Still too much sniping

That's really too vague to be able to respond to or do anything about.

Ricochet wrote: I know some "acid" or "direct" members exist around here, otherwise I don't really understand what "snipping" exactly means...

it's been worse than it is now around here... and what more can you ask than good Admins?  No one can be *prevented* from sniping before it happens (and it does add a bit of excitement now and then, even the spectacle of someone being tossed out    )








Edited by Atavachron - January 05 2008 at 02:42

Zappa88 wrote: Atavachron wrote: it's been worse around here... and what more can you ask than good Admins?  No one can be *prevented* from sniping before it happens (and it does add a bit of excitement now and then, even the spectacle of someone being tossed out    )   They should let the blood-thirsty Collabs do a ban every know and then, eh?

I've never had, as a Collab, any snipping habits, but if necessary, I can get fit on it.

First, by drinking some






Edited by Ricochet - January 05 2008 at 04:00

That's a paradox! Vampires hate the light...so why color a big, huge, juicy sun behind my back? 

As a one time regular contributor (my internet access is now limited to public access), I was one of those who would sometimes respond without reading the entire 50 pages of previous posts. Guilty as I am, I see it as natural that not everyone who happens onto an interesting thread will bother to go over the whole history of the discussion if the replies are very numerous. Even worse, if you do, you find that many just repeat themselves. As a habit, I'd usually read those posts from certain members who I thought could be counted on for interesting, well reasoned & valid debating.

Actual real life PA experience - I did get feedback from an Admin person once in regards to a , ahem, over zealous poster. I had closed my previous account due to a discomforting response. When I announced my return and explained in very general terms the reason for my changing tagnames, I got a PM asking & actually guessing the incident in question. I was also told that the member had been "talked to" in the past, and that PA treated all members, admin/collabs AND other PA visitors as expected to follow the site guidelines, with the aforementioned penalties applicable to all.