Genesis of Classic Prog : When did it all begin ? |
Post Reply | Page 123 5> |
Author | ||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17497 |
Topic: Genesis of Classic Prog : When did it all begin ? Posted: April 29 2010 at 15:06 |
|
Well, let me tell you this ... I was not a prog fan and have never been, because the word means nothing about music!
But in 69 I already had Pink Floyd and Soft Machine and Frank Zappa and had already phazed out of the popular music stuff for the most part. But I was also way more aware of other musics out there from Heinemann, Stockhausen, Terry Riley, Carl Orff, Benjamin Britten, Varese and many others ... so when you hear some Zappa having fun and the mix includes 2 sections of Verese, 1 section of rock music, 1 section of who cares, and 1 section of jazz and 1 section of kitchen sink ... you go immediately ... ohh my gawd ... this guy knows music and knows it well! ... sadly, what has become a definition for prog, is not about people experimenting with music ... but some London based fantasy about some dollies and drugs? Or some pseudo Grimm Brothers like story? Or some pseudo variation on a title to make it sound more interesting and people feeling like the cover was magical and mystical and the music was the same? Ohhh , the better one ... costumes! Like they have never been used on a stage!
Music was the important part, not the media events! ... yes, sometimes we have to stand up naked and do something stupid to get attention and get folks to find something in the art itself ... and while it might not be fun to do that all the time, more often than not it does get the attention. Doesn't make it prog, but it gets attention! Edited by moshkito - April 29 2010 at 15:18 |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
Devonsidhe
Forum Groupie Joined: April 21 2010 Location: PDX, OR Status: Offline Points: 74 |
Posted: April 29 2010 at 11:43 | |
Agreed. The penultimate is never reached without the steps leading up to it. By keeping the pop/rock feel to their work, they were able to reach a bigger audience than those, say, of a Frank Zappa during that time period. By bringing in the public, it made it much easier for the following bands to gain studio support from the record labels or a chance to be heard on the radio and many other elements.
That is not to say the effects of a less commercial band like Frank Zappa and the MOI is less important. Oft times, it is the less heard records aiming for a smaller audience that has the freedom to go beyond the limitations of the public buying sector and aim for work that could be ahead of its time. That work can influence other artists instead of the public and still reach the suburban living rooms through those other artists albeit in a less direct manner.
With all of this cross fertilization, we do not have a single tree to branch out from which is why it is near impossible to look at beginnings. Each branch that comes from a single trunk usually has many roots. Each root usually leads to many branches. Add to that several different trunks of prog, when we try to map it, we have a multi-dimensional nightmare but infinitely enjoyable to explore.
|
||
Even a man who stumbles around in the dark will influence those he does not see.
|
||
Floydman
Forum Groupie Joined: November 24 2009 Status: Offline Points: 67 |
Posted: April 29 2010 at 10:02 | |
Revolver and Sgt Pepper are not the most experimental albums ever it didn't have to be. "Strawberry Fields Forever" was a bizarre sounding pop hit full of avant ideas to create trippy sounds which you couldn't really say that about "Good Vibrations" though I love that song.
It's a fact those were experimental albums with great songs done by the world's greatest pop group showing that rock could be a serious genre. It was one thing for the Velvet Underground, Pink Floyd or Frank Zappa do their weird experimental stuff. Their ideas may have been more out there than the Beatles. The fact is that since they were not on the world stage of music at this point, they could be dismissed as an anomaly. The Beatles put out an album with the experimental trappings, without sacrificing all of their great melodies, the world had no choice but to take notice. Rock, pop, and all of it's cousins, was here to stay. So if you agree or not it was a huge influence. Edited by Floydman - April 29 2010 at 10:05 |
||
Dick Heath
Special Collaborator Jazz-Rock Specialist Joined: April 19 2004 Location: England Status: Offline Points: 12812 |
Posted: April 29 2010 at 07:52 | |
Related discussion at:
perhaps worth dipping into
|
||
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php Host by PA's Dick Heath. |
||
ferush
Forum Senior Member Joined: August 26 2006 Location: Mexico Status: Offline Points: 363 |
Posted: April 28 2010 at 13:20 | |
THE BEATLE ALBUM REVOLVER MUST BE DEFINITIVELY INCLUDED IN LIST
|
||
shockedjazz
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 12 2008 Location: Madrid (spain) Status: Offline Points: 169 |
Posted: April 28 2010 at 11:24 | |
Yes finaly i understood you so sorry for the mistake and the tone. Is just i consider Procol (incredible) Symphonic proto-prog, the same with the Moodys...well not the same....i love Procol much more...one of the greatest. |
||
octopus-4
Special Collaborator RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams Joined: October 31 2006 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 14071 |
Posted: April 28 2010 at 03:43 | |
The good thing with this post is that we are debating about a question that can't be answered. For me prog is a way to feel music so highly individual. I think us olders are mentioning groups and artists that made us feel the "prog" sensation for the first time. Others look back to older artists looking for the beginning.
I guess that in 2015 this post will still be receiving comments.
About Procol Harum, symphonic ir not, they conquered me to prog with "A salty dog".
|
||
ProcolWho?
Forum Senior Member Joined: May 06 2007 Location: New york Status: Offline Points: 162 |
Posted: April 27 2010 at 20:40 | |
I'm not sure if you understood what I was saying or if I understand what you're saying. So we must agree. |
||
Garion81
Special Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: May 22 2004 Location: So Cal, USA Status: Offline Points: 4338 |
Posted: April 27 2010 at 18:20 | |
You hit right on the nail head. Almost everything back then that wasn't top 40 was called progressive rock. I never heard the term prog until this decade. The development of what we now call prog (which is what we meant by the British groups) evolved over several years. There are many albums that contained elements of prog many listed in this thread. So what was first or when did it happen are kind of relevant because there were elements in some of the music we wouldn't place here that eventually went into prog. 1969, 1966 what does it matter.?
|
||
"What are you going to do when that damn thing rusts?" |
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17497 |
Posted: April 27 2010 at 16:41 | |
Thank you Baldie ... sometimes I think we need to lock some of these people up with Miles in a room somewhere in 1954 and listen to these guys for 30 minutes ... not to just appreciate jzz, mind you, but to get people to realize ... the inspiration and the love for creating "music" ... has absolutely nothing to do with the wording and terminology that we talk about 50 years later!
Not sure some folks here want to hear that about "prog", though! Edited by moshkito - April 27 2010 at 16:45 |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
sealchan
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 12 2009 Status: Offline Points: 179 |
Posted: April 27 2010 at 11:15 | |
It seems that heavy metal and prog may share some deep roots based on comments made about Procol Harem and Deep Purple.
|
||
BaldJean
Prog Reviewer Joined: May 28 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 10387 |
Posted: April 27 2010 at 09:01 | |
I believe that "Sea Shanties" is every bit as progressive as ITCOTCK. but "Sea Shanties" also can be seen as the first prog-metal album - so it is in my opinion a better candidate for getting the honors. only "Sea Shanties" is not as well known as ITCOTCK
|
||
A shot of me as High Priestess of Gaia during our fall festival. Ceterum censeo principiis obsta |
||
shockedjazz
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 12 2008 Location: Madrid (spain) Status: Offline Points: 169 |
Posted: April 27 2010 at 08:56 | |
Sorry i missed your point know i see.
|
||
shockedjazz
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 12 2008 Location: Madrid (spain) Status: Offline Points: 169 |
Posted: April 27 2010 at 08:51 | |
And maybe clear that i was not saying that Procol made the first symphonic prog-rock album, no i was saying that they were the first to made symphonic rock. So calm down procolwho
|
||
shockedjazz
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 12 2008 Location: Madrid (spain) Status: Offline Points: 169 |
Posted: April 27 2010 at 08:47 | |
There were some groups that have some ingredients of what would be latter called prog, one these ingredients is symphonism- wich groups like Procol mixed with rock...but it was 100 % prog. Omonimous album the one i was refering is symphonic pop-rock, no progrock.
"Shine on brightly" is a concept album, the music have contaminations but miss some ingredients like jazz, and hiper fantastic rock riffs, things like that.
I still bet for ITCOCK
|
||
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 02 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 10261 |
Posted: April 26 2010 at 23:17 | |
An excellent post indeed. Even in 1973 a lot of different names were around for that "new cool music", as can be seen in a rock-lexicon of that time.. And people back then had no progblem to put Deep Purple or Led Zeppelin (which are only prog-related in the archives) into the same category as Genesis, Pink Floyd or Yes; it was just this new cool music. At least this was the way my brother and his friends used to look at it. They never used the term "prog" at all. And this is not the faulty memory of a kid which was born about the same time as prog was born; I checked back with my brother, who is ten years older than I am. |
||
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue. |
||
BaldFriede
Prog Reviewer Joined: June 02 2005 Location: Germany Status: Offline Points: 10261 |
Posted: April 26 2010 at 23:06 | |
It is nonsense to reduce the "start" to one band or one record; it was
simply in the air. King Crimson's first album may be the first prog
album which came out (by the way: what about "Sea Shanties" by High
Tide?), but a lot of things like that were going on at that time. Whoever published the first album can't claim that they invented it..
|
||
BaldJean and I; I am the one in blue. |
||
moshkito
Forum Senior Member Joined: January 04 2007 Location: Grok City Status: Offline Points: 17497 |
Posted: April 26 2010 at 18:34 | |
If you ever see that DVD about Tom Dowd you will change your mind about how you said this ... there were a lot of "interstellar overdrives" done, and "close to the edge"s done, but they were slightly different and may have been not as electrified as you expect. The transposition of elements in time causes confusion and bringing the "rock/electric" element to the 30's is like watching Michael J Fox do his guitar thing on that movie ... "I guess you're not ready for that yet!" ... It's out of time and place. BUT, you missed the important point. That there was music out there that was being done with similar inspirations and tastes in mind. And it might have been done within different contexts in music. How else would you explain the Stravinsky's and so many others from the turn of the century on?
Music is not that "exclusive" to the point where nothing else matters ... and while you do not have to look at it in a quotidian manner, it helps, and in the end gives you a rather nice perspective. But thinking that what you "want" today, and why it did not happen yesterday ... is not going to get you any answers! It doesn't reverse a lot of bad history! ... you do know that right?
You probably want to go through the 40's and 50's jazz stuff that ended up giving us Miles and such, people that did nothing but long cuts and played for a long time, which is where some of the "prog" and "rock" things that we love got their inspiration, including classical music. See the experiments in literature, film and thater in the 30's and 40's and what was being done ... a lot of music history might make a lot more sense to you. And please, look up that Tom Dowd DVD ... it is the history of 30 years of music like you have never heard it and it will surprise the living heck out of you! ... assuming you love music enough to even appreciate having your knockers knocked senseless all day long! Edited by moshkito - April 26 2010 at 19:09 |
||
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told!
www.pedrosena.com |
||
sealchan
Forum Senior Member Joined: March 12 2009 Status: Offline Points: 179 |
Posted: April 26 2010 at 17:42 | |
I think it is fair to say that there there are albums which are prog before ITCOTCK. In fact, I am willing to believe this is true just based on the fact that more than a handful of alternate candidates for first prog album have been put forward.
Also, I think any thing which arises out of a creative background probably does so through multiple roots and incrementally such that there is no clear moment of the creation of a genre. This is probably just as true in the evolution of species where no species magically started at one generation.
For my own part I enjoy the discussion and the debate.
In an effort to engage myself further with the music I know and love I will probably start examining song by song my music collection and use (and no doubt adjust) my own particular prog rock definition and see how that applies through the years of music since the late 60s. I can then compare that and share this with others hear and see if the definition appears valid. At the very least I will be learning something as I go and in a way that I will enjoy.
There may be a value in saying that the genre started a bit later than the first prog rock album...but then again for many there might not be a value in this. It should be fun finding out! |
||
ProgressiveAttic
Collaborator Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 05 2008 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 1243 |
Posted: April 26 2010 at 17:30 | |
What about Deep Purple?....this is 100% symphonic prog in 1969:
And Donovan: |
||
Michael's Sonic Kaleidoscope Mondays 5:00pm EST(re-runs Thursdays 3:00pm) @ Delicious Agony Progressive Rock Radio(http://www.deliciousagony.com)
|
||
Post Reply | Page 123 5> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |