Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Suggested Sub-Genre: New Prog
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSuggested Sub-Genre: New Prog

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
Citizen Erased View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 25 2009
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 192
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Suggested Sub-Genre: New Prog
    Posted: November 30 2009 at 16:44
Upon browsing the Prog Archivse I've discovered a lot of my favourite bands, but not all of them in the genre I'd expect. Many of these bands are lumped in with Prog-Related, which to be honest could be virtually anything that escapes the constrains of pop structure. Others are labelled in Crossover Prog; one example I saw on this sub-forum recently is Dead Letter Circus - an inherently New Prog band, or alternative rock band with progressive tendencies, that come from a tradition of bands such as Radiohead rather than Rush. The Australian rock scene in particular are spawning a lot of these 'alternative' bands that may take influence from as far as post-rock to nu metal e.g. Karnivool, Cog, The Butterfly Effect and so on.

In fact a good portion of what I'd listen to is a sub-genre that's emerged in recent years could be called New Prog. A good description would be thus:

Quote New Prog is not to be confused with 80s Neo-Prog, which is strongly influenced by Symphonic Rock. New Prog is a relatively new sub-genre of Progressive Rock, which combines elements of traditional Progressive Rock with more recent styles of music such as Alternative Rock, Post-Hardcore, and Post-Rock. This list includes New Prog bands, a few modern Art Rock bands with similar influences, as well as a few bordline bands that may be enjoyed by fans of New Prog. This list does not include new bands that play purely 70s Progressive Rock, it also does not include bands that are purely Progressive Metal.


In a personal sense, bands today that are just making 20 minute songs about hobbits with extended overblown guitar solos don't tend to interest me. Progressive music has evolved, and in terms of the mainstream, very much disappeared over the course of the 80s and 90s. However a new wave of progressive bands have been gaining more mainstream attention, influenced more by the likes of Radiohead, Tool and Sigur Rós than the likes of Genesis and Yes. These bands tend to be bracketed as alternative rock bands because the length of their songs might not be long, they do focus on a good pop melody and in many cases seem to have songs that sound not dissimilar to the mainstream rock bands of today.

However these bands become so popular for a reason. Some focus highly on dynamics (Biffy Clyro), others on time signatures (Oceansize) etc.

Many may confuse this genre with "Neo-Prog", the genre from the 80s, and many may just use the term to describe any modern progressive band. However I think it's important to define this is a term to describe alternative rock/post-rock bands that have a progressive aspect to their music/part of their musical DNA. Take a band like Muse, there's a definite progressive slant to what they do, and yet to call them prog-related makes them sound like they make vague passing references to it (Their latest symphony suggests this isn't the case). On the other hand we can't call them a full blown prog band like Genesis or Yes. Solution? New Prog. It's a term that's become more and more popular on messageboards and I reckon it'd be a useful addition to the site, particular for listeners of this style of music such as myself.

Of course, this is just a suggestion. I'd be interested to hear what the mods or whatever would make of this and whether others on here reckon this is just a load of needless rubbish.

Anyway: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_prog

http://rateyourmusic.com/list/WiiAreRabbid/new_prog__progressive_rock_with_a_modern_twist/

This is a list of bands whose fanbases are labelling New Prog (I'm not this user btw but I doubt he'll be too bothered. LOL):

3
 
2
My Heart Has a Wish That You Would Not GoAereogramme
 
3
Selling InsincerityAbigail's Ghost
 
4
AmplifierAmplifier
 
5
Floating WorldAnathallo
 
6
JudgementAnathema
 
7
Source Tags & Codes...And You Will Know Us by the Trail of Dead
 
8
MirroredBattles
 
9
Blackfield IIBlackfield
 
10
The Philosophy of VelocityBrazil
 
11
Wide AwakeCanon

Description: If Thom Yorke was in a traditional Progressive Rock band.
Style: Traditional Progressive Rock w/Alternative Rock influences
Similar Artists: Pending
Website: http://www.myspace.com/canon
 
12
TaantumusCircle
 
13
The New NormalCog
 
14
Good Apollo Im Burning Star IV: Volume One: From Fear Through the Eyes of MadnessCoheed and Cambria
 
15
Crime in ChoirCrime in Choir

Instrumental + Math Rock + Jazz Fusion + Progressive Rock + 2 former members of At the Drive-In. Are you interested yet?
 
16
Act II: The Meaning of, and All Things Regarding Ms. LeadingThe Dear Hunter
 
17
The Crane WifeThe Decemberists

Description: Indie, Prog, Folk, & Chamber/Baroque Pop all thrown in a blender in different proportions depending on the album.
 
18
Building an EmpireDemians
 
19
The Last BroadcastDoves
 
20
El Cielodredg
 
21
Ta det lugntDungen
 
22
Fables From a Mayfly: What I Tell You Three Times Is TrueFair to Midland
 
23
DoppelgängerThe Fall of Troy

If you like this artist you may also enjoy: The Dillinger Escape Plan, The Mars Volta, Protest the Hero, ...
 
24
Blueberry BoatThe Fiery Furnaces
 
25
HomeThe Gathering

Description: Pending
Style: Doom/Goth/Progressive Metal (1995-1997), Dark Progressive Rock (1998-Present)
If you like this artist you may enjoy: Anathema, ...
 
26
NightGazpacho
 
27
The Moon Is a Dead WorldGospel
 
28
UnisonHomesick for Space
 
29
S.U.S.A.R.Indukti
 
30
Set Sail the PrairieKaddisfly
 
31
ThemataKarnivool
 
32
De-Loused in the ComatoriumThe Mars Volta
 
33
And the Glass Handed KitesMew
 
34
Highly Refined PiratesMinus the Bear
 
35
Black Holes and RevelationsMuse
 
36
Mute MathMute Math
 
37
Making DensMystery Jets
 
38
Sol29Nosound
 
39
Everyone Into PositionOceansize
 
40
Blackwater ParkOpeth

I'm sure most people reading this list have at least heard of Opeth, they play a mixture of Progressive Rock, Progressive Metal, and Death Metal. What you may not know is that they released an album called Damnation that has no death growls, no Death Metal influences, or Metal really at all. It's actually a fairly mellow Progressive Rock album that may remind some people  a bit of Porcupine Tree. Even if you hate the rest of Opeth's discography and/or metal, you should give Damnation a try.

Note: To call Damnation New Prog would probably be inaccurate. The reason I added it was that it’s not Traditional Prog as well as I think most New Prog fans would enjoy it.
 
41
Office of Strategic InfluenceOSI
 
42
Silence of Another KindPaatos
 
43
Variations on a DreamThe Pineapple Thief
 
44
Fear of a Blank PlanetPorcupine Tree
 
45
The Dark ThirdPure Reason Revolution
 
46
OK ComputerRadiohead

Even though not everyone considers them to be a part of the New Prog genre, enough do to warrant their inclusion. Besides, like Tool I believe they deserve a spot on this list for their influence alone.
 
47
Between the Heart and the SynapseThe Receiving End of Sirens
 
48
EidolonRishloo
 
49
Second Life SyndromeRiverside
 
50
World Through My EyesRPWL
 
51
In Lake ChThe Mayan Factor
 
52
The New UpThe New Up

Added 8/20/09
 
53
Easily MisunderstoodThe Samuel Jackson Five
 
54
Lover, the Lord Has Left Us...The Sound of Animals Fighting
 
55
The Third EndingThe Third Ending
 
56
VheissuThrice
 
57
10,000 DaysTool

I decided that Tool deserved a spot on this list, even if just purely for being one of the most influential bands on the "New Prog" genre. However, when you consider that Tool combine Progressive Rock with Alternative Rock/Metal, perhaps they deserve a place on this list regardless.
And lo, the mighty riffage was played and it was good


<a href="www.last.fm/user/jonzo67" targe
Back to Top
Citizen Erased View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 25 2009
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 192
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 16:48
Oh and I found the forum this might want to be moved to actually Embarrassed

"Suggestions to Improve the Site" sub-forum or whatever - it might be better placed there but I couldn't see it at all at that moment in time = /
And lo, the mighty riffage was played and it was good


<a href="www.last.fm/user/jonzo67" targe
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 16:56
What?
Back to Top
WalterDigsTunes View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 11 2007
Location: SanDiegoTijuana
Status: Offline
Points: 4373
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 16:57
I dig this proposal. By keeping all the newfangled sounds in a single spot, prog newbies will be able to spot the differences between kids' stuff and the real deal. Similarly, those of us who look for, say, eclectic prog or symphonic rock, will be able to identify the classics without having to wade through bands that formed last week. This definitely has my approval!
Back to Top
Citizen Erased View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 25 2009
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 192
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 16:57
Yeah. I noticed that afterwards.

Sorry Mr Admin.
And lo, the mighty riffage was played and it was good


<a href="www.last.fm/user/jonzo67" targe
Back to Top
Citizen Erased View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 25 2009
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 192
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 16:58
Originally posted by WalterDigsTunes WalterDigsTunes wrote:

I dig this proposal. By keeping all the newfangled sounds in a single spot, prog newbies will be able to spot the differences between kids' stuff and the real deal. Similarly, those of us who look for, say, eclectic prog or symphonic rock, will be able to identify the classics without having to wade through bands that formed last week. This definitely has my approval!


I appreciate the support mate.

And will continue to favour the noob prog bands over emotionless sci-fi twaddle. Nah, I'm just winding you up back. I love a lot of old prog bands.
And lo, the mighty riffage was played and it was good


<a href="www.last.fm/user/jonzo67" targe
Back to Top
Icarium View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar
VIP Member

Joined: March 21 2008
Location: Tigerstaden
Status: Offline
Points: 34083
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 17:06
I think New Prog is interesting I have only heard of those bands Porcupine Tree, Mew, Muse, Tool and Opeth (which I dont concidder to be New-prog but Progressive Metal)

I think Porcupine Tree, Tool and Opeth will be hard to remove from where they are placed now (heavy prog, Experimental metal and Tech/Extreme metal)

but i think this sub-genre diserves to be here since it is a  NEW movement in Progressive rock (they use the curent genres of 90s and 00s and expand it bounderies which also the 70s prog bands did in there time by fusing psychadelic rock /beat music with classical music, Jazz, folk, avant garde and 20th century classic and minimalistic music while todays New-prog scene blends alternative rock/hardcore punk /post rock with Noise rock, shoegazing, grunge, prog, metal and electronica.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 17:12
Originally posted by Citizen Erased Citizen Erased wrote:

Yeah. I noticed that afterwards.

Sorry Mr Admin.
No worries - the search option is a bit of a pig to use so allowances are made for new members.
 
I should really close this thread and direct everyone to the one Conor opened last week on the same subject: http://www.progarchives.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=62988 
 
But you obviously put a lot of thought into the OT I'm reluctant to close it.
What?
Back to Top
Citizen Erased View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 25 2009
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 192
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 17:21
Feel free to merge or whatever. I just hope it doesn't get lost hehe. 
And lo, the mighty riffage was played and it was good


<a href="www.last.fm/user/jonzo67" targe
Back to Top
progkidjoel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2009
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19643
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 18:44
I don't think its a bad idea, but it doesn't seem to be categorising bands musically, but rather by time of formation.

I mean, Blackfield, The Mars Volta and Anathema couldn't be more different.
Back to Top
Finnforest View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 03 2007
Location: The Heartland
Status: Offline
Points: 17309
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 18:53
Originally posted by progkidjoel progkidjoel wrote:

I don't think its a bad idea, but it doesn't seem to be categorising bands musically, but rather by time of formation.

I mean, Blackfield, The Mars Volta and Anathema couldn't be more different.



Yup.  I think the name is problematic.   What are some alternate names you could propose for such a category?
...that moment you realize you like "Mob Rules" better than "Heaven and Hell"
Back to Top
topofsm View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 19:14
Originally posted by progkidjoel progkidjoel wrote:

I don't think its a bad idea, but it doesn't seem to be categorising bands musically, but rather by time of formation.

I mean, Blackfield, The Mars Volta and Anathema couldn't be more different.
 
But they all incorporate some sort of alternative 90s or 00s sounds into their music. Plus you not every band in every category sounds too much alike. Zappa, Mr. Bungle, and Univers Zero don't sound alike at all either.

Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 19:26
Originally posted by progkidjoel progkidjoel wrote:

I don't think its a bad idea, but it doesn't seem to be categorising bands musically, but rather by time of formation.

I mean, Blackfield, The Mars Volta and Anathema couldn't be more different.
I think that is the show stopper.
What?
Back to Top
A Person View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 10 2008
Location: __
Status: Offline
Points: 65760
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 19:47
I like the idea, although the list is probably not complete, and I agree that the name should be different.
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 21:00
If the majority of the bands that would go in that genre are already listed on this site are prog-related, how can you call it a true progressive genre? We would simply be watering down the definition of prog even further, and I can't support that. I understand the impulse to use it as a subset of Crossover, even if I hate the name and don't think it's necessary, but if a band would not fit under the current guidelines, which seems to be the case since many of the bands listed aren't even in prog-related, then why should we add them just because they're slightly progressive alt-rock? What does PA gain by making Muse "full prog" when they're clearly not, and if they ever do become prog we have Crossover for them?
Originally posted by aginor aginor wrote:


but i think this sub-genre diserves to be here since it is a  NEW movement in Progressive rock (they use the curent genres of 90s and 00s and expand it bounderies which also the 70s prog bands did in there time by fusing psychadelic rock /beat music with classical music, Jazz, folk, avant garde and 20th century classic and minimalistic music while todays New-prog scene blends alternative rock/hardcore punk /post rock with Noise rock, shoegazing, grunge, prog, metal and electronica.
And only post-rock and prog are actually prog, so how is that combination relevant to us?
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

New prog = bands who never had any connection to prog but decided to add keyboards or a layer of complexity after 3 albums.


Edited by Henry Plainview - November 30 2009 at 23:02
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
Atavachron View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: September 30 2006
Location: Pearland
Status: Offline
Points: 65616
Direct Link To This Post Posted: November 30 2009 at 23:46
Olde Prog
Back to Top
Evolutionary Sleeper View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2008
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 7037
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2009 at 00:18
I agree with Henry, I think it's completely unnecessary. 
Back to Top
Tarquin Underspoon View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: September 12 2009
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1416
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2009 at 00:20
I dunno. This seems like a weakly connected collection of bands that have little in common musically, as Joel said.
 
Cool idea, but.....sorry. I think you lost me at Opeth.
"WAAAAAAOOOOOUGH!    WAAAAAAAUUUUGGHHHH!!   WAAAAAOOOO!!!"

-The Great Gig in the Sky
Back to Top
Marty McFly View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2009
Location: Czech Republic
Status: Offline
Points: 3968
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2009 at 03:57
It's hard to deny that there's a (not so) small share of truth in his arguments and list he made up.
There's a point where "avant-garde" and "experimental" becomes "terrible" and "pointless,"

   -Andyman1125 on Lulu







Even my
Back to Top
Henry Plainview View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 26 2008
Location: Declined
Status: Offline
Points: 16715
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 01 2009 at 13:27
While, as an avant fan, I would agree with some additions that some would consider controversial, those borderline cases are chipping away at the definition of rock for the sake of including progressive music. This would be chipping away at the definition of progressive for the sake of including rock music.
if you own a sodastream i hate you
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.275 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.