Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Dean
Special Collaborator
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout
Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
|
Posted: December 01 2010 at 05:05 |
It really depends on what you call "a fall" - if we consider A Momentary Lapse Of Reason as being the nadir of their entire career (as some here suggest) then we have to take into account that it was a multi-platinum album that spurned tour that grossed £60M and a multi-plantimum live album (Delicate Sound Of Thunder). Critically and artistically it is not "up to the standard" of previous Floyd albums, but that standard is remarkably high for a band that had been in existence for 20+ years and had recorded 12 studio albums up until then - no other psyche/prog band had achieved that feat with that sustained level of success, 17 years after their first No.1 album (AHM). However, the relative success of AMLoR wasn't carried solely on the Floyd name either (unlike The Final Cut) - it was an album of its time and for that time it was actually a good one when compared to what else was being produced in 1987 by any band with Prog credentials (Rush, Marillion & Tull). It is easy to sit here in the relative comfort of 2010 and say it was a weak album, but from the perspective of 1987 it wasn't ... that we on the PA can rate Savatage's Hall Of The Mountain King as a "better" 1987 album is frankly laughable (and I love Savatage and HotMK) and is more a reflection of how we view AMLoR with respect to previous Floyd releases than how it stands up against releases by any other band in that year. We must remember just how dire 1987 was from a Prog perspective - Tull won the Grammy for Best Hard Rock/Metal album in '89 for their 1987 album Crest Of A Knave (not a bad album in itself either, but a long way short of being a good Tull album) - Marillion and Rush were being held aloft by "pop" singles success, not "prog" album sales (Hold Your Fire spurned three top 20 singles in the US, Clutching At Straws three top-30 hits in the UK) - Floyd sold AMLoR without radio airplay and without "hit" singles.
Many regard it as a solo Gilmour album, but musically it is a completely different product when compared to his previous solo albums and one that is more than worthy of the Floyd name (more so than the undeniably Water's driven Final Cut) - while Wright and Manson are present on the album practically in name only is somewhat irrelevant given that their presence in the studio was enough to motivate and inspire Gilmour and Ezrin to make it more than just a solo album, (especially in light of the ensuing legal battle with Waters during the recording).
Edited by Dean - December 01 2010 at 12:42
|
What?
|
|
octopus-4
Special Collaborator
RIO/Avant/Zeuhl,Neo & Post/Math Teams
Joined: October 31 2006
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 14122
|
Posted: December 01 2010 at 03:41 |
someone_else wrote:
ferush wrote:
Floyd's got ups and downs and they started too bad by four or five bad albums one by one at the beginning. |
|
If I correctly understand, Ferush means
The Piper At The Gates of Dawn A Saucerful of Secrets More Ummagumma Meddle
Five bad albums?
|
I stand with Roger Waters, I stand with Joan Baez, I stand with Victor Jara, I stand with Woody Guthrie. Music is revolution
|
|
someone_else
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: May 02 2008
Location: Going Bananas
Status: Offline
Points: 24302
|
Posted: December 01 2010 at 03:23 |
ferush wrote:
Floyd's got ups and downs and they started too bad by four or five bad albums one by one at the beginning. |
|
|
|
JeanFrame
Forum Senior Member
Joined: December 01 2010
Location: London, England
Status: Offline
Points: 195
|
Posted: December 01 2010 at 03:14 |
Artistically the fall started when Syd lost it. From then on, what we got was a watered-down version - And don't point out to me how successful they were in selling albums. If you're going to say that commercial success equates to artistic value, then I won't believe another word you write.
I still really like what the band did after Syd by the way, but it pales by comparison to what would have been possible had the Barrett mind not flipped to the dark side.
|
|
ferush
Forum Senior Member
Joined: August 26 2006
Location: Mexico
Status: Offline
Points: 363
|
Posted: November 30 2010 at 19:25 |
Floyd's got ups and downs and they started too bad by four or five bad albums one by one at the beginning.
|
|
The_Jester
Forum Senior Member
Joined: September 29 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 741
|
Posted: November 30 2010 at 16:28 |
For me, the fall of Pink Floyd began when they became more comercial. It began to become comercial when Dark Side of the Moon was realesed. Even if there were good albums including Dark Side of the Moon after it, the band started to make comercial things and lead to the fall of Pink Floyd.
|
|
Bitterblogger
Forum Senior Member
Joined: November 04 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1719
|
Posted: November 30 2010 at 16:19 |
Jake Kobrin wrote:
They dissipated just like any other band, from the inside. It even happened to The Beatles. Roger Waters sort of took over the band, and David Gilmour hated that which fueled a grudge between them. Meanwhile Richard Wright became unmotivated and uninspired and was ultimately fired. Plus they lost a lot of money on tours, etc, etc, etc... It's no mystery. |
This sounds about right. Should've stopped after A Momentary Lapse of Reason (not that it's so outstanding it's a winner to go out on, but it proved they could go on successfully without Waters). The Division Bell is lesser, and had they continued, no doubt some downright embarassing stuff would've resulted.
|
|
moshkito
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2007
Location: Grok City
Status: Offline
Points: 17524
|
Posted: November 30 2010 at 15:46 |
The_Jester wrote:
When do you think the fall occured? Or do you pretend they did not fell? |
Wish You Were Here.
And if their two songs "Welcome to the Machine" and then "Have a Cigar" don't tell you all of it ... you are not listening to the words! They were pist at the record company for being forced to do something closer to the concept of Dark Side of the Moon, than they were in doing the material that they already had been playing in concert for at least a year! ... which finally appeared in "Animals" ...
That is not to discredit things like "The Wall" at all ... and I think that Roger decided to do something even bigger to get back at the record company ... but by that time, so much money was rolling in and DSOTM was still on the charts that no record company was going to say NO to Pink Floyd ever again ... because the contract would die that very second!
In the end, PF even gave in to the record company and the film company. Material, pictures and visuals that ended up in "The Final Cut" were a part of "The Wall", that would have made it way too long and force it onto 3 LP's and it was hard enough to sell double LP's, let alone triples in those days ... and you pretty much could only use about 80 to 90 minutes tops for the whole thing!
Were it today, the day and age of the CD, the material of "The Final Cut" would be much more integrated into "The Wall" ... and it has ... the political nature of it is quite visible in the current version of "The Wall" ... which apparently Roger wanted in the other shows but had to be curtailed for both financial reasons and the length of the work.
|
Music is not just for listening ... it is for LIVING ... you got to feel it to know what's it about! Not being told! www.pedrosena.com
|
|
Noak
Forum Senior Member
Joined: January 04 2009
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 544
|
Posted: November 30 2010 at 15:00 |
Piper, Saucerful and AHM are the only PF albums I really enjoy. So after that I guess.
|
|
lazland
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13634
|
Posted: November 30 2010 at 13:22 |
paganinio wrote:
The Fall of Pink Floyd: here's my side of the story.
Pink Floyd ruled 1971-79.
And then in 1980, a post-punk band called The Fall took over, along with other post-punk bands.
That's when Pink Floyd, as well as other prog bands, fell.
Post-punk rose and prog fell. That's the long story short.
|
Are you seriously suggesting the The Fall took over Floyd's mantle? They were fairly big for a while, and still are in Mark E Smith's twisted ego, but replace Floyd? Come on. If anything, in the 1980's, in spite of critical panning from the trendy media (who LOVED The Fall BTW), prog bands such as Floyd, Genesis, and Yes, with newer bands such as Marillion sold LPs and gigs by the shedful. Commercially, they were still doing extremely well. Also, prog is still a very healthy scene. Post punk most certainly isn't.
|
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
|
Tapfret
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin
Joined: August 12 2007
Location: Bryant, Wa
Status: Offline
Points: 8581
|
Posted: November 30 2010 at 10:51 |
In all honesty, I would have not really enjoyed The Wall had the movie not gone along with it. The Final Cut just sounded like outtakes from The Wall. 45 minutes of continuous whining by RW. Come to think of it, Animals doesn't do much for me. Wish You Were Here has the 3rd best campfire song ever. Dark Side would be fine if it wasn't so freaking overplayed. Meddle is the only one that I can't live without.
|
|
|
Okocha
Forum Senior Member
Joined: July 13 2007
Location: Greece
Status: Offline
Points: 681
|
Posted: November 30 2010 at 10:44 |
After Animals.
|
|
chrijom
Forum Senior Member
Joined: October 23 2010
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Points: 683
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 15:30 |
|
|
Jake Kobrin
Prog Reviewer
Joined: September 20 2008
Status: Offline
Points: 1303
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 15:18 |
They dissipated just like any other band, from the inside. It even happened to The Beatles. Roger Waters sort of took over the band, and David Gilmour hated that which fueled a grudge between them. Meanwhile Richard Wright became unmotivated and uninspired and was ultimately fired. Plus they lost a lot of money on tours, etc, etc, etc... It's no mystery.
|
|
|
rushfan4
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: May 22 2007
Location: Michigan, U.S.
Status: Offline
Points: 66264
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 14:54 |
The Wall fell at the end of the Wall.
|
|
|
silverpot
Forum Senior Member
VIP Member
Joined: March 19 2008
Location: Sweden
Status: Offline
Points: 841
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 14:53 |
They never fell! They changed from album to album and they managed to surprise me everytime. They never got stuck with a formula, didn't make the same album over and over. I also think that their eighties output was better than most of their peers' , and so was The Division Bell from the nineties.
|
|
Chris S
Special Collaborator
Honorary Collaborator
Joined: June 09 2004
Location: Front Range
Status: Offline
Points: 7028
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 14:49 |
Floyd never fell.
|
<font color=Brown>Music - The Sound Librarian
...As I venture through the slipstream, between the viaducts in your dreams...[/COLOR]
|
|
Languagegeek
Forum Newbie
Joined: June 18 2007
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 38
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 14:48 |
I'd say my interest falls dramatically after Pompeii/Obscured by Clouds. Everything Dark Side on is overplayed and boring except Animals, which is superb IMO.
|
|
lazland
Prog Reviewer
Joined: October 28 2008
Location: Wales
Status: Offline
Points: 13634
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 09:42 |
infandous wrote:
I'd say, considering the enduring popularity of Floyd (arguably the only prog band to have such universal and prolonged popularity), that they never fell. I wasn't crazy about the post-Waters albums, but the Division Bell is a nice psudo-Floyd album that at least has reminders of what made them so great, and at best is not their worse album (even considering the ones with Waters). Final Cut is a great Waters solo album, with Gilmour and Mason as guests.
|
It would be virtually impossible for me to put it any better than this
|
Enhance your life. Get down to www.lazland.org
Now also broadcasting on www.progzilla.com Every Saturday, 4.00 p.m. UK time!
|
|
infandous
Forum Senior Member
Joined: March 23 2006
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 2447
|
Posted: November 29 2010 at 09:41 |
I'd say, considering the enduring popularity of Floyd (arguably the only prog band to have such universal and prolonged popularity), that they never fell. I wasn't crazy about the post-Waters albums, but the Division Bell is a nice psudo-Floyd album that at least has reminders of what made them so great, and at best is not their worse album (even considering the ones with Waters). Final Cut is a great Waters solo album, with Gilmour and Mason as guests.
|
|
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.