Forum Home Forum Home > Other music related lounges > General Music Discussions
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Some Classical Music Fan Here ?
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedSome Classical Music Fan Here ?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456>
Author
Message Reverse Sort Order
nacho View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2004
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 521
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 16:37

Three names to start with: J.S. Bach, Berlioz, Wagner

Back to Top
Sir Realist View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: May 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 16:24
Great. Name some.
I can have double standards, and you can't
Back to Top
nacho View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: November 18 2004
Location: Spain
Status: Offline
Points: 521
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 16:04

Originally posted by Sir Realist Sir Realist wrote:

Actually, Beethoven is the ultimate prog. He pushed the boundaries of,
and redefined, every form in which he wrote. He made music louder,
more dramatic, more searching, and more extended.

What you have written is true, but I think I could write a number of names where you wrote Beethoven, keep the rest of the sentence, and it would still be true...

 

Back to Top
Sir Realist View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: May 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 15:52
Actually, Beethoven is the ultimate prog. He pushed the boundaries of,
and redefined, every form in which he wrote. He made music louder,
more dramatic, more searching, and more extended.
I can have double standards, and you can't
Back to Top
ita_prog_fan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 15:15

 

There is more than one composition called Images.

"Images 1ere Serie"

"Images 2eme Serie"

"Images (oubliées)"

all for piano,  and

"Images pour Orchestre"

I don't know any orchestrated version of "Images" 1 and 2 or "Images (oubliées)" (and i have also the strangest Debussy's compositions, such as Rapsodie pour Saxophone, Khamma, Tarantelle Styrienne, etc.) but maybe there are a lot...

 

Back to Top
Dragon Phoenix View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member


Joined: August 31 2004
Status: Offline
Points: 1475
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 13:17

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Orchestral versions of Images is great.

 

To clear up some confusion here: the orchestral composition Images is a totally different work from the piano compositions Images. The orchestral Images consists of 3 parts:

Gigues

Iberia

Rondes de printemps

Back to Top
ita_prog_fan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 12:38

Originally posted by Sir Realist Sir Realist wrote:

classical music? Definitely. What could be more Prog than "The Rite of
Spring" or the Bartok string quartets?

Very exerimental pieces of music... especially Bartok's quartets, difficult but rewarding, i don't find the so-much-praised Shostakovich quartets at same level .

About 20th century, i love Prokofiev and Hindemith quartets

 



Edited by ita_prog_fan
Back to Top
ita_prog_fan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 12:31

Originally posted by haas haas wrote:

I have never heard these Orchestral Version!! But most times I hate the orchestral versions because the composer didn't write it for an orchestra but for the piano. I really don't like these arrangers who arrange such a masterpiece to something it wasn't ment to be.

You're right , for example the Ravel orchestrated version of Pictures at an Exhibition is very nice and skillful but the orignal for piano got a unrivalled beauty and poetic force

 

 

Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 07:48
Hmm...i see what you mean.
I will look at it and tell you the best "images" orchestral versions.
Back to Top
haas View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: April 18 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 73
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 07:25
I have never heard these Orchestral Version!! But most times I hate the orchestral versions because the composer didn't write it for an orchestra but for the piano. I really don't like these arrangers who arrange such a masterpiece to something it wasn't ment to be.
"the attraction of the virtuoso for the public is very like that of the circus for the crowd. there is always the hope that something dangerous may happen" - Claude Debussy
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 06:22
Orchestral versions of Images is great.
Back to Top
haas View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: April 18 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 73
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 25 2005 at 05:38
:) haha, he was in a way right, it is kind off new age. I personally like his piano works, the etudes, the preludes, Images (oubliees), they are simply great :D.
"the attraction of the virtuoso for the public is very like that of the circus for the crowd. there is always the hope that something dangerous may happen" - Claude Debussy
Back to Top
Sir Realist View Drop Down
Forum Newbie
Forum Newbie


Joined: May 24 2005
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 38
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 17:59
classical music? Definitely. What could be more Prog than "The Rite of
Spring" or the Bartok string quartets?
I can have double standards, and you can't
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 13:40
Yes!!!
Debussy's chamber music is great, especialy the trio
you quote for flute, viola and harp.

So etheral!
Back to Top
ita_prog_fan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 12:22

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

Originally posted by haas haas wrote:

Debussy is the "progger" of the classical world. He is my favorite. I also like Beethoven, Chopin, Brahms, Tchaikovsky, Moussorgsky, Ravel, Prokofiev, Andriessen, Grieg, Schubert and Bach.


Completely agree: it's the more modern classical composer!
And what do you think of Ravel?
He's very close

Some years ago i was listening to Debussy's trio for flute, viola (alto ) and harp and a friend of mine said to me: "wow ! do you like new age !?"

                                                     

Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 06:12
Originally posted by haas haas wrote:

Debussy is the "progger" of the classical world. He is my favorite. I also like Beethoven, Chopin, Brahms, Tchaikovsky, Moussorgsky, Ravel, Prokofiev, Andriessen, Grieg, Schubert and Bach.


Completely agree: it's the more modern classical composer!
And what do you think of Ravel?
He's very close
Back to Top
haas View Drop Down
Forum Groupie
Forum Groupie


Joined: April 18 2005
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Points: 73
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 05:44
Debussy is the "progger" of the classical world. He is my favorite. I also like Beethoven, Chopin, Brahms, Tchaikovsky, Moussorgsky, Ravel, Prokofiev, Andriessen, Grieg, Schubert and Bach.
"the attraction of the virtuoso for the public is very like that of the circus for the crowd. there is always the hope that something dangerous may happen" - Claude Debussy
Back to Top
oliverstoned View Drop Down
Special Collaborator
Special Collaborator
Avatar
Honorary Collaborator

Joined: March 26 2004
Location: France
Status: Offline
Points: 6308
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 24 2005 at 05:02
Yes, it's great also!

Her's a list of composers close to Ravel:


Camille Saint-Saëns
Igor Stravinsky
Modest Mussorgsky
Ernest Chausson
Francis Poulenc
Sergey Prokofiev
Albert Roussel

Back to Top
ita_prog_fan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2005 at 13:39

Originally posted by oliverstoned oliverstoned wrote:

1-Debussy/Ravel
2-Many others!

And what about Faurè ?  Isn't he, a little bit, their Daddy ?

 

Back to Top
ita_prog_fan View Drop Down
Forum Senior Member
Forum Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: April 20 2005
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Points: 258
Direct Link To This Post Posted: May 23 2005 at 13:35

Originally posted by Dan Yaron Dan Yaron wrote:

I've grown up on classical music. My favourite composer at the moment at is Oliver Messiaen. His compositions aren't very "catchy" like the famous symphonies by the well known composers.

I must admit... when i entered the maze of "Turangalila Simphony" i couldn't get out by myself... i was saved by a COAST GUARD CHOPPER !

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 23456>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down



This page was generated in 0.262 seconds.
Donate monthly and keep PA fast-loading and ad-free forever.