Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Mikerinos
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Planet Gong
Status: Offline
Points: 8890
|
Posted: December 24 2006 at 18:38 |
The Miracle wrote:
Bluesaga wrote:
Well I liked the Can and Neu! samples (forget what I thought of Faust), but it just wasn't enough to persuade me to buy anything. You really can't call me close-minded because I'm not crazy about electronic music. At least I don't claim to hate it all (like some people say with punk )
|
I have some Faust and Can and it's all orgasmic... I have a very high avant tolerance level. Ambient Electronic stuff is actually some of the most avant garde music out there, with no structure, no melody, just harmony and inner beauty. Certainly not to everyone's taste.
I don't claim to hate any prog sub genre either, in fact I claim that I like them all. I'm talking about open mindness towards prog
|
There is plenty of prog I'm not so crazy about (Neo, Metal, Electronic, some Avant), but that's because of preference, not close-mindedness. I'm not 100% open-minded though, and thank god for that!
|
|
|
progismylife
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
|
Posted: December 24 2006 at 18:38 |
The Wizard wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
About TFK being all about copying (or being highly influenced at least) byt the likes of Yes, KC, and GG, one thing that seperates TFK from these bands (not so much GG, but most symphonic prog bands in general) is their sense of playfulness. Come on, "Minor Giant Steps," while not groundbreaking, is a fun, spirited song. If you look at my last.fm chart, you can see TFK doesn't even break my top 10 bands, but I can at least respect them for what they are.
I want to ask a question: if Yes released an album exactly like Paradox Hotel with Jon Anderson singing instead of Roine, would it still be so bad? |
Yes.
The thing I'm trying to say in my review is that once again, I don't dislike the album for it's like classic prog. I dislike it becuase it's poorly made. I think a lot of you are having trouble understanding that. |
If it is like classic prog, which you don't mind, why did you give it 1 star? I sense a paradox.
|
|
The Miracle
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
|
Posted: December 24 2006 at 18:39 |
Bluesaga wrote:
There is plenty of prog I'm not so crazy about (Neo, Metal, Electronic, some Avant), but that's because of preference, not close-mindedness. I'm not 100% open-minded though, and thank god for that!
|
I am (towards prog) and thank Bern for that!
|
|
|
The Wizard
Prog Reviewer
Joined: July 18 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 7341
|
Posted: December 24 2006 at 18:40 |
progismylife wrote:
The Wizard wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
About TFK being all about copying (or being highly influenced at least) byt the likes of Yes, KC, and GG, one thing that seperates TFK from these bands (not so much GG, but most symphonic prog bands in general) is their sense of playfulness. Come on, "Minor Giant Steps," while not groundbreaking, is a fun, spirited song. If you look at my last.fm chart, you can see TFK doesn't even break my top 10 bands, but I can at least respect them for what they are.
I want to ask a question: if Yes released an album exactly like Paradox Hotel with Jon Anderson singing instead of Roine, would it still be so bad? |
Yes.
The thing I'm trying to say in my review is that once again, I don't dislike the album for it's like classic prog. I dislike it becuase it's poorly made. I think a lot of you are having trouble understanding that. | If it is like classic prog, which you don't mind, why did you give it 1 star? I sense a paradox. |
Read my review to find out. I dislike it for many other reasons.
|
|
|
Mikerinos
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Planet Gong
Status: Offline
Points: 8890
|
Posted: December 24 2006 at 18:40 |
|
|
|
TRoTZ
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 25 2004
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 35
|
Posted: December 24 2006 at 18:42 |
stonebeard wrote:
About TFK being all about copying (or being highly influenced at least) byt the likes of Yes, KC, and GG, one thing that seperates TFK from these bands (not so much GG, but most symphonic prog bands in general) is their sense of playfulness. Come on, "Minor Giant Steps," while not groundbreaking, is a fun, spirited song. If you look at my last.fm chart, you can see TFK doesn't even break my top 10 bands, but I can at least respect them for what they are.
I want to ask a question: if Yes released an album exactly like Paradox Hotel with Jon Anderson singing instead of Roine, would it still be so bad? |
Well, in fact I have to agree it wouldn't. If this album was released in the 70's it would be possibly a today's classic, because it would be a novelty, and specially if allied with Yes sensibility.
|
|
The Miracle
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
|
Posted: December 24 2006 at 18:43 |
|
|
|
Mikerinos
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 11 2005
Location: Planet Gong
Status: Offline
Points: 8890
|
Posted: December 24 2006 at 18:50 |
|
|
|
The Miracle
Prog Reviewer
Joined: May 29 2005
Location: hell
Status: Offline
Points: 28427
|
Posted: December 24 2006 at 18:53 |
|
|
|
TRoTZ
Prog Reviewer
Joined: December 25 2004
Location: Portugal
Status: Offline
Points: 35
|
Posted: December 24 2006 at 18:55 |
oh come on, is there really any point in your discussion
"I'm 1% more open-minded than you"
(eheh just kidding)
Piece o/
|
|
progismylife
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 19 2006
Location: ibreathehelium
Status: Offline
Points: 15535
|
Posted: December 24 2006 at 22:28 |
The Wizard wrote:
progismylife wrote:
The Wizard wrote:
stonebeard wrote:
About TFK being all about copying (or being highly influenced at least) byt the likes of Yes, KC, and GG, one thing that seperates TFK from these bands (not so much GG, but most symphonic prog bands in general) is their sense of playfulness. Come on, "Minor Giant Steps," while not groundbreaking, is a fun, spirited song. If you look at my last.fm chart, you can see TFK doesn't even break my top 10 bands, but I can at least respect them for what they are.
I want to ask a question: if Yes released an album exactly like Paradox Hotel with Jon Anderson singing instead of Roine, would it still be so bad? |
Yes.
The thing I'm trying to say in my review is that once again, I don't dislike the album for it's like classic prog. I dislike it becuase it's poorly made. I think a lot of you are having trouble understanding that. | If it is like classic prog, which you don't mind, why did you give it 1 star? I sense a paradox. |
Read my review to find out. I dislike it for many other reasons. |
I did read it. Multiple times. I got nothing else from this review. Nothing.
|
|
Visitor13
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
|
Posted: December 25 2006 at 05:13 |
I've just given The Wizard's review a read and I don't see a problem with it. It's harsh but IMO fair - it does seem like he listened to the album multiple times (I'm not familiar with Paradox Hotel, BTW, I like The Flower Kings, but I do understand the people who don't). I'd give similar reviews to some highly revered classic prog albums, but that's beside the point.
I don't think saying things like "there are worse albums out there" changes anything. Sure, there are worse albums than Paradox Hotel, but are they prog? This is a prog site, I like to believe that everything that makes it here maintains at least a bare minimum of quality - and that minimum quality is represented by the one star. And everyone is entitled to using the one star rating, providing they've tried to approach the album in question with the minimum of bias, which I believe The Wizard has done.
So please stop trying to prove he's objectively wrong. You can't prove that. Let his review be.
Not that The Wizard can prove he's objectively right, either.
Edited by Visitor13 - December 25 2006 at 05:20
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
|
Posted: December 25 2006 at 05:23 |
^ It's not a matter of proving him wrong, or proving that I'm right. I'm just trying to say that the rating will be considered to be wrong by most people who see it or read the review ... that doesn't mean that he should change it, or that I (or these people) have a problem with it. BTW: Of course there are also worse prog albums out there ... but I know that the limited rating scale of the archives makes it hard to put them into proper relation. So I guess 1 star can mean good or bad, depending on who you ask.
|
|
|
Visitor13
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
|
Posted: December 25 2006 at 05:29 |
^ Yes, the 5 star system is inadequate to say the least.
|
|
MikeEnRegalia
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21206
|
Posted: December 25 2006 at 05:34 |
Of course if you introduce more steps another problem arises: The agony of choice. Have a try on my website if you like.
|
|
|
salmacis
Forum Senior Member
Content Addition
Joined: April 10 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 3928
|
Posted: December 25 2006 at 05:51 |
Actually, I must say 'Paradox Hotel' has caused me to re-evaluate this band. Though I still have problems with their jazzier ambles which seem to go nowhere at all, I think the only albums that are struck with that I have now are 'Unfold The Future' (should NOT have been a double imo) and 'The Rainmaker' (seems to be a lot of inconsequential stuff on that, imho). I don't like some of the snobbery on this thread- it appears as though some members are looking down on fans of neo prog or more modern symphonic bands (of which I am definitely one) just because they are into more dissonant and avant garde fare- I don't think it's necessary at all. Please, let's not turn into the Genesis forum....
|
|
andu
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 27 2006
Location: Romania
Status: Offline
Points: 3089
|
Posted: December 25 2006 at 06:13 |
Visitor13 wrote:
I've just given The Wizard's review a read and I don't see a problem with it.
|
though i couldn't know if he is right or wrong, there is plenty of "how not to review" there. for example, instead of "Unfortunately Paradox Hotel does not offer that." i'd say "Unfortunately I don't find that in Paradox Hotel." The same goes for: - The album is bland,
uninspired, and just plain weak / I find the album bland,
uninspired, and just plain weak - It does nothing to really provoke any emotional
reaction or even inspire any thought. / It does nothing for me to really provoke any emotional
reaction or even inspire any thought. - The music won't make you feel or think or anything of the sort. / The music didn't make me feel or think or anything of the sort. - There's really nothing to listen for. As a fact, there are other listeners that have certified (by reviewing) that they found something to listen for. - There's no thing offered by this album. Well, if The Wizard says so...I guess The Wizard is the referee of taste and albums are made directly for his evaluation. If he doesn't find anything in there, we, the rest, shouldn't even try. ......... beyond being less useful for those who consider approaching the respective album and thus looking for elaborate opinions, this kind of reviewing is first of all un-ethical, especially in the case of democratic (user-reviews) forum. one can not just say "my opinion is the truth, the true knowledge". as i said somewhere else, one's subjectivity can be managed objectively, aka fairly.
|
|
Visitor13
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: February 02 2005
Location: Poland
Status: Offline
Points: 4702
|
Posted: December 25 2006 at 06:49 |
While I kinda agree with you, Andu, I don't think much of 'hedging' in reviews. To me it's a given that however you phrase your opinion, it's going to remain just that - an opinion.
|
|
eugene
Forum Senior Member
Joined: May 30 2005
Location: Ukraine
Status: Offline
Points: 2703
|
Posted: December 25 2006 at 07:32 |
Visitor13 wrote:
While I kinda agree with you, Andu, I don't think much of 'hedging' in reviews. To me it's a given that however you phrase your opinion, it's going to remain just that - an opinion. |
I agree with you, but not all the people take it like that. I remember editing my posts just adding IMO after every other sentence, so that other people do not jump at me in anger thinking that I am declaring an Absolute Truth.
|
carefulwiththataxe
|
|
Guitar God
Forum Newbie
Joined: December 24 2006
Location: Russian Federation
Status: Offline
Points: 36
|
Posted: December 25 2006 at 08:12 |
I really like Flower Kings. I like all their albums. I don't care if they have 70's art-rock influences or not, I just like them. I'm sure that 20 years after TFK will be the CLASSICS OF PROG-MUSIC in 90's and 00's and many future prog bands will copy some of their music.
|
|