Progarchives.com has always (since 2002) relied on banners ads to cover web hosting fees and all.
Please consider supporting us by giving monthly PayPal donations and help keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.
/PAlogo_v2.gif "Progarchives.com Homepage") |
|
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
Atkingani 
Special Collaborator 
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: October 21 2005 Location: Terra Brasilis Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
 Topic: boldness in review needs fixed.Posted: June 02 2007 at 13:32 |
|
There's no rule for the reviews texts but checking the most succesful and prolific reviewers we can gather the following:
GENESIS - capital letters only for the band's names.
"Foxtrot" - double inverted commas for album's titles.
'Aqualung' - single inverted commas for track's names.
<i> italic </i> - italic for non-English words: samba, cuenca, etc.
<b> bold </b> - bold for highlighting a word or sentence: masterpiece, 17 yo keyboardist, etc.
<u> underline </u> - underline used for highlighting too.
No need to highlight people's or nation's names... they must be written plain: Franco Mussida, Germany, Japan, etc. if the band bears the same name of the artist the reviewer should know where to use the highlight or not: SANTANA & Carlos Santana.
 |
|
|
Guigo
~~~~~~ |
|
 |
|
|
Atkingani
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: October 21 2005 Location: Terra Brasilis Status: Offline Points: 12288 |
Posted: June 02 2007 at 13:14 |
|
It works this way:
<b> word </b>
Thanks!
|
|
|
Guigo
~~~~~~ |
|
|
|
|
kidofthecentury
Forum Newbie 
Joined: September 30 2005 Location: Chile Status: Offline Points: 27 |
Posted: June 02 2007 at 13:04 |
|
I submitted a review and "bold" didn't work. Look.
Edit: lol, it must be HTML, not BBcode... can somebody fix it?  Edited by kidofthecentury - June 02 2007 at 13:05 |
|
|
http://www.mylodonrecords.com/
|
|
|
|
|
Easy Livin
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
Posted: June 01 2007 at 11:35 |
|
Fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
Joolz
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 24 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1377 |
Posted: June 01 2007 at 09:00 |
|
Have PMed Admin ...
|
|
|
|
|
tuxon
Forum Senior Member 
Joined: September 21 2004 Location: plugged-in Status: Offline Points: 5502 |
Posted: June 01 2007 at 07:15 |
CAMEL — NudeReview by belz (Louis Préfontaine)PROG REVIEWER
Posted Thursday, April 27, 2006, 10:59 EST | Permanent link Belz forgot to add </b> at the end of his review therefor all reviews below are in bold. can someone fix this.
 |
|
|
I'm always almost unlucky _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Id5ZcnjXSZaSMFMC Id5LM2q2jfqz3YxT
|
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
boldness in review needs fixed.
Topic Options
2.8/5.0 At the time of writing this review, this album has a higher rating than Camel's first album. This is a shame, as this is not even comparable to the 1973 album. Nude is not a bad album; a pretty good one in comparison to what others were doing in the 80s. But who said the 80s were a progressive music glory age? Sorry, but doing better than others does not mean doing great. 'Nude' is a good concept album with a good story, good lyrics, good keyboards, good melodies, good climax, good rhythm. Yes, this is a "good" album, but there is not any really great peak like on The Snow Goose, Moonmadness, or even Rain Dances. A pretty solid album from a great band, worth listening to, but nothing to bang your head on the wall in ecstasy! 2.8/5.0