| Author |
 Topic Search  Topic Options
|
angelmk 
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: November 22 2006
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 1955
|
 Posted: March 30 2009 at 13:28 |
|
i 've missed this poll till now i guess, so to say a few things.. without hesitation Rush.
|
 |
mr.cub
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 06 2009
Location: Lexington, VA
Status: Offline
Points: 971
|
Posted: March 30 2009 at 14:22 |
|
Ive lived my entire life without Rush but cannot fathom living without The Beatles. That is simply the personal effect their music has had on me. Im sure people can relate to Rush for one reason or another, but they never communicated something greater to me like the Beatles. I have tried out a few Rush albums lately and I like the musicianship but again the Beatles literally changed my outlook on life, there is something greater than the music at work with them. And I do not think I can say the same about Rush
|
|
|
|
claugroi
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 04 2008
Location: Brasil
Status: Offline
Points: 288
|
Posted: March 30 2009 at 18:53 |
|
|
|
Symphonic Prog Master
|
|
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 02:15 |
 memowakeman wrote:
BaldJean wrote:
It is easier to understand than the fuss about Rush, at least from an historic point of view. I doubt we would have prog today if it hadn't been for the Beatles.
|
That is why i am not really a Beatles follower, i think their value is just from the historic point of view as you said, they openend doors for new music, sounds and new genres, but i find most of their music boring.
I am not a true Rush follower either, but i actually listen to them more and prefer them over Beatles.
|
Right on bro. I'd rather take a band that still has a lot of historical significance that I can actually enjoy listening to than a band with even more historical significance which I find to be garbage except for these 2 songs Helter Skelter and Revolution no.9. And I'm not a true Rush follower either, FWIW.
|
|
|
|
BiGi
Forum Senior Member
Joined: June 01 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 848
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 04:19 |
BaldJean wrote:
It is easier to understand than the fuss about Rush, at least from an historic point of view. I doubt we would have prog today if it hadn't been for the Beatles.
|
Well, they surely gave way to introducing a new level of experimentation in music, delivering it pleasantly enough to reach the ears of the average rock listeners.
|
A flower?
|
|
BaldJean
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 05:32 |
HughesJB4 wrote:
memowakeman wrote:
BaldJean wrote:
It is easier to understand than the fuss about Rush, at least from an historic point of view. I doubt we would have prog today if it hadn't been for the Beatles.
|
That is why i am not really a Beatles follower, i think their value is just from the historic point of view as you said, they openend doors for new music, sounds and new genres, but i find most of their music boring.
I am not a true Rush follower either, but i actually listen to them more and prefer them over Beatles.
|
Right on bro.
I'd rather take a band that still has a lot of historical significance that I can actually enjoy listening to than a band with even more historical significance which I find to be garbage except for these 2 songs Helter Skelter and Revolution no.9.
And I'm not a true Rush follower either, FWIW.
|
there are a lot more songs by the Beatles which I can listen to and liking it still, not only "Helter Skelter" and "Revolution Nr. 9". songs like "Julia" or "I will" have wonderful melodies. the Beatles had a great knack for melodies, which is unrivalled by any other prog band, in my opinion. even conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein admired the melodies of the Beatles
|
 A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
|
|
LinusW
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 27 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 10665
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 07:17 |
|
I'm a big fan of the Beatles. I'm an even bigger fan of Rush.
|
|
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 07:18 |
BaldJean wrote:
HughesJB4 wrote:
memowakeman wrote:
BaldJean wrote:
It is easier to understand than the fuss about Rush, at least from an historic point of view. I doubt we would have prog today if it hadn't been for the Beatles.
|
That is why i am not really a Beatles follower, i think their value is just from the historic point of view as you said, they openend doors for new music, sounds and new genres, but i find most of their music boring.
I am not a true Rush follower either, but i actually listen to them more and prefer them over Beatles.
|
Right on bro.
I'd rather take a band that still has a lot of historical significance that I can actually enjoy listening to than a band with even more historical significance which I find to be garbage except for these 2 songs Helter Skelter and Revolution no.9.
And I'm not a true Rush follower either, FWIW.
|
there are a lot more songs by the Beatles which I can listen to and liking it still, not only "Helter Skelter" and "Revolution Nr. 9". songs like "Julia" or "I will" have wonderful melodies. the Beatles had a great knack for melodies, which is unrivalled by any other prog band, in my opinion. even conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein admired the melodies of the Beatles
|
Fair enough. I still don't like The Beatles except those 2 songs 
|
|
|
|
Abstrakt
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 07:22 |
HughesJB4 wrote:
BaldJean wrote:
HughesJB4 wrote:
memowakeman wrote:
BaldJean wrote:
It is easier to understand than the fuss about Rush, at least from an historic point of view. I doubt we would have prog today if it hadn't been for the Beatles.
|
That is why i am not really a Beatles follower, i think their value is just from the historic point of view as you said, they openend doors for new music, sounds and new genres, but i find most of their music boring.
I am not a true Rush follower either, but i actually listen to them more and prefer them over Beatles.
|
Right on bro.
I'd rather take a band that still has a lot of historical significance that I can actually enjoy listening to than a band with even more historical significance which I find to be garbage except for these 2 songs Helter Skelter and Revolution no.9.
And I'm not a true Rush follower either, FWIW.
|
there are a lot more songs by the Beatles which I can listen to and liking it still, not only "Helter Skelter" and "Revolution Nr. 9". songs like "Julia" or "I will" have wonderful melodies. the Beatles had a great knack for melodies, which is unrivalled by any other prog band, in my opinion. even conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein admired the melodies of the Beatles
|
Fair enough. I still don't like The Beatles except those 2 songs
|
That's because you're silly! 
|
|
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 07:26 |
Abstrakt wrote:
HughesJB4 wrote:
BaldJean wrote:
HughesJB4 wrote:
memowakeman wrote:
BaldJean wrote:
It is easier to understand than the fuss about Rush, at least from an historic point of view. I doubt we would have prog today if it hadn't been for the Beatles.
|
That is why i am not really a Beatles follower, i think their value is just from the historic point of view as you said, they openend doors for new music, sounds and new genres, but i find most of their music boring.
I am not a true Rush follower either, but i actually listen to them more and prefer them over Beatles.
|
Right on bro.
I'd rather take a band that still has a lot of historical significance that I can actually enjoy listening to than a band with even more historical significance which I find to be garbage except for these 2 songs Helter Skelter and Revolution no.9.
And I'm not a true Rush follower either, FWIW.
|
there are a lot more songs by the Beatles which I can listen to and liking it still, not only "Helter Skelter" and "Revolution Nr. 9". songs like "Julia" or "I will" have wonderful melodies. the Beatles had a great knack for melodies, which is unrivalled by any other prog band, in my opinion. even conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein admired the melodies of the Beatles
|
Fair enough. I still don't like The Beatles except those 2 songs
|
That's because you're silly!
|
Or because I don't buy into the media hype like some people do.
|
|
|
|
LinusW
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 27 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 10665
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 07:28 |
|
Yeah. We've all been duped into liking what we like.
|
|
Petrovsk Mizinski
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 24 2007
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 25210
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 07:29 |
Shut up Linus 
|
|
|
|
LinusW
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: September 27 2007
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 10665
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 07:30 |
|
|
|
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 08:41 |
|
I find it funny that the sacrosanct Beatles are only winning by a small margin much to the disapproval of indignant Beatles purists.
|
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
BaldJean
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 09:36 |
the Beatles are sacrosanct? since when? certainly not in here. judging by some of the posts in the forum one would rather get the impression that Rush are sacrosanct . you just have to look at all the drummer polls which end 1) Peart .... nothing for a while... 2) others. 
|
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
|
|
Alberto Muņoz
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 3577
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 11:54 |
BaldJean wrote:
the Beatles are sacrosanct? since when? certainly not in here. judging by some of the posts in the forum one would rather get the impression that Rush are sacrosanct . you just have to look at all the drummer polls which end 1) Peart .... nothing for a while... 2) others.
|
Yes i completely agree in that.
Rush Archives? gimme a.... 
|
|
|
|
JLocke
Prog Reviewer
Joined: November 18 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 4900
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 12:05 |
Peart will never touch Lennon in terms of songwriting ability or creativity.
That being said, technically speaking the better band is obvious, but from a prog standpoint, The Beatles had much more influence than Rush ever did. Rush inspired more Metal guys than Proggers.
This poll is near impossible to vote on for me, but I'm gonna have to go with the fab four.
|
|
Equality 7-2521
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Philly
Status: Offline
Points: 15784
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 13:45 |
BaldJean wrote:
the Beatles are sacrosanct? since when? certainly not in here. judging by some of the posts in the forum one would rather get the impression that Rush are sacrosanct . you just have to look at all the drummer polls which end 1) Peart .... nothing for a while... 2) others.
|
True on a local level maybe, but globally as you said Rush are given relatively little credit, but The Beatles tend to considered to best band ever all over. As Hughes said it seems you have to apologize whenever you label The Beatles as worse than any other artists. I was only referring to Beatles choosers posting in this thread actually.
|
|
"One had to be a Newton to notice that the moon is falling, when everyone sees that it doesn't fall. "
|
|
BaldJean
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 28 2005
Location: Germany
Status: Offline
Points: 10387
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 14:10 |
|
|
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta
|
|
Raff
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: July 29 2005
Location: None
Status: Offline
Points: 24429
|
Posted: March 31 2009 at 15:03 |
Keltic wrote:
Petrovsk Mizinski wrote:
|
There is also a whole ton of non Beatles fans and people that even hate The Beatles probably rolling on the floor laughing because they think for themselves and don't think The Beatles is the best band ever because Rolling Stone magazine tells people they are.
It's people like you that make people think we have to apologize for not liking this supposedly 'BEST BAND EVAH ZONG".
I don't apologize for hating most of their music. I think the Beatles suck and would rather listen to Eminem quite frankly.
I also feel their legacy is only tangentially related to music, the rest is just a world of media over hype that they left for us.
|
What in the name of distilled cheap vodka and stupid haircuts do Russians know about music ?
I honestly don't give a twopenny fart whether you like them or not. Your loss, comrade.  [/QUOTE] Russian  ?
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage")
Rush vs The Beatles
