Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
RoyFairbank
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 07 2008
Location: Somewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 1072
|
Topic: The Dead Guys: who would've done best? Posted: April 26 2010 at 16:07 |
syd barrett just for fun  but seriously  no not really
Edited by RoyFairbank - April 26 2010 at 18:05
|
 |
WalterDigsTunes
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 16:15 |
Jimi, since he actually knew how to play his instrument, how to produce, how to jam and how to take listeners to his world.
|
 |
Logan
Forum & Site Admin Group
Site Admin
Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37598
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 16:42 |
Had he not tragically died in that cow tipping accident, Jimi Hendrix.
That Barrett comment isn't very nice
Edited by Logan - April 26 2010 at 16:43
|
 |
RoyFairbank
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 07 2008
Location: Somewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 1072
|
Posted: April 26 2010 at 16:44 |
Logan wrote:
Had he not tragically died in that cow tipping accident, Jimi Hendrix.
That Barrett comment isn't very nice
|
I said Syd Barrett I wasn't talking about Roger Barrett, geez....  oh wait they're the same person 
Edited by RoyFairbank - April 26 2010 at 16:46
|
 |
npjnpj
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 05 2007
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 2720
|
Posted: April 27 2010 at 06:28 |
As an alternative question: If all of those four artists hadn't dies but just given up the music business to become accountants and bank clerks, would they have been as famous as they are?
I'd say Hendrix possibly, but definitively not Joplin, Barrett, and Morrison.
|
 |
harmonium.ro
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 18 2008
Location: Anna Calvi
Status: Offline
Points: 22989
|
Posted: April 27 2010 at 06:38 |
I think Jim Morrison was planning to get more serious into his real profession, film direction. Also, I don't think Janis would have evolved out of the 60s rock paradigm she embodied so well. So this leaves Jimi and Syd. I think Jimi would have continued to make stuff of great public appeal, while Syd would have indulged into excentric niches... but I can't say who would have done a better job.
Edited by harmonium.ro - April 27 2010 at 06:42
|
 |
someone_else
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Online
Points: 24673
|
Posted: April 27 2010 at 06:42 |
Jim Morrison and Janis Joplin have always been overrated. The screaming of the latter may have dimmed a bit by age-inducted hoarseness. Jimi Hendrix may have done well, but my vote goes to Syd Barrett.
|
|
 |
RoyFairbank
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 07 2008
Location: Somewhere
Status: Offline
Points: 1072
|
Posted: April 27 2010 at 11:48 |
Personally, I imagine for Syd a career of conformity. I just don't think he had that much to say. He always was the "single factor" of early Pink Floyd. He would have been doing smooth synth pop by the 1980s.
As for Hendrix, I imagine a career like Clapton's but much better. Often well-regarded back-to-basics albums, a few forays into well-produced AOR type stuff like Clapton 1985-1989, the basic reputation of a living legend.
Joplin would have faded into obscurity IMO. Morrison I can't say.
So Jimi.
|
 |
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.