![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 524525526527> |
Author | |
Triceratopsoil ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: April 03 2010 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 18016 |
![]() |
want I finally bought Money Store, along with some other stuff (see - recent purchases thread if anybody cares) |
|
![]() |
|
rushfan4 ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 22 2007 Location: Michigan, U.S. Status: Offline Points: 66567 |
![]() |
Quite the hot one here today.
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Failcore ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: October 27 2006 Status: Offline Points: 4625 |
![]() |
Pumb
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
rushfan4 ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 22 2007 Location: Michigan, U.S. Status: Offline Points: 66567 |
![]() |
Is that a dumb pee?
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
TheGazzardian ![]() Prog Reviewer ![]() ![]() Joined: August 11 2009 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 8780 |
![]() |
I don't understand why people are saying Storm Corrosion sounds like ambient, I'm still on the first track but so far it doesn't strike me as particularly ambient. Low key, but not ambient.
|
|
![]() |
|
Icarium ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() VIP Member Joined: March 21 2008 Location: Tigerstaden Status: Offline Points: 34076 |
![]() |
please don't shoot me im only the piano player
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
rushfan4 ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 22 2007 Location: Michigan, U.S. Status: Offline Points: 66567 |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
rushfan4 ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 22 2007 Location: Michigan, U.S. Status: Offline Points: 66567 |
![]() |
Alan, you might like this album. It has some of the bleeps and bloops of electronic prog.
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
HolyMoly ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin Joined: April 01 2009 Location: Atlanta Status: Offline Points: 26138 |
![]() |
Doctors do not make good businessmen.
|
|
My other avatar is a Porsche
It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle if it is lightly greased. -Kehlog Albran |
|
![]() |
|
rushfan4 ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 22 2007 Location: Michigan, U.S. Status: Offline Points: 66567 |
![]() |
This is true. It is funny to see a doctor's personal financial statement. Nice house. Nice cars. Nice boat. Investments - None. |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
darkshade ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 19 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 10964 |
![]() |
Hm this thread is still alive? I'll keep it going. I haven't forgotten how I was betrayed when I made a new shred after four or five hundred pages, yet it got shot down and was replaced by another new one after a couple of days.
|
|
![]() |
|
A Person ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 10 2008 Location: __ Status: Offline Points: 65760 |
![]() |
We were told to stop using it by Dean, he said it'd be closed last weekend but it didn't happen I guess. |
|
![]() |
|
darkshade ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 19 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 10964 |
![]() |
But why did he say to stop using it? I thought these threads can now go up to 1600 pages. I could understand stopping it at 1000 or something, but if the thread hasn't even reached half of it's potential, why start another one so prematurely?
|
|
![]() |
|
A Person ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 10 2008 Location: __ Status: Offline Points: 65760 |
![]() |
Because they don't want two Shreds at once, since Tanner made a new one we needn't continue use of the old. Take it up with Tanner for creating the new thread :P
|
|
![]() |
|
darkshade ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 19 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 10964 |
![]() |
I understand the 2 shreds at once thing, I mean, why start a new shred when you can continue the current one for another 1000 pages? I mean this in general, this has been happening to every shred for a while now.
|
|
![]() |
|
A Person ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 10 2008 Location: __ Status: Offline Points: 65760 |
![]() |
I dunno, people have been doing that for a while now. It used to be customary to wait for it to be closed and then open a new thread, but people keep wanting to make them I guess. We had one instance where three new ones were made after one was closed.
|
|
![]() |
|
darkshade ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 19 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 10964 |
![]() |
LOL
Well whatever, I wasn't really trying to make a big stink about it, I was being mildly sarcastic when I bumped this one. But I'll keep this alive on principle until it gets closed (or if no one participates). |
|
![]() |
|
rushfan4 ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 22 2007 Location: Michigan, U.S. Status: Offline Points: 66567 |
![]() |
I would just assume keep this thread alive until it gets buggy. It would be nice to see how far it can go.
|
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
Dean ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout Joined: May 13 2007 Location: Europe Status: Offline Points: 37575 |
![]() |
Whoever decided to open a new one did so at their own volition and without an Admin telling them too. I suggested you stop using the old one once a new one has been made - that would be the logical thing to do. I seldom tell anyone to do or not to do anything, because if there is one thing I've learnt in the past 56 years is that when you tell people to do something they invariably do the diametric opposite.
I don't see why an Admin has to lock these f_____g things just to stop you using them, it's not in my job description and I'm not at your beck and call. Just stop using the old one - it's not rocket science - enough threads die-on-their-feet around here without them being locked, people just stop posting in them.
People bitch about concentration of power, bullying Admins, dictator mindsets, hidden posts, locked threads, micromanaged moderation, "fear" of suspension and perceived pettiness... then moan because there are two Shreds and the old one hasn't been locked!? wtf?
Personally I don't see the point of locking them at 500 or 1000 pages - I don't believe it slows down the server response time because the "This page was generated in" message doesn't show a significant increase for longer threads and we know the pages didn't go screwy until the post-count hit 32,768 - which is 1,638.2 pages - and that was on earlier versions of the Web-wiz forum software so that bug could be fixed for all we know. But not all Admins see it that way, so that's why I said Bob would probably lock the old one, he didn't, and I won't.
|
|
What?
|
|
![]() |
|
darkshade ![]() Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: November 19 2005 Location: New Jersey Status: Offline Points: 10964 |
![]() |
Well I wasn't mad, just making some observations. Since there are no actual 'topics' in these threads, it doesn't make sense to start a new one at an arbitrary point like say, 500 pages in.
|
|
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 524525526527> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |