Forum Home Forum Home > Topics not related to music > General discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Wikipedia - how much do you use it?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedWikipedia - how much do you use it?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
cookieacquired View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: January 23 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 911
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Wikipedia - how much do you use it?
    Posted: December 31 2007 at 11:54

Yes Wikipedia is useful, though should be taken with a grain of salt.

Much good music and other bits of info has been learned off the site



Back to Top
ita_prog_fan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 31 2007 at 05:09
.
 
 
I use it more than Google... you can find certain infos more easily !
 
I wrote about 10 articles in Italian and 1 in English (mostly about 19th century war vessels)
 
You have to be carefull, of course, many inaccurate statements in there, but can you tell me where you don't find inaccurate information ?
 
 
.
 
 
Back to Top
darren View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: October 31 2005
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 452
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2007 at 21:24
Hate wikipedia.
 
I'm in the middle of a political commotion (I'm not going to get into it here or give details). It's an issue that requires accurate biology. I hate how people quote wikipedia like it's some kind of reliable source. I find wikipedia has many errors and a LOT of missing info.
 
 
"they locked up a man who wanted to rule the world.
the fools
they locked up the wrong man."
- Leonard Cohen
Back to Top
Gamemako View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 31 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1184
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 30 2007 at 18:35
I am a user, and I edit quite a bit. Always have.
Hail Eris!
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2007 at 19:22
What happened to The Encyclopedia Britannica ? What happened to slide rules ? What happenned to turntables ? What happened to dial phones ? I`m also worried about the baggage retrieval system they have at Heathrow ? Do they have that on Wikopedia ?
Back to Top
progaeopteryx View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2005
Location: Refrigerator
Status: Offline
Points: 3613
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2007 at 12:38
I think Wikipedia is just a fabulous creation. I contribute from time to time, mostly adding to those stubs in topics I'm well versed in, but sometimes just adding hyperlinks to terms in articles that were missing them.

As for the inaccuracies, Wikipedia is improving in that area, so much so that an article in Nature, an international weekly journal of science, claimed that Wikipedia comes close to the Encyclopaedia Britannica in terms of accuracy for its science entries. Britannica of course refuted it, and later Nature issued a rebuttal. That was back in December 2005, and I haven't heard anything about it since.

As for other categories, I'm sure there are mistakes. Encyclopedias have always been known to have mistakes, even those written by experts in their fields. I think the major point to be taken from this inaccuracy issue is that if you are an expert in your field, then fix the inaccuracy. Make Wikipedia better. Add reliable reference sources to the articles. Is that really so hard to do rather than complaining about it?

As for hard core research, people who are familiar with their fields should know the appropriate resources for checking stuff out. If they don't know it now, hopefully they will understand what proper context encyclopedias are supposed to fill.


Back to Top
Era V. View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: November 17 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 97
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 28 2007 at 09:19
I adore wikipedia.  I just spend hours on it reading country profiles, city profiles, historical figure profiles etc.
 
I'd never use it for a project or anything but then, since I've been out of study of anything except music for about 3 years now, I'd never need to either.  Absolutely one of the best additions to the internet ever. 
 
If you don't accept the risk of it being slightly inaccurate and double check aspects of a subject that seem pertinent then that's just being stupid...obviously, given the nature of its construct. 
 
But then again, encyclopedias have been wildly inaccurate for decades...as they can only rely on information correct at time of printing ;)
Back to Top
bhikkhu View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: April 06 2006
Location: A² Michigan
Status: Offline
Points: 5109
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 27 2007 at 14:14
If I get a hit during a search, I will check out the entry. I don't use the information they provide. I just use it to guide me to other sources.
Back to Top
stonebeard View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: May 27 2005
Location: NE Indiana
Status: Offline
Points: 28057
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 27 2007 at 14:02
I use it a lot. In high school, it eventually got banned by most teachers, but I only had to do 1 or 2 research projects a year, so by that time it didn't even effect me really. My WW2 History teacher didn't care if we used it or not, and for a variety of other reasons, mostly because I write papers very well, I used only wikipedia and maybe 1 or 2 other sources to write a few research papers. The class was set up like a college class in high school, and since I wasn't getting college credit for the difficulty of the coursework, my using wikipedia reflects my contempt. In college, I haven't had to write a research paper yet. So, I use wikipedia if I'm curious about something.
Back to Top
JJLehto View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: April 05 2006
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Status: Offline
Points: 34550
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 27 2007 at 13:53
Alot.
 
I don't care what everyone says...I still think it's a great source.
I mainly use it for factual info as well, but also as a way to get to other more "scholarly" sources.
Back to Top
Barla View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 13 2006
Location: Argentina
Status: Offline
Points: 4309
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 27 2007 at 13:02
I use it a lot for school, and many of the information is good, but you know, there always are mistakes. It's incredible the amount of info they have!
Back to Top
VanderGraafKommandöh View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: July 04 2005
Location: Malaria
Status: Offline
Points: 89372
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 27 2007 at 12:52
I use it to look up deceased Baseball and/or American Football and/or Basketball and/or NFL (former-) coaches/players in the "Recent deaths" section. LOL

Let's see... this month alone:

Cry

I've never heard of any of them...

Actually, I do have an account on there, but it's been a while since I've edited an entry on there.



Edited by Geck0 - December 27 2007 at 12:59
Back to Top
Abstrakt View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: August 18 2005
Location: Soundgarden
Status: Offline
Points: 18292
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 27 2007 at 12:16
Quite alot, both for schoolwork and for fun.
Back to Top
Philéas View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: June 14 2006
Status: Offline
Points: 6419
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2007 at 23:08
I use it a lot, but I'm not really dependent on it.
Back to Top
ProgBagel View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer


Joined: May 13 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2819
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2007 at 17:36
Everyday...one of the most useful things on the internet. Even though it is inaccurate at times.
Back to Top
laplace View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: October 06 2005
Location: popupControl();
Status: Offline
Points: 7606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2007 at 17:12
wikipedia's great for the sort of things I'm interested in - nerdy or arty rubbish that no-one hates enough to deface. not so much for political or national info ;P
Back to Top
N Ellingworth View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: April 17 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1324
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2007 at 17:09
I use it to get a general view of what I'm researching and then find specialist sites to get more in depth knowledge, interestingly I recently discovered that my great grandfather has an entry on wikipedia detailing how he won his George Cross
Back to Top
Dick Heath View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Jazz-Rock Specialist

Joined: April 19 2004
Location: England
Status: Offline
Points: 12812
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2007 at 15:40
Originally posted by Aeternus Aeternus wrote:

Do you depend on Wikipedia? Do you trust it? Do you contribute?


I've banned its use as a reference for coursework, research projects in our undergraduate and post-graduate  programmes - just too unreliable, worse ,wrong too many times to be a safe reference.
The best eclectic music on the Web,8-11pm BST/GMT THURS.
CLICK ON: http://www.lborosu.org.uk/media/lcr/live.php
Host by PA's Dick Heath.

Back to Top
ClassicRocker View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 02 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 894
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2007 at 15:32
Originally posted by Bluesaga Bluesaga wrote:

A few times a day on average probably.  It's misleading though, people act like you can add or edit anything in the articles on wikipedia but I believe the revisions need to be passed by moderator-like people before (correct me if I'm wrong...).  I  mean I'm sure faulty stuff gets passed but probably not as often as the librarians at my school say..

You're right. Apparently there are people checking new and revised articles round-the-clock. And besides, people don't need Wikipedia to mess up topics and write goofy articles: that's what Uncyclopedia is for! (http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Main_Page)
Back to Top
Vibrationbaby View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: February 13 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 6898
Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2007 at 15:29
After seeing so many errors I don`t even bother. In fact I don`t use the internet for a source of information. There`s books and libraries for that. It`s more of an entertainment thing for me. I even joined Queen Elizabeth`s Royal Channel on youtube.Smile
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.