Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: March 21 2008
Location: Tigerstaden
Status: Offline
Points: 34083
Posted: December 22 2010 at 18:35
esky wrote:
Juan Carlos de Mulde wrote:
The tightest musicians I've ever heard are not Progressive Rock musicians. Especially live performances with Drummers like Simon Phillips, Dennis Chambers or Vinnie Colaiuta are really f**kin tight.
1. Toto live with S. Phillips and J. Porcaro (+) I had the opportunity to see them live in 2006. Awesome musicians. Dream Theater are just beginners compared to them.
2. CAB with Dennis Chambers on the drums.
3. John Mclaughlin and Chick Corea (Five Piece Band) with Vinnie Colaiuta
4. John McLaughlin Trio - Live At The Royal Festival Hall
I'm a big fan of Mr. Phillips myself, but Toto? Ouch! La cuenta, por favor. I'll go with the Giant, gently.
if this is not as tight as a mountain, then what is tight
Joined: June 02 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10266
Posted: December 28 2010 at 17:32
moshkito wrote:
Hi,
Amon Duul 2
So hard and so much and so full ... that anything past their early day concerts sound like the worst crap you ever heard.
Some music, you can not let go down the tubes, and is not meant to be done as a folks song or accapela by Renate and a guitarist ... that simple!
The only live stuff of theirs that sounds good is in the "Live in London" album.
Sometimes I think they take their "freedom" of expression thing and recklessness for creativity a little too seriously and think that anything they do now is more important than what was done then, or before ... and while there is a point to be made there, there is also a lack of respect for the good work that was done before ... and that has nothing to do with one's opinion of it later in life.
To my ears, AD2 is a very sad thing today ... I will listen to one more album though!
The excerpts I heard from their latest album were excellent.
Joined: July 03 2009
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Points: 290
Posted: January 02 2011 at 12:43
rogerthat wrote:
I would go for Gentle Giant. They switch instruments literally at will and keep going on like clockwork. Derek's singing lets them down, but the instrumentation is bang on target.
I agree with the first part... but Derek was the voice and had the charisma to be the front man.
But now my branches suffer
And my leaves don't bear the glow
They did so long ago
Joined: December 16 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 221
Posted: January 02 2011 at 20:25
I think its safe to say that generally the fusion bands are going to beat out the proggers when it comes to tightness.
But this begs a question: does compositional complexity have to go hand-in-glove with tightness?
Someone mentioned Phish, but Phish is (also) a lot of jamming / spontaneity, right? How can spontaneity be tight? To be tight you have to know what the next note is going to be, dont you? (That is, unless you are INSTINCTIVELY tight.)
Just wondering.
Anyways - this new-ish band, Deluge Grander is pretty damn tight.
Joined: August 04 2009
Location: Estonia
Status: Offline
Points: 70
Posted: January 03 2011 at 18:29
I'm probably also going to have to say Gentle Giant.
I don't think people recognize this much, but even though the compositions themselves aren't the apex of rhythmic irregularity, the way the parts are arranged between the band members demands absolute precision from every single one of them. One phrase may be played by three different instruments - each person has to know their own parts and the other parts very, very well, as it can be very counter intuitive on it's own.
For that reason, when using the word "tight" the first that hops into my mind is GG.
Of course Zappa probably beats everybody in terms of instrumental prowess of his band. He simply demanded the absolute best.
I really don't get that people choose Genesis here for example... They really don't have anything that impressive showing. (In case anyone thinks this is an attack on Genesis, absolutely not, the early era of the band remains one of my absolute favorites in music overall)
I think its safe to say that generally the fusion bands are going to beat out the proggers when it comes to tightness.
But this begs a question: does compositional complexity have to go hand-in-glove with tightness?
Someone mentioned Phish, but Phish is (also) a lot of jamming / spontaneity, right? How can spontaneity be tight? To be tight you have to know what the next note is going to be, dont you? (That is, unless you are INSTINCTIVELY tight.)
Just wondering.
This is correct. To put further detailed definition on "Instinctively tight", one must of course consider that musicians know each other's playing in an improvisational situation like husband and wife in a marriage. Weather Report with the prime line up of the "Heavy Weather" period could predict each other's patterns of riffing without even a glimpse of each other visually. Some people would assume that those particular sections were written where it was really all about prediction and knowing each other's playing. It's where a sax will play a series of about 15 notes, and repeating them as the drummer, bassist, and keyboardist accent those notes with dynamic rhythmical reflections of the pattern causing the entire affair to sound like pre-planned composition. A very natural sequence for the musician and sometimes a rare one.
Joined: August 15 2009
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 698
Posted: January 08 2011 at 07:08
There is a music genre all dedicated to tightness. It's called smooth jazz!
How about Spyro Gyra:
I mean, you could program this on MIDI and it would sound the same... : )
I have to say that this music can be very entertaining, but there is always some level of ugliness that go with it.. In this case I have a hard time with sax, though.
But, more interestingly if we compare the 20 biggest, most famous prog bands, which would be the "tightest"?
I think Jethro Tull. But not in a bad way. They have a folky swing to their playing, so it's never stiff or tight in a boring way. I realized that when I was discovering them, that some of the more complex parts with interplays between instruments in their music reminded me of Gentle Giant, but it's played more seemlessly than Gentle Giant. It's all very fluid, in a good way. So I would say Jethro Tull.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.199 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.