Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all. Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Joined: October 10 2010
Location: Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Posted: November 17 2010 at 23:51
Triceratopsoil wrote:
A Person wrote:
Triceratopsoil wrote:
S~V~S wrote:
I think the people who are behaving with purpose may be the recruiters, and we do not want to lynch them.
why not?
Wouldn't it be better to kill them all immediately?
yeah, then the non-recruited win, I do believe
No, no we don't. We will mostly eventually be recruited to one team or
another. And in the one game I played with a similar premise to this,
each time the Recruiter was replaced (and s/he was replaced) the teams
powers diminished. Unless the progger unrecruited can definitively say
which team is bad and which good, at this point, we all have to watch
out for ourselves.
There have already been recruits, and there will be more. It will be almost impossible to determine every person that has been recruited and hunt them down. We lynch one per day, and there can be up to 4 per night, it appears.
If the Proggers can figure out which team is which, i will moderate my stance. But at this point, I think the non recruited need to think realistically. We can't kill them all immediately; it's a logistic impossibility. We have to think of some other plan.
Joined: October 10 2010
Location: Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Posted: November 17 2010 at 23:32
BloodFeastIslandMan wrote:
I would be more suspicious of the people who are posting a lot. Making themselves seem as nobody to be suspicious of, because they are sharies multiple theories, which very well may be to lead us in the wrong direction. Or reverse psychology, which seems to be working on SVS. By making themselves seem suspicious, it makes some feel that those people aren't the one to be suspicious of.
Nah, I'm WAAAAAY too jaded for that~ I think the people who are behaving with purpose may be the recruiters, and we do not want to lynch them. And the people whose behavior is being compelled (if that is indeed what is happening, and I am not sold on that) may have an agenda we do not know. So i don't want to lynch them, either (and i am assuming being sucked into a black hole IS death).
I want to lynch someone who may cause ME grief down the line, and not knowing what team i may join, I don't want to take too active a stance against any of them at this point.
Joined: April 03 2010
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 18016
Posted: November 17 2010 at 23:25
Triceratopsoil wrote:
blindfaeth wrote:
I'm just glad no one can call us out on defending other players at this point in the game because there isnt even a possibility of having a teammate yet.
So, yeah, I don't find Mandy (Sorsha) suspicious for the chapel thing. I thought it would probably be a safe place to be too. The early votes are also making me way nervous.
I had to vote tonight, have a night class tomorrow
just realized I should be better at math than that :P
Joined: October 10 2010
Location: Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Posted: November 17 2010 at 22:59
I don't necessarily think i want to lynch any of the recruiters. We are not sure who is whom, really, do we? I am actually considering Necktie. he made one post, at 10:46 (my time) AM today, saying he was going to catch up. He logged out at 10:48
IMO, he is my direct competition for a role. Or conversely, perhaps there is some forced recruitment, and I don't want to end up on a team with a non participator.
Either way, he seems like the best bet at this time to me~
Joined: November 08 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Status: Offline
Points: 184
Posted: November 17 2010 at 22:58
I would be more suspicious of the people who are posting a lot. Making themselves seem as nobody to be suspicious of, because they are sharies multiple theories, which very well may be to lead us in the wrong direction. Or reverse psychology, which seems to be working on SVS. By making themselves seem suspicious, it makes some feel that those people aren't the one to be suspicious of.
Joined: November 14 2010
Location: Virginia
Status: Offline
Points: 54
Posted: November 17 2010 at 22:52
My only thoughts for today are really, I don't think i'll be voting sorsha.
I guess Mandy could have one of the original 4 recruiting roles but I can probably guarantee you that no one would recruit her with this much "suspicion" per se on her back.
Or did the recruitment happen before that? Idk. Strange day is strange.
Joined: October 10 2010
Location: Montana
Status: Offline
Points: 292
Posted: November 17 2010 at 22:35
I agree that for the people with no role yet, which is most of us, we should be very leery of pretty much everyone, lol~ we don't know where we may end up, and TBQH, I am most likely to vote for those who are NOT acting weirdly. Those jumping out of the gate and voting, those pushing an agenda, those whose vote may be controlled or appear to be controlled~
All of those may already have a role, and I have no clue which team may be which. Or which team I may end up on. At this point, my competition. So I would not be adverse to picking off the low posters (except those that said in advance they would be scarce for a few days).
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.330 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.