Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Video & PC Game Discussion
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Video & PC Game Discussion

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 243>
Author
Message
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lindsay Lohan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 03:11
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Lindsay Lohan Lindsay Lohan wrote:

Consoles in general are built to cheaply to be profitable so console games are often more expansive than PC-games and you also have to live with knowing that the graphics you see on the first PS3 game forexample is going to be just as good as a PS3 game relased 5 years after.

This is not true. The graphics for launch games for most all next-gen games (when compared to the previous generation) are demonstrably better. After a few years go by and the developers really disect the console and get everything out of it that they can, the games released thereafter are incredibly better than the launch games, both in graphics and design, simply because the developers know the ins and outs and what the console is made of and can juice it for all it's got.

When I see not-prerendered pics and footage for MGS4 on the PS3, presumably a launch title or soon after, I get excited because it has the best graphics I have ever seen in a game. It makes Half-Life 2 look like Tetris. And I know that that game is using far less than 50% of the PS3's total power.

Hah it takes a maximum year of 1 year before the graphics for an console system seems dated...i mean ps2 games today looks like the kind of games you could get for pc 4 years ago.

Comparing a dated game like Half-life 2 with a new PS3 game aint remotly fair, besides if you want the good graphics you look to Unreal Engine 3 the most advanced graphics engine EVER!

Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lindsay Lohan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 04:09
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by Lindsay Lohan Lindsay Lohan wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

 a few examples:

  • in one or two years BTX will begin to replace ATX. So if you then decide to upgrade your motherboard - you'll need a new computer case (and power supply).
  • If you today upgrade your system and still use an IDE harddisk, you will eventually want to upgrade to a SATA disk - or else your old harddisk will become a performance bottleneck.
  • If you currently own a really good AGP graphics board and plan to upgrade your mainboard in a year or so - forget about it, because you WILL need a new graphics board for PCIe.
  • USB is backward compatible, that's true. But eventually you will want to upgrade to USB2 if you use a memory stick, because it's at least 10x faster.
  • ...

 

Yes as i said before most standards SATA, PCIe,USB2 and BTX is implemented in the MOTHERBOARD so when you buy a new MOTHERBOARD all these things comes naturally.

I was not aware of BTX becoming a new standard for motherboards? It is quite an old standard and have been used for DELL for years but as you say changing from ATX to BTX will require new case and PS but new motherboard standards happen very rarely.

It's a fairly new standard ... the successor of ATX. It features a different layout which optimizes air flow.

Yes but as i said Motherboards standards almost never change...ATX is really old.

Also SATA disk does not run faster than IDE  disks on games really but most motherboards supports both standards so when space restrictions calls for it you will propably buy a SATA disc since they cost the same.

Currently SATA is not faster than IDE, that's correct. But it won't stay that way ... that particular issue is not a big problem though as you correctly point out.

Also many got a good AGP card and wants to buy a new motherboard but still want to wait 5-6 months or so before buying a new graphics card and since all new graphics card today are PCI-e they would ofcourse buy a motherboard with PCI-e but there are adapters that can put in the PCI-e slot and also some motherboards run both AGP and PCI-e

No. converters seriously degrade performance, so you really have to decide which one to use. I currently have a good combo (Athlon 64 3000 + GeForce 6800 AGP), and when I upgrade the mainboard it will be PCIe, and thus also a new graphics board.

Certainly the adapter is ONLY a temporary installment that can be removed when you can afford to buy a PCIe Graphics Card. The adapter is only inserted into the PCIe slot and can be removed at any time. And i have not seen any benchmarch results that indicates a notable performance loss from using a standard AGPX8  port.

So in reality you really only need to buy a new Motherboard, processor and memory at the same time. The rest (Optic drives,HDD,Human interfaces,Soundcards,Graphics cards) You can really buy afterwards as standards for these products rarely changes so fast and if they do you propably can get a adapter or something for it.

In two years from now, you will also want a new case, new hard disk (because then SATA III will be standard, and a lot faster than IDE), new optic drives (with DHCP so you can watch Blu Ray / HD DVD discs on the computer) and graphics card (with DHCP).

DVD-Roms was relased in 1998 yet it took atleast 4-5 years before it became a standard on new computers. And it is only now that you see most games can be found in a dvd format back in 98 there where VERY few games that had advantage of the DVD format and those where mostly movie games like forexample Phantasmagoria that would go over 8 cd's

So although HD-DVD/BLURAY will perhaps be relased properly in a 2 years time it will take much longer before it comes standard and until you find games that  REALLY needs these standards.

All in all new stuff and formats is released all the time...soon PCIe2 is on the way but it WILL take some time before you actualy can use it for anything them or before they are "reasonably" priced.

Look at the new trend with Dual-Core processors currently now games and OS is not optimalized for such systems and most of them ist to expansive anyway so investing in a Dual Core system now would be pointless.



Edited by Lindsay Lohan
Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21138
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MikeEnRegalia Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 06:36
Originally posted by Lindsay Lohan Lindsay Lohan wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

Originally posted by Lindsay Lohan Lindsay Lohan wrote:

Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

 a few examples:

  • in one or two years BTX will begin to replace ATX. So if you then decide to upgrade your motherboard - you'll need a new computer case (and power supply).
  • If you today upgrade your system and still use an IDE harddisk, you will eventually want to upgrade to a SATA disk - or else your old harddisk will become a performance bottleneck.
  • If you currently own a really good AGP graphics board and plan to upgrade your mainboard in a year or so - forget about it, because you WILL need a new graphics board for PCIe.
  • USB is backward compatible, that's true. But eventually you will want to upgrade to USB2 if you use a memory stick, because it's at least 10x faster.
  • ...

 

Yes as i said before most standards SATA, PCIe,USB2 and BTX is implemented in the MOTHERBOARD so when you buy a new MOTHERBOARD all these things comes naturally.

I was not aware of BTX becoming a new standard for motherboards? It is quite an old standard and have been used for DELL for years but as you say changing from ATX to BTX will require new case and PS but new motherboard standards happen very rarely.

It's a fairly new standard ... the successor of ATX. It features a different layout which optimizes air flow.

Yes but as i said Motherboards standards almost never change...ATX is really old.

That's true ... yesterday I bought a new ATX computer case to replace my old one. ATX will surely be around another 4-5 years ... and in 1-2 years the BTX cases will become attractive. Today there are only few, and they offer few advantages over ATX.

Also SATA disk does not run faster than IDE  disks on games really but most motherboards supports both standards so when space restrictions calls for it you will propably buy a SATA disc since they cost the same.

Currently SATA is not faster than IDE, that's correct. But it won't stay that way ... that particular issue is not a big problem though as you correctly point out.

Also many got a good AGP card and wants to buy a new motherboard but still want to wait 5-6 months or so before buying a new graphics card and since all new graphics card today are PCI-e they would ofcourse buy a motherboard with PCI-e but there are adapters that can put in the PCI-e slot and also some motherboards run both AGP and PCI-e

No. converters seriously degrade performance, so you really have to decide which one to use. I currently have a good combo (Athlon 64 3000 + GeForce 6800 AGP), and when I upgrade the mainboard it will be PCIe, and thus also a new graphics board.

Certainly the adapter is ONLY a temporary installment that can be removed when you can afford to buy a PCIe Graphics Card. The adapter is only inserted into the PCIe slot and can be removed at any time. And i have not seen any benchmarch results that indicates a notable performance loss from using a standard AGPX8  port.

In fact I have only heard (read) negative remarks. 50% performance loss is common, at least with high resolution (which require a higher bandwidth).

So in reality you really only need to buy a new Motherboard, processor and memory at the same time. The rest (Optic drives,HDD,Human interfaces,Soundcards,Graphics cards) You can really buy afterwards as standards for these products rarely changes so fast and if they do you propably can get a adapter or something for it.

In two years from now, you will also want a new case, new hard disk (because then SATA III will be standard, and a lot faster than IDE), new optic drives (with DHCP so you can watch Blu Ray / HD DVD discs on the computer) and graphics card (with DHCP).

DVD-Roms was relased in 1998 yet it took atleast 4-5 years before it became a standard on new computers. And it is only now that you see most games can be found in a dvd format back in 98 there where VERY few games that had advantage of the DVD format and those where mostly movie games like forexample Phantasmagoria that would go over 8 cd's

So although HD-DVD/BLURAY will perhaps be relased properly in a 2 years time it will take much longer before it comes standard and until you find games that  REALLY needs these standards.

Not games ... movies in 720p or 1080p.

All in all new stuff and formats is released all the time...soon PCIe2 is on the way but it WILL take some time before you actualy can use it for anything them or before they are "reasonably" priced.

Agreed.

Look at the new trend with Dual-Core processors currently now games and OS is not optimalized for such systems and most of them ist to expansive anyway so investing in a Dual Core system now would be pointless.

Agreed - for now. But games will quickly adopt Dual-Core processors, once they've reached a certain popularity. I'd say that in one year from now games will make heavy use of them.

Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lindsay Lohan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 06:48

^

As said i do not doubt that movies will benefit greatly from the Bluray/HD-DVD format as DVD's today is already horribly compressed...But we where mainly talking about a gaming pc so i dont think that any games that would need to be pressed onto HD-DVD/Bluray yet.

And yes as you said in a year or so games will propably beging to optimalize towards 64bit processor systems and dual core config.

Anyways who do you think will be the leading format HD-DVD or Bluray?

HD-DVD benefits:

Backward compatible with DVD

Cheaper

Easier to use

Bluray benefits:

Greater storage capacity

Better copy protection (Well atleast a benefit for the movie industry )

Playstation 3 uses it? (If you think that is a benefit anyway)

To me it looks like HD-DVD is winning

 

Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stonebeard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 07:18
Originally posted by Lindsay Lohan Lindsay Lohan wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Lindsay Lohan Lindsay Lohan wrote:

Consoles in general are built to cheaply to be profitable so console games are often more expansive than PC-games and you also have to live with knowing that the graphics you see on the first PS3 game forexample is going to be just as good as a PS3 game relased 5 years after.

This is not true. The graphics for launch games for most all next-gen games (when compared to the previous generation) are demonstrably better. After a few years go by and the developers really disect the console and get everything out of it that they can, the games released thereafter are incredibly better than the launch games, both in graphics and design, simply because the developers know the ins and outs and what the console is made of and can juice it for all it's got.

When I see not-prerendered pics and footage for MGS4 on the PS3, presumably a launch title or soon after, I get excited because it has the best graphics I have ever seen in a game. It makes Half-Life 2 look like Tetris. And I know that that game is using far less than 50% of the PS3's total power.

Hah it takes a maximum year of 1 year before the graphics for an console system seems dated...i mean ps2 games today looks like the kind of games you could get for pc 4 years ago.

Comparing a dated game like Half-life 2 with a new PS3 game aint remotly fair, besides if you want the good graphics you look to Unreal Engine 3 the most advanced graphics engine EVER!

Oh, well OK. But X360 games, at their current level of graphical capability, hardly look different than high-end PC graphics. Call of Duty 2 on X360 is identical in almost every way to the PC version, except for less players in multiplayer. But CoD isn't even the best representation of the X360's launch lineup graphical capability.

The gap between PC graphics and the next-gen console graphics is incredibly thin now; the next gen systems are basically computers with a controller.

Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lindsay Lohan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 07:28
Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Lindsay Lohan Lindsay Lohan wrote:

Originally posted by stonebeard stonebeard wrote:

Originally posted by Lindsay Lohan Lindsay Lohan wrote:

Consoles in general are built to cheaply to be profitable so console games are often more expansive than PC-games and you also have to live with knowing that the graphics you see on the first PS3 game forexample is going to be just as good as a PS3 game relased 5 years after.

This is not true. The graphics for launch games for most all next-gen games (when compared to the previous generation) are demonstrably better. After a few years go by and the developers really disect the console and get everything out of it that they can, the games released thereafter are incredibly better than the launch games, both in graphics and design, simply because the developers know the ins and outs and what the console is made of and can juice it for all it's got.

When I see not-prerendered pics and footage for MGS4 on the PS3, presumably a launch title or soon after, I get excited because it has the best graphics I have ever seen in a game. It makes Half-Life 2 look like Tetris. And I know that that game is using far less than 50% of the PS3's total power.

Hah it takes a maximum year of 1 year before the graphics for an console system seems dated...i mean ps2 games today looks like the kind of games you could get for pc 4 years ago.

Comparing a dated game like Half-life 2 with a new PS3 game aint remotly fair, besides if you want the good graphics you look to Unreal Engine 3 the most advanced graphics engine EVER!

Oh, well OK. But X360 games, at their current level of graphical capability, hardly look different than high-end PC graphics. Call of Duty 2 on X360 is identical in almost every way to the PC version, except for less players in multiplayer. But CoD isn't even the best representation of the X360's launch lineup graphical capability.

The gap between PC graphics and the next-gen console graphics is incredibly thin now; the next gen systems are basically computers with a controller.

Look at it this way a HIGH-END pc with super processor and super graphics-card is capable of releasing graphics beyond of what atleast an  X360 could produce

But certainlty you can not produce games that will only run with an HIGH-END pc you have to produce games that will run nicely on a STANDARD-PC and thats basically aslo a difference because the consoles have all the same amount of power available so THEN the gaming industry can produce games that milks every percent out of the console and usually when a console is firstly released it will take about 6 months before STANDARD-PC's are at the same level and you can expect equal graphics quality.

This thing happens every time and happened due to the release of the playstation 2 where everyobdy was cheering its graphics that in reality could have been done better on a decent pc.

The system a ps2 originally run was the equavilent to a p-II system with 450mhz and 128mb ram. And if you had a pc with the same system set up you would not get the same performance because pc's also has operating systems and programs in the background which degrades performance and it is also meant be much more VERSITAILE than any console system which is optimized for gaming and gaming only.

Back to Top
MikeEnRegalia View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 22 2005
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 21138
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MikeEnRegalia Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 07:40

^ in two years PC based games will leave the XBox 360 behind, just as it happened with the original XBox. The games will still run on older PCs (and consoles) with reduced graphics.

One thing that will be introduced to PC games are advanced physics using special hardware ... but IMO it will take another 2 years until this feature really becomes interesting.

Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lindsay Lohan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 07:45
Originally posted by MikeEnRegalia MikeEnRegalia wrote:

^ in two years PC based games will leave the XBox 360 behind, just as it happened with the original XBox. The games will still run on older PCs (and consoles) with reduced graphics.

One thing that will be introduced to PC games are advanced physics using special hardware ... but IMO it will take another 2 years until this feature really becomes interesting.

Yes i have heard about having graphics card with their own physics processor or whatever and it sounded really interesting looking at forexample what the HAVOK engine could do.

In a few years time physics will become big-deal in gaming...soon most FPS will have the abilty to blow up everything (And make it realistic unlike the red faction thingie)

Ah it would have been awfully fun to play battlefield 2 with the ability to blow up everything eh?

Btw mike who do you think will "win" in the battle for the New "dvd" format?

Back to Top
AtLossForWords View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 11 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 6699
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote AtLossForWords Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 10:53
I'm contemplating getting an Xbox 360, but only because Perfect Dark Zero looks so so good!

"Mastodon sucks giant monkey balls."
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Forum Guest Group
Forum Guest Group
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 21:10
Seen a demo on the x-box 360, and it looks real good. But, gimme my computer any day, especially monday when my new super souped up edition appears.
Back to Top
tardis View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: October 02 2005
Location: Victoria, BC
Status: Offline
Points: 14378
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tardis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 21:17
Not playing anything right now, but I'm downloading Carmageddon, Jedi Knight: Dark Forces II, and a collection of hundreds of old PC games.

I used to own Dark Forces II, but I'm getting it again since I remember enjoying it immensely (despite the fact it's slightly outdated, but that never stopped me from having any fun). Plus I used to screw around with the sound files so that the stormtroopers would say things like, "Invite him in for a cup of tea" instead of "Kill him"...
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stonebeard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 02 2005 at 22:09

Originally posted by AtLossForWords AtLossForWords wrote:

I'm contemplating getting an Xbox 360, but only because Perfect Dark Zero looks so so good!

Uhhh...hate to burst your bubble, but IMO it's mediocre as can be. The graphics are very nice, but there are a ton of little annoying things that ebb aways at the fun. If you're expecting a time as fun as with the N64 PD, you'll be disappointed.

My friends like it, to a degree, but I think it is just plain mediocre. I would say it's a letdown, but since I expected it to be pretty mediocre, it's not really a letdown.

I'd give it a 6 or 7 out of 10.

IMO, the only essential 360 launch games are Call of Duty 2 (best historical war game ever) and Condemned.

 

Get a 360 for the games to be released in 2006;Elder Scrolls 4: Oblivion (Medieval RPG) Mass Effect (Sci-fi RPG) and Too Human (Sci-fi action) are what I'm going to get a 360 for.

Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lindsay Lohan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2005 at 08:52
I would have bought an PSP if it had not been for the crappy battery time
Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sleeper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2005 at 09:05

I notice a lot of this conversation is about graphics, so is that the most important thing for all of you in gaming? For me its playabilaty. Lindsay you constantly site that PC games leave consol games behind after 1 or 2 years but that is something that has only happend in the last 5 years, befor then I prefered PS1 graphics to PC. And to make full use of the PC's better graphics now you have to make regular updates to its internal systems and the cost for these PC and keeping them at the top gaming abilaty is HUGE.

Consols are cost effective, easier to use and a lot closerto PC abilaty than you seem preperd to admit.

Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lindsay Lohan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2005 at 09:09
Originally posted by sleeper sleeper wrote:

I notice a lot of this conversation is about graphics, so is that the most important thing for all of you in gaming? For me its playabilaty. Lindsay you constantly site that PC games leave consol games behind after 1 or 2 years but that is something that has only happend in the last 5 years, befor then I prefered PS1 graphics to PC. And to make full use of the PC's better graphics now you have to make regular updates to its internal systems and the cost for these PC and keeping them at the top gaming abilaty is HUGE.

Consols are cost effective, easier to use and a lot closerto PC abilaty than you seem preperd to admit.

The only real benefit with consoles is that they are CHEAP AND EASY TO USE. Nothing else...PC's are for serious gamers...a console is just a toy

And certainly the gameplay for typical console games are dreadful and typical console-companies like Capcom or Konami is DANGEROUSLY unoriginal and boring games...

The best games are fairly old my good man i'd say you have to had a Commandore 64 to understand!

And as said $500 a year is all that is needed...i have had my pc for 1 year now and it can play any new game at full graphics!

And btw saying that you PREFERED PS1 graphics to PC graphics is just overly silly to say!



Edited by Lindsay Lohan
Back to Top
moonlapse View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 15 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 464
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote moonlapse Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2005 at 09:54
I only play sports management sims, like Out of the Park Baseball and Eastside Hockey Manager, where you play GM and/or coach depending on your preference.  There's a new football management sim called Bowl Bound College Football, currently testing the demo now and looks promising.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stonebeard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2005 at 11:11
Originally posted by Lindsay Lohan Lindsay Lohan wrote:

Originally posted by sleeper sleeper wrote:

I notice a lot of this conversation is about graphics, so is that the most important thing for all of you in gaming? For me its playabilaty. Lindsay you constantly site that PC games leave consol games behind after 1 or 2 years but that is something that has only happend in the last 5 years, befor then I prefered PS1 graphics to PC. And to make full use of the PC's better graphics now you have to make regular updates to its internal systems and the cost for these PC and keeping them at the top gaming abilaty is HUGE.

Consols are cost effective, easier to use and a lot closerto PC abilaty than you seem preperd to admit.

The only real benefit with consoles is that they are CHEAP AND EASY TO USE. Nothing else...PC's are for serious gamers...a console is just a toy

And certainly the gameplay for typical console games are dreadful and typical console-companies like Capcom or Konami is DANGEROUSLY unoriginal and boring games...

The best games are fairly old my good man i'd say you have to had a Commandore 64 to understand!

And as said $500 a year is all that is needed...i have had my pc for 1 year now and it can play any new game at full graphics!

And btw saying that you PREFERED PS1 graphics to PC graphics is just overly silly to say!

Fanboy...

Back to Top
sleeper View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 09 2005
Location: Entropia
Status: Offline
Points: 16449
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote sleeper Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2005 at 13:51
Originally posted by Lindsay Lohan Lindsay Lohan wrote:

Originally posted by sleeper sleeper wrote:

I notice a lot of this conversation is about graphics, so is that the most important thing for all of you in gaming? For me its playabilaty. Lindsay you constantly site that PC games leave consol games behind after 1 or 2 years but that is something that has only happend in the last 5 years, befor then I prefered PS1 graphics to PC. And to make full use of the PC's better graphics now you have to make regular updates to its internal systems and the cost for these PC and keeping them at the top gaming abilaty is HUGE.

Consols are cost effective, easier to use and a lot closerto PC abilaty than you seem preperd to admit.

The only real benefit with consoles is that they are CHEAP AND EASY TO USE. Nothing else...PC's are for serious gamers...a console is just a toy

And certainly the gameplay for typical console games are dreadful and typical console-companies like Capcom or Konami is DANGEROUSLY unoriginal and boring games...

The best games are fairly old my good man i'd say you have to had a Commandore 64 to understand!

And as said $500 a year is all that is needed...i have had my pc for 1 year now and it can play any new game at full graphics!

And btw saying that you PREFERED PS1 graphics to PC graphics is just overly silly to say!

Well its nice to know that you have 500 pounds (I know your not english but neither of us are american) to throw away every year. Tell me how big is your mansion.

And though PC games of the time may have had higher polygon counts the skins and textures looked awfull so I preferd PS1. If you think the game play of typical consol games is dreadfull then you dont know any typical consol games, its much easier to pick up and play than a PC is and theres no way that you can denie that.

Spending more than I should on Prog since 2005

Back to Top
Lindsay Lohan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: May 25 2005
Location: Norway
Status: Offline
Points: 3254
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lindsay Lohan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2005 at 14:55

^

Ahum ps1 run in awfull 640x480!

And certainly $500 is about 290£ my good man! and that is hardly alot of money to have the best gaming system on earth!

 

Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VanderGraafKommandöh Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 03 2005 at 15:23
They really need to re-release the SNES to the masses and re-release all the RPG classics for it too, including translations for the Japanese games that never came to Europe or North America.

Well, there are ROMs and translations, but that isn't the same, bring back the SNES, the ultimate RPG experience!

It's all about the gameplay.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 910111213 243>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.