Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Your thoughts on gay rights?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedYour thoughts on gay rights?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 13>
Author
Message
Guldbamsen View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin

Joined: January 22 2009
Location: Magic Theatre
Status: Offline
Points: 23104
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2012 at 13:16
Yes and no. Alan's thread is about gay people in regards to prog, but yeah people are kind of touching the same sort of areas(not a joke).
“The Guide says there is an art to flying or rather a knack. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss.”

- Douglas Adams
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2012 at 13:52
Poligamy should be allowed too.
Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2012 at 14:11
Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Also, references to "The government" mean nothing in an international site such as this. Which spcific "government" is being referred to, or is it all governments?


The only reason this thread even exists is because many governments interfere with people's ability to freely make contracts amongst themselves.
Back to Top
RoyFairbank View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 07 2008
Location: Somewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 1072
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2012 at 22:04
Originally posted by Epignosis Epignosis wrote:

Originally posted by Easy Livin Easy Livin wrote:

Also, references to "The government" mean nothing in an international site such as this. Which spcific "government" is being referred to, or is it all governments?


The only reason this thread even exists is because many governments interfere with people's ability to freely make contracts amongst themselves.


Libertarian Roy (He Isn't Dead): Yeah,  why outlaw prostitution, free contract! Why outlaw unlicensed medicine, free contract! Why outlaw sale of defective or dangerous products, free contract! Why outlaw insider trading... free contract! ......

Regular Roy: I think its less about government interfering with free contracts (is this what [usually pro-business] politicians think about when they are passing these restrictions?) then it is trying to make society conform to a certain cohesive and nationalistic status quo and creating political diversions to distract the population and attract their support whilst screwing them, creating an environment within which the establishment can function.

Not to nitpick or anything.
Back to Top
Equality 7-2521 View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2012 at 22:34
Originally posted by The T The T wrote:

Poligamy should be allowed too.


A man should be able to marry a chair too.
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
Back to Top
colorofmoney91 View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: March 16 2008
Location: Biosphere
Status: Offline
Points: 22774
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2012 at 22:54
My chair and I would love to get married.
Back to Top
The T View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: October 16 2006
Location: FL, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 17493
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2012 at 23:09
I'm quite sure a lot of men are actually married to their chairs...
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2012 at 23:09
IMHO Marriage is the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law.

So I don't believe in gay marriage.

But I do believe that single people can adopt if they have a stable position that ensure the kids wealth, no matter the sexual preference of the parent, 

There are millions of abandoned kids, and gay couples (or single gay persons) are as good parents as heterosexual couples.

Sounds contradictory, but that's my position.

Iván

Note: I believe in equal rights, not in special rights.

For example, in my country they have created femicide, if you kill a woman you have a larger conviction, that's absurd

Gay or straight you can only marry persons of the opposite sex

But adopting is a right that gay or straight share equally


Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 15 2012 at 23:37
            
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 15 2012 at 23:48
There is an inequality in how people who can love one another cannot marry whereas people who do love one another can marry. All that is different is the sex of one of the partners involved. All parties are of the age of consent and reasonable people, at least it is possibly they are. It's...kind of hard to put into words because it seems so obvious that it's wrong do deny homosexuals the ability to marry one another. It would at least be understandable to say "I disagree with gay marriage because of my religion" but I take issue with trying to make it a rational opinion through argument devoid of empathy. 
Back to Top
Slaughternalia View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: February 17 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 901
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2012 at 00:02
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

IMHO Marriage is the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law.

So I don't believe in gay marriage.

But I do believe that single people can adopt if they have a stable position that ensure the kids wealth, no matter the sexual preference of the parent, 

There are millions of abandoned kids, and gay couples (or single gay persons) are as good parents as heterosexual couples.

Sounds contradictory, but that's my position.

Iván

Note: I believe in equal rights, not in special rights.

For example, in my country they have created femicide, if you kill a woman you have a larger conviction, that's absurd

Gay or straight you can only marry persons of the opposite sex

But adopting is a right that gay or straight share equally
I disagree, only because I think that it's a bit old fashioned to define and restrict "marriage" that much, but this is a reasonable argument
I'm so mad that you enjoy a certain combination of noises that I don't
Back to Top
Ivan_Melgar_M View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator

Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 27 2004
Location: Peru
Status: Offline
Points: 19535
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2012 at 00:10
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

There is an inequality in how people who can love one another cannot marry whereas people who do love one another can marry. All that is different is the sex of one of the partners involved. All parties are of the age of consent and reasonable people, at least it is possibly they are. It's...kind of hard to put into words because it seems so obvious that it's wrong do deny homosexuals the ability to marry one another. It would at least be understandable to say "I disagree with gay marriage because of my religion" but I take issue with trying to make it a rational opinion through argument devoid of empathy. 

This is not a religious thread, if it was based on religious idea, my opinion would be different, because as a Catholic person, would be enough to agree with the rules of the Catholic Church (The Church will never accept it), and the Church doesn't care for civil marriage. .

In the Civil Code of my country, marriage is defined as the legal union between two persons of different sex with no impediments. as long as it's not changed, and I believe it shouldn't be changed because marriage is clearly defined, I won't change my position, remember, marriage is an institution  but also a contract and contracts must be formal in order to be valid.

They can live together, I have no problem, they can inherit to anyone they want, they should be allowed to adopt, that not contrary  to the institution of marriage and grants no special rights to anybody.

We should have equal rights, and be allowed to marry a person of the opposite sex, granting marriage between people of the same sex, would be allowing special rights to one sector of the population and I can't accept this.

For the same reason I don't accept polygamy (even between consenting adults), the institution of sister-wife  or marriage with minors allowed in determined religions.

Iván




Edited by Ivan_Melgar_M - April 16 2012 at 00:20
            
Back to Top
PyramidMeetsTheEye View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 02 2012
Location: Slovenia
Status: Offline
Points: 118
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2012 at 00:23
f**king epic man thanks for the video.
this video really opens your mind.

Cant wait for the philosophy class 
Back to Top
PyramidMeetsTheEye View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 02 2012
Location: Slovenia
Status: Offline
Points: 118
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2012 at 00:23
why not it seems reasonable 
Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2012 at 04:14
The Catholic church will accept gay marriage within 30 years, bank on it. That big bunch of sellouts will do anything to change with the times in order to keep the coffers fill. Time and again they shift the goalposts whenever they worry they're losing customers.
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2012 at 04:15
Originally posted by Ivan_Melgar_M Ivan_Melgar_M wrote:

 
We should have equal rights, and be allowed to marry a person of the opposite sex, granting marriage between people of the same sex, would be allowing special rights to one sector of the population and I can't accept this.


How is that allowing special rights?  It's equal rights.  Which is exactly what you want.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2012 at 04:26
Yeah Ivan, if you are against it for religious reasons/think it's unnatural than that's perfectly fine...but can't use the rationale you are trying.

I and most will agree "special rights" are not equal..but you are trying to claim gay marriage is a special right?
They are already denied that right, so if it was allowed they WOULD be equal, not special.

It's just not a sound reason, just admit you don't like it/the notion goes against your religious beliefs.


Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2012 at 04:31
Special rights is what heterosexuals have by not allowing homosexuals to marry.  I would also say that I am all for the husband taking his wife's surname and also neither partner changing their surname.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2012 at 04:51
Originally posted by VanderGraafKommandöh VanderGraafKommandöh wrote:

Special rights is what heterosexuals have by not allowing homosexuals to marry.  


That is an excellent point.








Back to Top
Textbook View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 08 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 3281
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2012 at 04:56
Look, let's cut to the chase- whatever he says, Ivan *is* opposing gay marriage because of his religious prejudices. He's trying to conceal this in a trojan horse of logic and law because he knows that if he's honest and says "I hate gays because a man in the sky who created them tells me to", then there's likely to be a dog pile.
 
PS Ivan's right about femicide though. What complete nonsense that is.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: April 16 2012 at 05:00
Originally posted by Textbook Textbook wrote:

Look, let's cut to the chase- whatever he says, Ivan *is* opposing gay marriage because of his religious prejudices. He's trying to conceal this in a trojan horse of logic and law because he knows that if he's honest and says "I hate gays because a man in the sky who created them tells me to", then there's likely to be a dog pile.
 
PS Ivan's right about femicide though. What complete nonsense that is.



Of course that's the case, but like I said...we're not being fooled, just come out with it, Ivan.
I respect an honest opinion I hate over someone pandering, any day.


That's a different story, no one (should) believe in different penalties for the same crime just because the victim is (insert whatever you'd like). That's for another thread though.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 13>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.105 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.