![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 3456> |
Author | ||
yeppp ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: February 22 2006 Status: Offline Points: 108 |
![]() |
|
Why did you choose IV ?? Come on " Physical Graffiti "
is much more progressive !!! IV is a good rock album with SOME prog
influences.. BUT i would say that Physical Graffiti could be labeled as
a prog album
|
||
![]() |
||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21596 |
![]() |
|
It is prog archives, with the prog related section attached to it. I know what you mean regarding Physical Graffity, but I prefer the compactness of Led Zeppelin IV - only Rock and Roll and Going to California are plain rock songs. |
||
![]() |
||
glass house ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: June 16 2005 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 4986 |
![]() |
|
Is this prog Archives or progressive Archives ? If it is the second one, surely Zep must be in the Archives. Within the rock music they were highly progressive. IV is not prog related, Psychical Graffity imo is.
|
||
![]() |
||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
|
well I do tend to rant and rave so yeah I did go a bit too far ahahahha. Obvioiusly they weren't hacks.. but I do not see them as artists either and not any part of a progressive movement.. just swept up in it in a way. Edited by micky |
||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
||
![]() |
||
ANDREW ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: November 21 2005 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 3064 |
![]() |
|
I voted Yes, although their most progressive album is "Houses Of The Holy".
|
||
![]() |
||
man@arms ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: March 31 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 238 |
![]() |
|
Zeppelin were more interested in album sales, ticket sales, and generally getting rich and laid than any prevailing sense of changing the way rock music is viewed or done on the artistic side.
|
||
![]() |
||
micky ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: October 02 2005 Location: . Status: Offline Points: 46838 |
![]() |
|
by that rationale is every band that put an album or two out that incorporated SOME prog elements going to be put under Prog-Related. The question is are they prog or are they not. Those who are borderline like ELO make a good fit for prog related. Those like Zeppelin who were first and foremost a rock band.. that happened to see the winds of musical change blowing and incorporated an epic or two on an album... that's not prog-related... that's prog...sampling hahahah. Then again I'm one of those who has the crazy notion that Prog was a movement to bring artistic integrety to rock music. Zeppelin were more interested in album sales, ticket sales, and generally getting rich and laid than any prevailing sense of changing the way rock music is viewed or done on the artistic side. ![]() |
||
The Pedro and Micky Experience - When one no longer requires psychotropics to trip
|
||
![]() |
||
mystic fred ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 13 2006 Location: Londinium Status: Offline Points: 4252 |
![]() |
|
you can't pin led zeppelin down, they were many many things. i remember reading years ago they didn't like being "labelled" at all, so no PA entry i'm afraid!
|
||
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21596 |
![]() |
|
Here's my detailed review: http://www.ratingfreak.com/db/reviews/_auto_5991591.xhtml It shows which tracks I consider more or less progressive ... |
||
![]() |
||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21596 |
![]() |
|
It's not about "prog", but "prog-related". Edited by MikeEnRegalia |
||
![]() |
||
Joolz ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 24 2006 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1377 |
![]() |
|
Hell no - Zep were not Prog. Sure they pushed the boundaries but they operated within the genre of hard rock. Leave it there.
I don't understand this apparent need to include everyone under the sun in this site. Somebody wanted David Bowie. Or Stravinsky. One day soon someone will propose adding Madonna. Can't vote either! |
||
![]() |
||
chopper ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: July 13 2005 Location: Essex, UK Status: Offline Points: 20032 |
![]() |
|
I don't seem to be allowed to vote in this either. Anyway, I'd say no - it's a mixture of rock (Black Dog, Rock'n'Roll etc) and folk (Going to California etc), as someone else said other Zep albums have more prog elements. |
||
![]() |
||
Easy Livin ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
![]() |
|
SD, How embarrassing, |
||
![]() |
||
krusty ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() Joined: September 27 2005 Location: United Kingdom Status: Offline Points: 1777 |
![]() |
|
If I could vote then it would be yes. Not sure why I can't vote though.
![]() (Not really sure what prog-related is to be honest either ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
|
Is there an echo in here?
Or is it short term memory? |
||
![]() |
||
MikeEnRegalia ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: April 22 2005 Location: Sweden Status: Offline Points: 21596 |
![]() |
|
^ fair enough, I should have created the poll in the Non-Prog section. But re the band/album discussion: I thought that the initial rule of thumb for the inclusion of prog artists was that they released at least one progressive album? Then it would also be reasonable to look at the most progressive album of a prog-related "candidate", wouldn't it? Edited by MikeEnRegalia |
||
![]() |
||
Lazy ![]() Forum Newbie ![]() ![]() Joined: March 30 2006 Location: Argentina Status: Offline Points: 33 |
![]() |
|
Led zeppelin should be in this web... I don´t now which genre will you choose but they have plenty of songs that could be easily cataloged like prog ones!
my vote it´s YES to LZ IV! |
||
...And as the fear grows, the bad blood slows and turns to stone...
|
||
![]() |
||
Easy Livin ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator / Retired Admin Joined: February 21 2004 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 15585 |
![]() |
|
Mike, I've moved this thread to the non-prog section, as the proto-prog and prog related section of the forum is for bands who are included in the archives under those categories. I voted yes by the way, but is there a specific relevance of the question? The inclusion of individual albums doesn't happen. (I voted yes by the way! |
||
![]() |
||
Snow Dog ![]() Special Collaborator ![]() ![]() Honorary Collaborator Joined: March 23 2005 Location: Caerdydd Status: Offline Points: 32995 |
![]() |
|
So what about the Folk? |
||
![]() |
||
OT Räihälä ![]() Forum Senior Member ![]() ![]() Joined: August 09 2005 Location: Finland Status: Offline Points: 514 |
![]() |
|
Quite simply: no. Zeppelin IV is not prog related. It's blues related rock, whereas i.e. LZ I is rock related blues.
Edited by OT Räihälä |
||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <1 3456> |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |