Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:20 |
JJLehto wrote:
Well thank you Rob, and I'm surprised you weren't surprised I agree more or less with your idea. At least on paper. I'd like to see the current system be reformed to actually be made about education, but barring that unlikely case...your idea is appealing.
And I wish I was 25. We all need to run for congress. Regardless of belief, a wave of total outsiders with crazy ideas would be good. I can arm wrestle with Pat over raising minimum wage and Rob will replace the lectern with a giant keg.
|
I have thought about running for office, but I just don't think I could handle the bureaucracy. I'd go insane. Maybe someday, though... Anyway, I'm far to honest to ever make it anywhere in politics.
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:24 |
JJLehto wrote:
and Rob will replace the lectern with a giant keg.
| Oh f**k yeah.
Maybe we all should run one of these days? That'd be bitchin'. Hey CSPAN, hope your viewers like prog!
|
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:24 |
James wrote:
You completely failed to understand my point, Llama.
Plus you should also read my later point. I do see some valid points in Rob's idea.
I do agree that much of what we are taught in Secondary Education is mostly pointless. There does need to be a radicalisation of Education.
I just think there needs to be a proper learning environment for those aged 11 to 16 (or 18), rather than learning for themselves from home. There needs be a disciplined environment. Not a school, as such but more of a College environment.
I never once said anything about anyone being stupid either. Neither did I mention anything about being forced to learn if people are stupid. So please don't misquote me.
However, some people won't bother to learn anything. Not even for a career. Of course, those who want to learn, will.
I, myself, prefer to have a more disciplined and rigid environment to learn in. I get distracted at home if I ever try to read articles online. I realise that's not proper studying but it's still somewhat of a chore sometimes. I get easily sidetracked.
I am going to be doing a Distance Learning course come January and I am hoping that I can discipline myself enough to get through it. However, the difference here is that there is some rigidity. There's deadlines to meet. Grades to be given.
Of course, I am sure Rob's plan also includes grading schemes and deadlines. I just don't necessarily think home-schooling is right for everyone.
|
Fair enough. I posted my response before reading the rest of the thread. I agree that the option for a disciplined learning environment should be there, and it is. There are tutors and private schools and all that goodness. I also agree that some people will choose not to learn anything, but that doesn't bother me much. If they want to spend their lives as beggars, that's their choice. Just don't ask me to support them.
|
|
|
Kestrel
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 18 2008
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 512
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:27 |
I feel sorry for all of you who thought high school was a waste of time. I learned a ton through my AP classes and that forms the background of my college education. This was an inner-city school too; theoretically, the suburban schools should be even better.
I'm not saying the education system is fine as is, but that not everyone wasted their time in high school. :P Edit: Also I am not a fan of online educations. I of course have learned a ton by surfing the internet (but I feel I am unusual in that way) but the several online courses I have taken were no good. This is just personal/anecdotal evidence so I won't argue my point that fiercely, but if given the choice between online or in-person courses... in-person courses are the best by far.
Edited by Kestrel - December 03 2010 at 20:29
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:28 |
They won't necessarily become beggars. They may actually succeed in life by being blaggers. They'll scrape through life with the minimum of study.
But yes. I don't want to support them either.
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:29 |
Kestrel wrote:
I feel sorry for all of you who thought high school was a waste of time. I learned a ton through my AP classes and that forms the background of my college education. This was an inner-city school too; theoretically, the suburban schools should be even better.
I'm not saying the education system is fine as is, but that not everyone wasted their time in high school. :P | I'd wager that many of us didn't waste our time- we had many teachers who did that for us!
|
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:32 |
Kestrel wrote:
I feel sorry for all of you who thought high school was a waste of time. I learned a ton through my AP classes and that forms the background of my college education. This was an inner-city school too; theoretically, the suburban schools should be even better.
I'm not saying the education system is fine as is, but that not everyone wasted their time in high school. :P |
I didn't waste my time. Besides, in year 10, we had the choice of what subjects to take (but English and Mathematics were compulsory). It's just not everything I learnt was beneficial. Plus there's the social aspect too. School actually makes you who you are (not 100% obviously), to some degree. The environment and people you grow up around do make a difference. I just feel that if you're at home, you won't get the same social interaction. Besides, Rob, what are the parents supposed to do? Quit work so they can stay at home to look after their stay-at-home children? Or are you suggesting some sort of financial benefit for parents?
Edited by James - December 03 2010 at 20:33
|
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:33 |
And that's what is appealing about the idea James. Who does want to support them? If you're not motivated...then dropping the public education system wouln't do much damage to them (maybe some would become more motivated to learn?). Then they can start working their job/doing whatever with their life. It's cutting the middle man I guess.
Kestrel wrote:
I feel sorry for all of you who thought high school was a waste of time. I learned a ton through my AP classes and that forms the background of my college education. This was an inner-city school too; theoretically, the suburban schools should be even better.
I'm not saying the education system is fine as is, but that not everyone wasted their time in high school. :P |
Well you are quite lucky. Education wise, my high school was a total waste and I did go to a suburban school. I did have a few teachers/classes that were great, I'll admit. The thing with his idea is, "AP classes" can still exist. As can those good teachers. And if someone wants to take them you could. Hell, someone could easily set up their own school, for parents who may not like the idea and their kids can go, (or do it online).
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:33 |
Kestrel wrote:
I feel sorry for all of you who thought high school was a waste of time. I learned a ton through my AP classes and that forms the background of my college education. This was an inner-city school too; theoretically, the suburban schools should be even better.
I'm not saying the education system is fine as is, but that not everyone wasted their time in high school. :P Edit: Also I am not a fan of online educations. I of course have learned a ton by surfing the internet (but I feel I am unusual in that way) but the several online courses I have taken were no good. This is just personal/anecdotal evidence so I won't argue my point that fiercely, but if given the choice between online or in-person courses... in-person courses are the best by far.
|
The online classes I have taken have also been largely useless, although I did learn calculus that way. When I started taking economics classes in person, the teachers were far less adept at explaining it than my online teacher. Like all things, I guess it just depends.
|
|
|
Kestrel
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 18 2008
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 512
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:34 |
Epignosis wrote:
Kestrel wrote:
I feel sorry for all of you who thought high school was a waste of time. I learned a ton through my AP classes and that forms the background of my college education. This was an inner-city school too; theoretically, the suburban schools should be even better.
I'm not saying the education system is fine as is, but that not everyone wasted their time in high school. :P |
I'd wager that many of us didn't waste our time- we had many teachers who did that for us!
|
Haha. I had my share of time-wasting teachers but was lucky enough to have some great science, math and history teachers. I have a question about your proposed education plan. If students more or less become independent after elementary school, would you still require some kind of civics course? Civics education has a ton of room to improve in this country, I think, but I would rather take what we have now than to have none at all.
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:35 |
Oh yeah, I failed my on line economics class. Others didn't so it is possible...but for me I have NO clue how one can learn that topic on your own and in such a loose environment.
|
|
thellama73
Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 29 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 8368
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:37 |
JJLehto wrote:
Oh yeah, I failed my on line economics class. Others didn't so it is possible...but for me I have NO clue how one can learn that topic on your own and in such a loose environment.
|
See, mine was the opposite problem. The online econ course I took was so easy as to be useless.
|
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:38 |
Rob, have you read about the Free Schools idea being put about over here? I'm just curious.
|
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:38 |
James wrote:
Plus there's the social aspect too. School actually makes you who you are (not 100% obviously), to some degree. The environment and people you grow up around do make a difference. I just feel that if you're at home, you won't get the same social interaction.
| It also allows for taunting and bullying.
James wrote:
Besides, Rob, what are the parents supposed to do? Quit work so they can stay at home to look after their stay-at-home children?
Or are you suggesting some sort of financial benefit for parents?
| Good question. I (ideally) think parents should be the #1 educators of their children- not employees of the state. I think parents should be able to either educate their kids at home, or put their kids in the private schools of their choice. Public schools funded by the government should not be an option. Why does the government give tax breaks to parents? Children are tax burdens.
|
|
|
Kestrel
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 18 2008
Location: Minnesota
Status: Offline
Points: 512
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:38 |
I took an econ class in person taught by a replacement who didn't know what he was doing. I got an A in the class because it was so easy but I couldn't tell you I actually learned anything.
So using econ as an example is just completely inconclusive. lol
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:40 |
Kestrel wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Kestrel wrote:
I feel sorry for all of you who thought high school was a waste of time. I learned a ton through my AP classes and that forms the background of my college education. This was an inner-city school too; theoretically, the suburban schools should be even better.
I'm not saying the education system is fine as is, but that not everyone wasted their time in high school. :P |
I'd wager that many of us didn't waste our time- we had many teachers who did that for us!
|
Haha. I had my share of time-wasting teachers but was lucky enough to have some great science, math and history teachers. I have a question about your proposed education plan. If students more or less become independent after elementary school, would you still require some kind of civics course? Civics education has a ton of room to improve in this country, I think, but I would rather take what we have now than to have none at all. | I wouldn't require anything. Learn what you need to know. That's what I do. It's amazing.
|
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:40 |
|
|
Epignosis
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32524
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:40 |
James wrote:
Rob, have you read about the Free Schools idea being put about over here? I'm just curious.
| No, I am not familiar with that.
|
|
|
VanderGraafKommandöh
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:46 |
Epignosis wrote:
James wrote:
Plus there's the social aspect too. School actually makes you who you are (not 100% obviously), to some degree. The environment and people you grow up around do make a difference. I just feel that if you're at home, you won't get the same social interaction.
|
It also allows for taunting and bullying.
The world isn't perfect. It's controversial but I think sometimes people do grow as a person from bullying. Not in all cases, obviously. I don't like bullying or taunting either.
People shouldn't be coddled though. We all need to meet undesirable people in our lives and we should do this as we're growing up. You could turn 18, being a coddled teenager being home-schooled and met wonderful people whilst doing so. Then you could end up on a rocky road and getting bullied in the workplace and not being able to handle it.
James wrote:
Besides, Rob, what are the parents supposed to do? Quit work so they can stay at home to look after their stay-at-home children?
Or are you suggesting some sort of financial benefit for parents?
|
Good question. I (ideally) think parents should be the #1 educators of their children- not employees of the state. I think parents should be able to either educate their kids at home, or put their kids in the private schools of their choice. Public schools funded by the government should not be an option. Why does the government give tax breaks to parents? Children are tax burdens.
| Of course. However, parents don't know everything. They should teach their children to read and write and to learn maths, plus also teach them morals and everything else like that too. However, if I was a parent, I wouldn't want to teach Science - your argument is probably that they shouldn't need to learn Science unless that's what they want to do but how will they know if they want to work in a Science-field, without firstly learning the basics? - for example. I really do not know enough about such a vast subject. I realise you'd still have tertiary schooling but how much can children take in by the time they're 10?
|
|
|
JJLehto
Prog Reviewer
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
|
Posted: December 03 2010 at 20:47 |
thellama73 wrote:
JJLehto wrote:
Well thank you Rob, and I'm surprised you weren't surprised I agree more or less with your idea. At least on paper. I'd like to see the current system be reformed to actually be made about education, but barring that unlikely case...your idea is appealing.
And I wish I was 25. We all need to run for congress. Regardless of belief, a wave of total outsiders with crazy ideas would be good. I can arm wrestle with Pat over raising minimum wage and Rob will replace the lectern with a giant keg.
|
I have thought about running for office, but I just don't think I could handle the bureaucracy. I'd go insane. Maybe someday, though...
Anyway, I'm far to honest to ever make it anywhere in politics.
|
Yeah those are the 2 major problems... Shame since the lot of us would provide one hell of a shake up. We'd have to wait a few years anyway to do this, Pat and I need to be at least 25 of course. In reality, I doubt any of us are electable anyway. I sure as hell am not. "Tax is theft" will win many hearts but Pat will then say we need a private army, there should be no building codes and laws against flying a plane drunk and people will freak the hell out. Rob's education idea is too much for the masses Anton is too mysterious and llama, you will frighten people with your cane sword and talks of replacing jail with public flogging.
Edited by JJLehto - December 03 2010 at 20:48
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.