Forum Home Forum Home > Site News, Newbies, Help and Improvements > Help us improve the site
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Inviting disaster
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedInviting disaster
 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
krusty View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 27 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1777 		Direct Link To This Post Topic: Inviting disaster
    Posted: February 17 2006 at 11:03
^ 
Humanism
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2006 at 09:26

Originally posted by krusty krusty wrote:

I just think we should ignor Snowdogs post or possibly even use it as an object of ridicule.


I shall ignore that remark!

 

Oh no paradox! I haven't ignored it.

 

 

 
Back to Top
Peter View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: January 31 2004
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 9669 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2006 at 09:02
Originally posted by cobb cobb wrote:

  • There is a Proto-prog section, where bands who are not progressive but may have influenced progressive, reside.

  • There is a rating system that has the highest accolade of progressive masterpiece.


These two appear to be at odds with each other...

The home page contains many reviews of proto-prog groups with a progressive masterpiece rating. If they are not prog how can they be a progressive masterpiece? Someone is trying to have their cake and eat it. I refer to the owners, not the reviewers.

It is high time that the words added to the stars were scrapped, as I've said many times.Dead

Any album listed here should be able to qualify for top marks as a piece of MUSIC.

The words added to the ratings cause the clash Cobb has pointed out, above (many reviewers seem to ignore them) and they are subjective/open to interpretation, in any case.

I want only MY carefully-chosen words (not someone else's generic ones) to accompany my review. Let the review address the rating!Stern Smile

 

And where are our half stars?
"And, has thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!'
He chortled in his joy.
Back to Top
Easy Livin View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: February 21 2004
Location: Scotland
Status: Offline
Points: 15585 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2006 at 08:45

It is a valid concern, but it has not materialised with other "marginal" bands who have been added to date.

I believe the balance of our reviews will always ensure that the cream of prog rises to the top.

 
Back to Top
krusty View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: September 27 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1777 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 17 2006 at 07:05
I just think we should ignor Snowdogs post or possibly even use it as an object of ridicule.

















I don't think proto-prog or prog-related should be included in the review section.
Simple as that...
Humanism
Back to Top
progaeopteryx View Drop Down
Prog Reviewer
Prog Reviewer
Avatar

Joined: June 03 2005
Location: Refrigerator
Status: Offline
Points: 3613 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 22:46
I went to the Top 500 chart and only found 8 proto-prog titles listed. Deep Purple's Machine Head was the highest at #130.

There are two prog-related in the top 100, but I think they're both special cases as they were the "proggiest" releases from those two bands (Supertramp and Alan Parsons Project).

I see you're point though. It would be weird if the Beatles ended up in the top 10. It probably wouldn't bother me much, but I could see the poopies hitting the fan for some folks.
Back to Top
cobb View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 10 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 20:05
The comment about the owners is in no way meant to be derogatory, just pointing out that you can't have both and expect it to work, unless you change the way band releases are rated.
Back to Top
TheProgtologist View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin

Joined: May 23 2005
Location: Baltimore,Md US
Status: Offline
Points: 27802 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 19:55

That is a good point you raised about the rating of proto-prog albums,ashamed to say I never thought of it that way.

Don't agree with your comment about the site owners though.


Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 18:46
Originally posted by cobb cobb wrote:

  • There is a Proto-prog section, where bands who are not progressive but may have influenced progressive, reside.

  • There is a rating system that has the highest accolade of progressive masterpiece.


These two appear to be at odds with each other...

The home page contains many reviews of proto-prog groups with a progressive masterpiece rating. If they are not prog how can they be a progressive masterpiece? Someone is trying to have their cake and eat it. I refer to the owners, not the reviewers.

I have raised this issue several times. I'm usually ignored or derided!
Back to Top
cobb View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: July 10 2005
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 1149 		Direct Link To This Post Posted: February 16 2006 at 18:10
  • There is a Proto-prog section, where bands who are not progressive but may have influenced progressive, reside.

  • There is a rating system that has the highest accolade of progressive masterpiece.

These two appear to be at odds with each other...

The home page contains many reviews of proto-prog groups with a progressive masterpiece rating. If they are not prog how can they be a progressive masterpiece? Someone is trying to have their cake and eat it. I refer to the owners, not the reviewers.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.191 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.