9/11 Pentagon Video finally released...

 

If you have time, take a look at Wilson's Solidworks 3D model animations, they are quite instructive (see the URL I gave in an earlier post). He has modelled the Pentagon building and position of the light poles (lamp posts) in the trajectory of the 757. The 757 is to scale too. His modelling also shows how the right engine knocked the generator out of the way, and how the left engine knocked a hole in the low wall in front of the building. It also shows how the 757 missed some of the cable reels. There are 3 animations on his site, if I recall. One of them is slow because it is an executable of the complete model environment, which you can rotate and zoom, which you will need to do because the aircraft is miniscule because you are looking at the entire Pentagon from a distance. His to-scale perspective rendering is also useful - it helped me to realise that the 757 *would* look like a small 'cigar tube' from that distance and angle. It also helped me to realise that what I thought was the aircraft was in fact the smoke, trailing behind, from a possibly damaged engine. The aircraft itself is almost completely obscured by the barrier's pedestal.

 

 

 

 

There are already umpteen Web sites by the so-called 'conspiracy theorists' that attempt to debunk the debunking of the conspiracy theories. I have read several of them.

 

In fact, I found one that mimics that 146-page document by Roberts: it even uses some of the same words as Roberts, and at first I thought he had changed his spots!

 

 

Don't be too hasty, Mike. Even if he turns out to be wrong about the science, David Ray Griffin's message about the US neo-conservatives and so-called Bush Doctrine and US imperialism deserves to be heard and debated.

 

The AGM-109 is the GLCM & SLCM (ground launched & ship launched...) used by the US army and navy. It's speed is 550 mph.

 

Your guesstimate of the time lapse camera frame speed was, if I recall 1/4 sec., i.e. 100% out. You are now making a guesstimate of distances which could be widely in error. See if you can find a plan view of the area, viz. the roads, barriers, aircraft trajectory and point of impact. You will I'm sure see that it is possible. If I get the time, I will do the same. There are plan views on the Web, by the way. Study also the 3D models I referred to earlier. you can manipulate one of them.

 

Think about it: the Pentagon is not stupid enough to release a time lapse CCTV recording that would easily prove that a supersonic speed was the obvious conclusion!

 

Furthermore, all the evidence - which has been discussed ad nauseam in this thread and in the various Web sites linked to in this thread - point strongly against your conclusion. To recap: witnesses, debris, impact damage to the building and surrounding area (how would a cruise missle knock down the 5 lamp posts - see their physical layout, for example).

 

You need to read all the Web sites and various reports to find out about all these.