
dtguitarfan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
![]() |
|||
Which Mitt is the one you think is a good person? The one who criticized every...single...d*** thing Obama did while in office and tried to stir all the crazy Republicans up into a murderous frenzy, or the one who came to the debate and agreed with everything he ever did in order to sell to the "normals"? The one who wants to cut all the good programs (veteran's benefits, tax breaks for middle class, etc.), or the one who claims he can work magic and eliminate debt without cutting ANYTHING and actually doing MORE of a lot of things (such as building more ships than the Navy even wants or needs)? The man is nothing but a lie - how do you know you like him? |
||||
![]() |
||||
thellama73 ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 29 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8368 |
![]() |
|||
All politicians (all the ones who get votes anyway) say those kinds of things, it's how the game is played. By the standard you're setting, it would be impossible to like any candidate who actually had a chance of winning. If that's you're position, fine, but didn't you just say you liked Obama a few posts up? It's ludicrous to pretend that he hasn't been dishonest and politically expedient for his entire career. |
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
||||
dtguitarfan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
![]() |
|||
Here's my take. I actually disagree with Obama on the issue of abortion, because I do think abortion is immoral. HOWEVER...it's legal, it's been legal for a long time, and I'm not so sure making it illegal would do much good - it might make things worse because people would still be getting abortions, or doing them themselves with unsafe, at-home remedies. So, I'm glad I don't have to make that decision, really. And the whole thing about Obama being "for" partial birth abortions and such - let's be clear: the Republicans set a trap for him. No, really, think about it - they knew that bill was not going to pass, no matter what, because they'd need to overturn Roe Vs. Wade to get it to pass. So they put a bill that was not going to pass in front of a man who they KNEW was going to oppose it, and they made no exception for cases where the mother would die (it doesn't matter if you argue that this case never arises - give a little. Be sensible - if abortion is murder then there has to be a "self defense" clause, and you leave the morality of the matter up to the individual.). The only reason they put this bill in front of Obama was so that when he opposed it they could turn around and say "OBAMA LIKES TO KILL BABIES!!!" Let me put it to you this way - let's say I were to become a lawmaker (no way that will ever happen, I don't want the job, I don't think I'd be good at it - not gonna happen, but let's just say). If you came to me and told me that people were dying because of something that had been legal before I ever entered office and it's my fault because I haven't made it illegal - I am NOT going to feel any guilt. No way. But let's say I made something illegal that used to be legal, and someone could make a good case that people had died because I made it illegal - let's say guns, because Republicans seem to like them quite a bit. Let's say I made guns illegal, and 2 days later, Ricky Sue (who had to throw out her gun after my law passed) had her home broken into, and she was killed in her bedroom, next to the bed-stand where she used to keep her gun. I'd feel guilty. I would. Now keep in mind - I don't think abortion is moral! But, I don't think making it illegal is as easy a decision as some people make it out to be. Add to this some statistics - did you know that the state that had the highest abortion rate over the last 4 years was Massachussets? Mitt Romney's state? Did you know that the President with the lowest rate of abortions since they became legal was...Clinton? Clinton, who is evil incarnate to conservative Republicans? Kinda makes you think... Yeah, I disagree with Obama on abortion, but I think he is moral for coming at it with a viewpoint that what is immoral does not necessarily equate to what should be illegal, and I am disgusted by the Christians out there who imply that you can't be a Christian and hold that viewpoint. I am disgusted by Billy Graham who hems and haws around Obama's Christianity (even after Obama told him personally that he was) and says things like "well, I can't say for sure that he's not a Muslim", and then turns around and removes statements from his website that say that Mormonism is a cult when the Republican candidate is a Mormon. And finally, I don't think there's much likelihood that Roe Vs. Wade is going to be overturned even IF Romney became president - I think saying "I'm against abortion" is the easiest thing to do as a Republican, and doesn't really mean much. It's like saying "if I had a gazillion dollars, I'd end poverty." It's not gonna happen! So why should I make that the issue that I base my vote 100% on?! Add to this the fact that people like Paul Ryan have basically been committing legal treason against the country for the last four years, and it makes no sense that Christian Republicans act all self righteous about holding the moral high ground in politics. I'd rather vote for someone I disagree with on some occasions who is actually trying to help than to vote for an evil two-faced liar who has been sabotaging the country in order to try to make Obama look bad because the #1 priority has been to get him out of office. Before you call me crazy: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/daniel-altman/sabotage-book_b_1744343.html http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/13/1119591/-January-2009-Paul-Ryan-Literally-Plotted-To-Sabotage-U-S-Economy http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/republicans-attempt-to-ac_b_1576962.html">http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/07/23/how_republicans_sabotaged_the_recovery http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/republicans-attempt-to-ac_b_1576962.html http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jun/09/did-republicans-deliberately-crash-us-economy http://tucsoncitizen.com/baja-democrats/2012/06/10/did-republicans-deliberately-sabotage-the-economy/ Take that into context with this as well: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/08/13/1119587/-On-Veterans-Rep-Paul-Davis-Ryan-Research-Report |
||||
![]() |
||||
dtguitarfan ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 24 2011 Location: Chattanooga, TN Status: Offline Points: 1708 |
![]() |
|||
That's a lazy argument. And it's not quite accurate - I think there is a difference between Obama, who bit off more than he could chew and made a ton of promises he could keep, and Romney who has not said a single thing that was true during his campaign. I never believed Obama was going to fulfill every single promise he made, so I was never disillusioned when he didn't. On the contrary, I've been impressed by the things he actually HAS been able to do even while being opposed by many. So I'd rather vote for someone who is actually going to try to do what he says he's going to try to do than someone whose only platform is "the other guy is evil!" and "I'm gonna do this thing that is the opposite of what I said I was going to do yesterday to some other people." |
||||
![]() |
||||
Finnforest ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 03 2007 Location: The Heartland Status: Online Points: 17350 |
![]() |
|||
I'm not an Obama guy, but I sincerely hope the middle part of this piece about Libya is proven completely false.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/331806/incredible-shrinking-president-mark-steyn |
||||
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Epignosis ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: December 30 2007 Location: Raeford, NC Status: Offline Points: 32559 |
![]() |
|||
Went to a Halloween party last night (as Frodo Baggins- even had an authentic replica of the one ring!). Wound up in a conversation with a 23-year-old grad student. In the course of about an hour we talked about presidential parties, the economy, and health care. Mostly, I listened.
She had a lot of numbers, and I couldn't say whether they were accurate numbers, but I don't think those numbers mattered as much to buttress the scope of her position. I think it threw her off to be speaking to someone who rejects both 21st century Democrat and Republican agendas. She couldn't use the "but Bush" trump card that somehow seems to keep on conveniently absolving the current commander in chief. I used Sting (my orc-revealing sword, not the singer) as an object to demonstrate our level of deficit and I asked her what she would do to eliminate it, and she said "cut military spending in half" and "raise taxes on the rich." I replied that she would still have a big deficit. I don't think many people understand that reducing the deficit does nothing more than slow disaster; eliminating the deficit is the only way to stop our interest payments (and thus mandatory spending) from rising. The Republicrat single party system we have (I no longer call it a two-party system) will never eliminate enough of our discretionary budget (which is almost all of it) to eliminate the deficit and start paying down the debt. Regarding healthcare, my acquaintance said some things I agreed with, but I pressed her on her desire for universal health I did find it bizarre, though, that a person who is (presumably) pro-choice would castigate our decision to deliver our third son at home. ![]() Edited by Epignosis - October 28 2012 at 10:46 |
||||
![]() |
||||
Finnforest ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: February 03 2007 Location: The Heartland Status: Online Points: 17350 |
![]() |
|||
Good post Rob, it is fun to talk politics with people in a relaxed social setting, as opposed to having to type out long arguments on a screen. Esp if one does not wish to type much after typing all day at work.
The MN Star Tribune, a firmly liberal paper who is no friend to conservatives, released a new D+5 poll this morning which has Romney within 3 points, within the margin of error, in MN. Obama won by 10 points here in 2008 with a D+4 turnout. ![]() |
||||
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
|
||||
![]() |
||||
thellama73 ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 29 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8368 |
![]() |
|||
Why would anyone object to you delivering your own son at home? That's absurd.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 225226227228229 303> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |