Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > I Have A Question For You......?
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - What does WR mean?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWhat does WR mean?
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
ClemofNazareth View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Prog Folk Researcher

Joined: August 17 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4659 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: What does WR mean?
    Posted: October 09 2009 at 09:51
Originally posted by TheProgtologist TheProgtologist wrote:

 
Wide Receiver.
 
 
Right - such as Walter Rasby, former Wide Receiver for the Washington Redskins!  Cool
 
 
"Peace is the only battle worth waging."

Albert Camus
Back to Top
Slartibartfast View Drop Down
Collaborator
Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / In Memoriam

Joined: April 29 2006
Location: Atlantais
Status: Offline
Points: 29630 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2009 at 08:19
Dang, I always thought it meant Weird Record. LOL
Released date are often when it it impacted you but recorded dates are when it really happened...
Back to Top
Mr ProgFreak View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 08 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 5195 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2009 at 01:29
There are two "weightings" at work:

1. The weighting between ratings without reviews, normal reviews and collab reviews
2. The weighted algorithm used for sorting (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_average)

I think that the number currently displayed as the rating only contains the first weighting, while the one named "WR" also contains the second.
Back to Top
SaltyJon View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: February 08 2008
Location: Location
Status: Offline
Points: 28772 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 09 2009 at 00:33
Weather Report.  I don't know what these people are talking about. Wacko
Back to Top
topofsm View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2009 at 20:58
Ahh that makes sense. I assume the point system for ratings for reviewers still applies for the first one, and a different formula is used for the weighted rating:
 
1 - Rating
5 - Review
10 - Collab review

Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2009 at 20:29
Originally posted by topofsm topofsm wrote:

I thought it was "without ratings" as in only counting the ratings with reviews. "weighted rating" didn't make sense, because as TheCaptain said the ratings should be weighted.
 
What are we looking at now then?


That's impossible.

75 3.77 Excellent addition to any prog rock music collection
(5 ratings)
WR = 3.6883
Lazarus
Hacride		 Tech/Extreme Prog Metal
Studio, 2009		 Buy


This has 5 ratings, but only two of those are reviews.  Both reviews are four star reviews.  By that theory, the WR would be 4.0000- but it is not.  Let's have another example:

70 5.00 Essential: a masterpiece of progressive rock music
(1 ratings)
WR = 3.7336
Exodusarabesque
Andrew Douglas Rothbard		 Psychedelic/Space Rock
Studio, 2009		 Buy


Here is #70 in the 2009 chart, with only one rating (not even a review).  Notice the WR- much lower than 5.00!

Here's why: An album with two fives will still have a 5.00, but it will chart much higher than an album with one five.  That's where the WR comes in.  It shows why everything is where it is in the chart, and why a 3.80 can chart much higher than a 4.50 album.

I hope I have made Master Dean proud.  Geek
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
Back to Top
topofsm View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 17 2008
Location: Arizona, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1698 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2009 at 20:01
I thought it was "without ratings" as in only counting the ratings with reviews. "weighted rating" didn't make sense, because as TheCaptain said the ratings should be weighted.
 
What are we looking at now then?

Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2009 at 18:24
Wide Receiver.
 
Don't you know anything about football?
 
Tongue


Back to Top
Epignosis View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: December 30 2007
Location: Raeford, NC
Status: Offline
Points: 32553 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2009 at 18:23
Weighted rating.  It's a nice feature that shows why an album is exactly where it is (comparing the average ratings to the number of ratings).
https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/album/a-month-of-sundays
Back to Top
TheCaptain View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 04 2009
Location: Ohio, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 1335 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: October 08 2009 at 18:19
I recently noticed on the Top PA album list there is the rating, the number of ratings and something that says "WR = [some number]." The only thing I can imagine is "weighted rating" but that doesn't make sense because the rating is/was/should be the weighted rating. Thanks in advance for the answer.
Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.895 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.