Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Porcupine Tree for Eclectic?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedPorcupine Tree for Eclectic?
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234
Author
Message
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
Logan View Drop Down
Forum & Site Admin Group
Forum & Site Admin Group
Avatar
Site Admin

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 37246 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 28 2009 at 14:59
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

^ Well, then I submit that PT - even on their latest albums - use elements of Psych/Space Rock, Heavy Prog, Crossover Prog and Avant-Prog.Smile


And I think due to the mainstream elements it's better suited to Crossover than Eclectic (for me they're significant enough).
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2009 at 02:10
Unfortunately they're too Eclectic for Crossover. LOL
Back to Top
Kotro View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: August 16 2004
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 2815 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: September 29 2009 at 03:59
Originally posted by Mr ProgFreak Mr ProgFreak wrote:

Unfortunately they're too Eclectic for Crossover. LOL
 
But nor enough to be out of Space Rock, IMO.Wink
Bigger on the inside.
Back to Top
Conor Fynes View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 11 2009
Location: Vancouver, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3196 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2009 at 19:38
They would personally fit best in Crossover or Eclectic (concerning such a wide range of styles, wider than most bands on the site) although Psychedelic and Heavy both fit different parts of their career.

I could never see them in Progressive Metal though. That would essentially be judging a band based on a few minutes of their expansive discography?!
Back to Top
LiquidEternity View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: December 07 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 900 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2009 at 19:43
Not progressive metal, agreed. But still, I would have to vote if not Crossover they should go in experimental/post metal.
Back to Top
Conor Fynes View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: February 11 2009
Location: Vancouver, CA
Status: Offline
Points: 3196 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 02 2009 at 20:05
Still, I can't see them ever as a metal band. Even in the incident, there was alot of stuff that was not metal at all. They are not considered a metal band. Metal as just an ingredient in their newfound mixing pot.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 234

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.207 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.