Forum Home Forum Home > Progressive Music Lounges > Prog Blogs
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Defining Prog- The Eternal Question
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedDefining Prog- The Eternal Question

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 8>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
sararocksprog View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie
Avatar

Joined: October 25 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Points: 47
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 16:37
Originally posted by rematpac rematpac wrote:

I hope someone could please walk me through the steps on how to respond properly when I'm more mentally prepared to try and grasp it.Thank You.
You're doing fine!
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 13:15
SleepyI can't figure out how to reply properly because I'M COMPUTER ILLITERATE AND ASLEEP WITH MY EYES OPEN.Maybe we can't define what prog rock is,but we can begin by saying what it is not to a degree.It's not about the clothes,fashion ,or lifestyle.It has always been about the music foremost.And the definition is so obscure that what used to be called a prog rock band in the 70's like The Mahavishnu Orchestra is now classified as simply jazz today.The key word to try to interpret is progressive.What music from the rock genre exhibit the qualities of being progressive-advocating progress concernig creative and experimentally new,improved and advanced modern sounds which usually means adding jazz and classical musical elements to the basic rock music format.So I agree,there really is no clear cut definition,as long as the music shows elements of progressing to a more intricate or complecated form than it's prior musical state,it can be deemed progressive.The word progressive invokes an evolving,improving,changing style of music so pinning it down to an exact starting point is not a perfectly precise thing to be able to do.24 hours from now I'll probably have a completely different answer or outlook and I hope someone could please walk me through the steps on how to respond properly when I'm more mentally prepared to try and grasp it.Thank You.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 13:13
Originally posted by Snow Dog Snow Dog wrote:

Originally posted by rematpac rematpac wrote:

Sleepy

Ermm
Yeah, I never was very good at keeping people awake...Ouch
What?
Back to Top
Snow Dog View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 23 2005
Location: Caerdydd
Status: Offline
Points: 32995
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 12:39
Originally posted by rematpac rematpac wrote:

Sleepy

Ermm
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 12:36
Sleepy
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 12:34
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by rematpac rematpac wrote:

ConfusedWhat is your definition of the music I've been playing for the last 36 years?
I have no idea. What have you been playing for the last 36 years? Tongue
 
I have listened to a broad spectrum of music my entire life (53.9863 years and counting) and played a narrower but still relatively wide range of styles for slightly less than that. Most of that I would call good music, music that was created for the sake of music or art or just to be lisened to and appreciated for what it is and not what it represesents or how it was presented - some of it would be called Prog, but even then not all Prog would fit into such a description.
 
If we are to talk about Prog Rock and universally understand what we mean by that then some assume that a concrete immutable definition is required, just as it is with any other form of music. We can define Blues by its scales, structure, style and chord progressions that will suffice for most Blues with minor variances and modifications. However, when you are discussing a form of music that deliberately sets out to break convention then any attempt at definition becomes an excercise in futility and what you are left with is a discussion about the simularities between various forms of Prog rather than what sets it apart. Your posts are of the latter form, characterising Prog by effect rather than cause.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 11:59
Originally posted by rematpac rematpac wrote:

ConfusedWhat is your definition of the music I've been playing for the last 36 years?
I have no idea. What have you been playing for the last 36 years? Tongue
 
I have listened to a broad spectrum of music my entire life (53.9863 years and counting) and played a narrower but still relatively wide range of styles for slightly less than that. Most of that I would call good music, music that was created for the sake of music or art or just to be lisened to and appreciated for what it is and not what it represesents or how it was presented - some of it would be called Prog, but even then not all Prog would fit into such a description.
 
If we are to talk about Prog Rock and universally understand what we mean by that then some assume that a concrete immutable definition is required, just as it is with any other form of music. We can define Blues by its scales, structure, style and chord progressions that will suffice for most Blues with minor variances and modifications. However, when you are discussing a form of music that deliberately sets out to break convention then any attempt at definition becomes an excercise in futility and what you are left with is a discussion about the simularities between various forms of Prog rather than what sets it apart. Your posts are of the latter form, characterising Prog by effect rather than cause.
What?
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:51
ConfusedWhat is your definition of the music I've been playing for the last 36 years?
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:49
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by rematpac rematpac wrote:

WinkIt's SUPPOSED to be the definition,but in reality of course it's not.The prog rockers realize that it is their stage show or something else that's actually drawing people into their concerts.But in the long run,TIME will sort out the better music from the mediocre.Time is the only true test we have if music is really good or not because in the present,it's all just a matter of opinion.The better the music ,the longer it will be listened to.Some might be forgotten for a while for some reason like being overplayed,but if it's really good eventually it will always come back and  to future generations even.
Again, that covers many forms of music, not just Prog. That is not what "defines" Prog and seperates it from everyother kind of music.
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:46
UnhappyI give up!
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:46
Confused
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

you still have to type something when you quote... Wink
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:44
ConfusedAm I getting it any closer yet?
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:41
ConfusedWhat am I doing wrong?
Originally posted by rematpac rematpac wrote:

Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

you still have to type something when you quote... Wink
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:36
SleepyProg rock will be around for many decades yet.It will eventually travel all around the world just like English and American prog rock from the 70's is very popular in different countries in the world today.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:34
Originally posted by rematpac rematpac wrote:

WinkIt's SUPPOSED to be the definition,but in reality of course it's not.The prog rockers realize that it is their stage show or something else that's actually drawing people into their concerts.But in the long run,TIME will sort out the better music from the mediocre.Time is the only true test we have if music is really good or not because in the present,it's all just a matter of opinion.The better the music ,the longer it will be listened to.Some might be forgotten for a while for some reason like being overplayed,but if it's really good eventually it will always come back and  to future generations even.
Again, that covers many forms of music, not just Prog. That is not what "defines" Prog and seperates it from everyother kind of music.
What?
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:33
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

you still have to type something when you quote... Wink
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:31
WinkIt's SUPPOSED to be the definition,but in reality of course it's not.The prog rockers realize that it is their stage show or something else that's actually drawing people into their concerts.But in the long run,TIME will sort out the better music from the mediocre.Time is the only true test we have if music is really good or not because in the present,it's all just a matter of opinion.The better the music ,the longer it will be listened to.Some might be forgotten for a while for some reason like being overplayed,but if it's really good eventually it will always come back and  to future generations even.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:24
you still have to type something when you quote... Wink
What?
Back to Top
rematpac View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: March 26 2011
Status: Offline
Points: 123
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:23
Originally posted by Dean Dean wrote:

Originally posted by rematpac rematpac wrote:

WinkThere is no confusion about the definition of prog at all! Nothing could be easier to understand! It's very simple,why people try to make something confusing about it is beyond me?Prog rock is music that is about the music only.That's it.It's not about what's cool or in or out or what the people wear or what they look like or about the stage show or the lyrics or politics or ratings or sales or ANYTHING,except the music.The music is composed and played with one thing in mind-the music itself ,nothing else.The idea is to make music that is musically good and that is the ONLY consideration.The reason why it seems confusing is because music for music's sake is rare in the world of rock music.For most of rock music the more important things are what you look like,how old you are,what kind of clothes you wear,what your politics are,do masses of idiots like you for some reason,how many records do you sell,what are your politics,what do your lyrics say,who are they talking to,or what about,how do you act on stage or off,what do you say,how do you move on stage or off,are you something new,are you more of the same thing are you the "latest thing" and a 100 other things that aren't prog rock.Once again,prog rock is music for music's sake only,that's it.If there's any arguement then you're talking about something else.
That applies to any form of "serious" music, not just Prog and not just Rock. It is a characteristic of some prog, but it isn't a defining characteristic by any means.
Back to Top
Dean View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Retired Admin and Amateur Layabout

Joined: May 13 2007
Location: Europe
Status: Offline
Points: 37575
Direct Link To This Post Posted: March 27 2011 at 10:14
Originally posted by rematpac rematpac wrote:

WinkThere is no confusion about the definition of prog at all! Nothing could be easier to understand! It's very simple,why people try to make something confusing about it is beyond me?Prog rock is music that is about the music only.That's it.It's not about what's cool or in or out or what the people wear or what they look like or about the stage show or the lyrics or politics or ratings or sales or ANYTHING,except the music.The music is composed and played with one thing in mind-the music itself ,nothing else.The idea is to make music that is musically good and that is the ONLY consideration.The reason why it seems confusing is because music for music's sake is rare in the world of rock music.For most of rock music the more important things are what you look like,how old you are,what kind of clothes you wear,what your politics are,do masses of idiots like you for some reason,how many records do you sell,what are your politics,what do your lyrics say,who are they talking to,or what about,how do you act on stage or off,what do you say,how do you move on stage or off,are you something new,are you more of the same thing are you the "latest thing" and a 100 other things that aren't prog rock.Once again,prog rock is music for music's sake only,that's it.If there's any arguement then you're talking about something else.
That applies to any form of "serious" music, not just Prog and not just Rock. It is a characteristic of some prog, but it isn't a defining characteristic by any means.
What?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456 8>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.199 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.