Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Bands, Artists and Genres Appreciation
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Rush Fan Central
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedRush Fan Central

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3233343536 65>
Author
Message
Matte View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: November 20 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 111
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2012 at 06:16
Next year Rush is coming to Sweden:
 
Back to Top
CL-Ghost-Rider View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie
Avatar

Joined: October 07 2010
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 1
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2012 at 15:55
Don't think I'll make Sweden!
Just got tickets for Glasgow on May 31st though. Gutted when I realised it was 2013, not 2012! Still, could have been worse. Could have been 2011 and I missed them!
Roll on Clockwork Angels!
"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17973
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2012 at 17:01
Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

Originally posted by rushfan4 rushfan4 wrote:

An interview with Geddy in SPIN Magazine.  I'm not sure if it adds anything to other interviews but I thought that I would share the link.  http://www.spin.com/#articles/geddy-lees-ludicrous-machines-rush-frontman-talks-new-album-tour?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=052212

Great interview. There have quite a few great interviews as of late.
 
Agree......their interviews are really getting pretty darn good......you can sense how calm Geddy Lee is, as a band they seem to be at a level not experienced by others......Very comfortable in what they want to do.
 
I also sense the humor in his responses, like Alex is in the background making faces.
 
The tour is gonna be awesome!
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2012 at 18:18
And there was mention of another studio album!
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17973
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2012 at 09:08
 
This cover pretty much tells it all, about Rush today.
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2012 at 11:26
Another new review:
http://www.bravewords.com/news/184118

RUSH - Martin Popoff Reviews Clockwork Angels

Rock Hard

Posted on Thursday, May 24, 2012 at 10:59:47 EST

RUSH's anxiously-awaited new album Clockwork Angels will be released on June 12th via Anthem/Universal in Canada and their debut for Anthem/Roadrunner Records in the US. Revered BraveWords.com Editor In Chief Martin Popoff has heard the album and provides (as usual) an in-depth, step-by-step, track-by-track synopsis of the magnum opus we are all just dying to wrap our ears around! Check out his massive glowing 10/10 review below:



Hard to believe, but this is the first full concept album for the Willy Wonkas of prog metal, Clockwork Angels being a complicated, oblique, angled tale involving less steampunk than rumour had it and much more about the march of time, all wrapped up in the meaninglessness for the non-believer, except for some sort of inner temple-building, or a garden as it were, Candide-style. If Vapor Trails was in the spirit (but not the sound) of red, yellow and blue Crimson (frantic, textured, high on the shelf), Clockwork Angels is in the glorious yet dour (an apt result of ascribing to Neil’s belief system) spirit of Wetton-era Crimson mixed with Van Der Graaf Generator, with all the Victorian weight lead-lined in a box of the two institutions. And therein lies one of a few steampunk nods, as there’s no one more “watchmaker” than Peter Hammill.

A singular Rush triumph results, and yes, before we even get to the music, there really is so much to ponder here, as there’s lyrics, light narration, visuals, and then an exo-story by Kevin J. Anderson. And like the best concept albums, the lyrics alone are mostly abstraction, with further abstraction caused by demarcation into their necessary chapters, welcome, so that these hugely ambitious and exclusively dark songs can stand on their own as Rush songs, soon to be mouthed by crowds in the wrongness for this of hockey barns.

But the concept nature is not the least of why this feels like the most unified and purposeful Rush album since Vapor Trails and before that, Signals and its pastels – it’s the baffling music, an almost new invention, or new is old, or “the future as it’s meant to be” in steampunk parlance. Gone is Alex’s trinket of layering in acoustic to accompany the riff (I always thought this sounded like a tear in the woofer), and also gone, then, logically, is any of the tinkle in Rush production, the brightness, which started with Grace and then reared its head to varying degrees and with often enrageable persona throughout, on every album, save I suppose for Vapor Trails.

No, what we have here is Rush’s bassiest production quake ever. Neil’s drums have never sounded so fat, warm and powerful, and Geddy and Alex storm on along with him, through track by blustery track, many neo-Maiden- and Death Magnetic-like in their sodding of conventional verse/chorus structure in redefinition of the word “break.” The boomy resonance of all this was captured inside of three months at a brand new/one-year-old studio in Toronto called Revolution Recordings, and through an approach that had Geddy and Alex writing their crazy musicks, then handing it to Neil to make sense of. The Professor then supposed for himself a pile of spontaneity (an oxymoron, until you hear how much exertion is necessary through the album’s 66.6 minutes), literally conducted with a drumstick by producer Nick Raskulinecz, who would and obviously could suggest fills by singing them like a Three Stooges routine (which makes him the fourth Stooge).

The result is Neil’s grooviest playing ever, groove being the one area Neil, by necessity of Rushwriting, rarely bothered himself with – I think he’d have to admit he’s a white man playing the drums. Ergo, he gorgeously falls off the end of bars all around Clockwork town, helping to create a hot mess of a ‘70s prog album, the type that would never sell, but to fellow English cynics born out of tyme, squelching through the moors.

You’ll be glad to know at least one person (me) thinks the balance of Clockwork Angels is actually better than the two old/advance songs ‘Caravan’ and ‘BU2B’, but that both those songs fit, despite their being recorded a year and a half earlier than the balance. Both are essentially slide rule grunge, the first, about getting away from the family farm, the next, as Neil surmises, faith-bashing, which sets up the dark cloud over how time rapes us over the rest of the album.



The title track comes next (and ain’t it cool that the distraction of the two songs we know, and even know in a live setting, is over with?), and it’s one of many with a huge swooping finale that could close an album or a show. And the remarkable picture that emerges now is that of a future imagined from 120 years ago, a world lit only by fire and all that, steam, of contraptions – this is now graphically, sonically, aurally, representingly (!) being played out in the ragged, 21st Century schizoid music. If there was prog, and then the undisputable invention of a singularly bright neo-prog by Rush… they were the future Kings in 1977, but one wonders if the future of prog imagined in 1971 would have been closer to the inefficient frump of Red-era King Crimson – or Clockwork Angels. For to be sure, the snap of Permanent Waves is not here. This is Rush looking at mortality carrying around Alex’s extra 15 pounds and Geddy’s deteriorating, yodel-era voice, and probably Neil’s knees any month now. In other words, there’s a worn wisdom here, and the guys turn in their most inspired music, even at and inside the improbable crucible of jammy spontaneity, and then Neil writes perfectly in line (as if we want to ascribe order when there is none), with layers of enigma, a feast for hours of reflection.

Back to the record, ‘The Anarchist’ is aptly named as it conjures another subtle dimension to the whole, and that’s post-punk, Alex and Ged angling their chords and melodies, everything more sour than sweet, Neil jamming, this one with a Vapor Trails vibe. A ringing Beatles chord ends it, which brings up another creep, that of these haunting inter-song bits, which evokes the Shining-like horror of the lone Trader Horne album.

‘Carnies’ hit me hard between the eyes, lyrically, as it immediately conjured the classic noir of William Lindsay Gresham’s Nightmare Alley. Rush is off on another ass-over-head trip into the crypt, Neil bashing away, more gobs of Magazine-like heavy post-punk, weird chords in the chorus. Bloody ‘ell, ‘Halo Effect’ perpetuates the (coincidental) connection with Nightmare Alley, making me want to read it again, and dragging further immersion into the album’s insistent, consistent, boomy, garagey, welled-up-with-wattage claustrophobia.

Mysterious, Manchestered and explosive, this one leads to ‘Seven Cities Of Gold’, influenced by Cormac McCarthy, other influences around the stultifying environs including John Barth, Michael Ondaatje, Joseph Conrad, and come ‘The Wreckers’, Dauphne du Maurier. ‘The Wreckers’ had Alex and Ged switch instruments for the writing, but go back when time to get serious. It’s about a shipwreck, and for some reason, conjured the fantastical Imaginos saga from Sandy Pearlman and Blue Oyster Cult, that perhaps being an even better steampunk tale than this.



‘Headlong Flight’ is the album’s true advance single, the way it was done in the old days, and it opens with a ‘Bastille Day’ drum quote and proceeds eventually to a White Album-style chorus, so passion-filled but still, in total, weirdly dark and detached, or perhaps bitter about how life all necessarily plays out at the second, minute and hour hands of Chronos.

‘BU2B2’ is the first or clearest indication of what is probably the most uneasy use of string arrangements on a hard rock record, which will play out further come closer ‘The Garden’. Real 16-piece (I think) section, at the hands of David Campbell. No drums, Eno/Glass-like, haunting, which contrasts jarringly to the album’s party rocker, ‘Wish Them Well’, which aggravated Neil to no end in the bread-making. Odd, ‘cos this one rocks most forthrightly, despite a Byrdsy tinge to the chorus. Calling ‘Stick It Out’ the heaviest Rush song becomes hard lifting under the weight of much of this album.

‘The Garden’ closes the journey, with another almost laughably epic flourish (although the epic surge is undermined by sorta like the hangover of the epic, in the final strained strains). It’s a chilling finale, supposed to give hope, but more about how the (aforementioned) idea of Candide’s garden… in the final analysis what else have you got? It’s all very Zen-like as is the musical accompaniment which oscillates between operating room anesthesia drone and heavy metal drone.

And that’s it, that’s really it, actually – heavy metal drone, a hot mess of it, enticingly sliced up and shifted over and over again, a very strange landscape of obscure prog metal of a most curmudgeonly and English type, piled on with more worthy intellectual ideas from Neil as he grows and grows into a finer fiction writer all the time. Curious to see how Clockwork Angels is received out there, ‘cos I can see there being a lot of exasperation. No matter what the response, one can’t deny that there’s more purpose and focus here than on any Rush album ever, save perhaps for the sad anguished and sad Vapor Trails.





Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2012 at 11:28
In case no one saw this....Headlong Flight.


Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17973
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2012 at 11:48
^ Thanks.......very heady review, cerebral for sure. Based on every other review or commentary, it seems like you can almost say to Martin Popoff...."I agree".
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2012 at 06:04
I can't wait to hear what The Garden will be like. The hype over it sounds very interesting. Hopefully it won't be another "Resist".
Back to Top
AtomicCrimsonRush View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: July 02 2008
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 14258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2012 at 06:47
Very exciting stuff - I am just waiting for a phone call from my local newsagency and I will have this with the Classic Rock magazine... Love the new single too - brilliant melodic prog.
Back to Top
zumacraig View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2012 at 07:00
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

^ Thanks.......very heady review, cerebral for sure. Based on every other review or commentary, it seems like you can almost say to Martin Popoff...."I agree".

i disagree.  from the first songs to headlong, this album sounds just like everything else since...test for echo?  at least in the 80s and early 90s one could hear separation of instruments, even though they all sounded like they were playing tiny little instruments, especially neil.  

now, if the songs are there, then this might be okay, but 10/10?  no way.  10/10 is hemispheres.  why is hemispheres that good, because it was made by urgent young dudes on the cusp of progressive rock in an era (seemingly oblivious to them) where music was recorded to be listened to an enjoyed rather than some sort of endurance contest.  major key melodies, fat guitar, fat bass, and fat drums.  those recordings are like your sitting on the floor looking up at neil.  so...the production blows on this!  the 90s sheen, the compression, and the loudness.  i'm interested in hearing this, but when will musicians WAKE UP and give a sh*t about how their music sounds and is produced.  and for god's sake, could you please write a song in a major key again....alex, geddy?

sorry to rant.  i just think the buzz on this is getting ridiculous.  the buzz when hemispheres was about to be released was..."pick it up at Tape City next week."  ah, the good old days when music was an art form and treated as such...not a product to be marketed and hyped.  (of course this did go in then too, but not for the good stuff...that stuff stood on its own).
Back to Top
Horizons View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 20 2011
Location: Somewhere Else
Status: Offline
Points: 16952
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2012 at 07:14

All the grasping at nostalgia this forum has is rediculous.

Sorry, but it ain't 1978. Whether it's for good or bad.

 

 
 
Crushed like a rose in the riverflow.
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2012 at 07:45
Another review/interview:
http://www.musicradar.com/news/guitars/interview-alex-lifeson-talks-rushs-clockwork-angels-track-by-track-545614/1

Interview: Alex Lifeson talks Rush's Clockwork Angels track-by-track

The much-anticipated 2012 album discussed in full

Joe Bosso, Fri 25 May 2012, 8:20 am BST






Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2012 at 07:49
Originally posted by zumacraig zumacraig wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

^ Thanks.......very heady review, cerebral for sure. Based on every other review or commentary, it seems like you can almost say to Martin Popoff...."I agree".

i disagree.  from the first songs to headlong, this album sounds just like everything else since...test for echo?  at least in the 80s and early 90s one could hear separation of instruments, even though they all sounded like they were playing tiny little instruments, especially neil.  

now, if the songs are there, then this might be okay, but 10/10?  no way.  10/10 is hemispheres.  why is hemispheres that good, because it was made by urgent young dudes on the cusp of progressive rock in an era (seemingly oblivious to them) where music was recorded to be listened to an enjoyed rather than some sort of endurance contest.  major key melodies, fat guitar, fat bass, and fat drums.  those recordings are like your sitting on the floor looking up at neil.  so...the production blows on this!  the 90s sheen, the compression, and the loudness.  i'm interested in hearing this, but when will musicians WAKE UP and give a sh*t about how their music sounds and is produced.  and for god's sake, could you please write a song in a major key again....alex, geddy?

sorry to rant.  i just think the buzz on this is getting ridiculous.  the buzz when hemispheres was about to be released was..."pick it up at Tape City next week."  ah, the good old days when music was an art form and treated as such...not a product to be marketed and hyped.  (of course this did go in then too, but not for the good stuff...that stuff stood on its own).


While I disagree with most of your comments, I have to say, the red Tama's had the best sound for Neil. I have disliked his drum sounds, especially the high toms, for years now.
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17973
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2012 at 08:09
Originally posted by zumacraig zumacraig wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

^ Thanks.......very heady review, cerebral for sure. Based on every other review or commentary, it seems like you can almost say to Martin Popoff...."I agree".

i disagree.  from the first songs to headlong, this album sounds just like everything else since...test for echo?  at least in the 80s and early 90s one could hear separation of instruments, even though they all sounded like they were playing tiny little instruments, especially neil.  

now, if the songs are there, then this might be okay, but 10/10?  no way.  10/10 is hemispheres.  why is hemispheres that good, because it was made by urgent young dudes on the cusp of progressive rock in an era (seemingly oblivious to them) where music was recorded to be listened to an enjoyed rather than some sort of endurance contest.  major key melodies, fat guitar, fat bass, and fat drums.  those recordings are like your sitting on the floor looking up at neil.  so...the production blows on this!  the 90s sheen, the compression, and the loudness.  i'm interested in hearing this, but when will musicians WAKE UP and give a sh*t about how their music sounds and is produced.  and for god's sake, could you please write a song in a major key again....alex, geddy?

sorry to rant.  i just think the buzz on this is getting ridiculous.  the buzz when hemispheres was about to be released was..."pick it up at Tape City next week."  ah, the good old days when music was an art form and treated as such...not a product to be marketed and hyped.  (of course this did go in then too, but not for the good stuff...that stuff stood on its own).
 
While I can agree that 10/10 is maybe over the top.....but these reviews are coming from writers who have heard the whole album.....We have not. And honestly, I for one am not a review minded person.......I don't really care what the final rating is, what I pay attention to is the commentary, and so far its been pretty positive to say the least.
 
Regarding all the other stuff you mention.....ummmm I think you need to set your alarm clock to go off so you wake up in 2012, not 1978.
Rush and others have changed their sound as the times have changed, some good some bad.......but they have progressed in all their musical aspects......I like the tag "musical scientists", they are constantly looking for something new.
 
Sometimes we are "two-faced" prog fans.....I get a laugh when people complain that an artist needs to get a new sound or do something different, then a month later we are complaining because what they issued sounds too "new" and "weird" and not what it was 2 albums ago.....
 
This is gonna be a great album and tour.
Back to Top
StyLaZyn View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 22 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2012 at 08:20
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

 
This is gonna be a great album and tour.


HeadbangerClap
Thumbs Up

Edited by StyLaZyn - May 25 2012 at 08:20
Back to Top
zumacraig View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: December 10 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 1301
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2012 at 09:26
Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

Originally posted by zumacraig zumacraig wrote:

Originally posted by Catcher10 Catcher10 wrote:

^ Thanks.......very heady review, cerebral for sure. Based on every other review or commentary, it seems like you can almost say to Martin Popoff...."I agree".

i disagree.  from the first songs to headlong, this album sounds just like everything else since...test for echo?  at least in the 80s and early 90s one could hear separation of instruments, even though they all sounded like they were playing tiny little instruments, especially neil.  

now, if the songs are there, then this might be okay, but 10/10?  no way.  10/10 is hemispheres.  why is hemispheres that good, because it was made by urgent young dudes on the cusp of progressive rock in an era (seemingly oblivious to them) where music was recorded to be listened to an enjoyed rather than some sort of endurance contest.  major key melodies, fat guitar, fat bass, and fat drums.  those recordings are like your sitting on the floor looking up at neil.  so...the production blows on this!  the 90s sheen, the compression, and the loudness.  i'm interested in hearing this, but when will musicians WAKE UP and give a sh*t about how their music sounds and is produced.  and for god's sake, could you please write a song in a major key again....alex, geddy?

sorry to rant.  i just think the buzz on this is getting ridiculous.  the buzz when hemispheres was about to be released was..."pick it up at Tape City next week."  ah, the good old days when music was an art form and treated as such...not a product to be marketed and hyped.  (of course this did go in then too, but not for the good stuff...that stuff stood on its own).
 
While I can agree that 10/10 is maybe over the top.....but these reviews are coming from writers who have heard the whole album.....We have not. And honestly, I for one am not a review minded person.......I don't really care what the final rating is, what I pay attention to is the commentary, and so far its been pretty positive to say the least.
 
Regarding all the other stuff you mention.....ummmm I think you need to set your alarm clock to go off so you wake up in 2012, not 1978.
Rush and others have changed their sound as the times have changed, some good some bad.......but they have progressed in all their musical aspects......I like the tag "musical scientists", they are constantly looking for something new.
 
Sometimes we are "two-faced" prog fans.....I get a laugh when people complain that an artist needs to get a new sound or do something different, then a month later we are complaining because what they issued sounds too "new" and "weird" and not what it was 2 albums ago.....
 
This is gonna be a great album and tour.

good comments on my rants.  i just prefer a warmer production.  bands are doing it, just not prog bands.  so true about bands not being able to win.  they put out something new and they get trashed for changing their sound.
i just really hope this album is not brick walled.
Back to Top
Jim Garten View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin & Razor Guru

Joined: February 02 2004
Location: South England
Status: Offline
Points: 14693
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2012 at 09:47
Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

I have to say, the red Tama's had the best sound for Neil. I have disliked his drum sounds, especially the high toms, for years now.


Much as I love NP as a drummer (my favorite, in fact), I have to agree with this - not keen on the current sound of his setup at all & yes, the Tama kit he was using in the old days had a fantastic sound

Jon Lord 1941 - 2012
Back to Top
Catcher10 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: December 23 2009
Location: Emerald City
Status: Offline
Points: 17973
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 28 2012 at 13:38
Originally posted by Jim Garten Jim Garten wrote:

Originally posted by StyLaZyn StyLaZyn wrote:

I have to say, the red Tama's had the best sound for Neil. I have disliked his drum sounds, especially the high toms, for years now.


Much as I love NP as a drummer (my favorite, in fact), I have to agree with this - not keen on the current sound of his setup at all & yes, the Tama kit he was using in the old days had a fantastic sound
 
Agree......
Back to Top
rushaholic View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 13 2005
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1140
Direct Link To This Post Posted: June 01 2012 at 09:16
Clockwork Angels fan packs are shipping!!!


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 3233343536 65>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.438 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.